Archive

Posts Tagged ‘TV Election Debates’

The Brexit Withdrawal Agreement ‘Head-to-Head’: If we really must have May and Corbyn selling nothing which will be of use to anyone PLEASE at least remove the bloody script!

November 27, 2018 Leave a comment

May Corbyn Debate

Despite Sky TV’s continuing Campaign to make Leaders Debates a common fixture for all General Election Campaigns, I like many others am less than convinced that this further attempt at Americanising British Politics will deliver anything good.

Providing such a platform with politics working as it is today is showmanship at best. It comes at a time when we are suffering a drought of Politicians in positions of power who really care, giving them yet another way to provide us with only more of the same grandstanding is a place that probably most of us would rather not go.

With this in mind, you will probably not be surprised that I do not see the point in disrupting a Sunday evening viewing schedule – particularly when the Final of this year’s I’m a Celebrity Final is on, just to give Theresa May the opportunity to trying selling something in words that she will no doubt be able to choose – and especially so when the product on offer is oh so very very wrong.

Never mind the rather strange question which lays across the whole idea and relates to the Prime Minister’s reluctance to go near anything which resembled a debate in real time during her flawed 2017 General Election Campaign. The whole pretence that she is now out there to sell her idea gives the lie to the whole exercise for no more reason than it demonstrates that she hasn’t actually listened to anyone and just intends to convince everyone that her ideas are somehow right.

So if we really must be subjected to this kind of peak-time-viewing-charade, the least the TV Companies could do is make the whole process interesting.

How about removing the entire script and leveraging something along the lines of a real Question Time?

The questions could be chosen from a random selection by the public. But the show itself could be compared by a Chair who can follow up and introduce supplementary questions. It could all be done in a way that could really make the idea that testing the people who wish to demonstrate their ability to lead has some credibility. It would certainly give us an insight into whether outside the realm of the pre-prepared and stage-managed, May’s or Corbyn’s politics and metal really is so very strong?

At one end of the spectrum and without any intentional bias towards the offerings of the BBC, we could perhaps give the chair to Andrew Neil, who is only disliked by the people whose ideas are easily offended or upended and as such want to brand the questioner as the one who has got their policy wrong.

Otherwise someone like the up and coming Emma Barnett, who is highly promising as a political interrogator and has the same ability to press the right keys to get these two singing a very different and unorchestrated song.

Either of these two Presenters or someone skilled and unintimidated like them would soon begin to uncover the truths that people really need to hear about May’s Welched Brexit and Corbyn’s dangerous alternative reality.

And if this really has to go on TV, why shouldn’t the audience be treated to something they actually need?

In the absence of any structured and open disclosure on the reality of what it will be to Leave without an unnecessary deal and take control of our own destiny, this is likely to be the only way that a genuine story from either of these two on TV is ever likely to evolve.

TV Election debates are great if showmanship is the only standard set for Political leadership

September 17, 2018 Leave a comment

download (23)I’ve written about televised leaders debates before and I continue to have doubts about their validity, and whether it is even possible for them to be truly fair.

With talk of another General Elections becoming ever frequent, probably because of Labours obsession with finding a way to cause one, it comes as little surprise that somebody, somewhere is obsessing about how people will feel in a very specific, but what will be painted as being a wholly comprehensive way..

That looking to ‘big up’ a certain point of view is a process of little more than confirmation bias by people with the public ear is no great shock. But it is ironic that the subject matter here is the focus of the media, where a lot of the symptoms or effects causing upset amongst not only young people but the wider population too, was generated in the first place.

No, there’s nothing wrong with young people being in favour with television debates. In fact, I defy anyone to suggest other than it is what we can all safely expect.

After all, TV and all forms of media are now to many representative of the world we live in. From that perspective alone, we would be foolish to overlook the way that to so many people the world of politics is now perceived.

What happens is we all forget or overlook one massive and inescapable truth when when the infinitesimally small, pure, unadulterated level of fact provided through these mediums is acknowledged and put to one side.

Every other bit of content on the news, on TV, on the internet and on social media isn’t real. Its words. Opinion. Spin. Someone else’s way of interpreting events in the world. It’s the way that other people want us all to see AND interpret what is going on around us. And even then what they say and what we hear may be very different things.

We have created the illusion of all illusions. Instead of measuring our life decisions with the facts hidden below the surface of this pretend veil, we are mistaking illusion for fact. We have fallen in to the trap of creating a parallel universe where nothing really exists except the many perceptions that we have differently as individuals. Perceptions that we experience as genuine which are misleading is about everything.

No, I do not blame young people or anyone living a normal life outside the bubble where this is all created for the misunderstanding, the frustration and yes, the injustice which sits in between. I don’t even blame those creating the problem from within it, because these are people who are so clearly lost from the impact and consequence of what they are doing, that they cannot really have any idea of what it all means.

The biggest problem in amongst all of this is that our political classes do not see the reality of what is going on and what this all really is. Despite it not being unreasonable that we should be able to expect all those holding elected office to be savvy enough to see the wood for the trees AND act upon it, they have become obsessed with making all this noise real. They simply overlook the responsibilities that they have to us all and obsess about what looks good when it is presented to us

Watch Politicians on Twitter. Observe them on Facebook. But above all take note of how little sense any of their answers or statements really make when they are asked reasonable question about the work they are supposed to be doing for you.

Our political classes have become so obsessed with playing up to what they think people think, rather than doing the job they are supposed to do, that it really comes as no surprise that things have got as bad as they really are for us all. This is wrong.

The establishment didn’t see Brexit coming. Many of the Politicians belonging to it are still convinced that everyone outside Westminster and London actually wants to remain. They certainly haven’t got any real idea of what it is to be a normal person trying to make ends meet, or to be a young person struggling with the prospect of taking on a lifelong debt to obtain what will probably be useless qualifications before their adult life even begins.

So if we focus only on how a Politician or would-be Prime Minister performs on TV or all the other forms of media, we are overlooking a great many things.

Yes, good media performance is important for Politicians. But it is only just the cherry on a very large metaphorical cake. It’s not even the icing, or the most important part, the middle, which itself needs to contain real quality ingredients. All in one what should really be a many great things.

None of this can really be seen within a televised debate forum. Seeing is believing only if you believe the idea that the camera never lies. And if any of us use this example of judging the suitably of a prime ministerial candidate and the substance of the Political Party that backs them, we should not be surprised when the results are policies which only inflict pain within our lives, because the illusion of credibility that being on a screen gives then wins.

 

image thanks to independent.co.uk

%d bloggers like this: