The Harmful Hidden Meaning of ‘Growth’

We hear the term growth coming from the mouths of politicians so often that the word now sounds like it’s all government is about.

And yes, it is true that growth today is all that the government is about.

“Great!” say businesses and business owners. “The government are out to help us grow!”

And that is exactly the kind of growth most of us outside Westminster think of – and believe we are hearing – when politicians use the term. But it is not what they actually mean when they talk about “growth”, at least not the politicians who are in the know.

GDP (Gross Domestic Product)
The growth that politicians keep talking about is not the kind of growth most of us imagine when we hear them use the word.

Politicians – and the advisers around them – know perfectly well what the public thinks they mean, and they also know that what they mean is something quite different.

For politicians, growth does not mean business growth in the way most of us understand it. While it still includes the kind of growth we think of, that aspect matters far less to them today than it once did.

For politicians, growth means the growth of Gross Domestic Product, or GDP.

GDP is the size of the economy – the total amount of financial activity that has taken place across every form of business or trading activity involving measurable financial transactions. These transactions are recorded across the entire country by the Office for National Statistics from all the businesses and organisations it monitors.

“Measurable” is the key word here. It is the act of measuring so much of life because it has a financial value that has had such a negative influence on how we now value almost everything in purely monetary terms.

The Devil is in the Detail
GDP is critically important to politicians today because it is the benchmark figure that allows them to hide the true breadth and depth of public spending and public debt.

Yet GDP is really a measure of private‑sector or “commercial” activity, rather than the financial activity of public‑sector organisations.

Public borrowing figures matter because we have been conditioned to believe they have a direct relationship with the “economy”.

This is why they are always presented to us as a proportion or percentage of GDP.

If GDP grows quickly or significantly, the true financial position of the UK becomes easier to conceal.

Furthermore, this form of “creative accounting” can make the amount of money the government is spending, borrowing or creating appear smaller or less significant.

This sleight of hand works effectively because the narratives we hear from politicians and the media always frame public spending and public debt in terms of how “big” the economy is and how much it has “grown”.

Politicians and the money ‘creators’ are making our world unrecognisable whilst we are all being robbed
GDP is a very clever tool – and it was certainly designed to be. But it is also a double‑edged sword.

A quick recap:

Politicians can hide or even obscure public debt and “reduce” the amount they appear to be spending by “growing the economy”.

This is why politicians are obsessed with “growth”.

“Growing the economy” in this sense means increasing the amount of financial activity, or the total money spent or transferred through measurable activities during any defined period of time.

How “growth” works:

Political “growth” is typically achieved through an increase in private‑sector financial transactions and an increase in the volume of money in circulation (essentially the total of all the money sitting in every open bank account at any given moment).

Money is created by private banks and financial institutions – not by government.

While each pound is counted when it is created for GDP purposes, the real “magic” or sleight of hand lies in the fact that the same pound is counted again every time it changes hands in a new financial transaction at each point in a supply chain.

Housebuilding is perhaps the best example of how GDP – and therefore “growth” – can be increased, because large volumes of newly created money and the long chain of financial transactions it triggers can quickly be added to the UK’s balance sheet.

A good example of ‘Growth’ – in the way politicians need it to be:
To build a house requires private banks to create the money needed to buy the land and then to fund the entire building process. This includes the supply chains involving all the different businesses that produce building materials, the machinery used, the fuel required, the specialist tradesmen, and the surveyors.

Once the houses are built, they must be sold, which gives another private bank the opportunity to create the money for the mortgage. The mortgage lender charges a fee, the removal company gains business, the landscaper installs a garden, and so on.

Beyond this specific chain come the ongoing requirements: council tax for each home, which local councils automatically charge; utility accounts; increased demand for bus services; and the list continues.

Every one of the businesses involved provides data to the Office for National Statistics about their performance and turnover. Each set of figures is added to the country’s “productivity”, no matter how many times the same money has changed hands – meaning its value in GDP terms may be multiplied many times over.

Things to bear in mind – The System
It is important to understand that GDP functions as the “credible” measurement of economic activity precisely because it hides the creation of money behind the walls of private banks and finance houses.

Most people still believe that banks simply hold money for individuals or businesses and then lend that money to others – including governments – in return for interest, which is then shared with the original depositors.

While this may have been true in some limited ways historically, today money is created by private banks and finance houses as easily as an employee entering digits into a spreadsheet.

Many of the rules that once regulated and constrained these activities have been watered down or removed entirely under the banner of “deregulation” and “free markets”.

For The System to keep functioning, the amount of money available must keep growing, and the number of recorded financial transactions must keep increasing.

This is why the use – and increasing reliance – on credit, digital banking, and financial‑transaction tracking has become so important.

Cash transactions cannot be monitored or recorded in the same way digital transactions can. This is one of the key reasons cash is being phased out: cash, or any non‑digital transaction, is one of the few remaining tools of genuine financial independence.

Private banks and finance houses also “buy” the bonds that the government “sells” when it needs to “borrow” money to fund public policies and public‑sector delivery.
It is important to recognise that if the total amount of money in circulation were to remain fixed within this FIAT‑based economic and financial system, the value of transactions taking place would naturally fall.

The System was designed – and continues to operate – on the basis that money created within it automatically flows into the pockets of the rich. From there, it is invested in assets such as property, infrastructure, and business ownership, where it is used to generate even more credit‑creation opportunities.

In the FIAT system, money flows back to its source: those who are already very rich – the bubble where it was created in the first place.

Where our reality becomes VERY uncomfortable – just to support politicians’ ‘Growth’
To counteract the perverse nature of an economic system deliberately created to enrich and benefit those who created, manage and understand it (the creators), it becomes necessary for money to be created for new reasons and in an ever‑increasing number of ways. This ensures that money keeps flowing, keeps “multiplying”, and continues to appear as “growth”.

Deregulation allowed the same interests that create money to use even more of that created money to buy up almost everything they would never have been able to acquire otherwise – all because we have been encouraged to believe that the money they use is actually real.

This created, effectively “fake”, money has been used to buy or gain control of everything we recognise as real, typically so it can then be rented back to us – increasingly using more borrowed, created money on which we must pay interest.

Meanwhile, the money used for public spending is considered “dead money” because it generally pays wages and incomes rather than generating long chains of financial transactions that boost GDP. This creates a major problem for government, because running public services requires constant spending that does not produce the kind of measurable, repeatable financial activity that The System depends on. As a result, the government can no longer borrow enough to cover existing bills, especially as the UK has been stripped of its assets and productive capacity by the very same interests that create the money.

In contrast, large infrastructure projects are still politically attractive because they do generate the long supply‑chain activity that inflates GDP. Every stage – planning, contracting, materials, labour, machinery, financing, and eventual operation – produces measurable transactions that can be counted again and again. This makes such projects appear “affordable” or even “profitable” within the GDP‑driven framework, even when the government cannot sustainably fund day‑to‑day public services. Infrastructure spending therefore becomes a preferred tool not because it serves the public best, but because it props up the illusion of growth that The System requires.

More food for thought
Unfortunately for us, the creation of money out of nothing does not correspond in any meaningful way with the real value of what people and businesses across the UK own and produce.

Our politicians have helped to entrench this situation because adopting this system appeared to make life much easier for them.

This means that the real value of whatever money we possess – or expect to receive as income – falls each time even a single pound is “created” by politicians or by the banks.

The value of the pound in our pockets or in our bank accounts declines in proportion to the total amount of money in circulation.

The way The System attempts to counteract or mask this fall in monetary value is through what we know as inflation.

Inflation is the rise in prices that becomes necessary for anyone who owns or produces anything, simply so they can keep up with how “growth” is actually pushing the value of everything down.

How Inflation hurts us

We – the people and consumers – sit at the very end of the supply chain. We do not sell on what we buy, so we have no way to recoup the losses that government policy and economic distortions create across the wider economy.

Everything is driven by money, greed and profit.

As a result, we experience falling living standards because wages and incomes cannot rise fast enough to match the deficit that GDP‑driven “growth” creates for us at the level of everyday life.

Are we the victims of the biggest crime mankind has inflicted upon itself?
If you begin unpicking the layers of this economic onion – layers that have been deliberately obscured by narratives designed to deter anyone from looking too closely – you uncover some very uncomfortable truths that have been hiding in plain sight.

The biggest of these is that The System can only function by steadily impoverishing the masses, making people increasingly dependent on credit simply to exist.

When MMT, neoliberal economics and the FIAT monetary system were implemented in the early 1970s, it was already inevitable that those on the lowest incomes would eventually be unable to live without assistance – preferably in the form of credit.

That credit would be more of the same created money, lent back to us at interest, while our creditworthiness – and therefore our compliance – is monitored.

The government’s current push for welfare reform is not a sign that people want to live off the state. It is a sign that cracks are appearing in this bogus economy, and the fissures have widened so far that new “corporation‑friendly” policies can no longer hide them.

Although few of us trust politicians, most of us have not agreed on why.

What we should recognise is that – deliberate or not – everything politicians have done for the money creators over at least five decades has slowly destroyed the fabric of our society.

The uncomfortable truth is that we have all been robbed
The System has been created and maintained to benefit the few, while the many have been deliberately misled into believing that everything is fair, normal and simply “the way things are supposed to be”.

In reality, we have been robbed of our financial independence, our security, our opportunities, our communities, our public services and our ability to live without fear.

We have been robbed of the value of our labour, the value of our money, the value of our homes and the value of our time.

We have been robbed of the ability to live meaningful lives without being forced into debt, dependency or compliance.

We have been robbed of the truth.

We have been robbed of our peace.

And the worst part is that most people still don’t realise it.

Where we go from here
The harmful hidden meaning of “growth” becomes impossible to ignore once you understand how The System works. What politicians celebrate as “growth” is not the expansion of real prosperity, but the expansion of financial activity that extracts value from ordinary people and concentrates it elsewhere.

It is a cycle that demands ever‑greater debt, ever‑greater dependency and ever‑greater pressure on the real economy that people actually live in.

Growth is important to today’s political class because their political future depends on it. Without the appearance of growth, the economic narrative they rely on begins to collapse – and with it, the credibility of the system they defend.

Recognising this is the first step toward reclaiming what has quietly been taken from us.

The System only survives because we have been conditioned not to question it, not to challenge it and not to imagine that anything different is possible. But once the illusion is exposed, its power begins to fade.

Real change will not come from the same political class that helped build and protect this machinery of extraction. It will come from people who understand that a society cannot thrive when its citizens are reduced to consumers, debtors or data points in a spreadsheet.

We do not have to accept a future defined by insecurity, dependency or manufactured scarcity.

We can choose to rebuild an economy that values people over profit, communities over corporations and reality over the convenient fictions that have been sold to us for decades.

The truth may be uncomfortable, but it is also liberating. Once we understand how “growth” has been used as a tool of extraction, we can begin the work of creating something better – something fair, sustainable and genuinely human.

The theft only continues for as long as we fail to see it.

Awareness is the beginning of the end.

This Blog was first published on 6 December 2024. Updated on 28 April 2026 with minor revisions for clarity and relevance.

The Contemporary Politicians Dilemma

You’ve just been elected as an MP and your political group or party holds the majority of Seats in Parliament.

Your group or party now has power over everything. Can change anything. Can be anything. Can do everything that you all promised the people who voted for you when you were successfully elected, just the other day.

In the briefings and within the advice that was never available to you and your political colleagues before the election took place, you are told very clearly, that everything the last government was actually doing, no matter what they were saying publicly, was the only way that they were able to keep government and the public sector running.

The alternative was that the economy, quickly followed by the government and then all public services would simply collapse.

As you catch your breath, you realise that all the things that have been hurting people, whether it was the cost-of-living crisis, inflation, house building, immigration, the benefits crisis or many other of the other social issues you have promised to tackle are all connected to the economy.

You now understand that everything in The System relates to money and specifically to ‘growth’ and the GDP that sits behind it in some way.

People of all kinds, all ages and all backgrounds are struggling.

You saw it only too well as you campaigned before the election was held. Pain and suffering was lurking in just about every direction that you looked.

You are told that you can keep the economy running. Just as long as you keep finding credible reasons to spend.

‘Credible’ reasons are what you need to build and maintain the narrative that justifies the reason to borrow and print money. So that ‘growth’ hides all of the problems, and the money you have created keeps flowing in all the directions that The System demands that it should.

However, there is a cost.

The cost of ‘keeping the economy going’ will be that you cannot step back or away from any policy that already exists, no matter how you sell it to the public.

This will mean there will need to be a growing number of people within the population and reasons to spend on all the goods and services that they will need, so that you can justify spending more and more of that created money, and that money can keep being passed between all the different parts of the economy that provide goods and services to meet the basic needs of people.

This is the way that the problem and more importantly the size of that problem, can continue to be hidden from view.

You know what you promised. You know what you said.

You were going to be ‘The difference’, ‘The change’ and you are now faced with making things worse instead.

The question you now ask yourself; ‘Is it better just to keep managing things, in a state of ongoing but ‘managed decline’, or do you do the right thing and deliver on your promises, knowing that the immediate after effect is likely to be a complete ‘System Collapse’, that is probably now inevitable, but could be delayed if you ‘keep the plates spinning’ instead?

What would you do, if this was you…?

The reality of today’s Minimum Wage: The baseline of our Economic Crisis

The biggest elephant in this economic room and probably the reason why Kier Starmer was falling over himself over the use of the term and definition of ‘working people’, is there is a growing underclass of the population who cannot earn enough money to pay for the basic essentials that they need to live each week or month.

The ‘Minimum Wage’ – even at the £12.21 it is expected to reach in April 2025, will not meet the basic cost of living.

The Minimum Wage is not enough for a single person, living alone, to be able to meet all of their basic or essential needs and expenses, without having financial help, receiving benefits of some kind, getting support from a charity like a Food Bank, or by going into debt.

In October 2023, I calculated that the real hourly rate that a single person would need to receive for a 40-hour working week would be £14.00 per hour – and that figure will certainly have grown in the year that has passed since.

The Politicians who do know and understand this – and please be under no illusion that those at Cabinet Level really should know what it really costs to live, also know that if they were to openly and publicly recognise that the National Minimum Wage isn’t anywhere near enough for a single adult who is living alone to live on, they would then be required to act.

Acting would require an immediate uplift of the Minimum Wage to a figure that is today likely to be around £15.00 per hour.

However, whilst the truth that this economic model can only make some rich by making many poor cannot be ignored, the imposition of a genuine Minimum Wage overnight would have immediate knock-on effects for everything and effectively bring the entire economy to a halt. For no better reason than the economic model that we currently have can only exist and function by exploiting people in this way.

When asked, most people who understand how business and money works will recognise that there is something very wrong with the way this economic model works. But will inevitably return to the response ‘It’s just the way it is’ and ‘Nothing can be done about it’.

This false position of inevitability or that it is impossible to change would be fine, were it not the fact that the people taking this position are typically not those being affected by it.

Will Farmers advocates, membership representatives and activists make Inheritance Tax the hill that the future of U.K. Food Security dies on?

Uncomfortable to read as it may be, the well-known membership and advocacy organisations that supposedly enjoy ‘real’ influence on government and the other layers of ‘The Food Chain Onion’, and purportedly represent their members interests before anything else, are actually just players in an establishment game.

The officers and leaders amongst them value the access or relationships that they have with government departments, politicians and representatives above everything and to a level where they will not do anything that will risk those relationships.

When the wishes of the advocacy and membership organisations are aligned with what the government of the time is doing, we can be sure that industry representatives will walk away with what appear to be some great wins.

Just as they will appear to do so when the aims aren’t aligned and the politicians will make some sort of concession so that they can misrepresent and link to other issues that they will not rescind on.

This may regrettably yet prove to be the case with Inheritance Tax and linking it to UK Food Security. Just so that a narrative can be created that the UK Food Security issue has been solved with the intent that it heaps together all the issues Politicians and Government Departments don’t want to deal with, and builds the spurious narrative that ‘The Food Security problem is now solved’.

Although we can all be sure that representatives of these Organisations make very reasoned representations to those they meet and communicate with, they also take any reassurances and promises they obtain at face value.

They regrettably fall back on the way of thinking that ‘It’s just the way it is’ and that it is better and more beneficial to be ‘in the tent’ than to do anything that would risk their position, and might stop them from being allowed back in. As many smaller less well known organisations will have tried to their cost.

Advocacy isn’t working and isn’t going to work, because you cannot reason with those who are unreasonable

In many cases without even understanding why they are being unreasonable, our politicians and the officers and public sector representatives that surround them only see reason in doing and pursuing the public policies and actions that they believe to be best for everyone, whilst actually only doing what’s best for them.

Populist ‘activism’ and their current approaches

In the case of activist ‘organisation’ No Farmers No Food, whose yellow branding with the black silhouette tractor is capturing support, they are certainly well-meaning and led by good intention.

However, like the advocacy and membership organisations that are in The Food Chain mix, they are also missing the point that the best people to solve the problem aren’t the same ones that caused it.

And the problem we are all facing is much bigger than lots of talking and protesting about whatever gets traction in the media and appears to stick.

The priority of UK Politics today simply isn’t UK Farming and Food Security

In respect of Government and the Politicians we are dealing with, the faces and the branding might have changed in July. But the motives and the direction that drives them is very much the same as those who were in Power before.

As I write and publish in November 2024, there is nobody and no political movement or party out there in the Public realm that has the ability, system-wide understanding or the properly reasoned intent to tackle and change any of the problems we face, when the next General Election in the UK comes. Whether its within months OR in 5 years’ time.

This is a very serious problem for us all.

Why UK Food Security depends on supporting UK Farmers

The seemingly constant talk about the Farmers’ Protest March that is being held in London on Tuesday 19th March certainly appears to have captured many of our thoughts.

The Farmers Inheritance Tax changes that were introduced in the 2024 Budget in October are certainly set to have a BIG impact upon UK Farming as we know it.

But whilst it’s easy to argue that Farmers should be subject to the same taxes as everyone else, we must all remember that we need at least 2x healthy meals a day to survive, and that Food and our access to it is therefore just as important as the air that we breathe and the water that we drink.

Food Production and UK Farms that are supplying fresh, nutritious, Locally Produced Food are as such a Public Good.

Their existence is essential for this reason and there must be support for Farmers – just like all different kinds of businesses have that are focused only on profit – so that they can stay that way.

The change in the Budget tells us that Politicians don’t see the future role of our Farms that way.

So, it is important that all of us – whether we are Consumers, Farmers or both – understand what is really going on across the UK Food Chain that is making Politicians believe that the direction of Food Production and UK Food Security is not only safe, but also good for everyone and fundamentally OK.

The link below will take you to the full online text of Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future, which is also a Free to Download PDF and an e-book for Kindle (£1.99 in the UK from Amazon) which runs through the complexity and layers of The Food Chain, and the truths that are hidden in plain sight, from our everyday view.

There’s a lot to consider, no matter what we already know or the particular or perhaps ‘informed’ perspectives that we all have. So please do find the time if you can to have a look through, as you are likely to have a lot more questions of your own about why we are not giving priority to UK Food Production and the importance of Our Farms when you do.

Thank you for your interest and support.

#food #FoodSecurity #FarmersProtest #farmers #farming #foodchain

To download a FREE PDF Copy of Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future, Please CLICK HERE. Alternatively, if you would like to download the Book for Kindle at £1.99 (UK Price), please follow the link through to Amazon that follows immediately below: