Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Remain’

Well, what did you expect?

February 26, 2019 Leave a comment

img_2694Obvious as it has appeared to be time and time again already, the Welching of Brexit has finally reached the point where it is all but impossible to deny.

In a statement delivered to the House of Commons at lunchtime, Theresa May officially opened the doors to extending Article 50.

This is an act that anyone who has studied the mayhem playing out from this Prime Ministerial Tragedy since 2016 will know to be significant, in that it is within the no-mans land which lies beyond the failure of this Parliament to take us out of the EU on 29th March 2019, where its real legacy of a non-Brexit or rather its Brexit betrayal will be completely defined.

In her speech to Parliament, the Prime Minister laid out a series of votes  to be held on (or before) the 12th, 13th and 14th March 2019 that in their very being, outline the framework of what the majority of our MPs believe. They make clear the depth of the gargantuan divide between what our Elected Representatives intend to work for and what the People instructed them to deliver in the European Referendum on 23rd June 2016.

May’s Brexit Withdrawal Agreement (by 12th March)

 

The first of the three votes will be a return of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement that was so crushingly defeated only a few weeks ago.

Whilst Ministers still trot out the line that it is the best deal available, the reality is that it is no such thing.

May’s Withdrawal Agreement ties us into the EU project even more closely that we are now. It gives us even less influence and provides no mechanism for us to depart under our own steam.

May never has any intention of pursuing a meaningful change to the Agreement with the EU that would either provide us with a unilateral exit mechanism or for the Backstop to be strictly time-bound.

It is clear that she and her coterie haven’t even asked, and that even if they had, as far as the EU was concerned, it was a request that would have always been denied.

Instead, there has been much rumour and lip service paid to a codicil or rewording of the political statement which accompanies the Withdrawal Agreement, which we should all now know would be cleverly be interpreted by the PM or her legal advisors as being a change which is legally binding for the purposes of this audiences, but when it comes to something we could expect the EU to honour, would never have even the remotest form of equivalence.

This will be a vote on Brexit in name only (Brino).

It is a plan to Remain in the EU, devised and delivered by Remainers.

It is not Brexit and not what the British People voted for.

Leaving the EU with ‘no deal’ on 29th March (by 13th March)

 

The second of the three votes would be to Leave the EU on the 29th March 2019 with ‘no deal’.

This is the only vote available to Parliament that will now ensure the proper Brexit that honours the Result of the European Referendum.

It will also be the most defining. Because this vote will directly record the action of each and every MP in respect of their support for Leaving the EU or seeking to Remain, contrary to the Will of the People.

Be under no illusion. There has never been any need for a ‘deal’ to Leave the EU. It is only the actions of these very same Remainer MPs as they have sought to obstruct, redirect and prevent Brexit that have guaranteed that the UK may not be as well prepared for a ‘no deal’ departure as we would have been.

Things would have been very different if they had got on with doing what they had been instructed to do in 2016, rather than spend most of the time since trying to work out how they could ensure the result was denied.

Whilst many cannot currently see it, it is only from the position of Leaving the EU without precondition, obligation or agreement of any kind, that we will then be able to lead the reconstruction of a relationship with the EU which promises to bridge the UK’s Brexit divide.

You cannot negotiate the future when you are obsessed with the past.

Sadly, the dynamic of our current Parliament, which doesn’t collectively believe that the Will of the People should be upheld, means that this vote will more likely than not be lost.

That is unless there is an attempt to precipitate a chaotic no deal departure as a cloud covering the intention behind a result that would lead to a very different thing.

The third of the three votes would be to extend Article 50 (by 14th March)

 

Regrettably, now May has explicitly made this option available, it is where we are most likely to end up, even though Conservatives are now likely to see the true split in the Party undeniably illustrated in all its glory and for all to see.

Forget talk of the Malthouse Compromise or any other ‘plan’ that could provide a credible rescue of Brexit whilst this Parliament is still in place.

May won’t accept anything other than her own plan as the way in which Brexit will be defined and now that she has had to move her own trip wire as the result of threats from Ministers who should have already resigned, she will only see the delay as a further opportunity to bring back exactly the same flawed Agreement.

Nothing has changed. Nothing will have changed. Nothing can change until May has gone from No.10.

A short extension in these circumstances will make no difference.

A longer one will only open up greater opportunities for Remainers to thwart Brexit and for the EU to demand even more from the UK within an Agreement which under proper Brexit-derived leadership would itself never have seen light.

The reality of May’s Brexit Welch and the post-29th March Debacle

 

This Parliament is incapable of delivering a true Brexit under the leadership of Theresa May.

With a new Prime Minister, this Parliament will remain hamstrung and even with a new workable deal agreed with the EU or with a commitment to Leave on WTO Terms and build a relationship from there, the numbers simply don’t suggest that anything ‘clean’ can be achieved whilst the current Parliamentary dynamic remains in force.

This should be of concern to us all, as there is the potential for this saga to continue until at least 2022, with incalculable consequences that could reach out way beyond.

General Election?

 

The default setting for sorting out a Parliamentary mess like this is to call a General Election.

The problem is that the Political Parties remain the same.

They are not offering anything any different to what they have been and what they are now, and that even if new names were to be elected, they would come back and offer us all exactly the same thing that they are right now.

Exciting as the launch last week of the Independent Group last week might to some feel, they are not offering anything different. In fact they are more like a refined or distilled version of everything that is wrong with politics in this Country today. They would be best suited to the mantra ‘do as I say, whilst I do otherwise and certainly don’t pay attention to anything that I do’.

Likewise, the Brexit Party may well be destined by a failure to launch and suffer many of the same problems that faced UKIP. It’s not because there isn’t validity and support for what it is they are trying to do. But because the viewpoints providing influence are far too narrow and where organisation and administration is concerned, there is a significant absence of professionalism involved.

To make a General Election work in the way that it now should, we actually need a completely new Party that is as diverse in its policy outlook as it is in its membership. Is professional, well funded, but above all motivated by and to deliver what is genuinely in the best interests of all – no matter how hard the process might be.

None of the existing Parties can offer this. TIG is not capable and the Brexit Party already looks too much like the single issue of Brexit will be the nature of its complete stall.

When you look at it all this way and consider the implications of the constipated democracy that we now have, it is very difficult to work out what we might now have in store.

Our current MPs wish to avoid a General Election at all costs. They would inevitably run again if one was called, and because of the current nature of the system, in many cases would find themselves being successfully recalled.

They wont stand down and step aside for others to take their place. And in times like these, there will now be an increasing number of us who find ourselves internalising a very alarming question.

Has the time arrived when this Country could be susceptible to a Coup?

 

img_2690

images thanks to unknown

MPs: Trust this Prime Minister at the UK’s peril

January 28, 2019 1 comment

img_1589

Watching this all-too-predictable-for-anyone-other-than-the-MPs-within-this-Brexit-story as it continues to play itself out has been and remains very painful, especially for those of us who believe in democracy and the purpose that it serves.

Even with the abundance of opinionated commentary coming from sources where facts for those able to think critically are contained available to all MPs, this Parliament teeters in the edge of a multidimensional precipice where the odds are stacked for an unknown and frankly unknowable outcome. Yet even now, the majority of these political stool pigeons think they are going to walk away with BRINO – or what to those they see as the uneducated masses outside of Westminster is still very much Remain.

After a process that has provided Conservative MPs with red flag after red flag, making very clear its destination and outcome, it is amazing that the Politicians sat in the middle of all this cannot or will not read the direction of travel of Theresa May’s efforts, and  what this process of hers will ultimately become, once the point has been reached that Parliament buys into them.

Right now there is so much noise about different plans for Brexit – most of which are clinical forms of Remain – that the elephant in the room, or that which should have already been dead in the form of May’s ‘deal’, is doing a full on lasers act. Suddenly, with the nebulous and unquantifiable promise of a rethink over the mythical Backstop of what looks very much like history will prove to be of her own design, The May deal looks increasingly like it might actually be what the outcome of the Brexit process becomes.

However, the celebrations are likely to be very premature.

At a stage where our fearful MPs are looking for any way to avoid the form of Brexit that the People actually voted for, even the so-called Brexiteers are hinting that they may back this travesty, trusting this untrustworthy Prime Minister to do the right thing with an ambiguous policy, relating to a non-existent deal with the EU which is likely to do nothing more than moving her considerably closer to the point where she has been gifted the final say.

All this at the end of the very same pathway which has already been overwhelmingly rejected, but with Parliament effectively now on the verge of giving the PM a blank sheet by removing itself from the ability to stop her anymore, and at a time when the government should be looking to select and implement new leadership, rather than take yet more quantum leaps back.

That there is so little recognition of and willingness within our Elected Parliament to deliver that which the People voted for in its clear and accurate form should be of great concern to us all.

That a sizeable majority are only being prevented from delivering their own form of a non-Brexit by their inability to coalesce and work to together collectively should give us all pause for thought in a very different form.

But that MPs could as a majority be about to give free reign to an incompetent and sell-out Prime Minister who sees our being tied to Europe as the only legacy her premiership was created to deliver, should be now concerning us all. Perhaps even terrifying us all a whole lot more.

Whatever happens from this point after the next ‘meaningful vote’ tomorrow, we as a Country are destined to be in a mess. That much has been guaranteed by the behaviour of this and the last Parliament as they have ignored what the purpose of the European Referendum was actually for.

There is only one form of Brexit that will deliver upon what the British People voted for.

Whilst we may have a bumpy ride for a few months immediately from the time we Leave, anything other than Leaving the EU on the 29th March, cleanly, on time and without the deal which was never essential to actually leave, it will be the start of significant problems, simply because MPs will have overturned or sought to defer or redirect a Public decision, and have therefore gone very wrong

Leaving the detail to May in the hope that a genuine Brexit will be the ultimate outcome will be an irreversible travesty, the outcome of which will become manifest very very quickly indeed.

Leaving without a ‘so-called deal’ or on WTO Terms with minimum fuss could have easily been achieved. The chaos we are experiencing instead is the bastard child of those obsessed with Remain

December 17, 2018 Leave a comment

img_2235As myth would have it, the last 30 months have actually been Brexit, rather than a process of chaos instigated completely at the hands of those obsessed by their wish to ‘Remain’.

We haven’t left the EU yet, and will never do so if the undemocratic and self-obsessed proponents on this full-scale assault on democracy should ever get their way.

On 23rd June 2016, in a Referendum which would never have needed to be called if Politicians had not already stepped way beyond their Common Market mandate, the People instructed our Political Classes that the UK must be sovereign and a completely independent Nation State once more.

The decision was clear. It wasn’t open to interpretation. There wasn’t an invitation for the malevolence of politicians to explore how they could flip the whole thing over, tie us in further and get us back to a situation that only suits the self interested and power hungry once more.

And with over two years available for the wheels of government to ensure the smoothest transition as part of the Leaving process, it was only the interference and attempts to override the will of the people which has created all of the problems we are now experiencing with the wholly poisonous irony that its creators are now attempting to use this chaos as an excuse to convince us all that we should Remain.

The problem is that the process of Brexit is not the act of Leaving the EU itself.

Had the energies of all our Politicians been focused upon what they should have been doing these past 30 months, the Country would be a matter of weeks away from the most promising of jumping-off points, rather than having the land of opportunity painted as a canvas of chaos in the forlorn hope that they can manipulate everyone into keeping everything that works only for them in place, under the suggestion that everything will just be the same.

Things will never be the same again. And if we now Leave the EU without the organisation and preemptive steps being taken that were always available but never taken seriously by those who’s strategy has always been to ensure that we Remain, it is these same people who will be responsible for all the problems that follow and exist from now until then.

Whatever the outcome of the coming days and weeks, the decision of the British People must be upheld.

For democracy to survive, the result of the vote cannot be superseded, and certainly not for the nefarious purposes of the few who believe that they somehow know better than the people, and that they have a right at any cost to ensure that in their eyes, the UK is forced to Remain.

The UK will get to where it is supposed to be going.

The UK’s departure from the EU can only ever be delayed.

And for the sake of our UK’s democracy, we can only hope that these ridiculously selfish people have an epiphany, get over themselves and start considering their true obligations which for the sake of clarity are to deliver upon the real People’s Vote to Leave and not attempt to create one for Remain.

A Referendum upon a Referendum is one Referendum too far

December 17, 2018 Leave a comment

img_2233Last Wednesday evening, the Conservative Party lost, or rather surrendered collective responsibility for its own direction on Brexit. With it, democracy in the UK may have been served a terminal blow.

Whilst we now know that the latest stage of Britain’s political chaos began when the present incumbent of No.10 first boomed out ‘Brexit means Brexit’ and meant no such thing, this has been a much longer process. One delivered by political parties of all colours and shielded from open view by our own trust and reverence for politicians being massively misused, taken for granted and abused.

Yet a watershed moment arrived when that contempt for the people went too far.

Our politicians miscalculated the response that would come back in the form of a decision on policy which they tossed out to us on the pretence that there was a decision that was itself simply too big for elected representatives to take themselves.

They did not get the result that they were expecting and had complacently assumed was coming when the Vote for the UK to Leave the European Union was won.

Not only did these self-aggrandised leaders not like it, many of them have and continue to do everything that they can to frustrate the will of the people.

Now after creating a completely avoidable mess, the continuing attempts to frighten everyone to admit that their decision to Leave was wrong and the myth that there is no better option available for a secure future for our Country than the one they have created, they are now advocating a second referendum to try and fix the problem. The blatant inference being that it was the decision and not their own obfuscation and failure at every turn to implement a proper Brexit since which is fundamentally wrong.

The simple truth is that the decision of the British People to Leave the EU called the bluff of a political class.

Members of this self-serving non-representative culture have and still believe that they have the natural right and authority – once elected – to manipulate anything and everything to suit what they want, what serves their own purposes and everything else required to ensure that they get their own way.

The narrative that suggests the decision of the people went the way that it did because Leavers didn’t understand what they were voting for isn’t just a lie.

It also demonstrates a complete misunderstanding and contempt for many of our MP’s own position and responsibilities. That of what the purpose of an elected representative of the people is actually for.

No, most of the People didn’t understand the detail or rather the minutae of what they were voting for in the EU Referendum.

But it is not the Electors who are supposed to understand the detail of any Policy.

It is the Elected themselves who have sought and as the direct result of their Election to Office been given the responsibility to deal with the details, thereby accepting their obligation to deliver upon the direction they have been given by the people.

By Parliament voting by a considerable majority to give the decision on our Membership of Europe to the People through a plebiscite, MP’s surrendered their right to dictate the direction and end result of the choice that was made.

They also obligated themselves to then do whatever would be necessary with the detail that they should all clearly understand, to execute our departure from Europe. Not with the bells and whistles and ties ins that work for them. But with the result that was intended, which was and remains very clear. That is to Leave and not be restricted by any form of tie to the European Union anymore.

To now seek to overturn the original and democratic decision of the people demonstrates either that those advocating it are wholly unworthy to hold public office.

They have already failed to do what they were told by the People to do.

What is more, they have done and continue to do everything they can to frustrate the process. And now, believing that their game of bluff, counter bluff and pretending that they have done everything that they were supposed to do has began to pay off, they wish to deliver the final insult to the Electorate that gave each and every one of them their position of responsibility, by making the clearest statement possible that it is only the People and not they who have ever done anything wrong.

The problem is that as with most things that our Politicians have been doing for so very long, they have completely misread the People. Underestimated the ability of people outside of the Westminster bubble to accurately perceive what they are up to. To still think that by simply telling People whatever they decide the truth should be, the People will simply believe.

The Electorate has been tired of Politicians for a very long time. But the nature of our current political system and the monopoly of the Triumvirate of Political Parties which has existed over a period of decades has meant that Tribalism itself has played the most significant role in Elections. This has left very few Electors in marginal Constituencies to place a Vote that will really decide who gets the opportunity to lead us. A choice from the same-old same-olds, taking new blood which might make a difference and bring legitimacy back to our democracy, rather than leaving the corrupted apparatus of Party Politics to decide.

This is a story of the Politicinas own making.

But it is now a future for politics which is going to be reclaimed by the People. Prized from the hands of the Parties who have boundaries and collective views which are set against, rather than for the best interests of the People. The People who Elected this shower, with whom the Politicians only have self interest and no longer have a mandate to hold Office because their purpose and the will of the People is not in any way aligned.

If they continue with this travesty and push a referendum upon a referendum back to the people, it will not be the result of that referendum upon which the future of the Conservative, Labour or Liberal Democrat Parties will be defined.

For within every Election that follows a Referendum which will give the lie to the existence of a respect for democracy within our sick political system, there will no longer be a choice which follows the direction of the Political Parties as we now know them.

When the choice comes to appointing the representatives of the people, it will from then onwards be set between electing Politicians who represent only themselves, and electing Politicians who represent us all.

A Referendum upon a Referendum without having first delivered the instruction from the former, questions the legitimacy of the latter, simply because it questions what the first was actually for.

This is the act that could kill off democracy in the UK once and for all.

image thanks to unknown

Splitting the Conservative Party may soon be the only hope for Democracy in the UK

December 14, 2018 Leave a comment

The idea that a new political party will be the cure to all ills in politics is not a new one.

As I have written at length before, the way that the Electorate interacts with British Politics doesn’t lend itself well to what the Establishment portrays as outsiders. Unless that is there is an issue at work over which the Establishment does not have control.

We only need look to the rise and fall of UKIP and it’s inextricable link to the EU Referendum and then Brexit itself to understand what happens when the Establishment has dropped the ball – whether for good or bad.

For decades there has been an embedded form of monopoly in politics held between the Conservative and Labour Parties, with the Liberal Democrats and its previous forms being held up or utilised from their position which is mislabelled as being between.

Breaking open this racket has been all but impossible for what seem to be very simple, but nonetheless seemingly impossible challenges to answer. Many have tried. Some have had significant bank balances to enable them to do so. But even when UKIP gained around 4 Million votes in the last General Election, it was simply the case that there was no new parliamentary real estate for them to be found.

In as succinct terms as possible, there has existed an unwritten and assumed covenant between Electors and the Elected, which has benefitted this triumvirate mode.

The purpose and responsibility of being a representative of the people, both given and received at the ballot box was understood.

A reverence and trust for politicians has been the default standard for all politicians in the psyche of the Electorate.

That is unless there has been some big scandal, usually focused on the actions of an individual politician rather than the Party itself, and once removed, the default position would quickly be resumed.

All, that is, until the straw arrived that broke this heavily burdened camels back. A straw which came in the form of a decision being tossed back over to the Public, after which the Establishment simply assumed the status quo would be returned once more.

The problem with that decision, the decision for the UK to leave the EU had its genesis in the inference that this was a choice too big to be left to the delegated powers of our MP’s alone. For a decision with such implications, the Electorate itself would be trusted with the choice, and once that choice was made, their decision would be delivered and not returned – as that itself would bring into question what the very purpose of the Referendum had actually been for.

Overnight the lines of that once apparently straightforward interaction between the Public and Politicians was overturned. Instead of Voters who are typically Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat or of a mind to sit on the borders located in between, there has emerged a new understanding and assessment of our Political Masters which rather than being fluid between 3 or maybe even more possibilities, has now become a binary choice – only presented as being many others and not least of all, the direction of either Leave or of Remain.

But as with everything that relates to the human condition, it is far from being even that simple and the options which relate to those choices are now unlikely to ever be viewed by voters as being anything like the same.

That choice itself when it comes to appointing the representatives of the people, is now between electing Politicians who represent only themselves, and electing Politicians who represent us all.

The dividing line is democracy itself.

Not party lines or any kind of political philosophy.

This is about the choice of our elected representatives being to work unquestionably for others, or working for oneself and the accumulation of position, status and wealth for personal gain plus more.

This dichotomy is not false. Politicians can only have one master. It’s the Electorate or their own ideas, party and dreams.

The insidious nature of this dynamic crosses across all of our Political Parties, but it is within the Conservative Party where the divide between the two principles has now become so very clear, that the change that many of us for so long have been advocating, may have finally found the right place and time to actually gain traction and the process of creating a new electable party which puts voters first in every sense and can command a majority wherever it runs, can finally begin.

No, I don’t for one minute think that the Tory Party will split whilst they seem to be in power, simply because until it is set in stone that the Party can no longer win anything in its current form, there remains a chance, albeit a very slim one, that sanity is restored and comes in the form of those who vote only for themselves recognising the change in the Electoral terrain and what its true purpose is for.

But when the point comes that the Conservative Party in May’s image hits the buffers – which if the current chaos and uncertainty continue it inevitably soon will, there will come a point where all the Conservative MP’s who make up the subsequent wreckage will have the opportunity to return true democracy to the UK once more.

May remains the EU’s patsy for as long as she squats in No.10 and we should all be concerned as they have serious form when it comes to loading the gun

December 11, 2018 1 comment

Whilst I know that I am far from alone in being hopeful that the Parliamentary Conservative Party will finally put the May Government out of everyone’s misery before too long, recent history shows us a catalogue of missed opportunities for them to have already done so. One that suggests they are all still hoping that someone else will be prepared to get their hands dirty at a time when they are all much mistaken and regrettably very wrong.

One of the biggest errors that Conservative Parliamentarians have made in summing up the abilities of their current leader, has been to overlook everything she has been doing and the patterns of behaviour which provide the tells about her form of play.

Whilst incidents as small as the way she answered questions on Trident, to big ones such as calling a General Election on a whim tell us much about the substance of the leadership they have been working with, it is May’s interactions and prioritisation of other EU Leaders at pivotal moments which dwell in plain sight, but like that ever illusive elephant in the room even now don’t seem to be troubling anyone quite enough to actually get in her way.

So in amongst the breathtaking chaos that is overtaking all of Westminster and its news bubble today, there may be a new dimension to all this brewing whilst May has a jolly around Europe.

One which is dependent on this continuing inaction, is not being widely talked about and could very much conclude in just a matter of weeks with Theresa May looking like she was always the one who did know best, ending up with her own form of Brexit being accepted at the final minute as the only acceptable way.

With the clock counting down towards the 29th of March, the EU knows that playing on people’s fears and upping the anti as they do so will be a process that at some point between now and then will reach a critical mass and has the potential to deliver its greatest reward.

May’s flawed and nonetheless EU-favouring plan could suddenly be seen as being very reasoned and the only way to stave off a catastrophe, leaving the EU perpetually in charge of our real destiny, whilst a Trumpton-esque future plays out with Remainers thinking that the world has stayed static and our pretend State is left under the CON-tinuing CON-artistry of a reinvigorated CON-servative Theresa May.

Inaction based on ambition has failed to remove an incumbent prime minister who clearly doesn’t know how to lead or be loyal to her own people, but when it comes to her own ambition is happy to cosy up with the EU to make sure that such trifling issues will never really get in her way.

Chaos and uncertainty are now inevitable whatever happens. But fear is stopping MP’s from taking action; inaction that is nonetheless a choice to give the EU the power it now needs to manipulate matters to go their own way.

There is now a serious risk that the fears of a majority in Parliament will very effectively be employed against them and they will then take a knee-jerk but nonetheless critically undemocratic decision that will tie the whole UK in to a situation which will be far far worse than anything which ever resembled Remain.

Conservative MP’s are the only people who can now put an end to this mess and begin a process that has the potential to make things better.

If Conservatives want things to play out differently, its time to grow some bollocks, replace the Prime Minster and remember that the UK has already chosen to Leave the EU, not to be manipulated into vassalage Remain.

Neither a new single issue Party nor one made up of the rump of the Remain Campaign can solve the Brexit crisis now

December 10, 2018 Leave a comment

Whilst it would be very easy to think differently, based upon how our MP’s are still behaving, the Vote to Leave the EU wasn’t just about one issue. It wasn’t about two, three, four or five. In fact it was about a whole lot more, and even then it looks different to everyone because their own experiences and views of the situation are different.

If the question over whether we should Leave or Remain had been a single issue, the decision and the reasoning behind it would be simple to quantify. Between the two choices there would be nothing in between.

Put simply, there is no way to avoid the reality that Brexit is multilayered, multidimensional and as such has multiple problems that cannot be solved by pretending that it is all about just one thing.

Yes, the single issue approach was successful over many years in the sense that it ultimately delivered the EU Referendum.

But to pretend that once the Referendum was secured the complexity of winning the public argument was anything other than an attempt at herding cats for either the Leave or Remain Campaigns would suggest that there was a level of control that neither side could ever have had over the process, even if they thought they did.

In this vein, the purpose of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) effectively came to its end at around twenty minutes to five on the morning of the 24th June 2016, when everything that it and its previous evolution The Anti Federalist League had been created for had effectively been achieved.

Indeed, the only real commonality between all members and politicians involved in either project was the mutual aim of ending the UK’s Membership of the EU once and for all.

Whilst much knowledge of policy and legislation governing the relationship between the UK and the EU always existed within its ranks, UKIP shared the same lack of foresight when it came to qualitative impacts upon the people it was trying to represent as the politicians in the main parties.

It is these impacts which are still not understood by the majority of the political class and the establishment itself. The reality for all which must be collectively acknowledged and considered before what has now gone bad can be made good.

UKIPs reach before the Referendum came from the misleadingly distilled version of the EU question that Nigel Farage delivered. He was prepared to speak out in ways that political correctness had for too long prevented politicians in the three main parties from doing. He tabled the blunt edges of the real world perspective which has always been the flip side to the EU debate coin, but did not demonstrate the complexity of those issues that even now continue to be overlooked and assumed to be very specific and identifiable as simple-to-explain issues using words like immigration, Leave and Remain.

Other than being openly and completely committed to the proper version of Leave or Brexit that so many of the People outside of the Westminster bubble want, the creation of a Party to replace the political squat which is today’s UKIP will not bring anything new to the situation the UK is now facing.

It will not bring a new dynamic to the debate and as it would not be anywhere near power within the required timeline, it is questionable whether its creation could in fact distract from the real issues by giving those who’s only argument against Brexit is that it is a right-wing conspiracy the tools to further polarise, when our divided People need and want something which unites us all.

A new Party, whether from the perceived right, the left or the centre would not be able to influence the debate positively and there remains an overriding obsession with making other people wrong, rather than working to deliver what is right.

What should be recognised by all of our MP’s is that without the acceptance and understanding of the real issues and the true value of the Public experience which led to Brexit in the first place, now being used as the real basis upon which to take the UK from here forward, there is simply no way that any political party – whether new or already existing – will ever find a solution which will be agreeable to all.

image thanks to unknown, quote attributed to Albert Einstein

%d bloggers like this: