Awareness of Foods We Can Trust is important Today, so that We can All Eat them Tomorrow

A Quick Note from Adam

Over recent months I have been migrating key works across from my Foods We Can Trust site, to share here on my main Blogsite.

The Importance of Foods We Can Trust Awareness is now joining the other FWCT and wider farming and food related works that I have published at www.adamtugwell.blog  in July 2026, but was originally published on 28 April 2025.

As such some of the language and terms used may reflect that time rather than the time of republication.

Introduction

In recent days, I had a conversation about what Foods We Can Trust can actually mean to different people.

It’s important to recognise that what Foods We Can Trust are, is a subject that can mean different things everyone at first glance.

It does so, because we all think about Food in ways that can be very divisive. Depending on what role Food already plays for us, in our lives.

However, Food really shouldn’t ever be divisive. Because whatever may or may not be important to us when we think about the types of food we Eat and why we do or do not Eat them, we should all be able to make the choice of what We Eat at every mealtime from Foods We Can Trust.

Once we’ve got through all of the questions, objections and every other form of barrier that stop people from being able to choose every meal from Foods We Can Trust today, there are very good reasons why each of us should be thinking a lot more carefully and consciously about the Food we consume and why.

The Human Body is a brilliant, natural machine that can only work at its very best when we consume the right fuels and lubricants

Changing the way that we think about Food is the biggest question to answer, as we consider the Foods We Can Trust.

We take Food for granted in just about every conceivable way.

But perhaps the worst and potentially most harmful way we overlook what we are Eating, for us personally and as far as our bodies are concerned, is our failure to always consider the nutritional value and what the Food we consume contains, at the point that it enters our bodies.

Please don’t be under any illusion. We all do it – Because that’s how life currently works. And that’s a real problem for us all!

We don’t need to be doctors, scientists, nutritionists or dieticians to understand the basic principle or equation that tells us what we put into our bodies will have a direct effect on what we get out.

The Food we consume impacts us all in terms of our physical health, mental health, energy levels, wellbeing, hormonal balances, how we feel at any particular time and yes, the list goes on.

But most of us also take this for granted too. And most worryingly, we don’t really think about any of it until whatever we are eating too much or not enough of, shows up by affecting us personally, in some uncomfortable way.

Sadly, even then we may not feel able to do anything about it because of the relationship we have with Food.

Put enough Goodness in and a lot more Goodness usually Shines out

The Human Body is a miraculous biological machine.

It has all sorts of weird and wonderful mechanisms, chemical processes and even physical filtering systems, that can deal with small amounts of things which aren’t actually all that good for us.

However, small really does mean small, in terms of anything that the Human body needs and really doesn’t need to consume.

The amounts of anything within what we Eat that can make a difference, either positively or negatively can be ridiculously small. Even in terms of the amount of the good things that we require each day for our bodies to function at their very best.

So small amounts of anything that we consume regularly that isn’t good for us can soon start to become a problem over time, because the body cannot keep removing the things we don’t need and so it can build up, causing a cumulative effect.

The difficult thing for us to get our heads around is that consuming small amounts of the wrong things doesn’t appear to have any direct relationship with what we Eat. Because we rarely have immediate reactions to bad things at the same moment that we eat it, and we would all typically spit it out or would soon be sick when we do.

This indirect relationship means that we easily overlook foods and ingredients that aren’t good for us at the moment we eat them. Especially when there is some reason that makes those foods very appealing to eat – and perhaps addictive or habit forming when we put them in our mouths. Such as the way that they taste.

Masking

The appeal of the Foods that we typically eat today isn’t as simple as all it might seem. Because the companies that make massive profits out of ‘making’ or manufacturing foods that can do us harm when we repeatedly Eat them over a period of time, are only really able to do what they do by using and abusing the knowledge of how our bodies work.

Many of the Foods we eat today are actually designed and then manufactured to fool our bodies into believing that we are only eating things that are actually good for us.

So, when it comes to the taste of the Food we eat, ‘good’ is no guarantee that what we are eating is good for us and can actually mean that its very bad!

Masking is a process where Food or ingredients that are artificial, have been modified or processed in ways that will often mean they will become harmful to our bodies when we keep consuming them over a period of time, are hidden by adding other ingredients that quite literally confuse our bodies and ‘mask’ our taste receptors, so our bodies natural responses are confused and unable to respond to whatever the food we are eating really is.

If we eat more of anything than we need or try to eat anything that isn’t going to be good for us that is naturally produced, a healthy body will usually tell us that we should stop eating.

Narratives, Technology and Medicine

Regrettably, because we are living through and experiencing an age where so much is available to us at the press of a button, whilst we are at the receiving end of a constant flow of information suggesting there isn’t much that technology cannot fix, it is very easy to think about happiness and pleasure being all about the moment and the now

Many of us don’t believe there is any downside to what we eat and that the consequences – if any really exist – are something we can deal with whenever and if ever we have to, if and when that day comes. (And let’s face it – few of us see anything ‘bad’ hiding between the adverts, narratives and marketing we constantly receive…)

We also fall into the rather large trap of accepting that anything that comes to us through digital devices, through TV, Radio, adverts, sponsorship, influencers, big brands and public figures of any kind can automatically be trusted – whatever it might be.

The phrase ‘Beware of distant elephants’ is very appropriate when it comes to our relationship with Food and what we actually eat. Because when the problems do arrive – which for many they certainly will, those problems will arrive all at once and we will feel like we are being trampled by an elephant when we do.

The role of opposing beliefs in remembering the shared Importance of Food

Let’s get one controversial bit out of the way in terms of how we think about our ‘bodies’. Because the real distant elephant in the ‘what we are eating room’, is this:

What our bodies are, and what the systems of the Human Body can do, is very much at odds with what most of the Food that is accessible and affordable to everyone today already suggests and would make anyone think.

The Human Body isn’t designed or built to work well using the fuel that the Food Chain typically brings to us.

Modern Food Production processes cannot emulate, replace or meet the completely natural set of nutritional requirements that the Human Body has. No matter how good manufacturing processes and the addition of different artificial ingredients can make unhealthy Food taste.

Our bodies have not, will not and cannot evolve to run effectively as they should and thrive when we constantly consume the Foods that the Food Chain and those benefitting from every part of it today would like us to. No matter what the narratives and even the politicians might say.

Facing up to Bodily Realities

In terms of where the Human Body came from or how our bodies ‘evolved’, most of us believe in one of two ‘histories’.

The Human Body was either:

  1. Divinely created, or
  2. Evolved ‘naturally’

If our bodies were divinely created, we can be reasonably sure that whoever or whatever created them intended that we fuel them with the foods that are readily available to us. Whether they are grown, harvested or caught.

If our bodies evolved in a way that theories such as Darwinism would indicate could only have only taken place over a period of many thousands if not millions of years in time, we can be just as sure that the Human Body cannot and will not adapt to any kinds of Foods or ingredients that they haven’t been exposed to for pretty much the same period of time.

For anyone who sits outside of these two possible pathways of human history and believes that we are either in a hologram or something that our dreams have made, either or both of the above will almost certainly be just as true. Because they don’t need to be mutually exclusive, and either way, this life as we know it is the experience that we are living, and these two models are basically the software options that we have to choose from!

Wishful Thinking that gambles with our lives

No matter how much we might love the lifestyle and ‘opportunities’ we have today and can overlook everything that is going on around us in so many different ways, the body is the centre of everyone’s private universe.

If we don’t look after our body and give it the right fuels and lubricants, we will soon be required to focus on the reality that it’s the only one that we have got.

However, it’s just as important to recognise that eating well and eating simplywithout all the processes and processing where all the money is there to be made, doesn’t sit well with the way that our culture and economies currently work.

Words can and are being used to convince us of anything we can be led to believe. If the stories and narratives they form will lead to profit, influence and control for the people who run everything.

Food is a key essential for daily life that we all need to have brought to us in the world as we know it, today.

So, controlling the processes and the ingredients that govern and support the Food Chain, so that they appear unavoidably difficult and uncontrollably expensive, is how people who need to eat regularly are increasingly being controlled and massive profits can also be made.

The Foods We Need

The Foods that our bodies need are not expensive. Or rather they wouldn’t be, IF we were growing them ourselves. Or they were being grown, harvested, produced and traditionally processed locally by small businesses and limited-sized supply chains, run and managed by people we know, who have very similar if not the same needs and ourselves.

Sadly, we have been conditioned to believe that the Foods We Need are too expensive and therefore are increasingly impractical.

We have also been carefully guided or conditioned to believe that we need a much greater variety of Foods to choose from than we do.

To top all of that, we are also being led to believe that the creation and manufacturing of Food is something that normal people and small independent businesses such as farms, growers, bakers, butchers, fishers and fishmongers, and dairies can no longer efficiently do properly, or that any of us can do so in the quantities that the world now needs.

The fight over our Food and what we eat is therefore a fight over control. Because as long as we have control over what we eat and how we produce it, we also have control over our own lives.

Regrettably, if we do not refocus and place our shared need for Foods We Can Trust, right back at the centre of our lives, we will soon lose that control.

With it will go the ability to create the Foods that our bodies need to be healthy and to ensure that happy, healthy and good lives can be experienced and maintained.

Progress is not always linear

Before we finish discussing our own personal needs and requirements for Foods We Can Trust, it is important to begin the task of addressing the many reasons that will be given that suggest we can no longer expect to have open access to the Foods We Can Trust in the way that we always should have.

If you follow current affairs closely and have been watching the impact that the new Trump Presidency has had through Trade Tariffs, you may also be able to see that there is a much bigger problem beginning to surface with the way that the Global Economy works.

The funny thing is that the Global Economy and the way that economics affects everything – not least of all Food, has always been flawed.

But the problems that it has steadily been creating for decades have been hidden by the way that everything has worked.

The problem with addressing the real problem – and this is especially the case when it comes to how we grow and produce our Food, is that those with real influence over the Food Chain as we know it, don’t prioritise Food, and therefore all of us in the way that they should be doing.

Ask them for their opinion or view, and the only thing that you will get back is the suggestion that technological advances in production and efficiencies can only go forward. With the inherent suggestion that everything that we do with Food Production today or that we have already done is archaic and therefore should be treated as if it is already in the past.

Most sovereign states around the world were themselves Agricultural Economies for what were sometimes substantial epochs of Human History.

The Agricultural Age was no accident. Because Food and the need for Food was historically and rightly considered to be the centre of whatever we would now recognise as the equivalent of the economy therefore had Food Production right at its very heart.

There is nothing good about the way we are being taken in respect of our relationships with Food, simply because of the way that money, economics and finance are worshipped and revered by the ruling classes above all things. Not least of all because of the impact that the deference to money, influence and control is already having on our Food Security and Food Supply – even BEFORE we give any thought to the Foods We Can Trust.

Food Production and Farming are already heading in the wrong direction

Right now, the way that our Farming Industry produces Food isn’t generally good for us.

Many Farmers are reliant on chemicals, maintaining levels of production that are impossible to maintain, and the farming methods that the Food Chain requires inflicts a cost on soil and the environment which is genuinely real, but instead of being helpful to Foods We Can Trust, is absurdly playing into the hands and narratives of those who wish to end traditional farming in every sense.

Moving towards factory farming and Foods that are heavily synthesized and contain many processed and manufactured ingredients – not least of all so they seem tasty enough to eat, is not progress.

Becoming reliant upon heavily processed and artificially constructed Foods that contain a majority of ingredients that we wouldn’t choose to eat is the route to a very bad outcome for us all that is itself littered with health and degenerating living standards, where many people will suffer and fall along the way.

Genuine progress in Food Production, from where Food Production is today, will be to return to traditional forms of Farming and the localised economics that thrive around it.

This is how everything should and would be now, if there wasn’t any self-interest, greed or an obsession with money around.

Moving back towards more simplified methods of Food Production, where technology is used to improve, rather than take over what we do, isn’t going backwards for anyone. Unless you are one of those worried about losing control or how your future profits are going to be made.

On the basis of what we know and what anyone can see about Food Production, the Food Chain and the many things that stand in the way of universal access to Foods We Can Trust today, backwards is most definitely the new forwards.

For humanity and for all of us, this focus on Food Production is how real progress into our future will be made.

The Government’s Biodiversity & National Security Report Misses the Real Threat: Our Food System is Already on the Brink

A response to HM Government – Global biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse and national security: A National Security Assessment (Published 20 January 2026)

When the UK Government publishes a national security assessment warning that global biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse threaten our food supply, you would expect honesty, clarity, and a sober assessment of the risks we face.

Instead, the report released on 20 January 2026 offers a strange mixture of stark warnings and comforting illusions – particularly around the UK’s food security.

It acknowledges that ecosystem degradation could destabilise global food production, disrupt supply chains, and trigger geopolitical competition for food. All of that is true.

But then it slips in a familiar, misleading reassurance:

“The UK imports 40% of its food.”

This figure is presented as if it reflects our real‑world vulnerability. It doesn’t.

It’s a net figure, not a resilience figure.

And it hides the truth that the UK is far more dependent on foreign food systems than the report admits.

In fact, if the UK’s borders closed tomorrow, the amount of food immediately available for the population is closer to 11%.

That is the real national security threat – and it has nothing to do with future ecosystem collapse.

It is the result of decades of political choices, corporate control, and a food system designed around globalisation rather than public need.

The 40% Myth: A Convenient Political Fiction

The government’s “40% import dependence” statistic is based on food by value, not food by:

  • calories
  • volume
  • nutritional availability
  • immediate edibility
  • or domestic accessibility

It also ignores the dynamic reality of the UK food chain:

1. UK‑produced food is routinely exported

Much of what we grow or rear here is not eaten here.

We export beef, lamb, dairy, fish, cereals, and vegetables – then import substitutes.

2. “British food” often depends on foreign inputs

Even domestic harvests rely on imported:

  • fertiliser
  • feed
  • seed
  • chemicals
  • machinery
  • packaging
  • labour

A UK-grown crop is not a UK-secure crop.

3. The UK’s food system is globally entangled

Ingredients cross borders multiple times before becoming something we can eat.

A “British” ready meal may contain components from 10–20 countries.

4. The UK cannot feed itself under current systems

Even the report admits:

“The UK cannot currently produce enough food to feed its population based on current diets.”

But it fails to explain why:

Because the UK no longer has a food system designed to feed its own people.

The Real National Security Threat is Already Here

The government frames biodiversity loss as a future risk. But the UK’s food insecurity is a present reality, engineered over decades.

This is the uncomfortable truth:

The UK dismantled its own food resilience long before ecosystems began collapsing.

  • Traditional farming was replaced by industrial, globalised supply chains.
  • Local food systems were hollowed out.
  • Supermarkets and processors gained total control over production.
  • Farmers became contract‑bound suppliers rather than independent producers.
  • Policy after policy pushed the UK away from self-sufficiency.

The result?

A nation that produces food – but cannot feed itself.

This is why the 11% figure matters.

It reflects the food that is:

  • edible immediately
  • consumed domestically
  • not dependent on foreign inputs
  • not locked into export contracts
  • not reliant on overseas processing

This is the food that would still be available if global supply chains failed.

And it is terrifyingly small.

Biodiversity Collapse Will Hurt Us – But It Will Hit a System Already Broken

The government report is right about one thing:

Ecosystem collapse will make global food production more volatile.

But the UK’s vulnerability is not caused by ecological decline.

It is caused by:

  • globalisation
  • supermarket dominance
  • financialisation of land
  • industrialised processing
  • loss of local food infrastructure
  • policy choices that prioritised profit over people

Ecosystem collapse will simply expose the fragility we have already created.

The Missing Piece: A Food System Built Around People, Not Profit

The report warns that the UK must “increase food system resilience”.

But it offers no meaningful pathway to achieve it.

It talks about:

  • lab-grown protein
  • AI
  • alternative proteins
  • technological innovation

But it barely mentions the one thing that actually works:

Traditional, regenerative, localised farming.

The kind of farming that:

  • Builds soil
  • Restores biodiversity
  • Strengthens communities
  • Reduces dependency on imports
  • Shortens supply chains
  • Produces real food, not processed substitutes
  • Keeps value circulating locally
  • Increases national resilience

This is the farming model that the UK abandoned.

And it is the farming model we must return to.

LEGS: A Framework for the Food Security We Actually Need

The Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS) offers exactly the kind of structural shift the government report refuses to contemplate.

Under LEGS:

Food is treated as a Public Good

Not a commodity.

Not a profit centre.

Not a tool of corporate control.

Local farming is prioritised

Communities produce the food they eat.

Farmers regain independence.

Supply chains shrink.

Resilience grows.

Traditional and regenerative methods become the norm

Because they work.

Because they protect ecosystems.

Because they feed people.

Because they build long-term security.

The economy becomes circular and local

Value stays within communities.

Food sovereignty becomes real.

Dependency on global systems collapses.

People, Community, and The Environment become the organising principles

Not money.

Not shareholder value.

Not global trade flows.

This is the only credible pathway to genuine food security.

The Government Report Is a Warning – But Not the One It Thinks It Is

The report warns that biodiversity loss threatens our food supply.

It’s right.

But the deeper warning is this:

The UK’s food system is already so fragile that any external shock – ecological, geopolitical, or economic – could collapse it.

We do not need to wait for the Amazon to fall or coral reefs to die.

We are already exposed.

The real national security threat is not future ecosystem collapse.

It is the current food system, built on:

  • Global dependency
  • Corporate control
  • Industrial processing
  • Financialised land
  • Political complacency

We cannot fix this with technology, trade deals, or emergency stockpiles.

We fix it by rebuilding the one thing that has always fed people:

Local, traditional, community-rooted farming.

And we fix it by adopting a governance and economic model – like LEGS – that puts food, people, and the environment back at the centre of national life.

If the Government Is Serious About Food Security, It Must Change Course Now

The UK cannot continue:

  • Exporting food we need
  • Importing food we could grow
  • Relying on global supply chains
  • Allowing supermarkets to dictate farming
  • Treating food as a commodity
  • Ignoring the collapse of local food systems

If we want real food security, we must:

  • Rebuild local food production
  • Restore traditional farming
  • Shorten supply chains
  • Treat food as a public good
  • Prioritise people over profit
  • Adopt community‑based governance
  • Embrace the principles of LEGS

Because the truth is simple:

A nation that cannot feed itself is not secure.

A nation that depends on global systems is not resilient.

A nation that abandons its farmers abandons its future.

The government’s report is a wake‑up call.

But the real alarm has been ringing for years.

It’s time we listened.

Further Reading: Navigating the Real Threats to UK Food Security

The blog’s central argument is that the UK’s food system is already dangerously fragile -not just because of future biodiversity loss, but due to decades of policy choices that prioritised global supply chains and corporate control over local resilience.

The following resources are curated to help readers move from understanding the government’s official stance, through critical analysis, to actionable frameworks for rebuilding food security.

1. Official Context: The Government’s Assessment

Nature security assessment on global biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse and national security

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nature-security-assessment-on-global-biodiversity-loss-ecosystem-collapse-and-national-security
Summary:
This is the UK Government’s own national security assessment, published on 20 January 2026. It warns that global biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse threaten food supply and national security. While it acknowledges risks to food production and supply chains, the report is critiqued in this blog for offering misleading reassurances about UK food resilience and failing to address the deeper, present-day vulnerabilities in the food system.

(Please note that a copy of the Report can be downloaded as a PDF below)

2. Critical Analysis & Solutions: The Author’s Portfolio

Adam’s Food and Farming Portfolio: A Guide to Books, Blogs, and Solutions

https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/12/18/adams-food-and-farming-portfolio-a-guide-to-books-blogs-and-solutions/
Summary:
This curated portfolio gathers key writings, books, and practical solutions from the blog’s author. It’s designed for readers who want to go beyond critique and discover actionable ideas for food system reform, regenerative agriculture, and community-based resilience. The portfolio reflects the blog’s ethos: prioritising people, local economies, and ecological health over profit and global dependency.

3. Deep Dive: The LEGS Ecosystem

Visit the LEGS Ecosystem

https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/12/31/visit-the-legs-ecosystem/
Summary:
LEGS (Local Economy & Governance System) is the framework proposed in the blog as the structural shift needed for genuine food security. This resource introduces LEGS in detail, showing how it treats food as a public good, rebuilds local farming, and fosters circular economies. It’s essential reading for those interested in systemic change and practical pathways to resilience.

4. In-Depth Reference: LEGS Online Text

The Local Economy Governance System – Online Text

https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/11/21/the-local-economy-governance-system-online-text/
Summary:
For readers seeking a comprehensive understanding of the LEGS framework, this online text provides the full theoretical and practical foundation. It expands on the principles outlined in the blog, offering guidance for communities, policymakers, and advocates aiming to rebuild food sovereignty and resilience from the ground up.

Guidance for Readers

Start with the government’s official report to understand the mainstream narrative and its limitations.

Move to the author’s portfolio for critical analysis and practical solutions.

Explore the LEGS resources to discover a transformative framework for food security rooted in local economies and regenerative practices.

This order will help readers progress from context, through critique, to concrete action – mirroring the blog’s call for urgent, systemic change in the UK’s approach to food and farming.