It’s not just British Beef at stake: the future of U.K. food production and our food security is on a knife edge

So obsessed have we become with tech, the next big thing and the apparent ease with which we can get everything that we want, that we have forgotten what’s actually important in life. And when it comes to the basic essentials for life, there’s likely to be nothing more important than what we eat.

Just like the air that we breathe, it’s easy to take the supply of food for granted. Unless you are already one of the growing number of us who cannot always afford to buy enough.

Yet, it’s not even as simple as having access to the food that we genuinely need.

For half a century and probably more, the food we eat, the systems, the supply chains that provide it and the governance that is supposed to be there in place to maintain supplies of the things that meet our basic needs have been changed, manipulated and replaced from top to bottom and from left to right. For no better reason than to allow someone somewhere to make more and more money, without any regard for consequences or what for us – and for our farmers and growers, is already becoming a very high price.

To really grasp the horror story currently unfolding, there is need to have understanding of our political system, of human nature and how money runs the world and makes everything work. Not in the sense of how we see it or how we talk about it. But in the sense of how it all really is.

This past weekend saw Channel 4 give a platform to yet another attack on meat production and specifically beef farming, leaning very much upon the narrative that to tackle global warming, cutting down and ideally stopping eating meat is the best place for everyone to begin.

Never mind the queues of private jets lining up at the very same time to fly an ‘elite group’ of very rich people to a meeting where they can all work out plans to force more of their green rules on the public, all in the comfort of luxury hotel suites in Dubai.

Regrettably, many of the people gifted high profile platforms to speak passionately about the guilt people trying to eat a balanced diet should expereince for eating properly have become the useful idiots of a very cynical strategy. One being pushed by people who were never elected to their roles and so recognise that to have control over everything, they must gain control of any basic essentials for life that everyone seeking to exert their own freedoms and will must automatically prioritise first.

What they forget to mention – even when these same people have responsibility for public health, is that good, healthy and nutritious food, as part of a balanced natural diet, is the essential building block and foundation of a happy life.

So, why would anyone of sound mind want to destroy or kick the foundation of good, healthy and nutritious diets away?

You can be sure that its not anything to do with the methane that animals, humans and just about every natural biological process produces. But it certainly has a lot to do with money and the two things  that come with it: power and control.

Yes, it sounds like a conspiracy theory. But everything that the world is doing to itself today is thoroughly unsustainable.

The irony is that it is the same people, businesses and financial minds that created the false ‘need’ we have bought into who are responsible. On one hand, they have normalised unsustainable behaviour that has depleted the planets resources for no good reason. On the other they have systematically destroyed the governance and infrastructure that would make it easier for us to choose and adopt alternative ways of living that would be much healthier, affordable and sustainable too.

It is these same selfish and self-serving minds that are now determined to dictate the solutions to the problems they caused, so that we change and then behave in ways that will work better for them.

Food is power

Whilst it will make uncomfortable reading for farmers, including many great friends that I know, an entire industry populated by some of the most creative and entrepreneurial people imaginable has been reconditioned to accept grants, subsidies and ‘guaranteed’ contracts with big business and retailers as being ‘normal’. Instead of using their own freedom to do all the things that only British farmers and growers know how to do best.

The consequences of what is happening because of greed and self-interest are very serious indeed.

Yes, farms are going out of business and land is being taken out of production at an alarming rate. But the fact the food the U.K. grows or is capable of growing doesn’t often find itself into the mouths of the very people who live closest to the farms where it was grown is both part of the nightmarish reality that people in food poverty are suffering obesity and diabetes, and the accompanying reality that basic healthy fruit, veg and and high quality meat and fish that resembles its origin in an unadulterated form is now for many, simply too expensive to eat.

It shouldn’t be this way. Yet the travesty doesn’t end there.

Whilst we should all be able to depend on the public representatives that we have elected to put our health and the security of UK food production first, the reality we all have to face is that whether it’s the Conservatives this year, Labour or anyone else occupying No. 10 and the green benches to the right of the Speaker, next, none of these politicians have any idea of just how fragile the UK food supply is right now. Nor how serious even a few shortages of outside food supplies could make things get.

U.K. agriculture has reached the point where farmers, growers and the industries that are inextricably linked to U.K. food production will either choose to accept the risk of taking the steps necessary to facilitate its own revival or wait perhaps no more than just a couple of years and see everything that still exists swallowed up by some impractical idealists 2030-based agenda of some kind.

Farmers and the public are the two key stakeholders in U.K. food production and accompanying supply relationship. Yet neither farmers nor consumers have anything like the genuine say and influence that they should have.

It’s money, self interest and other people’s agendas at every step of the way.

The UKs Farmers shouldn’t have to lead the revolution of reality. But the reality is that a meaningful commitment to changing U.K. food supply and recreating the local infrastructure that would be able to make that work, will soon gather growing public support once the work has really begun.

Its then and only then that our hapless politicians will have no option but to follow.

When benefits are enough to live on, it will be fair to police them. But everyone has the right to have their privacy kept intact.

If the average U.K. wage isn’t enough to live on, the minimum wage certainly isn’t enough. So, anyone on the most basic level of DWP benefits must be going through a living hell.

Benefits are being used by the government to pretend that the cost of living in the U.K. today is something that most people can afford.

Yet the reality is rather stark. The most recent figures available show that at least 22 Million people in the U.K. receive benefits of some kind.

That’s just under a third of the population or one in three of us. And that’s before we even begin thinking about the people who, in receipt of benefits and whether working or not, are holding everything together by dipping into savings or taking on unaffordable debt.

Not knowing if you can afford to eat or pay the bills that can be planned for will challenge the mental health of anyone after a relatively short period of time. Yet the experience of unforeseen expenses destroying that downward equilibrium can create a level of pain and uncertainty that for anyone who hasn’t experienced it, is simply unimaginable.

The confidence of anyone falling dependent upon benefits, credit or charity of some kind is quickly diminished. But the system still treats anyone in this situation as everyone’s guilty bastards – just because they haven’t got enough, or they don’t the same as everyone else.

Not having enough to live on and being able to enjoy the peace and security that it gives anyone, is far from being the ideal stepping off point to secure work. Even if that job would remove any reliance the applicant would then have upon benefits or help, and provide the opportunity to pay off any debt they had accumulated until then.

Anyone who can appreciate the reality of the experience that so many people living in Poverty face – when even people who are working don’t have enough income ‘to live’, will quickly realise that the way to get people out of this dreadful situation is to help them in the ways that will actually help them. And to help anyone who genuinely needs help, you really do need to understand and appreciate what they are going through first.

It certainly isn’t helping to create an additional set of circumstances where those needing genuine help will suddenly find their remaining privacy destroyed with their financial conduct being policed at every turn too.

Yet that’s what public sector access to the bank accounts of anyone in receipt of benefits could now actually mean.

The strangest and most incomprehensible part of plans to legalise government access to the bank accounts of benefit recipients, is the fact that in the majority of cases, those receiving benefits only receive them because they are the victims of an economic system that functions, abuses and exploits them for no other reason than to service some other persons greed.

If the infliction of poverty on anyone was recognised as the form of abuse that it is, just like any of the others that society now refuses to tolerate, the government would not even have the option of playing the role of corrupt jailer for those imprisoned by Poverty, with the ability to abuse their own power to make the experience of the prisoners they control even worse.

But that is exactly where we are.

Whether wrong or right, the decisions and actions taken by politicians in response to the Covid Pandemic demonstrate just how much power our Parliament has – IF they choose to use it.

So, the real question we should be asking, is why politicians aren’t using that power to make life affordable for everyone, with the added bonus that doing so would automatically funnel a significant number of benefit recipients – who want the peace and security that comes only from self-sufficiency – back into work?

Help doesn’t help anyone if the help being given isn’t what those being helped actually need

Yes, it sounds like quite a mouthful, doesn’t it?

How can help not be help, or when is help not actually help, do also sound like trick questions too. As help is always help, isn’t it?

Well, actually no. Help really doesn’t help anyone, if that help isn’t something that the recipient actually needs.

The point that help isn’t help unless it is needed is relevant, because those that can help others who do need help today, are, instead of giving the help that others need, only giving the help that they want to give, or what they believe that help should be.

Oddly enough, this blog isn’t an attack on anyone prepared to help another because they don’t do exactly what anyone needing help has asked them for. Because in many cases, even this isn’t a question of the help that those people need, but actually just a statement of the help that those people ‘want’.

Want and need are two very different things. Our needs are very basic and revolve around being happy, healthy, safe, secure and being able to function as any human being should, self sufficiently and without then requiring any further help. Whereas our wants could go on forever and regrettably, once fed, may never ever really be met.

Help isn’t help at all, if its only based on wants, rather than what anyone genuinely needs the help they receive to be.

Requiring any person to work for a weekly wage that’s less than what they can afford to live on without help is legitimised Slavery – No matter what Politicians say | Autumn Statement

I realised a long time ago that the Politicians running the UK today work on the basis that unemployment and poverty are synonymous, or exactly the same thing.

Some politicians have even built a public platform by trading on it and the arguably heartless policies that people have trusted to look after the  UKs poor and vulnerable tell us as much as we need to know about where the so-called Conservative’s priorities lie.

It wouldn’t be anywhere near as much of a problem if the ‘poverty isn’t real’ approach was only a message.

However, the idea that poverty isn’t a problem has gone way beyond being just a message. It is the basis of how today’s public policies are formed.

Today will see the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement – where the ‘Official’ announcement will be made to Parliament, that amongst a new range of sanctions against those on benefits (the punishment for the poor and vulnerable who don’t behave), the National Living Wage will rise in April 2024 to £11.44 (the gift to all the poor and vulnerable who behave and do as they are told).

For those in low paid jobs earning the current National Living Wage of £10.42 per hour (or less if they are too young), an uplift of over £1 an hour does sound great.

But £11.44 is still nowhere near enough to live on. And that was a month ago.

In October, I worked through the figures in an attempt to work out how the UK’s elected parliamentarians could be so confident that they are correct in their analysis of what it costs to live. Whilst those actually living the experience of being poor know that they are not.

At the moment I discovered that using the average costs for all of the important things that a single person, working a 40-hour week would need to earn per hour came to £9.41 per hour, I admit that I did genuinely wonder if everyone other than the Politicians had got this all wrong.

However, as I then went on to consider, averages only tell a helpful story to anyone who will benefit from presenting a story in that particular way.

Facts are, that when we consider the real world cost of everything a single person needs – including the ‘poverty premium’, which is the overcharge too many people are forced to pay, because being poor is perceived as being ‘a risk’, the real minimum hourly wage required – for ANYONE working a 40 hour week – just so that they can live WITHOUT SUPPORT – is a MINIMUM £14 per hour!!!**

Again, that was IN OCTOBER 2023 – without adding in the rapid rises in the cost of living. An inflation rate that might have halved, but is still running rampant at 4.7% or more.

It should be a basic human right that people be able to provide fully for themselves on a weekly wage. That’s even before thinking about the realities that married couples and people with family commitments have to contemplate.

Requiring anyone to work for a whole working week and then paying them any less than what it will cost them to cover the cost of meeting all of their basic needs, without subsidy from government, having to take out loans, or having to seek help through charities (such as food banks) is nothing less than sanctioned or legitimised slavery.

Just think about that for a moment. You cannot fend for yourself on what you earn but are being forced to work. Doesn’t that mean you being treated as a slave?

Yes, being honest with ourselves and seeing poverty and how Politicians ‘interpret’ it doesn’t make comfortable reading. Especially for all the small business owners who will already be wondering what the hell they are going to do to cover the upsurge in costs when wages rise – not only by £1.02 per hour in April 2024 – but with all the additional costs that the employers will then be forced to pay afterwards too.

However, all those business owners who couldn’t (or wouldn’t) pay a minimum £14 per hour (Plus the on-costs) in October 2023, should also be asking themselves the very troubling question ‘WHY?’

It won’t take long to realise that none of this adds up for anyone. Other than those who have already got more than they should ever need.

The world does not exist to do business or make money for those who have already got too much of it.

An economy should function purely to support and sustain happy and healthy lives that are humane for every one of us, above all else.

**It may be worth considering that with the average UK annual wage for all workers is currently at 27,756.00, even this realistically low figure sits way below the annual wage of what I am suggesting EVERYONE needs as a minimum of £14ph – which is £29,120.00. It is perhaps telling that only this week, the announcement was made that Foreign workers coming to the UK will need to earn at least £30K per year. Does someone working for the Government know something?

Free Trade is Market Governance by Private Interests rather than Publicly Elected Government…

The idea of free markets, small government and deregulation providing a capitalist utopia is intoxicating. Especially when it comes wrapped with the promise of low prices, ease of access to everything you could possibly want, and the promise of a golden payday for anyone who joins the gravy train.

After all, having looked closely at what successive governments in the U.K. have done with their own forms of political idealism, converted into policies which we are told are there for our benefit, but still end up somehow hurting everyone, why wouldn’t we reject this disaster for a model of democracy and let business do its thing?

What the neoliberals and big business don’t tell you is the real reason for all the deregulation isn’t do that they can be allowed to shower generosity on the general public in ways that publicly elected government will never be able to afford. This sham is so that they can use civil laws and expensive courts to bully, control and then make more snd more money from EVERYONE!

You only need look at subjects like the patents and controls now levied on seeds – yes, the seeds that grow the food that feeds us – to see how this model of privatised tyranny actually works.

Money and profit through market control – not freedom – are the only aims, and the people behind it are becoming more and more successful each and every day.

Where are the public representatives when we need them?