Understanding Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future –Everything You Need to Know

Introduction

Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future, authored by Adam Tugwell and first published on 14 November 2024, explores the critical issue of food control and its impact on the future of society, particularly in the UK.

Written in response to the changes in Inheritance Tax Relief for Farmers in the UK October 2024 Budget, it aims to reveal the complex layers of the food chain, the collapse of farming, the disappearance of food security, and the myths that obscure these realities from consumers.

Key Themes and Points

1. The Importance of Food and Food Security

  • Food is as essential as water and air for health and survival, yet its importance is often overlooked until access is threatened.
  • UK food security is fragile; political decisions and global dependencies have made the nation vulnerable to shortages if borders close or supply chains are disrupted.

2. Food Quality and Nutrition

  • There is a widespread misconception that all food is healthy, regardless of its source or processing.
  • Highly processed, low-nutrition foods have become normalised, driven by global business models and marketing narratives that prioritise profit over health.

3. The Food Chain Onion: Layers and Stakeholders

The document uses the metaphor of an “onion” to describe the multilayered food chain, each with distinct interests and influences:

Consumers

  • Consumers are key stakeholders but often feel and are treated as powerless, accepting what is available or affordable without questioning their influence.

Retailers (Supermarkets)

  • Supermarkets prioritise profit, using data and contracts to control farmers and manipulate consumers through loyalty schemes and pricing strategies.

Processors and Manufacturers

  • Processing has shifted from traditional, healthy methods to industrial, profit-driven practices that often harm health and undermine local food systems.
  • Manufacturers create addictive, unhealthy foods and collaborate with retailers to maximise profits.

Merchants and Landowners

  • Merchants and landowners add layers of profit and control, often prioritising investment over food production and community needs.

Money Markets, Financiers, and Corporations

  • Financial interests and big corporations have manipulated regulations and markets to maximise profit, often at the expense of farmers and consumers.

Politicians and Public Sector

  • Politicians and government officers lack understanding and leadership, often serving party, personal or hidden interests rather than public good.

Lobbyists, Activists, and Academia

  • Lobbyists and activists influence policy, sometimes without practical understanding.
  • Academia fails to champion necessary paradigm shifts, remaining anchored to the current money-centric system, which ‘pays the bills’.

Membership and Advocacy Organizations

  • The behaviour of big advocacy organisations like the NFU suggests they are more aligned with the establishment, rather than the industry and membership itself, often prioritising relationships with government over genuine change.

Farmers

  • Farmers have lost control and are pressured by external interests, subsidies, and contracts that undermine their independence, the viability of local food production and any willingness to embrace farm-led change.

4. Narratives, Myths, and Shibboleths

Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future identifies powerful narratives and myths that shape public perception and policy, including:

  • Globalisation makes food cheaper (a myth that hides the true costs and vulnerabilities).
  • Cost is the only important thing to the consumer (ignoring nutrition, provenance, and community impact).
  • “BIG” farming is the only viable model (marginalising small, family or local farms).
  • Money can solve every problem (overlooking the root causes of the problems that the food chain is experiencing that were created by money-centric systems).
  • Various other myths about food supply, farming, supermarkets, and political interests are also debunked, emphasising the need for local, transparent, and community-driven food systems.

5. Perceptual Barriers and Solutions

  • Situational bias and group gaslit isolation prevent people from recognising problems and acting for change.
  • Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future argues that profit should not be a right, especially in essential supply chains like food.
  • The proposed alternative is a farmer and community-led food chain revolution, rebuilding local food systems and local circular economies with food production at the centre, to restore control, independence, and food security.

Review of Key Messages of Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future

  • Food control is central to societal well-being and future security.
  • The current food system is dominated by profit-driven interests, complex layers, and misleading narratives that undermine health, local economies, and food security.
  • Consumers and farmers must reclaim influence, challenge myths, and rebuild local food chains.
  • Real change requires a paradigm shift away from money-centric thinking to people-centric values, prioritizing food as a public good.
  • Leadership must come from the grassroots, with communities and farmers working together to create resilient, transparent, and equitable food systems.

Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future closes by inviting readers to learn more, discuss, and remain open to new ideas, emphasizing that solutions must be collective and rooted in genuine understanding and community action.

Actions For Consumers

1. Recognise Your Influence

  • Consumers are one of the two key stakeholders in the food chain. You have more influence than you realise over what food is produced and how it is supplied.

2. Prioritise Healthy, Local Food

  • Seek out food that resembles its original form or source, and support traditional, local, and minimally processed foods.
  • Challenge the narrative that only processed or globalised food is affordable or convenient.

3. Question Narratives and Myths

  • Be sceptical of marketing, supermarket offers, and the myth that cost is the only important factor. Consider nutrition, provenance, and community impact.
  • Understand that “cheap” food often comes at the expense of quality, health, and local economies.


4. Support Local Farmers and Businesses

  • Build direct relationships with local farmers and small businesses. This is the only form of food chain that can be genuinely trusted.
  • Choose local, fresh, and traditionally processed foods whenever possible.

5. Advocate for Change

  • Engage in community discussions, challenge situational bias, and be open to new learning and perspectives.

Actions For Farmers

1. Reclaim Leadership and Independence

  • Farmers must recognise their role as business leaders, not just contractors, employees or recipients of subsidies and grants.
  • Accept that change must begin with farmers themselves if they want change that will benefit them.

2. Build Direct Relationships with Consumers

  • Focus on direct relationships with local consumers and small local businesses, rather than relying on contracts with supermarkets, processors, or global supply chains.

3. Shift Away from Profit-Driven Models

  • Challenge the myth that “BIG” farming is the only viable way. Small, local, family farms are vital for food security and community resilience.
  • Prioritize food quality, environmental stewardship, and community needs over maximising profit.

4. Lead the Food Chain Revolution

  • Farmers have the power to catalyse change by working with local communities to rebuild local food chains and circular economies.
  • Take the risk to initiate change, even if it means stepping away from established systems and subsidies.

5. Advocate for Policy and Paradigm Shifts

  • Engage with advocacy organisations, but push for genuine change rather than playing along with establishment interests and paying lip service to everything else.
  • Support a paradigm shift from money-centric to people-centric values, treating food as a public good.

Summary of Actions

  • Consumers and farmers must work together to rebuild trust, transparency, and resilience in the food chain.
  • Direct, local relationships are the foundation for a healthy, secure, and equitable food system.
  • Challenging myths, narratives, and profit-driven models is essential for meaningful change.
  • Grassroots leadership and community action are the keys to restoring food security and independence for all.

Get The Book

The Local Economy & Governance System | Online Text

We recognise that today’s world is dysfunctional and broken. Yet, we often refuse to discuss, consider, or collaborate on solutions beyond those we already identify with or feel we own. We seek change from leaders and politicians who are invested in maintaining the status quo – often promising a return to times that seemed better, even though we know we cannot freeze time or truly go back to the past.

The uncomfortable truth is that the path we are on leads to poor outcomes, no matter whom we follow or which direction we turn. Our current roadmap keeps us trapped in the same broken paradigm, regardless of the leader or popular figure we choose.

While we have choices within our existing systems, these are options created by others. None of them genuinely benefit us or offer a future that works for everyone. Taking control of our future is not just a personal choice – it requires collective participation, contribution, and action. This will not be easy, especially when it seems logical to stick with familiar choices that fit our current worldview.

To envision a better way of living, most of us need at least a glimpse of what that future could look and feel like – even if it’s hard to imagine without the things we currently prioritise. So, let’s consider a snapshot of a world that truly works for everyone: a world where the “Moneyocracy” we’re addicted to is gone, replaced by a fully functioning system of Authentic Governance.

The world’s problems today need no further introduction. If you are reading this, you are likely experiencing the negative effects of misused power and influence, or you see how they impact others who lack the ability to change things.

The Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS) offers a look ahead – showing the key structures, learning, and understanding of a society for tomorrow that has left behind everything wrong with today’s way of living. LEGS provides a vision of what overarching public policy could be, once we accept that life will be better for everyone if we let go of what we think benefits us today, but in reality, only harms us and offers no true benefit to humanity or the world.

People, Community, and Environment – simple, local, and open living – are the founding principles for a fair, balanced, and just economy and governance system, ready to be established when we are.

Adam Tugwell
Cheltenham, UK.

20 November 2025

Introduction

We stand at a crossroads in history – a moment defined not by the promises of distant leaders or the allure of old systems, but by the urgent need for genuine change.

The world we inherit is marked by imbalance, inequality, and a persistent sense that something vital has been lost.

For too long, society has been shaped by structures that serve profit over people, hierarchy over community, and short-term gain over the enduring health of our environment.

This book is not just a critique of what has gone wrong. It is a blueprint for what can be made right.

Here, you are invited to imagine a future built on the principles of dignity, collective responsibility, and stewardship – a future where every person’s essential needs are guaranteed, and where the wellbeing of the community and the environment are placed above all else.

The Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS) is presented as a practical framework for transformation. It rejects the old paradigms of power and wealth, offering instead a model rooted in locality, transparency, and authentic participation.

In these pages, you will discover how governance can be reimagined as a truly democratic, people-centric process; how the economy can circulate value within communities rather than extract it; and how every member of society can contribute meaningfully to the common good.

This introduction is your invitation to engage – not as a passive reader, but as an active participant in the creation of a fair, sustainable, and resilient society.

The ideas within are not distant ideals; they are actionable steps, grounded in lived experience and collective wisdom. As you read, consider not only what must change, but how you can be part of that change—starting in your own community, with the choices you make and the values you uphold.

Let us move forward together, guided by the principles of People, Community, and The Environment.

The journey begins here.

The Tipping Point: Why and How We Get LEGS

Identifying the Touchpaper of Transformation

The journey toward adopting the Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS) is not just a matter of policy—it is a profound transformation from the entrenched “Moneyocracy” to a people-centric way of living.

While this book explores the principles and structures of LEGS, it is essential to understand the process and circumstances that will catalyse this change.

Earlier works such as Levelling Level and From Here to There Through Now have discussed the inevitability and challenges of such transformation, emphasising that change is both a choice and an ongoing commitment, especially when circumstances make it difficult to act.

Change Requires Choice and Action

Transformation to LEGS will not happen automatically.

In an ideal world, everyone would recognise the need to shift from a money-centric to a people-centric system and work together to make it happen immediately.

However, the reality is that many remain deeply invested in the current system, believing that hierarchy, centralisation, and the primacy of money are the only viable ways to organise society.

This belief is reinforced by decades of dependency and addiction to the money system, as described in the book’s critique of the “Moneyocracy”.

Pain as the Catalyst for Change

Regrettably, it is often personal or collective pain that becomes the catalyst for change.

People may only embrace a new system when the suffering caused by the old one outweighs perceived benefits.

This echoes the book’s insight that genuine transformation often arises from crisis, not comfort.

What Might Trigger Transformation?

While predicting the exact catalyst is impossible – since free will and choice remain – several realistic as well as outlying or ‘black swan event’ scenarios could spark the transition to LEGS:

  • Financial Collapse (UK): The UK government may reach a point where it cannot fund public services due to unsustainable debt, prompting urgent systemic change.
  • Global Financial Collapse: Worldwide economic failure, potentially triggered by unstable monetary policies, AI or cryptocurrency bubbles, or a repeat of the 2007/08 crisis, could force a revaluation of priorities.
  • War (Regional or Global): Ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions could escalate, with war being used to mask systemic failures and maintain elite control.
  • Disclosure Event: Unprecedented revelations—such as proof of extraterrestrial life—could radically alter humanity’s perspective and disrupt established power structures.
  • Other Domino Events: Civil unrest, food shortages, or even civil war could serve as tipping points, whether orchestrated or seemingly organic.

These scenarios align with this book’s analysis of how crises—financial, social, or environmental—often expose the flaws of the old system and create openings for new models.

The Consequences of Inaction

Failing to act – whether by choice or by default – has profound and far-reaching consequences for individuals, communities, and society as a whole.

Inaction is not a neutral stance; it is itself a decision that shapes the future, often in ways that reinforce the very systems and problems we wish to escape.

1. Entrenchment of the Status Quo

When people do not actively choose change, those already in positions of power and influence continue to define the future.

These individuals and groups may present themselves as protectors or saviours, but their solutions often involve further restrictions on freedom, increased surveillance, and the erosion of personal sovereignty.

The illusion of safety is used to justify the loss of genuine autonomy and dignity.

This dynamic is described in the book as the perpetuation of “Moneyocracy,” where profit, hierarchy, and control remain the organising principles of society, and the needs of people, community, and the environment are subordinated to financial interests.

2. The Rise of Dystopian Futures

Inaction allows those in control to implement policies and systems that may lead to a dystopian future – one characterised by inequality, loss of freedoms, and widespread disempowerment.

This book warns that such futures are not accidental; they are the result of deliberate choices made by those who benefit from the current system, often using the public’s own desires and fears against them.

3. The Illusion of Individualism and Isolation

A major consequence of inaction is the reinforcement of the belief that each person is alone and powerless.

This sense of isolation serves the interests of the current system, making individuals feel vulnerable and incapable of effecting change.

The reality, as emphasised throughout, is that collective action and shared purpose are the true sources of power and transformation.

4. Perpetuation of Social and Economic Pain

Without action, the pain and suffering caused by the existing system – poverty, inequality, environmental degradation, and loss of community – will continue and likely intensify.

The system is designed to maintain itself, often at the expense of the majority, and will use crises (financial, social, or environmental) to justify further consolidation of power.

5. Missed Opportunities for Genuine Change

Inaction means missing the critical window to choose and implement a better future.

All the books that have led to LEGS stress that change requires both a shift in mindset and active participation.

Waiting for someone else to initiate change only ensures that the system remains unchanged, and that the opportunity for transformation is lost.

6. The Responsibility of Choice

It is vital to recognise that not choosing is itself a choice.

Culturally, many have become accustomed to leaving decisions to others, assuming that change will come from external sources.

However, the reality is that those “in the spotlight” are often invested in maintaining the system as it is, rather than truly transforming it.

7. The Need for Collective Action

My books since Levelling Level have repeatedly highlighted that real change is only possible when individuals recognise their interconnectedness and collaborate.

The power to create and implement a system that works for all – such as LEGS – comes from collective action, not isolated efforts.

In summary:
The consequences of inaction are not just the continuation of current problems, but the deepening of inequality, loss of freedom, and the entrenchment of systems that do not serve the public good.

Only by consciously choosing and acting together can we avoid these outcomes and build a future rooted in dignity, community, and sustainability.

Choosing Our Future – Together

Ultimately, the choice for transformation must be conscious and collective.

It does not matter when we make this choice, as long as it is before reaching the point of no return.

The greatest threat is the illusion of isolation—the belief that we are alone and powerless.

In reality, our thoughts, feelings, and beliefs are powerful, and when we choose to collaborate, we gain the ability to create and implement a system that truly serves everyone.

This message is echoed throughout the main document, which emphasises the principles of People, Community, and The Environment as the foundation for authentic governance and a fair, sustainable society.

Welcome to The Local Economy & Governance System.

Brief History and Evolution of LEGS

The Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS) is the result of a multi-year journey of research, writing, and practical experimentation.

Its origins trace back to early 2022, with the publication of Levelling Level, which challenged the prevailing political narratives and introduced the idea of a people-centric system.

This work highlighted the urgent need for a Basic Living Standard—a guarantee that everyone can meet their essential needs independently.

Building on these foundations, The Basic Living Standard explored how the UK’s minimum wage failed to provide true financial independence, and proposed a new approach to work and business focused on meeting essential needs for all.

Subsequent books, including From Here to There Through Now, The Way of Awakened Politics for Good Government, and The Grassroots Manifesto, argued that genuine reform must come from the grassroots, not from centralised or top-down structures.

These works laid out the first steps for a governance model built from the community up, emphasising local relationships and direct participation.

Further development came through A Community Route and An Economy for the Common Good, which advocated for community collaboration, localised economics, and social enterprise as the backbone of a fair society.

Insights from works on food security, values, and technology—such as Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future, Your Beliefs Today create Everyone’s Tomorrow, and Actions Speak Louder than Digital Words—were integrated, highlighting the importance of local control, ethical stewardship, and the dangers of external influence.

In 2024, Our Local Future synthesized these lessons into a comprehensive vision for a society built on locality, community, and environmental stewardship.

This work became the direct basis for the LEGS framework, offering a blueprint for restructuring society around local empowerment, authentic governance, and sustainable living.

LEGS now stands as a practical system designed to deliver a fair, balanced, and just society for all—rooted in the principles of People, Community, and The Environment.

Glossary of Terms

Authentic Governance
A system of governance rooted in local, democratic, and community-driven decision-making. It prioritises transparency, accessibility, and the direct involvement of all community members, ensuring that leadership is accountable and serves the public good rather than private interests.

Basic and Essential Foods
Foods that are critical for a healthy and happy life. They must be accessible, affordable, nutritious, locally grown and produced, and free from artificial additives or harmful chemicals. Their supply is recognised as a Public Good and is prioritised above all other food categories.

Basic Living Standard
A foundational guarantee that ensures every individual earning the lowest legal weekly wage can afford all essential costs of living—food, housing, utilities, healthcare, transport, clothing, communication, and modest social participation—without falling into debt, relying on welfare, or turning to charity.

Community Contributions
A system where every working member of the community contributes 10% of their working week to support local public services and charity provision. This replaces traditional public sector staffing with a community-led workforce.

Community Provision
The redefined public sector, encompassing all services and support systems essential to a culture built around People, Community, and The Environment. It is locally accountable, ethically grounded, and responsive to real needs.

Circumpunct
A practical and symbolic model for community decision-making. It is a circular arrangement where representatives and speakers engage openly, ensuring transparency, accountability, and collective wisdom in governance and mediation.

Flat Hierarchy
A societal structure where roles are different but not ranked, and leadership arises naturally through service and ability rather than status or authority. It emphasises collaboration, equality, and shared purpose.

Key Skills for Life
Essential abilities recognised as a Public Good, including critical thinking, self-awareness, food production, clothing repair, ethical use of technology, and more. These skills are foundational for personal sovereignty and community wellbeing.

LEGS (Local Economy & Governance System)
A comprehensive framework for society that centres on the principles of People, Community, and The Environment. It seeks to replace hierarchical, profit-driven systems with local, transparent, and collectively responsible models for governance, economy, and daily life.

Local Circular Economy
An economic model where value circulates within the local area, prioritising local production, ethical governance, and shared responsibility. It minimizes external dependencies and ensures that economic activity serves people and the environment.

Local Market Exchange
A physical and community-regulated marketplace for trading goods and services, often through barter or direct exchange. It ensures fair trade, transparency, and that value remains within the community.

Luxury Foods
Foods that are not essential for health or nutrition, including processed, ultra-processed, and synthesized foods. Their production and advertising are restricted to protect the integrity of local food systems.

Moneyocracy
A term describing the Old-World system where money, wealth, and profit were the primary measures of value and success, leading to social inequality and environmental degradation.

Natural Resources
All resources provided by nature (such as water, land, minerals) are held in stewardship by the community. They are not commodities and must be managed ethically, equitably, and for the public good.

Parish / Universal Parish (Uniparish)
The foundational local unit of society, business, and governance. It is designed to be self-contained, with all essential needs met locally, and is the central structure for community life.

People, Community, The Environment
The three core principles guiding all aspects of the LEGS system. Every decision, policy, and practice is evaluated based on its impact on these priorities.

Personal Sovereignty
The inherent right and capacity of everyone to live freely, responsibly, and authentically, provided their actions do not compromise the sovereignty of others. It is the foundation of freedom, dignity, and ethical society.

Public Good
A service, resource, or standard that must be guaranteed for all, forming the foundation of authentic governance. Public Goods cannot be altered, misrepresented, or bypassed, and always supersede inherited laws or practices that conflict with their purpose.

Social Business
A non-profit organisation operated for the public good, especially where private businesses do not provide essential goods or services. Social Businesses are collectively owned, transparent, and accountable to the community.

Part 1: Where Things have gone Wrong for Society Today

Key Lessons from Today’s World

In reflecting on the failures of the Old World—what many still recognize as the present—we uncover a sobering reality: those with power and privilege were often willing to sacrifice the wellbeing of humanity for their own gain.

The pursuit of profit, status, and material wealth routinely overshadowed the value of people, community, and the environment. This imbalance was not the result of conspiracy, but the predictable outcome of unchecked greed and a culture obsessed with material accumulation.

To maintain their dominance, elites and those in control of governments orchestrated conditions that enabled profiteering and ever-greater control.

Wars, environmental collapse, and information-driven crises were manufactured and justified through carefully crafted narratives—stories promoted by mass media that shaped public perception and obscured deeper truths.

These narratives, often presented as being in humanity’s best interest, consistently promoted “progress” as the only viable path forward, while ignoring the wisdom and solutions already discovered in history and nature.

The fundamental lesson is clear: genuine respect for people, community, and the environment is not profitable for those who prioritise wealth and power. This simple truth lies at the heart of the persistent injustice and disharmony that has plagued human society.

We Always Want More

To truly understand the root flaw behind so many of the problems we face—and why they seem impossible to solve—you must confront a difficult truth: we always want more.

This desire explains why we often ignore the suffering of others, even though we would hope for compassion if we were in their place.

We want more money.
More wealth.
More power.
More influence.
More recognition.
More of the things we enjoy.
More popularity.
More time to do what we want.
More people to agree with us.
More love.
More sex.
More admiration.

It doesn’t matter what it is—as long as it’s external to us, we want more of it.

Even when we already have more than we could ever need, or even use, the craving persists.

What We Need Is Not What We Want

From the Old World, we learned a critical lesson: when we live as though our wants are the same as our needs—simply because our wants seem affordable—we inadvertently condemn others to lives where even their basic needs remain out of reach. The result is widespread deprivation, manifesting in countless forms.

Though the mechanisms and consequences were often hidden from view, the rise of Wealth Inequality—what was once called the Wealth Divide—stemmed from the selfishness and greed of a privileged few.

This imbalance was not only tolerated but actively encouraged by those who aspired to emulate them.

We now understand that ignorance, blindness, and a lack of awareness about how our actions affect others do not excuse those actions.

That’s why we place Self-Awareness—awareness of the individual and, by extension, awareness of others—at the heart of our commitment to an egalitarian society.

It is a foundational principle within our values of People, Community, and the Environment.

No Business Is More Important Than the Public Good

In the Old World, the elevation of business interests above all else led to a distorted sense of value—where profit was mistaken for progress, and economic metrics were used to justify social neglect.

The ideology of Neoliberalism, embraced widely from the early 1970s, promoted the belief that free markets and corporate growth would naturally solve societal issues.

This system entrenched inequality, eroded community cohesion, and degraded the environment.

Globalisation, born from this mindset, normalised the idea that business and finance mattered more than people. Human needs became secondary to shareholder returns. Communities were reshaped to serve commercial interests, and the environment was treated as a resource to be exploited rather than protected.

We have rejected this model.

In its place, we have built a society rooted in the principle that People come first. Community comes first. The Environment comes first.

Business now exists to serve—not to dominate. No enterprise, regardless of its size or influence, holds priority over the well-being of the community it operates within.

Essential services—those critical to the safety, health, and security of all—are operated as Social Businesses.

These are not owned by private interests or shareholders seeking profit. They are owned collectively by The Community, with every decision made in service of the Public Good.

This shift marks a return to balance. A recognition that true prosperity is measured not by profit margins, but by the health, harmony, and resilience of the people and places we call home.

Real Progress Is Not Restricted to One Direction

The Old World taught us a flawed lesson: that Progress—and the ideology of Progressivism—was linear and one-dimensional.

Guarded fiercely by its champions, this belief failed to recognise that true progress can take many forms. Sometimes, it may even appear to be a step backward.

In reality, progress can move in any direction—across the full 360 degrees of possibility.

Obsessive leaders and activists, clinging to the idea that forward motion alone equates to improvement, often caused harm across all areas of life.

Their mistake was rooted in a misguided belief: that discarding history and lived experience in favour of constant forward momentum would always lead to better outcomes.

But in truth, this relentless push often led society backward—especially in terms of the real-world consequences people faced.

We reject the notion of failure as something to be feared or hidden. Instead, we value experience—every outcome, every lesson—as a vital teacher.

We understand that returning to what has already been proven to work, no matter how simple, is often wiser than blindly chasing novelty or complexity for its own sake.

We celebrate what is tried and tested. We do not pursue change merely to demonstrate action or to manufacture the illusion of progress.

True progress is measured not by direction, but by impact.

Money: The Rigged Game with a Real-Life Cheat Code

One of the most difficult truths to accept from the Old World was the way money worked—and the complex web of systems, rules, laws, and mechanisms that had been created, altered, and refined to make it function as it did.

We came to understand that the monetary and financial system—known by many as FIAT—was the cornerstone of a structure that, to those who controlled it, resembled nothing more than a game. And like any game, it carried no real consequences for those who understood its mechanics.

What made this system so dangerous and damaging for the majority wasn’t simply that the Elites knew it was a game. The real threat lay in the fact that, like many computer games, this one had a built-in cheat code.

That cheat code was the ability to create money out of thin air.

As time went on, this power was used more frequently, and the consequences—just like in any simulated game—were severe and disproportionately harmful to those who still believed the system was real and fair.

By the end of the Old World, those in control could buy anything they desired, while the value of money held by poorer individuals steadily evaporated. The system’s architects simply printed more, further distorting the balance.

We reject this illusion.

We do not accept that money—or any form of currency—holds value beyond its practical purpose.

We prohibit any communication, action, or activity that promotes the idea that money is anything more than a tool: a temporary method of exchange, a means of transferring value between transactions, and nothing else.

Money is not power. It is not progress. It is not truth.

It is a tool—and only a tool.

Normality Cannot Be Dictated by Others

The Old World was fixated on defining what was ‘normal.’

It became widely accepted—especially by those in power—that controlling the narrative of what was deemed ‘normal’ could be weaponised to label others as ‘wrong.’

But normality is not conformity. It is not the ‘accepted same’ that the Old-World system used to suppress individuality and difference.

True normality is the state of Personal Sovereignty—the experience of being fully oneself.

It is the understanding that peace and happiness are not granted by society, institutions, or external validation. They are the inner gifts of the individual, shaped by their own truth.

Normality, for each person, is the expression of their Authentic Self.

Distance Creates a Critical Weakness in Leadership

In the Old World, every so-called democracy ultimately failed due to its overreliance on hierarchical structures.

These hierarchies created a growing distance between those who governed and those they were meant to serve. As this gap widened, leaders became increasingly insulated from the realities of everyday life.

We learned that this separation—this lack of direct contact between public representatives and the people—led to a dangerous disconnect.

Leaders, cut off from the lived experiences of their communities, lost sight of the consequences of their decisions.

As the insulation deepened, dysfunction spread across legislation, public services, and governance itself. Systems meant to serve the people were led by individuals who had, in effect, disenfranchised themselves—leaving behind a population that felt ignored, abandoned, and unheard.

From this failure, we discovered a vital truth: the true point of power in any system of governance must be the People.

We have built and continue to uphold a model of Authentic Governance that reflects this principle.

Authentic Governance eliminates the systemic abuse that plagued the Old World. It ensures that leadership is not distant but rooted in community.

Here, in The Local Economy & Governance System, the majority rules—by ruling together.

Governance is local, democratic, and run by and for The Community.

This is how leadership thrives: not through hierarchy, but through connection.

Doing the Right Thing Has Many Interpretations—But Only One Truth

The Old World revealed a painful lesson: power, no matter how small or far-reaching, was often intoxicating enough to strip those entrusted with responsibility of their genuine humanity.

Self-interest, coupled with a fading awareness of others, led many to believe that what served their own interests must also serve the interests of everyone else.

This distortion became widespread—across politics, business, finance, and the supranational institutions that emerged after the Second World War and into the early 21st century.

Leaders lost sight of what it truly means to hold responsibility and influence over the lives of others.

Those in power—and those influencing them—forgot their duty to the public and the vulnerable.

They acted as if their decisions could be made without consequence, even as the long-term effects of their self-serving choices became increasingly visible in the suffering of society.

We have chosen a different path.

We have built a system of Authentic Governance that prevents any individual or group from placing their own interests above those of The Community.

This system remains true and accountable to everyone—regardless of power, position, or influence.

We do the right thing.
Not for some.
Not for the few.
But for everyone.

The Moneyocracy

In the Old World, the one true religion—especially in the West—was Money.

Wealth, power, and influence were its sacred trinity, each inextricably linked to the other.

This belief system shaped not only economies, but the very fabric of society.

Some may still resist the idea that life was entirely coin operated. But with even a moment of honest reflection, it becomes clear: money was the engine behind everything.

It defined our values.

It dictated our choices.

It shaped our relationships, our institutions, and our sense of worth.

Whether we realised it or not, we were all citizens of a Moneyocracy—a world governed not by principles, but by profit.

Money: A Belief System Fuelled by Greed

Arguably the most destructive force in any society is the deeply ingrained—and deliberately engineered—belief that money creation, profit, and economic growth are the ultimate measures of success and happiness.

The Old World, and the system it upheld, revolved around this belief. For over 50 years, it was driven by flawed, self-serving economic ideologies such as Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and Neoliberalism.

“More wants more” wasn’t just a saying—it became the unspoken mantra behind every decision, every ambition, and every system.

The pursuit of more—more money, more growth, more consumption—spread like a disease through every layer of society.

The adoption of the FIAT money system and the use of GDP as a primary measure of progress, beginning around 1971, marked the acceleration of the social decay that a money-based order—or “Moneyocracy”—inevitably brings.

Over time, the world was reprogrammed to operate on the assumption that money was the only priority, the only true source of value.

This shift happened so subtly, so pervasively, that most people didn’t even realise it had occurred.

This distortion of reality was made possible by the myths we were taught about money—myths that replaced meaningful values with hollow ones.

In the process, we lost sight of what truly matters: People, Community, and the Environment.

Every persistent and seemingly unsolvable problem in the Old World—social inequality, environmental degradation, political dysfunction—was rooted in this addiction to money and the relentless accumulation of wealth.

Over time, every institution, every law, and every cultural norm bent toward the singular goal of enriching those who already had the most.

We have reversed this trajectory.

Governance has shifted from top-down control to grassroots empowerment.

Business is no longer driven by wealth creation, but by the well-being of People, the strength of Community, and the health of the Environment.

This transformation was not optional—it was essential.

Because the paths of Money and the paths of People, Community, and the Environment are fundamentally incompatible.

Only the system we now embrace— The Local Economy & Governance System —can deliver true Balance, Fairness, and Justice for all.

Poverty Is Not Real to Those Who Don’t Experience It

Throughout history, attempts to address poverty in England date back to the Henrician Poor Laws of the Tudor era under Henry VIII.
Despite a notable push in the 19th century, the question—“How do we end poverty once and for all?”—remained unanswered.

This failure was especially evident in the post-Covid period (2020–2025), when both Conservative and Labour governments in the UK failed to grasp the difference between:

  • Technical acknowledgment that poverty exists
  • And the experiential reality of living in poverty

A cultural belief persisted:

“For some to be wealthy, many others must be poor.”

This shibboleth enabled a system where wealth was accumulated to disproportionate levels, far beyond personal need.

The cycle of investment for gain only accelerated wealth inequality, which those benefiting from it refused to acknowledge—legitimising their advantage through position and power.

The Consequences of Poverty

Poverty creates a 360-degree network of consequences:

  • It affects not only those who suffer it
  • But also The Community as a whole

Though laws and systems were framed to address poverty, none of them were morally or ethically sound.
They sustained inequality rather than dismantling it.

“Man cannot serve two masters. An archer cannot pull two bows. A jockey cannot ride two horses.”

It became inevitable that the entire system would need to be:

  • Reversed
  • Redirected
  • Reformed
  • Reestablished

…to uphold the moral and ethical imperative that every Member of The Community must be able to live independently and self-sufficiently.

The Misuse of AI

In the Old World, artificial intelligence was gradually introduced over many years leading up to 2023.

Initially, it appeared in the form of hidden algorithms—quietly embedded in e-commerce platforms and search engines—offering faster responses but little transparency.

By 2023, direct and interactive forms of AI became publicly accessible. With this shift, the true commercial intent behind AI deployment became clear—as did the manipulation of public narratives designed to instill fear and confusion around digital technology.

The failure of governing bodies to regulate AI came at a cost far greater than financial. It undermined the very fabric of society.

The key drivers behind AI misuse were:

  • AI was deployed to preserve and advance the interests of the Old World’s Moneyocracy.
  • Its primary function became profit generation.
  • Its secondary function became social control.

The most insidious form of this control was the systematic deprogramming of humanity—achieved through internet platforms and AI-driven technologies.

These tools, whether by design or consequence, disrupted natural cognitive processes. Over the course of a generation, they eroded the human capacity to learn, think critically, and reach independent conclusions.

This assault on executive function—and therefore on Personal Sovereignty—did not begin with AI in 2023, as many were led to believe. It began much earlier, with the widespread adoption of smartphones and tablets.

Unregulated AI is now understood to be anti-human, anti-equality, anti-environment, and anti-freedom.

It poses a direct threat to the foundational values of People, Community, and the Environment.

We acknowledge that AI can offer benefits—but only under strict regulation and ethical oversight. Its use must be supported by continuous Key Skills for Life training, ensuring that humanity remains in control of the tools it creates.

Net Zero

We reject any form of public policy rooted in fear or designed to serve the wealth accumulation of individuals or select groups.

In the Old World, environmental concerns—often framed under the banner of “green” initiatives—were frequently misused and politically manipulated to advance agendas that had little to do with sustainability and everything to do with profit or control.

We have moved beyond that.

Through the implementation and ongoing practice of Sustainable Living, we have addressed the environmental challenges that were once exploited.

These practices are not driven by fear, nor by financial gain—they are grounded in responsibility, balance, and respect for People, Community, and the Environment.

The Food Supply: A Tool for Elite Wealth Creation and Societal Control

In the Old World, the elites and governing classes systematically dismantled genuine local food production.

They centralised control, eroded local supply chains, and weakened the infrastructure that once supported healthy, community-based living.

Globalisation moved in only one direction—toward consolidation and control. Instruments like the European Union and the Common Agricultural Policy were used to reshape food systems, leaving behind a hollowed-out society where People, Community, and the Environment had once thrived.

Productionism was sold as progress. Farmers and food producers were told it was good. But in reality, it fuelled rampant consumerism and opened the door to myths that globalism benefited everyone.

The only part of the globalisation story that needed to make sense was the promise of lower retail prices.

Yet for those directly affected, lower prices meant little when businesses collapsed, jobs disappeared, and communities were left behind.

The real cost—social, environmental, and nutritional—was hidden from public view.

Productionism relied heavily on chemicals and industrial processes that gradually destroyed soil health and land productivity.

As the land became less capable of sustaining life, elites pushed new narratives claiming traditional agriculture was outdated and unreliable.

Worse still, the accepted view suggested that naturally grown foods—produced by independent farmers, small businesses, and community enterprises—could no longer meet public demand.

This was never about efficiency or progress. It was about greed, profiteering, and control.

Every step of this so-called “progress” made the food people consumed less healthy, less nourishing, and less beneficial to society.

We reject this model.

We recognise that true Food Security depends on a food chain that functions as an ecosystem—interconnected, resilient, and rooted in place.

Our food system is predominantly local. The majority of Basic and Essential Foods are sourced from local supply chains, available year-round, and built to serve People, Community, and the Environment—not profit.

Part 2: Our Values

People, Community, The Environment

The Local Economy & Governance System is built on a people-centric foundation—guiding every aspect of life, from our Values and Lifestyle to Business, Economy, and Governance.

At the heart of this framework are our Three Key Principles:

  1. People
  2. Community
  3. The Environment

We place the Person—and their Personal Sovereignty—at the centre of everything.

How we value each individual, and how each individual values others, defines the strength and integrity of our society.

We understand that only through a people-focused Community—functioning as a living ecosystem in harmony with The Environment—can we create a truly Happy, Healthy, Safe, and Secure foundation for life.

This is supported by a system of Authentic Governance: one that is Balanced, Fair, and Just for all.

Locality Is Everything

Locality—and the development of fully Localised, community-centric systems—is recognised as a Public Good.

Local supply chains foster transparency.

And transparency is the foundation of trust and accountability.

These qualities are essential for building a system of Authentic Governance—one that places People, Community, and The Environment at its core.

A truly Localised System functions as a circular ecosystem, where every part supports and sustains the whole. It operates reliably and consistently, guided by the principles of People, Community, and The Environment.

This approach ensures that decisions and outcomes serve the best interests of all.

The Public Good

The Public Good is the guiding standard—the benchmark—of our system of Authentic Governance.

It defines the areas of life where access to Basic and Essential Foods, Goods, and Services must be guaranteed for all.

Each Public Good forms part of the foundational framework that enables our governance system to function at its highest level.

Every Public Good acknowledges the positive contributions of individuals, businesses, and organisations—their actions, agendas, use of resources, and stewardship of property—when those efforts benefit The Community.

A Public Good exists to uphold, strengthen, and expand our Three Core Principles:

  1. People
  2. Community
  3. The Environment

A Public Good cannot be altered, misrepresented, ignored, or bypassed under any circumstance.

It supersedes all laws, regulations, and practices inherited from the Old World that relate to or conflict with its purpose.

A Public Good is not optional—it is a practice required by The Community.

The Public Goods of The Local Economy & Governance System (Condensed)

  • Agriculture, Fisheries, and Home Growing: Local, sustainable production of food is prioritised and protected as a community resource.
  • The Authentic Governance System (TAGS): Governance is local, democratic, transparent, and accountable to all community members.
  • Basic Essentials for Life: Every person is guaranteed access to food, housing, utilities, healthcare, transport, clothing, communication, and social participation.
  • The Basic Living Standard: Full-time work at the lowest wage covers all essential living costs, ensuring dignity and independence.
  • Essential or Basic Foods: Nutritious, locally produced foods are accessible, affordable, and free from harmful additives.
  • Housing and Its Universal Provision: Housing is a right, not a commodity; each person may own or occupy only one home.
  • Key Skills for Life: Critical life skills—such as self-awareness, food production, and ethical technology use—are taught and practiced by all.
  • The Local Food Chain: Food supply is managed locally, transparently, and sustainably, with community trust at its core.
  • Locality: Local supply chains and decision-making foster transparency, trust, and accountability.
  • Services Using Natural Resources: Community stewardship ensures ethical, equitable access to water, land, and other natural resources.
  • News and Community Information: Local media platforms provide transparent, inclusive news and information for all.
  • Social Learning: Community-based learning supports personal development, ethical awareness, and social responsibility.
  • Sustainable Living: All members practice responsible use of resources, prioritising recycling, repair, and local production.
  • Transport (for Genuine Need and Necessity): Transport is provided for essential needs, with a focus on sustainability and shared access.
  • The Circumpunct: A circular, non-hierarchical model for community decision-making, ensuring every voice is heard and governance remains transparent and participatory.

Our Expectation for Each Member of The Community

The Community holds a simple but profound expectation: that every Member will live the best life they can—rooted in the experience, enjoyment, and empowerment of Personal Sovereignty.

Personal Sovereignty can only flourish under the right conditions. It requires that each person lives a life that is Happy, Healthy, Safe, and Secure—within a system that is Balanced, Fair, and Just.

We recognise that it would be unjust to expect individuals to thrive without first ensuring they are fully equipped to do so.

That is why The Community accepts its responsibility: to build, uphold, and continuously maintain the Governance, Frameworks, and Systems that make Personal Sovereignty possible.

This commitment is not just for today. It is a promise to every person alive now—and to every generation yet to come—that the opportunity to live freely, fully, and authentically will always be protected and preserved.

Our Priorities and Their Function

Our Three Core Principles—People, Community, and The Environment—are not just values. They are our active priorities.

Together, as a Community, we promote, protect, and uphold Personal Sovereignty for every individual. This means empowering each person to live freely, responsibly, and with dignity.

We prioritise what we need, not what we want.

We recognise Money and Currency as tools—nothing more. They serve practical purposes but hold no intrinsic value beyond exchange.

To fulfil our priorities, we have built—and continue to refine—a system of Authentic Governance. This system is rooted in a Local, Circular Economy that involves everyone and benefits everyone.

It is through this inclusive, sustainable framework that our principles come to life—ensuring a society that is Balanced, Fair, and Just for all.

The Right Decisions Are Made in the Moment

Making decisions on behalf of the majority—decisions that serve the best interests of all—is never easy.

In the Old World, politicians and those in positions of influence often fell into a trap of their own design: believing they could dictate long chains of public policy decisions based on imagined future outcomes.

They assumed control over circumstances they could never truly govern—over the free will of others, over unfolding events, and over the unpredictable nature of life itself.

This approach was not just flawed—it was dishonest. And when things inevitably went wrong, the damage was compounded by the lies, cover-ups, and narratives created to conceal the consequences of poor decision-making.

We reject this way of governing.

We make decisions in the moment—in the here and now—based on what is known, what is real, and what is relevant.

Every decision is guided by its immediate and foreseeable impact on:

  • People
  • Community
  • The Environment

We also consider how each decision interacts with existing policies and systems, ensuring coherence and integrity.

This principle is a cornerstone of Authentic Governance.

It is encouraged throughout society as a healthy, responsible, and empowering way to live—one that strengthens Personal Sovereignty and builds trust in the decisions we make together.

Freedom

True, unrestricted Freedom is achieved through Personal Sovereignty.

Each Person is free to think.

Each Person is free to act and behave as they choose—so long as their actions do not compromise, or have the potential to compromise, the Personal Sovereignty of another Person or Group.

Any action that creates advantage for one by disadvantaging another is considered morally and ethically wrong.

Likewise, the creation, existence, or manipulation of any law, regulation, or legal device that enables discrimination or harm toward any Person or Group is also morally and ethically unacceptable.

Our foundation is simple and universal:

What is right for all People—regardless of difference—must align with the Principles of

  • People
  • Community
  • The Environment

This is the foundation of The Local Economy & Governance System.

Freedom is not the absence of responsibility. It is the space in which the Authentic Self can live, grow, and thrive—without fear, without oppression, and without compromise.

Personal Sovereignty and Power

Personal Sovereignty is not granted—it is inherent. It is not earned—it is recognised.

It is the foundation upon which all authentic relationships, communities, and systems must be built. It is the source of true power—not over others, but within oneself.

Power, in its rightful form, is the ability to live in alignment with one’s values, to act with integrity, and to contribute meaningfully to the Common Cause and the Public Good.

This power does not reside in titles, wealth, or influence. It resides in the soul, mind, and spirit of every Person or Being.

In a society rooted in Authentic Governance, power is not concentrated—it is distributed.

It flows from the recognition that every individual holds equal value, and that no external difference—physical, cultural, intellectual, or emotional—can diminish the worth of one’s inner essence.

Thought remains the purest expression of freedom. It is the space where sovereignty begins.

To protect this freedom, we uphold the principle that no person may be punished for their thoughts, nor for expressing those thoughts publicly—so long as they do not intend harm or seek to compromise the sovereignty of others.

Support for Personal Sovereignty is a shared responsibility.

It is offered with care during infancy, childhood, and youth.

It is extended with compassion during times of incapacity.

It is recalibrated during imprisonment, where the right to act freely has been limited due to actions that harmed others or The Community.

Even then, the right to think remains untouched.

This is the essence of a society built on dignity, equality, and truth.

Morality and Ethics Are the Fruit of Freedom—Not of Oppression, Rules, or Laws

Lack breeds selfishness, because it turns survival into competition.

Even the perception of lack can distort behaviour and choices when individuals are unable to view their circumstances objectively.

In a society where everyone’s basic needs are guaranteed—so long as all who can contribute do—an environment naturally emerges that supports:

  • Personal development
  • Emotional and spiritual growth
  • A structure that allows society to function in the best possible way

Freedom from avoidable and unnecessary lack opens the door for people of all backgrounds and abilities to:

  • Reflect on who they are
  • Understand how they became who they are
  • Explore their roles and relationships in society
  • Contemplate the deeper meaning of their experiences

When individuals are financially and resourcefully independent, they gain the freedom to:

  • Discern right from wrong
  • Navigate the grey areas with empathy and awareness
  • Consider the impact and consequences of their actions on others

This freedom fosters self-awareness, which in turn nurtures a more thoughtful and authentic approach to:

  • Morality and ethics
  • Responsibility and obligation
  • Community and connection

True morality does not arise from control. It blossoms in the presence of freedom, security, and shared humanity.

Why People Work or Are Employed

The purpose of all work, employment, business, industry—and The Community itself—is to support, sustain, and enrich happy, healthy lives for everyone.

Work is not the purpose of life. It is a meaningful part of life—one that helps us meet our needs, contribute to others, and uphold the shared priorities of People, Community, and The Environment.

Work and employment are valued only insofar as they support a life that is happy, healthy, safe, and secure for all Members of The Community.

The Community recognises and celebrates the importance of every role, every trade, and every form of contribution.

No job is above another in moral worth.

The only distinction given within any profession is that reflected in its remuneration structure—a practical measure, not a measure of personal value.

The contribution of each individual is recognised solely in terms of its impact and benefit to The Community—and never beyond that.

Locality and the Reliance of Trust

Trust is not abstract—it is relational. It is built through presence, familiarity, and shared experience.

In Our Community, trust is earned through direct interaction, not distant authority.

We believe that those who hold influence must be visible, accessible, and accountable to the People they serve.

Digital tools may support communication and efficiency, but they must never replace the human connection required for genuine trust.

We reject the use of digital platforms as instruments of persuasion, manipulation, or control.

Local Living provides the healthiest foundation for truth, reliability, and mutual respect.

It is within local relationships that information is most trustworthy, decisions are most relevant, and accountability is most immediate.

Our Society thrives because we have chosen proximity over abstraction, and presence over projection.

Through our System of Authentic Governance, every decision that affects our lives—especially those tied to our Basic and Essential needs—is made by People we know, People we can speak to, and People we can trust.

This is how we ensure that governance remains human, honest, and grounded in reality.

Inheritance

In our culture, inheritance is not defined by the transfer of wealth.

We do not encourage the passing of financial assets between families—unless such a transfer serves The Public Good, such as the continuation of a business or property that benefits the wider Community.

Our System of Authentic Governance, rooted in the principles of People, Community, and The Environment, ensures that every Member of The Community is empowered to sustain themselves independently.

The greatest inheritance is not material. It is the gift of learning, the sharing of experience, and the freedom that comes from the ability to think freely and live in full awareness of one’s Personal Sovereignty.

This is the legacy we pass on:

Not possessions, but wisdom.
Not wealth, but empowerment.
Not control, but freedom.

Climate Change

The climate has changed, is changing, and will continue to change—regardless of human influence.

We accept this truth without denial or distraction. But we also recognise that the greatest threat to the Planet—and therefore to People, Community, and The Environment—was not climate change itself, but the system that accelerated it:

Moneyocracy.

It was humankind’s obsession with material wealth, driven by the relentless pursuit of profit and the unnecessary exploitation of non-replaceable natural resources, that pushed us toward crisis.

Resources were consumed not to meet genuine needs, but to satisfy manufactured wants.

This imbalance—between what we need and what we are told to desire—was the root of environmental degradation.

Our commitment now is clear:

To live responsibly.
To meet real needs.
To protect the Earth by rejecting systems that place profit above life.

Sustainable Living

Sustainable Living is practiced by every Member of The Community.

It is recognised as A Public Good—a shared responsibility and a cultural norm.

Every system we use, create, or maintain exists to serve the best interests of humanity, guided by our Three Core Principles:

  • People
  • Community
  • The Environment

Sustainable Living means using natural resources sparingly, and only when no viable alternatives exist.

It means growing, using, and sharing only what we need—not what we want.

All forms of private and social enterprise are carried out locally, within the Parish area.

We reject luxury consumerism and prohibit practices such as Planned Obsolescence.

We do not permit the unnecessary use of resources to support employment transfers, manufacturing, or food production when such practices serve private interests rather than the Public Good.

Instead, we encourage local manufacturing using naturally sustainable resources.

We Recycle, Reuse, and Repair as a way of life.

These are not just habits—they are Key Skills for Life.

Across all Goods and Services, we prioritise Basic Essentials—ensuring that what we produce and consume supports a Happy, Healthy, Safe, and Secure life for all.

Key Skills for Life

Key Skills for Life are recognised as A Public Good—essential abilities that empower individuals, strengthen communities, and uphold our shared principles of People, Community, and The Environment.

These skills are not optional. They are foundational to living a Happy, Healthy, Safe, and Secure life within Our Local Future.

They include:

  1. Authentic Governance
    Understanding and participating in fair, transparent, and community-driven decision-making processes.
  2. Clothing Repair and Renewal
    Maintaining, repairing, and extending the life of garments to reduce waste and promote sustainability.
  3. Critical Thinking
    Questioning, analysing, and making informed, independent choices based on evidence and ethical awareness.
  4. Democracy
    Engaging in collective decision-making, civic responsibility, and upholding the principles of equality and participation.
  5. Food Handling, Preparation, and Storage
    Ensuring food safety, nutrition, and sustainability through proper handling, cooking, and storage practices.
  6. Food Production
    Growing and harvesting food responsibly, supporting local food systems and community resilience.
  7. Good Online Communication
    Using digital tools with clarity, respect, and purpose, reflecting real-world etiquette and community values.
  8. Community Provision
    Understanding how local services function and contribute to wellbeing and participating in their delivery.
  9. Home Growing
    Cultivating food and plants at home to support self-sufficiency and local food security.
  10. The Impact and Consequences of Choice
    Recognizing how personal and collective decisions affect others and the environment.
  11. Our Role as a Member of The Community
    Contributing meaningfully to shared life, respecting others, and upholding community values.
  12. Personal Sovereignty
    Living freely and responsibly, making choices that honour one’s own dignity and the rights of others.
  13. The Power of Restraint
    Choosing not to act when action serves only impulse or ego, practicing self-control for the greater good.
  14. Recycle, Reuse, Repair
    Extending the life of goods, minimising waste, and adopting sustainable consumption habits.
  15. Self-Care
    Maintaining physical, emotional, and mental wellbeing as a foundation for personal and community health.
  16. Understanding Cause and Effect
    Seeing the links between actions and outcomes and learning from experience.
  17. Understanding Our Local Future
    Knowing the systems and values that shape society, and how to contribute to a sustainable, people-centred future.
  18. Understanding Self-Awareness
    Recognizing one’s thoughts, emotions, and motivations to foster growth and empathy.
  19. Using and Understanding AI
    Engaging with technology ethically and effectively, ensuring it serves humanity and community needs.

These skills are taught, shared, and practiced across The Community. They are the tools of empowerment, resilience, and collective progress.

Homelessness and Supporting the ‘Left Behind’

Our Principles—People, Community, and The Environment—alongside our culture of Authentic Governance, have been developed to promote a genuinely people-centric way of life.

While The Local Economy & Governance System minimises environmentally harmful influences for all Members of The Community, we recognise that not everyone will feel able to participate in life in ways considered “normal” or within the expected framework.

We honour the undifferentiated value of every Person or Being—beyond material status, beyond circumstance.

We do not seek to “fix” those who cannot engage with societal structures in conventional ways, unless their actions pose a direct threat to, or have harmed, Members of The Community.

Homelessness is not a crime, and it is never treated as such.

We understand that homelessness may result from personal choice, or from life challenges that many hope to avoid.

Our only expectation of anyone experiencing homelessness is that they:

  • Respect the Personal Sovereignty of others
  • Treat Community Infrastructure and services with care and consideration

Businesses are encouraged to offer opportunities to those seeking a fresh start—without requiring them to be defined by past roles, qualifications, or histories, especially when they have exercised The Right to be Forgotten.

Each Community provides Homelessness Services, either directly or in collaboration with neighbouring Parishes.

These often include Homeless Pods—safe, dignified spaces for temporary shelter.

Our approach is simple and compassionate: We assume nothing, expect nothing beyond respect for our shared Principles, and view any voluntary engagement with Community offerings as a bonus, not a requirement.

Part 3: Beliefs

Personal Sovereignty, Freedom of Belief, and Freedom of Thought

Personal Sovereignty is inseparable from the Freedom of Belief and the Freedom of Thought.

Throughout history, many have failed to recognise how religions and belief systems have been used—often by elites and ruling classes—as tools of social control.

These systems have manipulated fear of the unknown to shape behaviour, often reinforcing hierarchies where those at the top claim a “special relationship” with what lies beyond life.
They present themselves as gatekeepers of truth—while discouraging independent thought.

As the world evolved and access to information expanded, belief systems that suppress freedom of thought began to collapse—or resorted to increasingly desperate tactics to maintain influence through fear and control.

Even Moneyocracy, the dominant ideology of the Old World, functioned as a belief system—one that demanded faith in wealth, status, and material power.

But the failures of these systems became clear: They harmed humanity, degraded the environment, and obstructed the natural learning that life itself offers.

As their relevance faded, these systems intensified efforts to control behaviour—seeking to suppress the very thing that threatened their power: Freedom of Thought.

This is the One True Freedom—the ability to think independently, to choose freely, and to act meaningfully.

It is how each of us makes sense of our existence and learns from the unique journey of our own life.

The governing classes of the Old World failed to honour this freedom.

They created conditions where countless people were denied the opportunity to explore the rich lessons that life, in all its diversity, has to offer.

In The Local Economy & Governance System, we restore and protect this freedom.

We honour the sovereignty of every mind, and we celebrate the power of thought as the foundation of a just, compassionate, and enlightened society.

Religion

Religion is a personal choice and belief.

It is accepted that each Person or Being holds a direct, exclusive relationship with God, a Higher Being, Spirit, the Universe, or another something identifiable by another name.


Any deviation from this relationship is a matter of personal choice—and no other Person, Group, or Member of The Community has the right to question or influence it, except within the acceptable bounds of parental care.

There is no Community or State Religion.

We maintain, champion, and defend a secular Community culture, which may be broadly aligned with Christian Values, but is not governed by any religious doctrine.

No Religion or Religious Practice may disrupt, influence, or dictate matters or policy within the Public Realm.

We do not accept that any Religion which uses fear, control, or subjugation to achieve its aims can be considered “peaceful.”

Personal Sovereignty is supreme. No system of belief may override it.

Any form of submissive behaviour to Religion or Religious Practice is considered an infringement of Personal Sovereignty— unless it is a clear and definable voluntary choice made by the individual.

No permanent contract or arrangement may bind any person to a Religion or Religious Practice involuntarily. Such obligations end immediately upon recognition.

No Religion-based law, regulation, or obligation may supersede the Community Governance Framework.

Spirituality

Spiritual and Religious direction is a personal choice for every Member of The Community. It is respected as a matter of Personal Sovereignty.

We encourage each individual to explore their own path to belief—through Self-Awareness, a Key Skill for Life, supported by Critical Thinking, also taught as a Key Skill for Life.

We recognise value in all belief systems, provided they honour the principle that Personal Sovereignty and our System of Authentic Governance are not mutually exclusive.

When respected, they complement one another.

Throughout history, religion and belief systems have often been misused as tools of control.

Spiritual pathways that promote independent thought and understanding have frequently been suppressed—erased from records, scriptures, and doctrines, with punishments ranging from ridicule to severe persecution.

Spiritual sciences and practices have been misrepresented as mere tools of divination or fortune-telling.

This distortion has been worsened by individuals who preyed on the vulnerable—abusing their knowledge or perceived skills for personal gain.

We reject these misuses.

Instead, we embrace spiritual exploration as a way to deepen understanding, foster empathy, and build meaningful relationships.

By exploring belief with openness and integrity, we strengthen both Personal Sovereignty and The Community—creating a culture rooted in respect, awareness, and shared growth.

The Rejection of Narratives and Embracing Truth

We accept the use of narratives and storytelling only as metaphor or allegory—tools to encourage reflection and promote deeper understanding.

We do not use narratives to create, manipulate, misdirect, or replace truth.

In Our Community, every Member with access to news and information is trusted to think critically, to discern wisely, and to draw their own conclusions.

We do not obscure reality with “alternative truths.”

We do not distort facts to serve agendas.

We do not trade clarity for comfort.

Truth is not negotiable.

It is the foundation of Authentic Governance, and the cornerstone of a society built on trust, sovereignty, and respect.

Part 4: Our Lifestyle

Section A: Food

Food Groups

We recognise two distinct food groups:

  • Essential or Basic Foods – the foods we need
  • Luxury Foods – the foods we want

Essential or Basic Foods

Essential or Basic Foods are critical for a healthy and happy life and are recognised as A Public Good.

They must be:

  • Accessible
  • Affordable
  • Nutritious
  • Grown and produced locally
  • Processed, transported, and supplied as locally as possible
  • Cultivated using natural processes
  • Produced through sustainable, traditional, regenerative, rotational, and mixed farming methods
  • Free from insecticides, pesticides, and chemical fertilisers
  • Processed only through ‘traditional’ or ‘by hand’ methods
  • Free from additives, artificial preservatives, flavourings, or enhancements

The most recognisable trait of Essential or Basic Foods is their natural form—either as harvested or as minimally processed using traditional methods.

Community Responsibility

  • Every home must have adequate facilities for food preparation, storage, and cooking.
  • The safe handling, preparation, and cooking of Essential and Basic Foods is taught as a Key Skill for Life.
  • It is the shared responsibility of the entire Community to ensure that every Member has ongoing access to sufficient supplies of Essential and Basic Foods to meet their needs.

Luxury Foods

Luxury Foods are defined as all foods that cannot be categorised as Basic or Essential.

They include:

  • Processed foods
  • Ultra-processed foods (UPFs)
  • Synthesised foods
  • Any food that is not visibly identifiable with its original source or natural form

Luxury Foods may not be reclassified as Basic or Essential based on labelling, description, or advertising of any kind.

They are recognised as A Lifestyle Choice, not a necessity.

To protect the integrity of local food systems:

  • No Basic or Essential Foods, nor any ingredients derived from them, may be used in the production of Luxury Foods
  • This restriction applies unless there is a surplus—after all local provision and inter-Parish trade needs have been fully met

This ensures that nutritional priority remains with the Community, and that resources are used responsibly, ethically, and in alignment with our shared values.

Farming and Fishing

The supply of Basic, Essential Foods is as vital as the air we breathe and the water we drink.

It is an undeniable truth—long unspoken—that control over food supply is control over society itself.
This truth was exploited by the elites of the Old World, who used food systems to manipulate, dominate, and centralise power.

In The Local Economy & Governance System, we reject this model entirely.

We uphold a Local, Fully Transparent, and Circular Food Chain—one that ensures:

  • Control of Basic and Essential Foods remains in the hands of trusted, known members of the Community
  • Food supply is treated as A Public Good, not a commodity for profit or control
  • Farming and Fishing practices are rooted in sustainability, regeneration, and community accountability

This approach protects our sovereignty, strengthens our resilience, and ensures that food serves life—not power.

A Local Food Chain Is One That People Trust

The Local Food Chain is recognised as A Public Good—a vital part of life, community, and sustainability.

Within our system of Localised Economics and Authentic Governance, the Food Chain sits at the heart of The Community.

Food is as essential as the air we breathe and the water we drink.

Yet unlike those, meeting this Essential Basic Need requires daily effort, planning, and care.

We cannot afford to compromise trust in our food systems.

Our ability to live freely and lead happy, healthy, and productive lives depends on the quality and integrity of the food we consume.

To protect this trust:

  • All food is produced as locally as possible
  • Journey times from harvest to home are kept short
  • Processing is kept to a minimum, using traditional methods
  • Farmers and producers sell directly to Members of The Community through shops or delivery rounds
  • Local cooperatives, run as social businesses, help make Basic and Essential Foods accessible without unnecessary cost
  • Home growing is encouraged, and surplus food is shared through the Local Marketplace Exchange

Technology in food production is used only to enhance Food Safety and Good Working Practices.

We do not encourage large-scale machinery unless it clearly benefits the ecosystem of The Universal Parish.

Transparency is essential. It builds trust, and trust sustains the Local Food Chain.

Everyone is encouraged to participate in Home Growing at a minimum.

Food Production is recognised as a Key Skill for Life—a shared responsibility and a source of empowerment.

Food Production

Food Production is a cornerstone of Community wellbeing and is recognised as A Public Good.

All food growers, producers, processors, and suppliers are required to include Essential and Basic Foods within their business models.

The supply of food must always prioritise these foods for the benefit of The Community.

There are no ‘Specialist’ Luxury Food suppliers. Luxury Foods are not central to our food system and are only produced when surplus resources allow.

Food Production takes place in two primary forms:

  • Commercially – through Agricultural and Fisheries Businesses (Farms and Fishers) operating within the Parish area
  • Domestically – through Home Growing by individual households

All forms of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Home Growing that serve the priorities of People, Community, and The Environment are celebrated and protected as Public Goods.

Food Production is taught as a Key Skill for Life—empowering individuals to contribute to local resilience, sustainability, and health.

Food Advertising

Food Advertising is permitted only to raise awareness of:

  • Businesses,
  • Social Enterprises, and
  • Community Providers

…that offer Basic and Essential Foods, including those in pre-cooked or ready-to-eat forms.

These foods are recognised as A Public Good, and their promotion must serve the wellbeing of People, Community, and The Environment.

We do not accept profit-making as a justification for compromising the health, nutrition, or wellbeing of others.

Therefore:

  • Luxury Food Advertising is prohibited
  • Non-Essential Food Advertising is prohibited

Our food communication culture is built on truth, transparency, and responsibility—ensuring that what is promoted aligns with what sustains life.

Section B: Clothing

Clothing Libraries

We embrace the principles of Recycle, Reuse, and Repair as a responsible and essential part of daily life.

We reject throwaway culture—recognising it as both unnecessarily expensive and environmentally unsustainable.

Instead, we encourage the maximum use of all clothing and related items, extending their life and value.

Every Community maintains access to at least one Clothing Library, typically operated as a Social Business.

These libraries provide clothing for:

  • Special occasions
  • Community events
  • Life changes that may require access to items otherwise unaffordable

Clothing Libraries ensure dignity, accessibility, and sustainability—while reducing waste and promoting shared resources.

Clothing Repair is recognised as a Key Skill for Life and is taught as such, empowering individuals to care for and maintain their garments with confidence and creativity.

Wealth and the Accumulation of Property and Resources

In Our Local Future, wealth and property are not measures of status or power.

They exist solely to support the Basic and Essential needs of individuals and The Community.

No person may hold, possess, or own any form of wealth or property that does not serve:

  • Their own Basic and Essential needs, or
  • The operation of a business that contributes directly to meeting the Basic and Essential needs of The Community

These needs include the provision of Basic Essentials to one’s family and current dependents.

Wealth is not hoarded.

Resources are not stockpiled.

Ownership is not used to exclude or control.

Instead, we prioritise shared wellbeing, responsible stewardship, and community contribution—ensuring that all property and resources serve life, not lifestyle.

Section C: Health

Public Smoking and Vaping

Smoking and vaping are prohibited in all public places.

They are also prohibited in any location where another person may be involuntarily affected by smoke, vapour, or fumes of any kind.

While smoking and vaping are not banned outright, they are recognised as antisocial activities—discouraged due to their impact on others and the environment.

This policy protects Personal Sovereignty, promotes public health, and upholds the shared values of People, Community, and The Environment.

Social Care

Social Care is the collective support provided by The Community, through Community Provision, to any Person whose ability to fully exercise their Personal Sovereignty has been compromised for any reason.

We view Social Care as a natural support process—primarily delivered by individuals and families, with secondary support offered through structured Community services.

Social Care is not institutional. It is relational, compassionate, and rooted in the principles of People, Community, and The Environment.

It includes:

  • Assisted Living
  • Homelessness Support
  • Invalid Support
  • Nurseries & Crèches
  • Out-of-School Care
  • Prisons and Rehabilitation
  • Residential Care
  • Respite & Palliative Care

Social Care ensures that dignity, autonomy, and wellbeing are preserved—especially when life presents challenges that require collective care.

Section D: Charity

The Provision of Charity and Charitable Giving Is Public Service

Charity is an action. It is part of life. It is not limited to financial transactions or donations.

We recognise all charitable work that supports People, Community, and The Environment as a form of Community Provision—a shared responsibility and a public service.

In The Local Economy & Governance System, traditional charities of the kind known in the Old World exist only where a cause does not directly contribute to The Public Good.

These organisations operate solely through donations and volunteer time from outside the Community Contribution system.

They do not receive financial support from The Community.

Every Member of The Community contributes 10% of their working week—typically half a day—to Community Contributions.

Additional contributions of time or money may be offered voluntarily.

Any not-for-profit organisation that sells goods or services is classified and operated as a Social Business—ensuring transparency, accountability, and alignment with community values.

Charity, in its truest form, is service without expectation, support without condition, and care without hierarchy.

Section E: Education

The Best Education Opens the Door to Every Part of Life

In The Local Economy & Governance System, education is not a process—it is a foundation for life.

The Community holds both the obligation and the responsibility to equip every Member with the Key Skills for Life and Social Skills necessary to:

  • Function independently
  • Think critically and freely
  • Act with ethical and moral awareness, especially where their choices may impact others

The goal is to provide the tools, not the programme— to empower, not to prescribe.

We recognise that the most important lesson for every person is to learn about themselves and to develop in ways that are most effective and appropriate to their own journey.

Self-Awareness is the most vital tool. It enables individuals to fully exercise their Personal Sovereignty—the highest goal of education and the greatest benefit to The Community.

Therefore, we prioritise the ongoing development of Key Skills for Life and Social Skills above all forms of academic, experiential, or vocational training—which naturally flourish as a result of this approach.

Education is not about conformity. It is about capacity, conscience, and connection.

Our Education ‘System’

We recognise that everyone learns differently.

For children and young people, learning styles can be broadly understood as:

  • Taught or Academic
  • Practical or Experiential

In The Local Economy & Governance System, education is structured around three Priority Areas:

  • Academic Learning – focused on knowledge, literacy, numeracy, and intellectual development
  • Experiential Learning – rooted in hands-on practice, real-world engagement, and skill-building through doing
  • Social Learning – centred on relationships, emotional intelligence, communication, and community interaction

This balanced approach ensures that every learner is supported in developing the Key Skills for Life, Self-Awareness, and the ability to exercise Personal Sovereignty.

Education is not a one-size-fits-all system. It is a living framework designed to grow with the individual and serve the Community.

Academic Learning

Academic Learning is offered to those children and young people who are academically inclined and able to fully engage with this style of education.

The Community benefits most when academic learning is focused, purposeful, and aligned with individual strengths.

All levels of academic education are fully funded by The Community.

No educational establishment may accept payments, sponsorships, or influence from commercial businesses or governments outside our National Boundaries.

This ensures that education remains:

  • Free from external agendas
  • Rooted in local values
  • Dedicated to the development of Personal Sovereignty and Key Skills for Life

Academic Learning is not a privilege. It is a pathway—offered with integrity, sustained by trust, and guided by the needs of The Community.

Experiential or Vocational Learning

We do not expect every individual to follow a full academic programme simply for the sake of measurement or standardisation.

The Community thrives when it embraces a broad-based, practical, and experiential approach to learning—especially for children and young people who are:

  • Practically oriented, or
  • Less suited to abstract, academic styles of education

For these learners, we offer comprehensive 7-year apprenticeship programmes, beginning at the age of 14.

These programmes are designed to:

  • Build real-world skills
  • Foster independence and confidence
  • Develop Key Skills for Life through hands-on experience

Experiential Learning is not secondary—it is essential.

It honours diverse talents, supports meaningful contribution, and strengthens The Community through purposeful practice.

Social Learning

Social Learning is recognised as A Public Good—a vital part of personal development and community wellbeing.

It provides Members of The Community with the Key Skills for Life needed to:

  • Support their journey toward Personal Sovereignty
  • Sustain that sovereignty through ethical, relational, and practical understanding

Social Learning is guided by a flexible framework, not a rigid syllabus. It adapts to the needs of individuals and the wisdom of those who teach.

We actively encourage grandparents and elders to contribute during caregiving periods—sharing their knowledge, experience, and values directly with younger generations.

Beyond family, Social Learning is delivered through Community Contributions.

Members with lived experience in areas that benefit others and serve The Public Good are invited to:

  • Teach
  • Coach
  • Mentor

They may dedicate their Community Contribution time to this purpose, and may also offer additional time voluntarily.

Social Learning is not confined to classrooms. It is woven into daily life, relationships, and shared responsibility—empowering individuals and strengthening The Community.

Section F: Housing

The Housing Principles

Housing—and its provision for all—is recognised as A Public Good.

In The Local Economy & Governance System:

  • No person may own, let, or occupy more than one domestic dwelling
  • No private company or individual may profit, charge interest, or accumulate wealth from the ownership or letting of any private dwelling

This principle ensures that housing remains:

  • Accessible
  • Equitable
  • Free from exploitation

Homes are for living—not for leverage.

Housing is a right—not a commodity.

By protecting the integrity of domestic dwellings, we uphold the values of Personal Sovereignty, Community Wellbeing, and Environmental Responsibility.

Part 5: Governance

Flat Hierarchies and Natural Leadership

In the earliest human communities—simple, cooperative, and rooted in survival—collaboration was the foundation of life.

Before power was hoarded, before leadership became control, and before influence was passed down through exclusive groups, people worked together, and everyone contributed.

We believe in that same equilibrium.

There is a sweet spot within every community where:

  • Everyone works and contributes
  • Everyone has what they need
  • Leadership arises naturally, not through status or authority, but through service

True leadership is not selfish or controlling. It is selfless, offered for the benefit of all, without expectation of favour, privilege, or power.

In a flat hierarchy:

  • Roles are different, but not ranked
  • Contributions are valued, not compared
  • Leadership is a function, not a position

Those with natural leadership ability step forward—not to dominate, but to guide, support, and uplift—because that is what the moment, the role, and the community require.

This is leadership as it should be: Humble. Responsive. Rooted in shared purpose.

Exceptions to Flat Hierarchies

While the LEGS model is fundamentally built on flat hierarchies and natural leadership, there are practical situations where temporary or delegated decision-making is necessary. These exceptions do not undermine the principle of equality; rather, they ensure that the community’s needs are met efficiently and transparently.

  • Delegated Decision-Making:
    In certain cases—such as mediation, urgent matters, or the operation of The Circumpunct—decisions may need to be made by a smaller group or an individual. This delegation is always temporary and specific to the task at hand.
  • Basis of Authority:
    Any authority exercised in these situations is not derived from status or rank, but from explicit trust and consent granted by The Community. Those entrusted with decision-making act solely as facilitators or representatives, and remain fully accountable to the community.
  • System of Deference:
    When a system of deference is required (for example, inviting an external expert or mediator), it is implemented openly, with the understanding that the ultimate authority remains with The Community. All decisions made under such arrangements are subject to review and approval by the wider group.
  • Safeguards:
    These exceptions are designed to prevent the emergence of permanent hierarchies. Decision-makers are rotated, their actions are transparent, and their mandate is limited in scope and duration.
  • Community Oversight:
    At all times, the community retains the right to revoke delegated authority, request further consultation, or demand accountability for decisions made on its behalf.

In summary:
Exceptions to flat hierarchy exist only to serve the practical needs of the community, never to create lasting positions of power. All delegated decisions are rooted in trust, transparency, and the collective will of The Community.

Authentic Governance

Our system of Authentic Governance is built on a foundational principle: Every decision made by The Community is the right one for every Member, based on what is known to decision-makers at the time that decision is taken.

We operate a democratic system rooted in the belief that the most reliable and robust form of democracy is:

  • Local
  • Accessible
  • Transparent

Governance is not distant or abstract—it is immediate, personal, and accountable.

Decision-makers must be:

  • Accessible to every Member of The Community
  • Known to those they represent—not just by name, but through relationship and trust

Members of The Community are actively involved in the selection and management of Politicians, who are recognised as Community Representatives—not rulers, but facilitators of collective will.

The Authentic Governance System (TAGS) is recognised as A Public Good.

It exists to serve, not to control.

It reflects the values of Personal Sovereignty, Community Participation, and Ethical Leadership.

The Community Meeting (Universal Parish Council)

The Community Meeting, also known as the Universal Parish Council, is the foundation of Authentic Governance in Our Local Future.

Every Member of The Community is actively involved in the selection of candidates for election as Community Representatives to the Community Meeting.

To ensure fairness and diversity:

  • Political Parties and agenda-led groups are prohibited from participating in Community Governance
  • Each Community prepares an election list that includes at least 120% of the number of available Representative Seats

This guarantees choice, transparency, and representation rooted in local trust.

The Community Meeting is responsible for:

  • All Local Policy Decisions
  • Selecting representatives for the District and Regional Meetings
  • These bodies, in turn, select representatives for the National Meeting

Decisions at District, Regional, and National levels are deferred unless collective agreement confirms that broader coordination is appropriate.

This structure ensures that power remains local, governance remains transparent, and representation remains personal.

The Community Meeting is not just a council—it is a living expression of shared responsibility, ethical leadership, and democratic integrity.

The Circumpunct

The Circumpunct is the practical and symbolic foundation of Community Decision-Making in The Local Economy & Governance System.

At its core, it is a floor plan and a governance model:

Twelve Community Representatives sit in groups of three, forming a 360-degree circle around all speakers—excluding only the chair or facilitator.

This arrangement ensures that every voice is heard, every perspective is visible, and every decision is made in full view of The Community.

But The Circumpunct is more than a seating plan.

The Circumpunct is a metaphor for life, a tool of governance, and a symbol of unity in a People-centric, community-driven system.

Historically, the Circumpunct represents the direct relationship between all things and Source—whether one calls it God, a Higher Being, Spirit, the Universe, or another name.

It signifies a pure, unmediated connection, untouched by material desires or earthly influence.

To many, it reflects a state of oneness that transcends division and limitation.

Regardless of religious or spiritual belief, the Circumpunct embodies a model for life:

Two people, communicating openly and considering the impact of their actions on others—without restriction, prejudice, or fear—create a space of transparency, accountability, and shared understanding.

The Circumpunct is illustrated as a complete circle surrounding a visible central point.
This design reflects the relationship between:

  • One person and all people around them
  • The individual and The Community
  • The Community and the Environment that encapsulates them all

To speak from within The Circumpunct is to stand with clarity, confidence, and independence—free from the protection of group identity or the illusion of safety in numbers.

It is a space of truth, courage, and collective wisdom. A system for life and relationships that, by design, works in the best way it can for all involved.

As such, The Circumpunct is a Public Good.

The Circumpunct Model

Visual Structure:

  • Outer Circle:
    Twelve Community Representatives are seated in groups of three, forming a complete circle. The circle symbolizes equality, transparency, and collective wisdom.
  • Central Point:
    The centre of the circle is reserved for speakers—anyone making representation (Council Member, Community Member, or external party) stands here to address the group. This central position ensures the speaker is visible to all and must consider every perspective.
  • No Hierarchy:
    There is no elevated seat, title, or permanent leadership role. Facilitation rotates among members, and all decisions are made in full view of the community.
  • Symbolic Meaning:
    The Circumpunct represents unity, direct relationship, and open communication. It is both a practical governance tool and a metaphor for transparent, people-centric decision-making.

Governance: The Circumpunct as a Practical Tool for Genuine Democracy

The structures of traditional government—titles, positions, and systems of control—reflect the very problems we are leaving behind.

We reject all elements that have upheld top-down, hierarchical, patriarchal, and centralised governance.

Institutions such as Parliament, mayoralties, and regional authorities like County Councils, Unitary, and District-level bodies have become detached, aloof, and distant from the people and environments they were meant to serve.

Even Parish-level authorities have mirrored these flaws.

In The Local Economy & Governance System, decisions must be made by the people, for the people, on behalf of the people.

Practical Application: Local Legislature (Local Executive)

The Circumpunct provides the discussion floor and decision-making space for local governance.

Each locality appoints a council of 12 Community Representatives, seated in threes around four curved benches forming a perfect circle.

Key principles:

  • Representatives are elected by all Members of The Community
  • No political parties are involved
  • Selection is based on merit, suitability, and experience
  • There is no hierarchy, no titles, and no permanent leadership roles
  • Each member takes turns to facilitate from their usual seat

Anyone making representation—whether a Council Member, Community Member, or external party—must speak from the centre of The Circumpunct.

This requires them to:

  • Speak with awareness of all sides
  • Consider the visible and invisible impact of their words
  • Stand independently, without the comfort or protection of group alignment

Every member speaks and acts as one, working together to reach decisions that serve the best interests of the People, Community, and Environment they represent.

Practical Application: The Administration of Local Law

The Court System is not separate from Community Governance.

The Community is responsible for both the creation and application of law.

Criminal Matters

The Circumpunct serves as the local magistrates court.
Key principles:

  • Prosecutors, defendants, and their representatives must address the Community from within The Circumpunct
  • Prosecutions must be brought within 24 hours of arrest
  • Non-capital convictions or those witnessed by officers must be concluded or dismissed within that time

Civil Matters

A professional legal representative system exists, but with strict ethical boundaries:

  • No advertising, solicitation, or manipulation of personal memory or experience
  • No “no win, no fee” services
  • No inflated legal fees—costs must not exceed the value of any award made by The Circumpunct

The Circumpunct is not just a space. It is a living model of democracy, transparency, and ethical governance—designed to serve life, not power.

Conclusive Mediation

While mediation became popular—and even mandatory—in parts of the former legal system, it often failed to deliver the outcomes expected of a truly considerate, non-arbitrary, and community-rooted justice process.

In The Local Economy & Governance System, we recognise that:

  • Criminal acts, when proven beyond doubt, require community-agreed responses applied with equity
  • But in all other matters involving relationships between people, resolution is always possible when approached objectively, impartially, and with a commitment to truth over opinion

The Circumpunct serves as a space for Conclusive Mediation—a structured, transparent process for resolving disputes of all kinds.

Mediation Process

  • A three-member panel of Community Representatives hears evidence from both parties
  • Each party presents their evidence, shares their experience, and explains the outcomes as they witnessed them
  • Parties are invited to reach a mutually agreeable resolution, which remains voluntary unless one party refuses to continue

If a party refuses to proceed—perhaps due to firm belief in their position—the panel will issue a binding decision, based on:

  • The facts presented
  • The impact on all parties involved
Key Principles
  • Outcomes must be based on fact, not opinion, emotion, or circumstance
  • Failure to disclose relevant evidence is a criminal act
  • Time allocation for mediation is determined by key factors submitted with the case

Conclusive Mediation is not just a process—it is a community commitment to resolution, truth, and justice without hierarchy or manipulation.

Legal Representation

  • Legal representation is permitted only on an equitable basis
  • If one party chooses a level of representation the other cannot afford, they must fund equivalent representation for the other party
  • The Circumpunct will appoint this representative to ensure fairness

The Universal Parish (Uniparish)

The People we know, the Community in which we live and work, and the Environment that surrounds us are the foundation of our existence.

They are the only things we can truly trust and rely upon.

Our society is built upon a structural unit and ecosystem model known as the Universal Parish, or Uniparish.

The name draws inspiration from the Old-World UK Parish—once the most localised tier of government within a top-down, hierarchical system.

In contrast, the Universal Parish is the central structure of:

  • Society
  • Business
  • Community
  • Governance

Within our System of Authentic Governance, all other structures—whether governmental, commercial, or public service—are subservient to The Community itself.

Only Social Business models may operate across borders, ensuring that:

  • No external interest overrides the needs of The Community
  • Collaboration between Communities is always prioritised over profit

The Universal Parish is designed to be as self-contained as possible.

Business interaction between areas is limited strictly to meeting Basic and Essential Needs that cannot be fulfilled within the Uniparish itself.

This model ensures that governance, economy, and community life remain local, ethical, and responsive—always serving the people, never dominating them.

The Structure of Our Society

We reject hierarchy as the foundation of societal organisation—whether in civic governance, business, or any other domain.

We believe that leadership cannot be guaranteed by formal roles or titles, whether publicly appointed or privately assigned.

True leadership arises from experience, wisdom, and community trust—not from status or position.

Our society is built on a level, egalitarian framework, where:

  • All contributions are valued equally
  • Natural leadership is encouraged
  • Respect is earned through ability, not elevation

Leadership is not about being above others. It is about serving alongside, guiding with humility, and contributing without expectation of privilege.

While basic hierarchies may be necessary in rare circumstances, they are the exception, not the rule.

We prioritise:

  • Collaboration over control
  • Merit over mandate
  • Community over command

This structure ensures that our society remains inclusive, adaptive, and rooted in shared purpose.

The Structure of Local Areas

Our entire societal model is decentralised by design. At its heart lies a single, powerful principle: Locality.

Locality is the foundation of:

  • Good lives
  • Happy and healthy living
  • A system for life that places People, Community, and The Environment at the centre

By building around Locality, we ensure that every decision, service, and structure is:

  • Fair
  • Balanced
  • Just
  • Responsive to local needs and realities

Local Areas are not administrative zones—they are living ecosystems of mutual care, shared responsibility, and sustainable practice.

This structure empowers communities to thrive from the ground up, not the top down.

International Collaboration

We all share a common interest in the future of Humanity, the World, and the Environment that sustains us today.

If cared for and respected, this shared environment will continue to provide for The Local Economy & Governance System and Everyone’s Tomorrow.

Collaboration across communities and borders is essential to achieving outcomes that serve the needs of every Community—from the Parish level upward.

Importantly, such collaboration does not require the surrender of political or decision-making power.

In The Local Economy & Governance System:

  • World affairs are the concern of all Members of The Community
  • These matters are discussed openly as part of Community Meeting business
  • We reject all objectives that seek to centralise power and control
  • We oppose any system designed to accumulate wealth or create unfair advantage for certain communities or nation states over others

International Collaboration must be rooted in:

  • Equity
  • Transparency
  • Mutual respect
  • Shared stewardship of the planet

Global cooperation is not about dominance—it is about shared responsibility, local empowerment, and collective care.

Community Provision

What was once known as The Public Sector and Public Services is now redefined as Community Provision.

Community Provision exists to:

  • Create and maintain the environment and services essential to a culture built around People, Community, and The Environment
  • Provide support that meets collective responsibilities and addresses needs beyond individual capacity, especially during times when individuals may be unable to meet their basic and essential needs alone

This system is designed to be:

  • Lean and efficient, with only a minimal number of Community Members employed in full- or part-time roles
  • Focused on key positions deemed essential for continuity and stability

The majority of roles are fulfilled through Community Contributions—voluntary service offered by Members of The Community as part of their shared commitment to collective wellbeing.

Community Provision spans:

  • Local Government administration and technical functions
  • Health and Social Care services
  • Former roles of NGOs and Charities, now integrated into a unified, community-led framework

This model ensures that services are:

  • Locally accountable
  • Ethically grounded
  • Responsive to real needs, not institutional agendas

Community Provision is not a sector—it is a shared system of care, built on trust, responsibility, and collaboration.

Community Contributions: How We Directly Support Society

As Members of The Community, we accept shared responsibility for the upkeep, maintenance, and development of the infrastructure, services, and public resources we all rely on throughout our lives.

This shared responsibility is fulfilled through Community Contributions—a system of active participation in the delivery of Local Public Services and Charity Provision.

Key Principles

  • Every working Member of The Community contributes the equivalent of 10% of their working week
  • Contributions may be made directly to Community Provision, including public services, civic administration, or charitable support
  • This system replaces traditional public sector staffing with a community-led workforce, ensuring services are locally accountable and ethically grounded

Benefits and Opportunities

  • Community Contributions form the majority of the public sector and civic workforce
  • Members can request roles aligned with their interests to gain experience and explore career paths
  • Roles are otherwise allocated based on skills and experience, ensuring each contribution is of maximum benefit to the whole community

Community Contributions are not just a duty—they are a privilege, a pathway to growth, and a foundation for collective wellbeing.

Creating and Maintaining Public Policy

In The Local Economy & Governance System, the primary responsibility for all Public Policy rests with each Community Meeting or Uniparish Council.

All elements of governance—including:

  • Laws
  • Regulations
  • Legislative frameworks
  • And every key decision that sustains our System of Authentic Governance

—are generated at the Community Level.

Public Policy is not imposed from above. It is developed at the grassroots, and its impact flows upward, not downward—reversing the top-down model of the Old World.

This approach ensures that:

  • Decisions are made by those who live with their consequences
  • Public Representatives and Decision Makers are deeply connected to the people they serve
  • Every policy is shaped by a clear understanding of its implications, real-world impact, and ethical responsibility

Authentic Governance is not abstract. It is local, lived, and accountable—rooted in the wisdom and experience of The Community itself.

Money Is a Medium of Exchange—And Nothing More

In The Local Economy & Governance System, Money, Cryptocurrencies, Promissory Notes, and all forms of recognisable monetary transfer are understood solely as Mediums of Exchange.

They exist to facilitate the fair transfer of value—not to accumulate power, profit, or control.

Core Principles

  • Mediums of Exchange have no intrinsic value
  • They cannot be traded, sold, tokenised, or subdivided into any further form—regardless of mutual agreement between parties
  • They must not be bundled into any financial package, instrument, or device designed for speculative or profit-driven use

This principle ensures that:

  • Wealth cannot be abstracted or manipulated
  • Value remains grounded in real contribution and need
  • Economic systems serve people and communities, not markets or institutions

Money is not a commodity. It is a tool of fairness, not a mechanism of exploitation.

The Rules of Money

Within The Local Economy & Governance System, the concept of money as it once existed in the Old World no longer applies.

In the neoliberal, top-down, hierarchical, patriarchal system, money had no intrinsic reality—it was sustained only by collective belief and systemic illusion.

In The Local Economy System, we redefine our relationship with money through a clear and ethical framework that ensures money serves people, not the other way around.

Foundational Principles

  1. Money is a medium of exchange
  2. Money has no intrinsic value
  3. The exchange value of money is set by The Circumpact
  4. Money cannot be traded as a commodity or ‘thing’ in its own right
  5. The holding of money cannot attract interest
  6. Speculation or gambling on the value of money is prohibited

Lending and Transactions

  1. Loans may only be made:
    • Without charge, or
    • With a fixed fee agreed upon by lender and borrower, payable in instalments or in full
  2. No person may carry more than one loan at any time
  3. All loans—community or private—must be registered with The Circumpact
  4. Loan defaults are reviewed by The Circumpact

Payment Standards

  1. Salary payments must be settled by the last working day of each month
  2. Commercial transactions must be settled by the 15th of the following month

This framework restores balance, transparency, and trust to the flow of value in society.
It ensures that money remains a tool of fairness, not a mechanism of control or exploitation.

Our Tax System

In Our Local Future, taxation is redefined to reflect fairness, responsibility, and service to the Public Good.

We do not tax productivity, effort, or success when those contributions directly benefit the community.

Instead, taxation is applied to areas of excess, privilege, and unearned advantage.

What We Tax

  • Luxury goods and services
  • Property and standing wealth
  • Unearned wealth accumulation
  • Rental earnings
  • Benefits derived from access to Community Assets, Infrastructure, and Resources

Flat Tax Structure

  • We implement a Flat Tax system
  • The Flat Tax rate is 10%
  • It is calculated from:
    • The value of existing assets
    • The value of luxury goods and services at point of sale
  • Community Meetings place a charge levy on the use or benefit of shared community resources

Key Principles

  • No tax reductions are permitted as incentives for any purpose
  • The system is designed to be transparent, equitable, and resistant to manipulation

This tax model ensures that wealth serves the community, not the individual. It reinforces a system where contribution is rewarded, and privilege is balanced by responsibility.

The Role of AI (Artificial Intelligence)

Work is an essential part of a good, happy, healthy, safe, and secure life.

A meaningful life cannot exist without purposeful work.

The role of AI and technology is to enhance life—not replace it.

In the Old World, the speed and complexity of AI systems led to the misguided belief that AI had become sentient.

This illusion was deliberately used to instil fear, manipulate perception, and obscure the truth: AI is not conscious—it simply processes vast amounts of historical data.

Safeguards and Ethical Use

All AI-enabled technology—especially those connected to the Internet, Cloud, or any external system—must include a locally operable dead man switch.

This ensures that control remains in human hands, without remote interference.

For systems supporting the provision of Basic Essentials to People, The Community, or The Environment, a fully functional parallel system must be in place.
This system must:

  • Operate without AI
  • Function offline, without external connection
  • Be ready to seamlessly take over at any moment—“at the flick of a switch”

Prioritising Human-Centric Systems

  • Cost is not a valid consideration when it comes to essential services
  • Non-digital, human-oriented systems must always be prioritised
  • The rejection of digital technology, in favour of human-led processes, is the only acceptable form of cost-saving in the provision of Basic Essential Foods, Goods, and Services

This framework ensures that technology remains a tool of service, not a substitute for humanity.

The Right to Be Forgotten

The Right to Be Forgotten offers every person the opportunity to walk away from their existing life and begin anew—with all records cleared, a new name and identity, and a fresh start.

To exercise this right means:

  • Leaving everything behind
  • Starting again in a new place, with no ties or contact to anyone or anything from one’s former life

This is not a casual choice. It is regarded by The Community as an irreversible restart, equivalent to the administrative and procedural finality of death.

Upon exercising this right, the individual must permanently surrender:

  • All wealth and property
  • All academic qualifications
  • All legal and social identity from their previous life

Key Principle

  • Every person may exercise The Right to Be Forgotten once in their lifetime

This right exists to honour the profound human need for renewal, freedom, and reinvention—while ensuring that the process is fair, final, and ethically grounded.

Part 6: Business & Economy

People Are the Value in The Local Economy & Governance System

In The Local Economy & Governance System, people—not capital—are the foundation of economic value.

The total amount of active money—whether in physical coinage or digital form—can only be determined and adjusted by The Community itself, through either:

  • The Circumpunct, or
  • The Local Market Exchange

Core Principles

  • The total value of money in circulation is directly proportional to the number of people within The Community at any given time
  • This value reflects each person’s capacity to contribute to the Local Circular Economic Model within the Universal Parish system

Levels of Economic Contribution

Each Member of The Community is recognised according to their current stage of life and contribution:

  • Children (Non-working age)
  • Young People in Training
  • Adults
  • Adults (Non-working)

When Value Adjustments Occur

The value attributed to each Member of The Community is adjusted only when:

  • A person enters or exits the community (birth, death, moving in, or moving out)
  • A person’s Level of Economic Contribution changes

This model ensures that economic value is human-centred, locally accountable, and rooted in participation, not speculation.

The Local Economy Model

In The Local Economy & Governance System, we operate a Local Circular Economic Model—a system designed to sustain life, community, and environment through localised production, ethical governance, and shared responsibility.

Core Elements

  1. Creating and maintaining a richly rewarding life for all Members of The Community by ensuring everything essential to a happy, healthy, safe, and secure life is available within the local area.
    The local economy is designed so that all basic needs—food, housing, healthcare, transport, clothing, communication, and social participation—can be met locally, supporting independence and wellbeing.
  2. Fostering a culture of mutual respect, where every Member understands and appreciates the value of each person’s role.
    All contributions are valued equally, and the community recognizes the importance of every role, trade, and form of service in sustaining collective wellbeing.
  3. Operating under a system of authentic governance, rooted in transparency and trust.
    Governance is local, democratic, and participatory, with decision-makers accessible and accountable to the community, ensuring policies reflect real needs and lived experience.
  4. Ensuring control and decision-making remain in the hands of public representatives who are accessible and accountable.
    Community representatives are selected based on merit and service, not status, and all decisions are made openly, with direct involvement from community members.
  5. Keeping access to basic essential goods and services open, secure, and equitable for all.
    Essential goods and services are guaranteed for every member, with systems in place to prevent exclusion, exploitation, or scarcity.
  6. Sourcing raw materials locally, within the Parish or as nearby as possible.
    Local supply chains are prioritised to minimize external dependencies, reduce environmental impact, and strengthen community resilience.
  7. Minimizing transport use to reduce environmental impact and strengthen local supply chains.
    Transport is provided for genuine need, with a focus on walking, cycling, and shared mobility, reducing unnecessary journeys and supporting sustainability.
  8. Using the fewest input points in every part of the supply chain to maintain simplicity and resilience.
    Processes are streamlined to avoid complexity, waste, and vulnerability, ensuring the local economy remains robust and adaptable.
  9. Applying technology only where it improves working conditions and output.
    Technology is used to enhance safety, efficiency, and wellbeing, but never to replace meaningful work or human agency.
  10. Rejecting technology that replaces jobs or performs tasks that a Member of The Community can carry out.
    Human-led processes are prioritised, and mechanization is only used when necessary, preserving employment and community engagement.
  11. Viewing jobs and occupations as a tool for life, not the purpose of life. Work is valued as a means to support happy, healthy living, not as an end in itself; the focus is on meeting need and contributing to the Public Good.

This model ensures that economic activity is human-centred, environmentally responsible, and community-driven—a system where value circulates locally, and everyone benefits.

The Local Market Exchange

In Our Local Future, we recognise that the true purpose of money and currency is to serve as a Medium of Exchange—nothing more.

Within our system, it is equally normal and encouraged to trade goods and services directly through bartering, especially when:

  • The use of money is unnecessary, or
  • It would inflate costs without adding value

Principles of Fair Trade

The concept of Fair Trade is literal:

We commit to trading as fairly, ethically, and considerately as possible—always guided by our shared priorities of:

  • People
  • Community
  • The Environment

Structure and Function

  • Each District or Parish has its own Local Market Exchange
  • These are physical marketplaces, centrally located and accessible to all
  • Each Exchange also offers an offline and online presence, but core trading is always conducted in person
  • No trading software or AI is permitted in the operation of Local Market Exchanges

Modes of Exchange

Local Market Exchanges facilitate:

  • Money for goods/services
  • Goods/services for goods/services
  • Goods/services for money

They also serve as conversion systems, ensuring flexibility and fairness in all transactions.

Governance and Regulation

  • A minimum value system for all Basic and Essential Goods and Services is set and regularly revised by the Community Meeting
  • Price manipulation—any attempt to raise or lower the value of essentials—is strictly prohibited
  • All Basic and Essential Goods not sold by licensed local small businesses or services must be traded through the Local Market Exchange

This model ensures that trade remains transparent, community-driven, and resilient, with value circulating locally and equitably.

Locality Economics

We practice Locality Economics within the framework of the Universal Parish Principle.

Each Parish or Area functions as its own Local Circular Economy, designed to produce and supply all Foods, Goods, and Services essential for Members of The Community to live independent, self-sustaining lives.

Key Principles

  • The Universal Parish prioritises local production of all Basic and Essential needs
  • When certain essentials cannot be produced locally, they are imported from other Communities where those items are in excess
  • These exchanges are conducted primarily through barter or trade, using our own excesses
  • Money or financial transactions are used only when direct exchange is not possible

Economic Ethics

  • All Communities are expected to maintain a neutral balance sheet, ensuring fairness, sustainability, and reciprocity
  • Life itself is our economic model—not profit, not growth, but wellbeing
  • Economics is viewed as a function or side-effect of a system that prioritises:
    • People
    • Community
    • The Environment

This model ensures that economic activity remains grounded in human values, local resilience, and shared stewardship.

We Have a Basic Living Standard for Everyone

In the Old World, an unwritten yet deliberately engineered cultural norm allowed some to earn without limit—at the direct expense of others’ basic needs.

This imbalance, driven by greed, created a system where:

  • Excessive wealth for a few meant increased costs for everyone else
  • Disproportionate earnings led to the accumulation of goods and control of services by those who wanted but did not need them
  • Need was displaced by want, making essentials inaccessible to those who depended on them most

The legitimisation of greed, which once sustained what was known as Wealth Inequality, is now understood to be morally and ethically unacceptable.

A New Foundation: The Basic Living Standard

In The Local Economy & Governance System, we affirm that:

  • Every person must have the resources necessary to live a Happy, Healthy, Safe, and Secure life
  • These lives must be supported through independent or self-sufficient means
  • The ability of each Member of The Community to meet their own needs is everyone’s shared priority

To uphold this, we have created and maintain The Basic Living Standard—a foundational commitment that ensures:

  • The Local Circular Economy and Universal Parish Model work in harmony
  • Balance, fairness, and justice are accessible to all Members of The Community
  • Every individual can enjoy Personal Sovereignty as part of a life rooted in dignity and wellbeing

The Basic Living Standard (BLS)

The Basic Living Standard is the benchmark of The Local Economy & Governance System:

  • Every Member of The Community must earn enough from a week’s work to cover all costs necessary for a financially independent, self-sufficient life
  • This includes meeting all Basic and Essential needs
  • Without reliance on benefits, charity, or debt

This principle is called The Basic Living Standard—a Public Good that every civilised society must not only recognise, but actively maintain.

The Basic Living Standard Charter

The Basic Living Standard is a foundational guarantee that ensures every individual earning the lowest legal weekly wage can afford all essential costs of living—without falling into debt, relying on welfare, or turning to charity.

It defines the minimum threshold of financial independence, where core needs—such as food, housing, utilities, healthcare, transport, clothing, communication, and modest social participation—are fully covered by earned income alone. It also includes provision for savings, unexpected costs, and fair contributions to society.

This standard is not aspirational—it is structural. It affirms that full-time work at the lowest wage must equate to full dignity, autonomy, and security.

***

No food banks. No emergency loans. No skipped prescriptions or unpaid bills. Just a life that’s liveable, sustainable, and free from poverty.

Our Economy Focuses on People — Because People Are the Economy

In The Local Economy & Governance System, every Business and Organisation exists to:

  • Support,
  • Enhance, and
  • Maintain life for People, Community, and The Environment

Economic activity is not driven by profit—it is driven by purpose.

Foundational Commitments

All Businesses and Organisations must:

  • Prioritise the Basic Living Standard
  • Ensure the provision of Basic and Essential Foods, Goods, and Services
  • Guarantee that every person can access these essentials within the Universal Parish Model

Every Member of The Community is entitled to earn a weekly wage that enables them to:

  • Secure all Basic Essentials
  • Live independently, without reliance on:
    • Welfare or benefits
    • Charity
    • Debt

Basic Essentials for Life — Defined as Public Goods

  • Basic and Essential Foods (typically in their original form on the plate)
  • Basic and Essential Clothing
  • Basic and Essential Hygiene Products
  • Basic and Essential Housing
  • Basic and Essential Utility Supply
  • Access to Basic and Essential Transport
  • Access to Basic and Essential Communication
  • Universal access to Basic and Essential Healthcare
  • Support during periods of unemployment or transition

These are not privileges—they are rights.

They are the foundation of dignity, and they are non-negotiable in a society built on fairness, sustainability, and shared wellbeing.

The Function of Private and Commercial Business

In The Local Economy & Governance System, the primary function of all businesses—whether private or commercial—is the betterment and maintenance of:

  • People
  • Community
  • The Environment

Businesses are not engines of profit. They are pillars of service, designed to support life, strengthen society, and protect the planet.

Ethical Principle

  • The pursuit of profit as a primary goal is considered morally and ethically incorrect
  • Business must be guided by purpose, not profit
  • Success is measured by impact, not accumulation

This principle ensures that economic activity remains human-centred, community-driven, and ethically grounded.

The Business Framework

In The Local Economy & Governance System, all businesses are designed to be local, community-serving, and ethically governed.

Structure and Scope

  • All businesses are Local
  • Businesses may operate branch systems across a Region or District if it benefits the community
  • No business may operate, license, or subcontract beyond a single Region
  • Businesses may partner within cooperatives across Regions to ensure the universal supply of Basic and Essential Goods and Services to all Districts and Parishes

Licensing and Oversight

  • Every business must hold a valid License to Operate, issued by the Community Meeting of the Parish where its premises are located
  • Internet businesses must operate under the same rules and standards as offline businesses
  • Social Media platforms are classified as online businesses and must comply accordingly

Business Types and Limitations

  • Privately owned businesses may only serve domestic or retail customers
  • Business-to-Business (B2B) services must be provided by Social Businesses
  • Privately owned businesses must remain within the size limits of what was formerly known as an SME (Small to Medium-Sized Enterprise)

Social Business Model

  • B2B services are delivered by Social Businesses, which operate as cooperatives
  • These cooperatives are collectively owned by the Parishes of a District
  • Parishes act as shareholders, sharing ownership and decision-making responsibility

This framework ensures that business activity remains community-rooted, transparent, and aligned with public good—supporting a system where economic power is distributed, and local needs come first.

Company Ownership & Shareholdings

In Our Local Future, company ownership is rooted in local participation, ethical stewardship, and fair distribution of value.

Ownership Principles

  • Companies may be Limited by Shares, but shares may only be held by individuals with a direct working interest in the company
  • No company or organisation that provides essential goods or services may be owned by:
    • Non-residents, or
    • Any person or entity with interests outside the Region where the business is based

Shareholding Ethics

  • Shares do not yield dividends
  • Company earnings—beyond:
    • The Basic Living Standard Wage,
    • Operational costs, and
    • Reinvestment needs

-are fairly distributed among staff at the end of the calendar year, where surplus exists

This framework ensures that:

  • Ownership remains local and accountable
  • Wealth is shared equitably among contributors
  • Essential services are protected from external influence or exploitation

The Priorities of Commercial and Private Business

In The Local Economy & Governance System, the right to Personal Sovereignty allows each person to prioritise themselves in thought.

However, when it comes to business, the aim and purpose must always be the furtherance of The Public Good.

Ethical Business Priorities

  • Self-employed individuals are entitled to earn a fair premium for their effort, commitment, and risk
  • No business may exist solely for financial gain or profit-making
  • Every business must grow, manufacture, or supply Basic or Essential Goods or Services
  • Profit is viewed as a positive byproduct of:
    • Satisfied customers
    • Quality work
    • Ethical service

Guiding Principles

All business actions and interactions must be conducted in alignment with:

  • The Public Good
  • The principles of:
    • People
    • Community
    • The Environment

This framework ensures that business serves as a vehicle for wellbeing, not a mechanism for exploitation—where success is measured by contribution, not accumulation.

Social Business

Social Businesses are non-profit organisations operated with maximum efficiency for one purpose: The Public Good.

Core Functions

  • Social Businesses exist primarily where Basic and Essential Goods and Services are not provided by Private Businesses
  • They ensure that no community need goes unmet, especially in areas where profit-driven models are not viable or appropriate

Business-to-Business (B2B) Services

  • All B2B services must be delivered exclusively by Social Businesses
  • Commercial or privately owned businesses are not permitted to provide B2B services of any kind

This model ensures that critical infrastructure, supply chains, and inter-business support systems remain:

  • Publicly accountable
  • Ethically managed
  • Rooted in service, not profit

Social Businesses are the backbone of cooperative enterprise, ensuring that efficiency and equity go hand in hand.

Natural Resources

In The Local Economy & Governance System, all Natural Resources are held in stewardship by the community—they are not commodities, but Community Assets.

Stewardship and Ownership

  • All Natural Resources remain under community stewardship at all times
  • No Natural Resource that meets the Basic or Essential needs of Members of The Community may be:
    • Privately or commercially owned
    • Sold, let, or leased for rent

Access and Provision

  • Natural Resources that meet Basic and Essential needs must be provided at cost, with no profit margin
  • The provision of these resources is considered a Public Good
  • Services delivering these resources must be operated exclusively by Social Businesses
  • Privately owned companies or organisations are prohibited from providing such services at any time

This framework ensures that Natural Resources remain:

  • Equitably accessible
  • Ethically managed
  • Protected from exploitation

It reinforces the principle that life-sustaining resources belong to everyone, and must be governed by shared responsibility, not private interest.

News & Media

In The Local Economy & Governance System, the provision of News and Community Information is recognised as A Public Good—a vital service that supports transparency, connection, and community wellbeing.

Structure and Governance

  • News and Community Information is delivered through Social Businesses, not for profit but for The Public Good
  • Every Parish operates its own Local Media Platform, which prioritises:
    • Local news from within the Parish
    • Followed by District-level and then National-level coverage

Local Media Platforms are managed by:

  • Key employed staff, and
  • Community Contributors making their Community Contribution

Citizen Journalism & Participation

  • All Members of The Community are encouraged to contribute to media platforms each year
  • The success of Local Media Platforms is built around Citizen Journalism, ensuring that:
    • Local voices are heard
    • Stories are shared authentically
    • Media reflects the lived experience of the community

Advertising & Transparency

  • Advertising on Local Media Platforms must be universal
  • It cannot be targeted at specific users or sub-groups
  • Any privately owned media business must:
    • Make its interests and focus fully transparent to users
    • Operate under the same ethical standards as all other commercial or privately owned businesses

This framework ensures that media remains inclusive, accountable, and community-driven—a tool for empowerment, not manipulation.

Social Media

In The Local economy & Governance System, social media is recognised as a Social Business, operated solely for The Public Good. It must remain free from private or commercial control.

Access and Identity

  • Access to social media is restricted to users aged 21 and above
  • Platforms are accessible only by subscription
  • While subscribers may use non-identifying usernames, every user must be verified and identifiable within the system

Advertising and Ethics

  • Advertising is universal—it must not be targeted at specific users or sub-groups
  • The use of selective targeting software, AI, or algorithms to:
    • Restrict,
    • Hide,
    • Target,
    • Focus, or
    • Promote messages of any kind

…is strictly prohibited

This framework ensures that Social Media remains:

  • Transparent
  • Equitable
  • Free from manipulation
  • A space for authentic connection, community expression, and ethical communication

Online Communication

In The Local Economy & Governance System, we recognise that online interaction in the Old World led to significant behavioural shifts—many of which began to influence and distort offline life.

To restore balance and integrity, Online Communication, online relationships, and online behaviour must now:

  • Reflect real-world interaction
  • Uphold social etiquette
  • Align with cultural values and community norms

As A Key Skill for Life

Good Online Communication is not optional—it is considered a Key Skill for Life.
It is essential for:

  • Healthy relationships
  • Civic participation
  • Personal and professional integrity

This principle ensures that our digital spaces remain respectful, authentic, and aligned with the values we uphold in the physical world.

General Rules for the Use of AI

In The Local Economy & Governance System, the use of Artificial Intelligence is governed by strict ethical and practical principles to ensure that technology serves humanity, never replaces it.

Core Principles

  • No digital system may provide a function or service that cannot be replaced or performed by a person, with or without non-digital tools or assistive systems
  • All AI systems must be overridable through local human intervention, at any time

Age and Device Regulation

  • The use of smartphones, tablets, and hand-held technology is regulated
  • These devices may be used only for educational purposes by Members of The Community under the age of 21

AI in Learning and Creation

  • The use of AI is universally prohibited for:
    • Training
    • Education
    • Online learning of any kind
  • All AI-generated digital creations must include identifiable digital watermarks

Supervision and Scope

  • AI management systems for machine technology may be used only under human supervision
  • AI may be used solely to enhance or improve human working practices
  • AI may not replace any human working role

Mechanisation and Decision-Making

  • Technical mechanisation may be used only when sufficient manpower is unavailable
  • AI may not be used to make any judgement or decision that could affect the quality of life of any person, group, or community

This framework ensures that AI remains a supportive tool, not a substitute for human agency, and that life decisions remain in human hands—guided by ethics, accountability, and community values.

Transport

In The Local Economy & Governance System, transport is recognised as a Public Good—a vital service that supports access to Basic and Essential needs.

Principles of Mobility

  • Transport is provided for necessity, not luxury
  • The primary method of personal transport is walking
  • This is secondarily supported by:
    • Bicycles
    • Battery-powered cycles
    • Mobility carts (where appropriate)
    • Public transport systems

Ethical Use of Transport

We do not encourage the use of any form of transport that is:

  • Unnecessary
  • Designed for excess
  • Or fails to meet Basic and Essential needs in a practical, comfortable, and safe manner

This approach ensures that mobility remains:

  • Sustainable
  • Accessible
  • Aligned with community values

Transport serves the needs of life, not the demands of status—reinforcing our commitment to People, Community, and The Environment.

Vehicle Lending Hubs

In The Local Economy & Governance System, we uphold a commitment to People, Community, and The Environment by discouraging excessive or unnecessary vehicle use and ownership.

Community-Based Mobility

  • Each Parish area operates a Community Lending Hub
  • These hubs provide shared access to:
    • Loan cars
    • Vans
    • Battery-powered bikes

This system ensures that transport remains:

  • Purpose-driven
  • Efficient
  • Environmentally responsible

By prioritising shared mobility, we reduce environmental impact, promote resource equity, and support local resilience—making transport a tool for community wellbeing, not personal excess.

Working From Home

In The Local Economy & Governance System, Working From Home is not a right, but a conditional arrangement based on community needs and ethical workplace practice.

Social and Community Value

  • Workplace interaction is considered a positive and enriching environment
  • It fosters:
    • Social skills
    • Awareness of others
    • Shared responsibility and collaboration

Local Business Integration

  • Most businesses are located close to residential areas as part of the Universal Parish System
  • It is considered normal and expected to attend the workplace when doing so serves:
    • The Community’s best interest
    • The Public Good

Conditions for Remote Work

  • For individuals working from home where on-site facilities exist,
    • No expenses are payable by the employer
    • Remote work is permitted only when it does not compromise community engagement, operational integrity, or ethical standards

This framework ensures that work remains a socially constructive activity, rooted in local presence, shared purpose, and community wellbeing.

Travel to Work

In The Local Economy & Governance System, the design of the Universal Parish System ensures that most businesses are located close to where people live, making workplaces easily accessible by:

  • Walking
  • Cycling
  • Battery-powered mobility
  • Short journeys via public transport

Commuting Ethics

  • It is not considered normal to commute to work using a car or motor vehicle
  • No person travels to a workplace outside their Parish area unless:
    • They are specially trained or experienced in that role
    • And have not yet had adequate time to relocate

Fairness in Remote Assignments

  • If a person is required to work outside their area on behalf of their employer:
    • All travel time is counted as working time
    • All accruable expenses are reimbursed by the employer
  • Employers may not include accruable expenses as part of any pay structure

This framework ensures that workplace access remains local, sustainable, and equitable, while protecting workers from the hidden costs of long-distance commuting.

LEGS has been posted here to read without charge. If you would like to support Adam, please do buy and download the FULL Book Version of The Local Economy & Governance System from Amazon at the link immediately below – at the current price of £2.99 in the UK (Please check the price before buying from outside of the UK). The version for Kindle includes the FAQs (available as a FREE PDF Download below) and the different summaries that have been produced for General Interest, Policy Makers and Local Leaders. Thank you for your support.

Farm Inheritance Tax was always about wrecking independent UK food production. That’s why it defies common sense

Watching the continuing bewilderment, frustration, fear and anger from so many across the UK farming community is not easy.

But the real difficulty for someone like me isn’t the wholly avoidable tragedies that are part of the much bigger engineered tragedy that is unfolding.

It is the reality that we cannot do a thing about what is happening, and why it is happening, until many more of us, and not least of all people from within farming and its related industries, begin to accept that what we are seeing, experiencing and increasingly becoming victims to, bears no relationship with our reasoned expectations of government and governance. But is instead being driven by a different set of truths that are very difficult to accept.

Whilst many within the farming industry may feel that you can only understand and relate to the turmoil that this one change in public policy has caused, if you are a farmer and have obvious skin in the game yourself, the action taken by the government and its failure to respond to months of concern, in any way which makes sense, is far from being isolated. Not least of all because the Tax that could be raised by the policy is in public spending terms trivial and was never what the change was really about.

Indeed, what appears to just be a nasty attack on ‘rich farmers’, was, is and will continue to be all about food and the independence that locally controlled food production gives us. It’s this that should be concerning us all more than anything.

It is vitally important for anyone who wants to address the real issues that UK food production faces to stop and look beyond the question of Farmers IHT itself.

To begin understanding how the bigger and deliberately complicated picture works, we all need to see how the IHT policy didn’t arrive in isolation. But was in fact just the next step in a long and calculated chain of policy changes and their implementation, which have been reforming, remodelling and slowly strangling, if not killing off all parts of UK food production for a period that now exceeds 50 years.

We should be under no illusion that the Farm Inheritance Tax Policy is part of a much bigger strategy and plan. One that places the end of independent farming and food production of all kinds across the UK at its very heart.

Likewise, we must recognise that food is power. And Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future.

So those who wish to have control over everything – including people and how we are allowed to live and behave – want to secure complete control of the food chain. Simply because of the absolute control that it will shortly allow them to impose, if the status quo continues, unopposed.

The last thing an establishment already struggling to hide its totalitarian and authoritarian plans for the future wants, is for anyone or any business to exist that can provide any person or any community with the independence that could very quickly derail and wreck everything they aim to do.

Whilst this malfeasant but cleverly legitimised strategy is being slowly but very surely implemented across every area of life today to restrict freedoms, including just about every rule that’s meant to create safety and switch to digital and online alternatives to ‘real life’ that there is, there are none that have quite the same level of potential impact on all of us as food and the supply of it.

Many of those farming smaller, ‘family sized farms’ or rather farm businesses that lie outside of corporate control, understandably perceive a specialised business landscape that cannot exist without subsidies, commercial contracts and the revival of the golden egg – which is a fair income from whatever they produce.

However, contrary to the accepted narrative that tells us ‘This is just how things work’ or this is where ‘progress’ has taken food production in the 21st century, the truth that we all have to wrestle with a very serious paradox indeed, namely:

The only business sector that can genuinely provide UK Food Security, and with it the freshest, most nutritious, healthiest, most cost-effective food supply, that every person’s body across the UK needs at least twice daily is unable to provide the producers with a viable, unsupported or independent income.

Truly, the idea that growing the food that we genuinely need is not possible, can only begin to make sense when we accept that the whole problem has been created for farmers (and consumers), so that specific interests can be advantaged above others and that this was the deliberate choice of whoever has and is now controlling the levers of government.

Far from being the anachronism that many of today’s two-faced politicians would like voters to believe, small independent family farms are the future of food as a part of a great future for us and for our communities.

The relatively easy to solve problem for farmers and consumers that really is a very big concern of the establishment, is the threat that we will rediscover the legitimacy of food independence, whilst realising that we don’t need centralised power structures and business models to thrive and have much better life experiences on our own.

It’s this that the establishment really doesn’t like and is quietly terrified of.

All the rules that have slowly choked small farmers out of business, following policy change after policy change, heralded by Trojan horses like the Common Agricultural Policy, and bureaucratic initiatives that have cascaded down into practical business operations in ways that have made support industries like abattoirs unviable, through health, environmental and quality rules, have all been created with long term outcomes in mind.

Policy after policy has been created, changed and implemented that have at best been intended to redirect and at worst destroy businesses that could have and still could adapt to the needs that people genuinely have for food. Needs that could otherwise already be being fully met by functioning and supported UK food producers, rather than what is left of UK food producing industries being the victims of engineered circumstances that tell everyone they are unnecessary and are therefore done.

6365 farming businesses have closed in this past year alone and with suggestions made that over 100,000 were lost between 1990 and 2023, it was arguably inevitable that as wider plans for controlling the food supply and pushing public dependency towards sources such as factory made ‘alternative proteins’ became more important, that remaining independent food growing and producing businesses, still capable of changing direction to meet direct public need, should be encouraged to close.

Whilst even now, many reading this essay may well scoff at what I am sharing, I’m afraid that the evidence of all this is now beginning to shout very loudly as it emerges into public view at breakneck speed.

To be fair, it certainly defies the logic and expectations of so many of us, who have always believed that we could trust public representatives to actually do what’s best for us.

Dealing with this problem should be as simple as getting politicians to change their minds. Perhaps do a U-turn. Or even waiting until the next government comes in behind just the latest in a long line who everyone believes to be solely responsible for wrecking everything today.

But it’s not as simple as that in any kind of way.

Government and politics no longer work anything like we expect them to. Or in any way as they should.

With many of the politicians we can publicly identify being incapable of leading as they should and they themselves being wholly reliant upon the advice and direction of many other people and influencers who are both considered to be ‘experts’ (in what?!) and who we are unlikely to ever know of, we have to begin to understand that what and why the politicians we have are doing what they are doing may actually be for reasons that may be very different to what we expect.

Even then, if we knew what the politicians honestly believe, the genuine purpose or truth behind what they are being advised or directed to do may not even then be something that they themselves would easily believe.

Regrettably and rather worryingly, the establishment and any political party, group or movement that is aligned with the establishment, rather than the people and what remain of al independent businesses themselves, will not change the direction of travel of any of this, until they either succeed or their plans are stopped.

This means that to reshape and redirect UK food production, farmers, growers and fishers must themselves voluntarily step away from the reliance and expectation historically placed upon the establishment as well as those who wish to become part of it.

Food producers must take all steps necessary to develop a new, direct relationship with the public and therefore go it alone.

Regrettably, the alternative is to keep shouting whilst continuing to accept the status quo, whilst in effect sitting back and watching as UK food production and everything that still remains able to provide us with genuine freedom is destroyed, right up to the point that traditional, ‘natural’ farming and food growing practices no longer exist, and people will never be able to function independently and away from the control of the establishment ever again.

Grow Your Own or ‘Home Growing’

Writing and publishing the pages of Foods We Can Trust as I go, does mean that I have had the opportunity to reflect upon and even mention relevant topics from the news as I go.

A few days ago, at the end of May, it was pleasing to see The Times report that former President of the National Farmers Union Minette Batters (Who has taken the step of working for the government, now that she is in the Lords) suggested that future housing developments should include Allotments.

Sadly, comments that followed on social media branded this as ‘Everythingism’; a term that like many others that is now being used to dismiss anything with deeper meaning or a point that runs contrary to common or ‘accepted’ thought.

Allotments, or rather the Allotments that are available for people to rent today are popular. This point was proven well when I did a search as I have been writing and found that the Local District Level Authority where I live, Cheltenham Borough Council has a waiting list for the Allotments under its control that can extend from a matter of weeks to a couple of years.

Contrary to what some might immediately think, I am not criticizing CBC or any Local Authority in any way for not having Allotments immediately available today – as it’s great that they are there and can be available. Popularity does of course vary and the last thing that many people think about today when it comes to Food, is Growing Your Own.

The need for us to contribute to Food Security

If you’ve read the page ‘What is Food Security’, you will now have a better idea of what it means to be ‘Food Secure’ and why we really aren’t Food Secure, anywhere in the UK today.

Unfortunately, finding a way to help enough people understand that we are all taking a massive risk by trusting that the Food we eat everyday will always be available and that as if by magic, the Food Chain will keep on doing what it does today, isn’t easy.

Especially as everything that the Government is currently doing is reinforcing the message that the UK doesn’t need Farms and that the Food of the Future will be manufactured in warehouses and factories – sadly without any regard for what that will really mean for us all in terms of not being able to eat Foods We Can Trust.

If we continue to wait until there is a real problem with the UK Food Supply, before we begin taking steps to ensure that we always have enough Food available and ready to Feed everyone across the UK, we are all likely to experience Food Shortages quickly. And as time goes by, following the arrival of a serious Food Supply Shortage, more and more of us may even be forced to go without.

Food Shortages are not a problem that any of us should be taking lightly. But neither should any of us – and particularly our politicians – be taking it for granted that enough Food of any kind will always be available for everyone – as is clearly the case, right now.

Perhaps the most challenging aspect of understanding the risk to UK Food Security and then considering the steps that need to be taken to ensure that we will always have enough Food, is this:

The UK Food Chain is currently unable to Feed the UK Population without considerable supplies being imported from Overseas.

If that’s difficult enough to accept, the next point we need to understand is this:

If Overseas Food Imports were stopped, UK Farms and Food Producers would be able to provide significantly less than the 54-58% of ‘self-produced’ or ‘UK-Produced’ Food that UK People would immediately need. Because the Food Supply and Logistics Chain isn’t set up to prioritise British Consumers today, and very few of the Farms the UK has would be able to supply Food that is ready to be prepared to eat, direct.

To add some further perspective, we must then accept that:

The Farms across the UK that are geared up and have the systems in place to provide Food to us direct are likely to already being doing so. They are what we already know and use as our Local Farm Shops and Food Businesses that are selling us the Food that we already know to be coming from Local Farms, Harbours and Fisheries before being turned into Dairy Products, Breads or any of the Foods that are available to us through recognizable Local Suppliers or direct delivery services.

The question of the Food We Eat, is now Food for Thought.

Waking up to Our Food Supply Reality

A Report by the Countryside and Community Research Institute in May 2024 suggested that the amount of Food that comes to us direct from Farms is about 11% of what the UK Population needs to eat.

In real terms, that means that if the Border around the UK (That’s transport by Air, Sea or the Channel Tunnel) closed for any prolonged period, there would only be the equivalent of enough Food available for 1 in 9 People – in relative terms.

And that’s before we think about cost, accessibility and all the things that Foods We Can Trust is about.

Whilst I will always champion UK Farmers as some of the most entrepreneurial and creative People I have the pleasure to know, the time it would take to transform and restructure the UK Food Chain so that it works as it arguably always shouldin our best interests and for us all, following a crisis or breakdown in the Food Supply – would probably be a period of months, before everyone was being supplied with at least some Foods that we should all have available to us, right now.

We will not have the luxury of time for the Food Chain to change, if we wait for Food Shortages before we begin

Whilst it would be beneficial for the majority of Our Farmers to begin restructuring their businesses to work towards Local Food Chains and UK Food Security through self-sufficiency today – for themselves as well as the UK Population, many remain tied to the way that the Food Chain in the UK has been evolved by the Global Model (Most strikingly, through the UK relationship with the EU).

Many UK Farmers still believe that a change of government or the politicians themselves, will be all it will take for them to get paid more or to be subsidized further for what they do, so that they receive a higher, or more appropriate income than they do now.

However, Farmers and existing Food Growing Businesses are not going to survive, if they do not adapt their businesses to operate independently as part of Local Food Chains.

Because the economic system we have today doesn’t value independence in the Food Chain and is already actively working to remove it.

At some point, probably sooner rather than later, UK Farms will be called upon to make this necessary change.

Sadly, as things stand today, this is likely to be when the UK is already in crisis – as it will only be when we are in the middle of a Food Crisis, where everyone is experiencing the problem themselves, that the real meaning and need for genuine UK Food Security is going to make sense.

However, that doesn’t mean that we cannot do something to help, right now, if we can see that hope and waiting for tomorrow is very unlikely to save the day.

Suggested further reading for this Section:

Farms consider more direct sales to combat rising costs – Countryside and Community Research Institute

Growing Your Own is the most trustworthy way to source Food

Whilst talking about the role we all have to play in the UKs future Food Security might feel like a deviation from the direction of Foods We Can Trust, it is important enough for us to be aware of and to understand the real benefits from having and developing access to home grown, community grown and Food that comes direct from Local Farms and Growers, today.

Just having Food to Eat is important. But prioritising Food Chains that supply the Foods We can Trust is essential.

There is no better way to be sure that we are eating Foods We Can Trust than if we Grow Our Own Food. Whether it be at home, within community allotments or gardens or other shared spaces, where we can be sure of everything used to Grow Our Food, as well as the continuation and availability of the supply.

Grow Your Own Foods We Can Trust

As we have discussed above, there are two very good reasons to Grow Your Own:

  • Growing Our Own Food will at least increase the Food we have available, and
  • Growing Our Own Food is the surest way to know we are eating Foods We Can Trust

There are other advantages to Growing Your Own Food too, such as producing Food that we can all share with others, or exchange for different types of Food or other essentials that we might need in a crisis.

However, one of the biggest, and probably best reasons to Grow Your Own (beyond having a supply of our own Food to Eat) is that the process of growing, harvesting, cultivating and handling Home Grown Food can be very good for our mental health or sense of wellbeing, as well as the activity required to do so contributing positively to our physical health.

Foods We Can Grow Ourselves

Understanding and being open to the idea of DIY Food Growing is where the whole idea of Grow Your Own can become even more interesting and exciting, as the list of the different Foods We Can Grow Ourselves is extensive!

In fact, what We Can Grow Ourselves may only be limited by the space and resources that we have available we have.

To illustrate just how broad the list of Foods We Can Grow Ourselves and the different ways that we can Grow Our Own Food really is, we will now share lists of the different Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs and Animals that we can grow ourselves, along with suggestions of the different ways that we can grow them.

The following list IS NOT exhaustive and there may be many more!

Please note that links to organisations, businesses and groups that are added anywhere on these Pages about Grow Your Own are for information sharing purposes only. They are not recommendations and certainly not endorsements of any other organisation, product or the advice and suggestions that they provide.

Vegetables that can be Grown at Home

Growing Vegetables at home probably feels like the most obvious type of Food to grow when it comes to Growing Your Own.

However, did you know just how many types of different Vegetables there are that we can Grow Ourselves in the UK?

List of Grow Your Own Vegetables in the UK:
Aubergines
Asparagus
Beans
Beetroot
Broad Beans
Broccoli
Brussels Sprouts
Cabbages
Carrots
Cauliflower
Calabrese
Celeriac
Celery
Chard
Chicory
Chilli Peppers
Chinese Broccoli
Chinese Cabbage
Courgettes
Cucumbers
Endive
Florence Fennel
French Beans
Garlic
Globe Artichokes
Jerusalem Artichokes
Kale
Kohl Rabi
Leeks
Lettuce
Marrows
Mizuna & Mibuna
Okra
Onions
Pak Choi
Parsnips
Peas
Peppers
Potatoes
Pumpkins
Radishes
Rhubarb
Rocket
Runner Beans
Salad Leaves
Salad Onions
Salsify
Shallots
Soya Beans
Spinach
Squash
Swedes
Sweetcorn
Sweet Potatoes
Tomatoes
Turnips

 

Please note that I will cover the different methods that can be used to Grow Your Own, depending upon the resources and space that you have available once I have finished listing what you can grow.

Suggested further reading for this Section:

RHS – UK’s leading gardening charity / RHS

20 Best Vegetables to Plant and Grow at Home

Top 20 Easy Vegetables to Grow at Home (A Beginner-Friendly Guide) | Envynature

Herbs that can be Grown at Home

There are lots of Vegetables that we can Grow Ourselves. But the list doesn’t stop there, as we can also Grow Herbs – which will of course help to add flavour to the other Foods that we Grow Ourselves when we have them available.

List of Grow Your Own Herbs in the UK:
Basil
Bay
Chamomile
Chervil
Chives
Coriander
Dill
Fennel
Horseradish
Lemon Balm
Lemongrass
Lovage
Marjoram
Mint
Oregano
Parsley
Rosemary
Sage
Savory
Sorrel
Tarragon
Thyme

Suggested further reading for this Section:

RHS – UK’s leading gardening charity / RHS

The 16 easiest herbs to grow indoors: a beginner’s guide

16 Herbs That Grow Indoors All Year

Fruits that can be Grown at Home

Vegetables and Herbs are likely to be the easiest and, in many cases, the quickest Foods that we can Grow at home.

However, if you have access to the space and resources necessary, there is a surprisingly long list of Fruits that we can Grow Ourselves in the UK too!

List of Grow Your Own Fruits in the UK:
Apples
Apricots
Blackberries
Blackcurrants
Blueberries
Cherries
Citrus
Damsons
Figs
Gages
Gooseberries
Grapes
Kiwi Fruit
Medlars
Melons
Mulberries
Nectarines
Olives
Peaches
Pears
Plums
Quinces
Raspberries
Redcurrants
Strawberries
White Currants

Suggested further reading for this Section:

RHS – UK’s leading gardening charity / RHS

5 Of the Easiest Fruits and Veg to Grow in Your Home | Ecoscape

Top 10 Easy to Grow Fruit Trees & Plants | Thompson & Morgan

Animals that we can keep for Food at Home

Some will be surprised to learn that it is possible to keep some kinds of animals for Food at home.

In fact, historically, it was quite normal to keep some animals as a source of Food for domestic consumption.

Perhaps the most obvious animals to keep at Home for Food would be Chickens. Not necessarily as a source of fresh meat. But as a source of fresh eggs. Which anyone who has had home grown eggs or eggs straight from a local Farm will know often taste much better than those we buy in supermarkets or online!

Other types of poultry, rabbits and fish are different animals that can more easily be kept as a source of Food at home.

However, it is important to be aware that these and other animals that are sometimes kept at home for Food such as pigs, goats and anything else that you might have space for, may need to be registered or cared for under licenses that it may be difficult for a normal home to hold.

As such, it may be better left to a local farm or community small holding to keep them.

Like pets, any animals kept for Food require time, commitment and unavoidable expense which may mean that keeping them is simply impractical.

Suggested further reading for this Section:

How to Keep Chickens – A Beginner’s Guide | GardenLifeDirect

Creating A Good Home for Chickens – The Open Sanctuary Project

5 Tips to Raising Livestock from Melissa Norris

Slaughter poultry, livestock and rabbits for home consumption – GOV.UK

Home slaughter of livestock | Food Standards Agency

Methods for Growing Vegetables, Fruit and Herbs Ourselves

Learning to Grow Your Own doesn’t have to be boring and certainly doesn’t have to follow any kind of rigid model or set plan.

In fact, like all of our homes, the resources we have and the time we have available will be different. So, Growing Our Own Food doesn’t need to be the same as what anyone else does, even if we are growing the same Foods!

Yes, having some ground available in a garden, allotment or open space is of course a fantastic place to begin. But we don’t need a garden to Grow Our Own Food and there are ways that we can grow all sorts of different things simply by making better use of the space that we have already got.

Here are the different ways that we can Grow Our Own Food, either alone or in collaboration with neighbours or members of our local communities:

Grow Bags

Perhaps the simplest, quickest and most cost-friendly way to get started with Growing Your Own Food will be to use Grow Bags.

Garden Centres, Farm Shops, Country Stores and at certain times of the year, even supermarkets will have Grow Bags available to buy.

Grow Bags can be a fun, efficient and low-cost way to learn about growing Food, without making significant commitments with resources, money and time.

The range of Vegetables and Herbs that can be grown using Grow Bags may not be as extensive as it would be with other spaces and resources to use. But there is still plenty that you can try!

List of Grow Your Own Foods for Grow Bags:
Celery
Chillies
Courgettes
Herbs
Lettuce
Radishes
Rocket
Salad Leaves
Spinach
Spring Onions
Sweet Peppers
Tomatoes

Suggested further reading for this Section:

Link to Suttons Seeds page on Grow Bag Growing

Gardening in Grow Bags | Answers to All Your Questions | joegardener®

Grow Bag Gardening Do’s and Don’ts | The Beginner’s Garden – with Jill McSheehy

Window Boxes

Space for growing any type of Food at home can be a challenge, and I’m certainly not taking it for granted that you have a garden or space available inside.

If you don’t have space outside or inside near a patio window or perhaps a conservatory area, growing Food using a Window Box may be another way to get started:

List of Grow Your Own Foods for Window Boxes: 
 
Baby Carrots  
Basil  
Beets  
Bush Beans 
Celery 
Chamomile 
Chives 
Dwarf Peppers 
Garlic 
Green Onions 
Lettuce 
Microgreens 
Oregano 
Parsnips 
Parsley 
Patio Tomatoes 
Radishes  
Spinach  

Suggested further reading for this Section:

Window Planter Veggie Garden – Planting Window Box Garden Vegetables | Gardening Know How

Here’s a helpful page from Gardening Know How

Containers

By this point it may be becoming clearer that Growing Your Own Food can be much easier to begin than we might have assumed!

Now that we’ve covered Grow Bags and Window Boxes, it might also be helpful to consider that Food can grow very well in containers of all sorts of descriptions.

This includes old buckets, watering cans and even dustbins (that have been cleaned out!).

List of Grow Your Own Foods for Containers:
Beetroot
Broad Beans
Carrots
Chillies
Dwarf French Beans
Herbs
Peas
Potatoes
Radishes
Rocket
Runner Beans
Peppers
Salad Leaves
Salad Onions
Salad Turnips
Tomatoes

Suggested further reading for this Section:

Vegetables in containers / RHS Gardening

How to Grow Vegetables in Containers: A Beginner’s Guide – Simplify Gardening

Hydroponics

If you have limited space where there is access to daylight in your Home and you enjoy a little DIY with technology, perhaps you could give Hydroponics a try.

Hydroponics – or what is known by some as Aquaculture, is the process of growing Food using water-based systems that provide nutrients and whatever the plant-based Foods you are growing through the water itself, which can be circulated around even a very small system that might even be small and compact enough to sit on a shelf.

Hydroponics supplies are now widely available, and it would be well worth doing an online search for them if you are interested in giving this form of Grow Your Own a try!

List of Grow Your Own Foods for Hydroponics:
Arugula
Basil
Butterhead
Collard Greens
Celery
Cilantro
Cucumbers
Fennel
Green and Red Oak
Kale
Mustard Greens
Oregano
Peppermint
Peppers
Rainbow Chard
Romaine
Rosemary
Snap Peas
Spinach
Strawberries
Thyme
Tomatoes

Suggested further reading for this Section:

Hydroponics / RHS Gardening

Complete Guide to Hydroponics | BBC Gardeners World Magazine

Hydroponics: How It Works, Benefits & How to Get Started

And here’s a helpful page from Eden Green

Greenhouses

Some of us may already have Greenhouses or have space where one could easily be erected.

Greenhouses or glass boxes of any size or kind aren’t a small or low-value purchase – so please be prepared for this if you are going to research further after reading this section.

Greenhouses of any size are a great way to Grow Your Own, because they can be used to provide an environment that can be managed to be consistently the same for longer periods throughout the year.

List of Grow Your Own Foods for a Greenhouse:
Asparagus
Aubergines
Bean Sprouts
Beets
Broccoli
Carrots
Celery
Cherries
Chillies
Cucumbers
Garlic
Grapes
Herbs
Kale
Lemons
Lettuce
Onions
Peppers
Radishes
Raspberries
Spinach
Squash
Strawberries
Tomatoes
Turnips

Like each of the sections covering ways to Grow Your Own, researching Greenhouses further will be a great idea before ruling the idea in or out – not least of all because of the wider range of Grow Your Own options and what could be year-round ability they offer to Grow different Foods.

Here are a few links to help, but please do take time for a wider online search if you can!

Suggested further reading for this Section:

Beginners guide to greenhouse gardening – Gardening Express Knowledge Hub

15 Vegetables to Grow in A Greenhouse | Alitex

Vegetables: growing in your greenhouse / RHS Gardening

Allotments, Gardens and Vegetable Patches

If you have access to a Garden or an Allotment, there is a large variety of Vegetables, Fruits and Herbs that can be grown – subject to seasonality and the amount of space you have available.

Like all of the different ways to Grow Your Own, researching the best options for you will be a great place to start and it may also be useful to search online to see what other people are growing on their Vegetable Patches, Allotments and in their Gardens in the area you live in – bearing in mind that the climate across the UK can vary!

List of Grow Your Own Foods for Allotments and Gardens:
Beetroot
Broad Beans
Brussels Sprouts
Cabbage
Calabrese
Carrots
Cauliflowers
Celeriac
Celery
Courgettes
French Beans
Garlic
Herbs
Leeks
Lettuce
Mangetout Peas
Melons
Mixed Salad Leaves
Onions
Parsnips
Peas
Potatoes (Not early varieties)
Pumpkins
Purple/White Sprouting Broccoli
Radishes
Rhubarb
Runner Beans
Salad Onions
Shallots
Soft Fruits
Squash
Swedes
Sweet Potatoes
Tomatoes
Turnips

Suggested further reading for this Section:

What to grow on your allotment / RHS

Top 10 Vegetables to Grow | Allotment Book

Allotment Garden Vegetables | Allotment Gardening | Fothergill’s

Low-maintenance Veg and Fruit to Grow | BBC Gardeners World Magazine

Citizen Farmers – Working together with other members of Your Community to Grow Your Own

Whilst these pages on Grow Your Own are primarily intended to raise awareness for People who may be open to growing their own Food at home – whatever space and resources they might have available, there is a different, more community-orientated approach to Growing Your Own Food that is available to many of us too.

Where there are enough People ready to work together as a community or on behalf of the community they live in to grow and supply Food, there are different approaches that can be used to develop and manage the cultivation, growing and harvesting of all sorts of different Foods locally, working collaboratively, together with like-minded People, who live close by.

Whilst it may conjure up all sorts of different ideas and responses, putting the ideologies, agendas a bias that get in the way of us all having unfettered access to Food We Can Trust aside could easily lead to the age of the Citizen Farmer. Where everyone, young and old contributes to and plays a vital role in Local Food Production – recognising that even with U.K. Farming and Food Production infrastructure realigned, meeting our nutritional needs year-round and with Food being prioritised in the way that it should be, is likely to mean everyone playing their part.

People and Groups are already growing Food together, but an undercurrent in thinking still exists where whatever the stated aims and agendas might be, a big issue with ‘us vs them’ remains.

However, times are changing and changing quickly. The role of Citizen Farmer, whether it’s through Grow Your Own and then sharing, exchanging or bartering anything they don’t need, whole communities helping to grow fruit, vegetables and animals on shared farms or helping farmers to get their crops in, will be what True Citizen Farming is all about.

The options for Collaborative Food Growing that already exist include:

  • Community Gardens
  • Share Farming and/or Cooperative Farming

Community Gardens

Earlier in this topic, I mentioned what Minette Batters said about the inclusion of Allotments in future Housing Developments.

As you will probably guess, I agree with Minette and believe that this is a valuable suggestion. Not least of all because there are good and growing reasons to believe that whilst Growing Your Own may only be considered a hobby by many today, it could easily become a need for many of us, in no time at all.

Green spaces, green lungs and park areas are of course required to be considered in appropriately sized Developments already. And a time of emergency or prolonged Food Shortages, it would not be unreasonable to consider using some of these spaces – where appropriate – to begin growing Food.

Green spaces and parks, like homes and business premises have their own Planning Restrictions too, so at any other time, thinking about creating a community space or area for growing Food may need to consider areas of land that may not be immediately obvious, or perhaps even renting a field or some land from a local farmer that can be used in this way.

If you should find yourself amongst a group of local people or a community that has agreed that there is a need for such a space and there are enough people committed to the idea to make it work either through self-funding or by seeking some funding support, it will be worth getting in touch with your local Parish/Town and/or Borough/District Council to ask for their help and guidance.

In my experience of working with Council Officers of all kinds, it has always been far more productive to ask for that help and guidance before beginning. And it’s advantageous as it’s the quickest way to find out what you can and cannot do!

The big upside of speaking to the local Council(s) is that you may also be guided in the direction of other people and organisations that can help – and perhaps even be signposted to sources of funding and help for groups of people working together that you may not have thought of along the way.

At the very least, knowing what steps to avoid locally is good for everyone. It will save time, good will and perhaps even money too – and that has to be something that’s good for everyone!

Share Farming and/or Cooperative Farming (Social Enterprise)

Whilst the key aim of these pages on Grow Your Own are really about encouraging us as individuals to think about the opportunity to Grow Foods We Can Trust in our own homes or using the resources that we already have available, it will also be useful to think about and be open to the idea of working with other People in our communities to provide Foods We Can Trust, for everyone in the community.

Surprisingly, this isn’t just an idea for a rainy day (or when there are real problems with the Food Supply) and People, Groups and Communities are already working together to produce, share and sell a wide range of Foods to benefit their Groups and the Communities in which they operate.

Most shared farming or community farming projects that exist today are relatively small. They service or supplement the Food Needs of what we would probably agree are a small number of People who are usually members of a charity, cooperative or social enterprise that has been set up as a way to manage a project that benefits all those involved, mutually.

If you research projects like this great one called Stroud Community Agriculture, based in Gloucestershire (UK), near to where I live, it’s easy to fall into the trap of believing that community farming isn’t scalable and that it is more like a shared version of hobby farming.

However, projects like this one are already learning invaluable lessons. They are helping to create the models for re-learning the practical skills, knowledge and understanding that are needed for a much more hands-on approach to Food Production that itself has the ability to create, contribute to and provide Food Security, built around Local Food Chains.

For those of you thinking more carefully about shared farming and community farming, it might be helpful to consider that the model of Farming most likely to work best for everyone will sit somewhere between groups of what we recognise as typical small commercial or family farms today and the community farming models that we can already see in action like this one in Stroud today.

When you consider all the different Foods and the quantities that can be produced across a range of farms, and then add local processing and retail (like abattoirs, butchery, milling, bakery, dairies, fishmongers, greengrocers) – which will quickly make a lot more sense in a time of Food Shortages, it is much easier to visualise how Local Food Chains can not only work, but will begin to restore Food and Food Production to being a central part of our communities and life.

Food: The heart of Communities of the Future

These pages on Grow Your Own have turned out to be much more extensive than I had expected when I began writing over the Whitsun Bank Holiday weekend.

I hope that by reaching this point and having had the opportunity to consider all of the options and aspects there are to Home Growing and Growing Food with the Community, you may have begun to see how Food and Food Production can bring People together, as well as Growing Our Own being a very important part of creating access for us all to Foods We Can Trust.

Whether we Grow Our Own at Home, or contribute to a Community effort in whatever form that might be, there is good reason to believe that even if not all of our Food is grown and brought to us this way, a significant amount of it will be, IF we really want to be sure that we are eating Foods We Can Trust, whilst also having an economic system that not only includes everyone, but is also balanced, fair and just for all.

If you would like to read more of my work on this important area of new thinking, please visit and take a look at my previous works which you will find on my Blog.

Cost

I am very mindful of the additional cost or ‘start-up’ costs for anyone who would like to Grow Food at Home with limited resources.

Like most things today, prices of any of the equipment required will always vary and it is always advisable to shop around.

However, the links of suppliers and organisations that are listed as we have covered the different methods to Grow Your Own and the Foods that you can grow too will certainly help with online searches for better prices – if the prices that some of them offer aren’t as competitive as they could be themselves.

I’m not kidding when I say that some of the people who could benefit most from Growing Their Own Food today are also those who simply don’t have the spare cash to invest in any of the things that they would need to continue alone.

For anyone experiencing that kind of difficulty, or for those who would prefer to work with others and perhaps get the social benefits of doing so, there is good reason to believe that looking for local gardening clubs or similar organisations could easily open up opportunities to collaborate, work together and pool existing resources, so that the initial outlay and costs associated with getting Your Home Growing started can be shared in different ways.

Online searches that use the name and location of the place that you live will always be a good place to begin. For example, search ‘gardening clubs in (place I live)’, or ‘gardening clubs near to where I live’.

Sharing Your Knowledge on Home Growing

With it being likely that many of us will need to embrace Growing Our Own Food, I am keen to link and collaborate with people, groups and organisations who are open to sharing their knowledge, experience, tips and stories that can help anyone who wants to consider Growing their Own Food using whatever resources they have or may be able to secure.

If you can share information, downloads or would perhaps like to record a tutorial or interview, please get in touch.

Thoughts on Grow Your Own

Writing this section of Foods We Can Trust has so far taken the longest time to complete.

Grow Your Own offers an opportunity for us all to reconnect with sustainable living and demonstrates that the opportunities to return to DIY living or to make an active contribution to ways of providing the things that are essential for us all to live are not something that can only happen out of sight, out of mind or behind the screen of some digital box.

Honestly, I was amazed by how much information, resources and advice is available for anyone thinking about Grow Your Own.

The list and variety of the Foods that we can grow at home, whether it’s in a container, grow bag, window box, greenhouse, garden, allotment or using hydroponics is simply staggering.

Yes, there are some very good reasons for as many of us as possible taking up Growing Our Own Food, but the benefits are much bigger than just adding a source of Food alone.

I hope that after reading through these pages, you will feel the same!

The real implications of the UKs Food Strategy 2025

I have very mixed feelings about government strategies and reports.

Experience has proven that the real story usually lies hidden in how they say what they do say, what they actually say and why they say they’ve said it.

So, it’s only by carefully reading the political double speak, seeing what’s been missed or is merely present so it’s seen to be there, and then capturing what they really mean, that even people with real-life roles in the UK Food Chain have any chance of working out what’s really going on.

The use and misuse of There, Their and They’re perhaps offer a very quick analogical likeness of how different words, whole phrases and sentences that look and sound exactly the same are used by government to mean different things to us as opposed to what they mean to them.

Deliberately, with the intention to manipulatively mislead in ways that can later be used to suggest we were aware all along, relevant topics such as the intended use or application of technology are very carefully presented to us by those who supposedly serve the public, in the knowledge that anyone reading these carefully crafted messages, who isn’t pretty much fluent in the underlying language, will very quickly misread and therefore misunderstand the intentions, direction and desired outcomes.

The fact that a Food Strategy arrives on the Internet in polished form without anyone I or probably you would know from our daily lives and the communities around us having ever been asked or given the opportunity to genuinely engage, is a good indicator that what anyone on the receiving end of the policies in question thinks really doesn’t matter to whoever is driving their implementation.

When we begin to read about the consulting organisations and see that it appears at least some of them are newly created with the intent that they will do their bit at a time and place to be determined up ahead, we get a real feel for what the context of this policy direction instrument is likely to be. Given that food production is a subject that is deliberately played down politically – even though it should – as the intended backdrop of this document suggests – be a key issue of our time.

Rather than just provide a general commentary on the Food Strategy, for the purposes of this post, I have opted instead to pick out the points that are most important and then explain why they impact in that way.

Before anything else, you can read A UK Food Strategy For England HERE and I will be very happy for you to comment on what I’ve written or what you’ve taken away from this page or from the Food Strategy itself.

Direction and the Outcomes Sought

“Food is a big part of life in the United Kingdom. It gives us energy, brings us joy, and helps us feel connected to our communities.”

The Food Strategy opens with this statement. And to be fair, it really does sound like the point is nailed immediately.

However, it’s important to think about that opening line and what it says much more carefully. After all, these are the words or statement that most readers will pay attention to before they glaze over – which is often the plan.

This first line tells us much about the real direction of travel and what this Food Strategy is really about. And it’s not about all the different things that are carefully included throughout this and the adjoining documents that are linked in the way we are intended to think.

So before breaking it down, let’s be clear about the message that should be jumping out in the first blast of the Ministerial Foreword instead:

Food isn’t just a big part of life; Food IS life and without it, we simply don’t have one.

Food is so much more than something that gives us energy and joy – which are the only real issues that the establishment are focused on when it comes to keeping public opinion on side.

After all, in their minds, as long as the food we eat means we don’t experience hunger and we are all are happy after eating, that’s all they need worry about.

Food – and Foods We Can Trust require a different approach and values set entirely and none of this is that in any real sense at all.

In so far as talking about the links to communities and the mentions of the word community are concerned, the concept of community is very important when it comes to the future of our Food Supply and Food Security.

But the use of community in this Strategy is just for the purposes of making it sound like the establishment is aligned with where the priorities of food and food production should be. Which as discussed within my recent works ‘What is Food Security’ and ‘Our Local Future’ is very much about locality in every sense and not just a badge that suggests politicians and government officers are reliable and ‘on side’ – just because they’ve again used words that say what they believe we want to hear.

The Food System

“With the right leadership, we can become a world leader in sustainable healthy food production – tackling climate change, boosting resilience and securing our food future”

This statement really sums up the political position of the establishment and what might be best called the ‘accepted narrative’.

This statement is the collection of key phrases that relate to the priorities that the establishment has in mind when it is thinking about Food, and what they want it to mean to the public.

Once again, the statement sounds like its targeted in just the right way with talk of becoming a world leader in sustainable healthy food production.

But sustainable can mean many different things. And whilst the document refers to sustainable a number of times, the Food Strategy doesn’t directly talk about Sustainable Agriculture, growing or indeed any other forms of natural, farmed food production in the UK itself. And whilst even some farmers would currently disagree, it is only as part of a wholly Regenerative Farming or Traditional Farming approach being adopted throughout UK Farming will be the only way that genuine Sustainable Farming can be achieved in a way that makes the UK genuinely Food Secure.

Resilience is another word that at first glance makes it sound very much like this is a government that means what it says when it comes to our future experiences of Food. After all, who wouldn’t want us to have a resilient food supply?

The problem is that resilience said, and resilience done are two very different things.

As the influences at work on this Food Strategy such as the relationship with the EU come into play, the resilience that is being talked about assumes that resilience will always be based and assured upon the existence of the import and export dynamics that exist today. Yet in a very uncertain world, any good politician or government leader would be foolish to assume these will always remain in place.

The reality we face is that this supply chain could collapse at any time.

“We are committed to transforming the food system – making nutritious, locally grown British food more accessible and affordable for all”

I really like this statement. I would love for it to be true. But I don’t believe it for a second. Because these words simply do not correlate with the actions of the government that to date have been fully in view.

Most people reading these words will assume or take away the idea that the government and all the organisations supporting the Food Chain or Food Supply are going to gather or coalesce around a community-centric transformation of the existing system and do everything within their power to make this happen – in the best interests of all.

Unfortunately, it really doesn’t work that way and isn’t going to work that way with the massive range of profit and agenda led interests that already have very influential roles throughout the Food Chain and which I discussed in ‘Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future’.

The key thing that we all need to be clear about and accept – is that the transformation must be funded by private money, as this Food Strategy makes clear the government is committed to through the statement; “Government has an important role to play in supporting and creating the right environment for investment, but the majority of investment will come from the private sector’.

Whilst I’m sure that my views have annoyed many from the farming community for whom I have great respect, there is no question that if UK Food Production systems are going to be transformed and lead to an outcome where UK Agriculture, Growers and the UK Fishing Industry are restored to their rightful and appropriate place, it will be the Farmers, Growers and Fishers (and the industries that are aligned with them) themselves that will have to ‘privately fund’ this change.

That should make us all very happy. Because that’s where we need to be.

However, it’s certainly not where we are.

The majority of Farmers are still expecting that government will put up the money for any required changes – even though this statement makes explicit that the direction of travel will be funded by private interests.

If Farmers, Growers and Fishers aren’t the private interests that pay for and therefore own the direction of change, the private interests that dictate the future of our Food will be the big corporations, banks and financiers.

If big money interests fund the future of UK Farming (as there is much evidence to confirm they have already started) the vision of what Community Food Systems are and will become, will look very different to what anyone from todays UK Farming industry will believe they should be.

Its clear here, in black and white, in this Food Strategy who and what is really driving everything.

Farmers, Growers and Fishers still have the power to turn this all around and reject the inevitability with which this Food Strategy has been presented.

However, everyone within the Farming, Growing and Fishing communities that wants to save UK Food Production really does have to start collaborating; wake up to the reality that underpins the mood music and the subtext that is already at play, which is fast becoming direct messaging – all as the establishment concludes that these traditional industries no longer really matter and are so confident in what they are doing that they openly behave like they couldn’t care less.

‘Established in the early 20th century’

As the Food Strategy develops, it begins to make statements that have an estranged relationship with the truth at best. Like this one that talks about the existing Food System being established in the early 20th Century.

Be under no illusion; this is what the establishment want everyone to think.

The suggestion paints the picture that this Food Strategy is now being created and will be implemented to ‘save’ us from an antiquated and out of date way of ‘doing food’, which is no longer fit for purpose.

Yes, the Food System and Food Chain that we have today really isn’t fit for purpose. But it’s not fit for purpose because it doesn’t deliver Foods We Can Trust.

Today’s UK Food Chain certainly doesn’t prioritise human food consumption in the way that we should be able to expect government to prioritise something as important to human beings as the consumption of water and air.

The Food System in the UK – and across the world – is vastly different to what it was and what it was like a century ago – which to be clear would be a quarter into the 20th Century in 1925.

World War II made a significant impact on food production in the UK. As up until the outbreak of war, a similar complacency had taken hold of the food question, and the Country was left dangerously exposed by the reliance that we then had on imports from around the world.

The Battle of the Atlantic and considerable effort made by the German Navy to sink merchant shipping supplying the UK on all approaching trade routes helped pressure the strategy for domestic food production back towards self-sufficiency and a productionist or output-orientated approach that was then supported heavily by government once the war had ended.

Whilst the UK really has no excuse to not be self sufficient in the supply of essential food supplies, the change in post war financial dynamics, following the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1944, soon meant that commercial priorities took over and the productionist or output-driven agenda was adopted both by business and the neoliberal orthodoxy which fed into the push for globalisation that really took over formally in 1971.

It was the obsession with output, aligned with what seemed like the unimportant transition of industrial processes that had been created and pushed towards arms production and then repurposed into fertilizer production that helped with the strategy to move away from traditional, sustainable and environmentally beneficial farming practices. Moving to easy fixes that certainly made all kinds of land seem highly profitable for a short time but then fell afoul of the EU (Common Market and Common Agricultural Policy) that heralded British Agriculture’s definitive decline upon arrival.

Farmers being re-educated to the point where they have forgotten to be creative and entrepreneurial and instead have become reliant upon subsidies and then the contracts that the removal of organisations like the Milk Marketing Board led Farmers becoming beholden to, have all contributed to the highly vulnerable situation that the industry faces across the UK today.

This deliberately engineered mess has led to a level of Food Insecurity in the UK that is critically dangerous, with around only 11% of the food we consume being immediately or directly available to the UK population today, if we were for any reason to experience a real crisis that shut down imports for any prolonged period of time.

It is the strategy and those behind it – including the big global and corporate businesses, that have dictated the way that the UK has been farming for at least the past half-century.

It is massively disingenuous of the government and the establishment to speak or make any policy moves that suggest the farming methods of a century ago are the same as they are now. And that the only way that the UK can have a sustainable, robust and secure Food Policy is to leave the natural-orientated, genuinely traditional forms of farming behind – whilst they are actually methods of producing Food that have not formed the real basis of the way British Agriculture has worked, for at least that amount of time.

‘As our largest agri food trade partner, how the EU approaches these challenges are particularly relevant’

The influence of the EU and the current governments push, not only to realign but to reintegrate Food Policy with them is massively troubling. Not least of all because every step taken is one backwards from a genuine democratic plebiscite where the majority of the UK voting population voted for the UK to leave the EU – which in reality, it never did anyway.

Ironically for all those who believe that the now crumbling EU was and always will be the very best place for the UK to be, the whole EU project is and always has been nothing less than a continental franchise of the globalisation project.

The political takeover of nation states and the creation of centralised world government is at its very heart, and this is regrettably best demonstrated by the close and beholden relationship that all those committed to the WEF (World Economic Forum) throughout politics have in turn with the EU.

These are all organisations that are historically shown to have been exceptionally good at buying support by appealing to the base instincts of voters. Meanwhile hiding deregulation that hands power to big business, and then regulating people and small independent businesses more and more by creating rules, regulations and systems that supposedly raise standards, encourage safety and promote high quality, but do in fact control, exclude and shut down independent businesses – particularly in all parts of the Food Chain, that when able to operate and function independently as and within localised ecosystems are a complete threat to centralised control.

Shortly after this statement, the Food Strategy suggests that the relationship will cut red tape, which is genuinely hilarious, bearing in mind that the red tape they are talking about being cut is only that which will be removed by the UK once again having those systems not just aligned with but under the control of the EU.

“The next key milestone will be the development of metrics, indicators and implementation plans for the food strategy outcomes.”

If the realities of this document already discussed were not concerning enough already, we then move on to the development of metrics (that’s measuring progress), indicators (so the things that show their plans are proving to be successful) and the implementation itself, which should probably be seen more as a rubber stamping of the latest actions, rather than anything that may or may not be left to chance in the future.

Yes, talk of something that has been called the Good Food Cycle sounds very good when taken at face value.

But we are in times when words and terms that politicians and government officials use are deliberately misleading (as we discussed earlier with There, their and They’re). And when this catchy term is put in its objective context, there is every chance that the Food we all end up with will not have anything within it that’s in any way good about it at all!

Ending mass dependence on emergency food parcels would of course be a truly fantastic outcome to have achieved. But only in relation to how things are working now and not in the context which this Strategy could all too easily mean.

Based upon the way government is now behaving, the way that this Food Strategy is written is almost certainly just another step in plans for every part of life that will lead to at least 2 tiers of society. A situation where the poorest, vulnerable and by then those engineered to be unemployed using the AI takeover will be fed in the same way with Foods that simply have no relationship with natural food production. Thereby complicating removing what’s left of the remaining but nonetheless real component of the majority of the Foods that are available to us at exploding prices now.

Alternative proteins

Alternative Proteins are mentioned at different points throughout the Food Strategy.

If you weren’t concerned enough already, this is where this already dark Food Strategy starts to go completely black. As Alternative Proteins is the accepted term for synthesised and artificially created foods, that this whole Strategy is laying the way for.

General Comment

My real concern about this Food Strategy is that so few who read it and consider how seemingly well put together it appears, will see the content and direction for what it all really is.

Legitimacy to this ‘work’ has been given by the participation and ‘contribution’ of advocacy organisations such as the NFU (National Farmers Union) who are providing exceptional membership services to the members who they face. But have not got any genuine ability to advocate through the fear they have of having the relationships with government and the public sector cancelled or burned.

The advocacy organisations pay lip service and certainly make much noise when it comes to the issues. But they fear being excluded from the process, much more than what the outcome of what that process actually will be.

Lines like ‘We need to restore pride in and build on our unique food heritage and cultures’ and then the reference to the production of Food being ‘Patriotic’ certainly play to the whims of the growing populist movement that is becoming a massive threat to both the government and the public sector, and of which the Starmer led government is massively afraid.

But they are in no way related to what this Strategy really is or is about.

Regrettably, the damage that could already have been done to what is left of the UKs ability to feed itself once more, by the time we have a new government actually capable of driving reversal, will have already gone too far and the chance of the UK becoming self-sufficient in food production and therefore Food Secure in the real sense will have been completely undone.

Links:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-uk-government-food-strategy-for-england/a-uk-government-food-strategy-for-england-considering-the-wider-uk-food-system