The solutions we need won’t come from anything we already do. Because it’s everything we already do that caused the problems.
The Familiar Path That Led Us Here
Right now, people believe they’re seeing the full picture. They believe they understand the crisis, the chaos, the uncertainty – because the surface‑level symptoms are impossible to ignore.
But the deeper reality is still being missed. Not because it’s hidden, but because most people aren’t yet in a place where they can recognise what they’re looking at.
Perspectives shape perception. And when perspectives are shaped by habit, fear, conditioning, or the comfort of familiar narratives, they filter out the very things that matter most.
That’s why so many warning signs are dismissed. Why so many contradictions go unchallenged. Why people can feel informed while still being completely unaware of what’s actually unfolding.
Understanding doesn’t come from information alone. It comes from readiness – from the moment when someone’s internal landscape shifts enough for them to finally see what was always there.
Until that readiness arrives, even the clearest truth will look like noise, exaggeration, or irrelevance.
And that’s the challenge we face: not just to speak truth, but to recognise that truth only lands when the conditions allow it to.
Seeing Through the Fog of Perspectives
In times like these, people assume they’re fully aware of what’s happening around them.
The noise is loud, the chaos is visible, and the headlines never stop. It creates the illusion of clarity – as if simply noticing the disruption means understanding its cause.
But awareness and understanding are not the same thing.
Much of what matters is still out of view. Not because it’s hidden, but because most people aren’t yet equipped to recognise the patterns behind the events.
They see the symptoms, not the structure.
They see the fallout, not the forces shaping it.
They see the drama, not the design.
That’s why so many explanations sound far‑fetched to those who aren’t ready for them. Why warnings are dismissed. Why truths are labelled extreme until the moment they become obvious.
And this is the danger: when people believe they already see everything, they stop looking for what they’ve missed.
Rattles in the Vehicle We Thought Was Safe
We are, metaphorically speaking, passengers in a vehicle we don’t realise is breaking or already broken.
We race along, ignoring the rattles, because it’s still moving.
We convince ourselves everything’s fine, right up until the moment it stops and we’re forced to accept that we’ve broken down.
The warning signs are everywhere. No matter your business, sector, or situation, the red flags are waving from every direction in plain sight. But because the wheels are still turning – or appear to be – we keep believing that a change of driver or a quick pit stop is all we need.
We imagine that after a brief pause, the journey will resume, more comfortable than before, with a better seat and a better view.
But the vehicle – whether you can picture it as a car, train, or bus – represents everything we do and everything we believe we’ve always done.
The road beneath it is the path we’ve been set upon, shaped by our behaviours, expectations, attitudes, approaches, and the values we’ve allowed to guide us.
The Quiet Ways We All Contributed
And here’s the uncomfortable truth: no matter what problem you’re facing, no matter what crisis is unfolding, if it involves decisions made by others, then yes – you can probably identify who’s responsible. But at some level, we all share responsibility. We all helped build the road.
Even if we didn’t make the active choices that led us here, into this mess, we made choices nonetheless.
When we avoided risk, chose the easy option, kept quiet to avoid rocking the boat, ignored the truth, or failed to do what was right – we took action. And often, that action was simply allowing those with hidden agendas to get their way.
Everything has a cost.
For decades, we’ve been conditioned by manipulation, sleight of hand, and narratives designed to convince us that non‑conformity leads to isolation.
But the real cost has been far greater.
Everything that once held value – our businesses, workplaces, sports, social spaces, food, water, money, communication, education, jobs, reputations – has been diminished.
Not by accident, but by design. So it could be reformed, centralised, and ultimately placed under someone else’s control – even while we still believe we own it.
This includes the institutions people still trust by default: government, the public sector, and the systems built around them. They were supposed to safeguard society, yet they’ve become part of the machinery that has allowed decline, mismanagement, and manipulation to take root. Not because everyone within them is corrupt, but because the structures themselves are no longer fit for purpose – and haven’t been for a long time.
Understanding Comes Only When We’re Ready
The problems we face — in farming, hospitality, industry, with people, community, the environment, government, the public sector – all stem from the same system. From all the “everythings” each and every one of us do.
No matter our background or bubble, it all adds up to the same thing: the trouble the world is now in.
And what we’ve done and been doing so far cannot or will not fix it.
It doesn’t matter if we wait for a change in government while continuing to elect candidates chosen by people we don’t know.
It doesn’t matter if we keep believing the establishment is structured to serve us, or that it has the integrity to do so.
It doesn’t matter if we trust the financial system, or believe that inflation and the cost of living are beyond anyone’s control.
If we don’t change the fundamental building blocks – of life, economics, and governance – then no matter who’s in charge, things will only get worse.
And we’ll keep being told they’re getting better.
Crisis as Catalyst
Today, life just happens to us.
Business, money, governance – they’re systems we’re expected to show up for, participate in, and conform to. That’s it.
But conformity is what brought us here. And we’re standing at the doorway of something that, once we step through it, may quickly reveal that there is no way back.
It’s only this way and we only got here because we surrendered our power – more often than not without ever realising that we had even given it up.
Building Something That Puts People First
If we want to change anything – even the smallest thing – in the world around us, we must participate. We must play our part. That’s what living a proper life demands.
And if we want things not just to improve, but to become truly better, then we must all get involved.
The collapse we’re experiencing offers something rare: the chance to see and experience life differently. A chance that wouldn’t have come if things had continued as they were. Which they no longer can.
As circumstances worsen and reality begins to speak for itself, we have a choice.
We can take back our power. We can work with the people we know – the people we share our lives with – to reclaim genuine control. To put people, community, and the environment first.
The Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS) – built upon The Basic Living Standard – offers a new structure for the future.
LEGS isn’t a shortcut, and it isn’t a promise that someone else will fix things for us.
LEGS is simply a framework that puts people, community, and the environment back at the centre of life – where they always should have been.
What comes next won’t be shaped by governments, institutions, or systems that have already failed us. It will be shaped by the choices we make now, the conversations we have with the people around us, and the willingness we each find to choose and step through the doorway in front of us, that leads to a Future that no one else can define.
The world we knew is ending. But what replaces it is still ours to decide.
Further Reading
1. Awakening & How We Perceive the Crisis
Understanding how people ‘wake up’ to what’s really happening
Making sense of a system that isolates and divides – and building a fair, functional system that stands as a real alternative for everyone.
A Note from Adam
For nearly four years, I’ve been publishing books and blogs about change – why we need it, what’s wrong with the world as it stands, and why those wrongs keep repeating.
I’ve written knowing full well that only a small number of people were truly interested in the perspective I was offering. Not because the ideas lacked value, but because they don’t fit neatly within the way the world currently works. They challenge assumptions. They question the foundations. They ask us to look at the system itself, not just the symptoms.
And yet, despite the limited audience, I’ve felt compelled to keep writing.
Part of that comes from a long‑held understanding that the world we know has been living on borrowed time. The cracks have been visible for years – widening, deepening, accelerating – and it has been impossible for me to ignore them.
Much of the time, I didn’t even know that another book would follow the one I had just finished. I would wrap up a manuscript, thinking the work was complete, only for a new structure, a new purpose, a new piece of the puzzle to arrive almost immediately. And so I would begin again.
A few of you have been with me from the very beginning, quietly following each step of this journey.
Others have joined along the way. And now, more than ever, I sense a growing number of people recognising what I have felt for a long time: we cannot shape a new future by using the same shape that created everything that’s wrong.
After publishing The Basic Living Standard Explained, LEGS, and From Principle to Practice, it felt like the right moment to share a little more of the experience that has driven this work – the lived reality, the observations, the research, and the personal journey that have informed every page.
Not because my story is important in itself, but because I do not doubt that for many, understanding the path will help to illuminate the destination.
This work has become important – and yes, urgent – in ways I could never have anticipated when I began.
Even if only a few of you are reading, reflecting, and engaging with these ideas, that is enough. Change has always begun with those who are willing to see and lead by thinking differently.
My hope is that what follows here will give you a clear insight into how LEGS came into being, and perhaps offer a sense of the depth and scope of the thinking that has shaped it along the way.
Thank you for being here.
Thank you for reading.
And thank you for caring enough to imagine something better.
Introduction
This work did not begin with a single idea, a political moment, or a sudden revelation. It began with a pattern – one that kept appearing no matter where I stood or what role I was in.
Whether I was a councillor working with public policy, developing services for charities and local authorities, running businesses, or volunteering within communities, I kept seeing the same thing: people were being pushed, pulled, and shaped by forces they didn’t control and often couldn’t even see.
Problems were treated as isolated issues, when in reality they were symptoms of the same failing system. And the system itself – fragmented, money‑centric, hierarchical, and blind to human reality – had no idea it was failing.
At some point, the realisation became impossible to ignore:
I came to see that all of us are in different boats, shaped by our own circumstances, yet all being blown around by the same winds – economic forces, political decisions, and pressures we never chose.
Most people have no control over where they’re heading or even realise when they’re drifting toward danger.
LEGS and the Basic Living Standard are about giving people an engine of their own, the power to steer their own direction, and the ability to reach safe shores they define for themselves, where a new world that works for everyone can begin.
That image stayed with me because it captured exactly what I had witnessed throughout my life. People weren’t failing. They were navigating a storm in vessels that were never built for them, under a system that blamed them for every wave that hit.
My own childhood gave me the first glimpse of this truth. Growing up in a one‑parent family, I didn’t know we were “poor” until the world told me.
What I did know – even then – was that life felt harder than it should, and that the rules seemed to work differently for different people.
Later, when I found myself working with public policy, charity development, local government projects, business operations, and voluntary roles, that early awareness became a lens. I could see the system from both sides: the side that created the rules, and the side that lived with the consequences.
The more I saw, the clearer it became that the system wasn’t malfunctioning. It was functioning exactly as designed – and that design no longer works for the world we live in.
A research project on my Postgraduate Course in 2023 confirmed what experience had already taught me. Inside a Gloucestershire foodbank, I heard stories that revealed the same structural truth: people were not struggling because of personal failure, but because the system had made survival itself a calculation that no longer added up.
‘The minute you step away from the ground, everything becomes theoretical.’
And that is exactly how the system hides its own contradictions.
This four-years body of work – from Levelling Level to The Basic Living Standard, From Here to There Through Now, The Way of Awakened Politics, The Grassroots Manifesto, A Community Route, and the conceptual foundation I call The Revaluation – is the result of following that pattern to its root.
Each step revealed another layer. Each layer made the next step unavoidable. And together, they led to one conclusion:
You cannot fix a system that is designed to protect itself from change.
But you can build a new one.
LEGS – the Local Economy & Governance System – is that new system.
The Basic Living Standard is its foundation.
And the work that follows is the framework or map.
This introduction is not an argument for ideology. It is an invitation to see the world differently – to recognise that the future is not predetermined, and that the systems we live within are Then when when choices, not inevitabilities.
If we choose differently, if we choose people first, if we choose dignity, locality, fairness, and responsibility, then the world that follows will be one worth living in.
This is the beginning of that choice.
SECTION 1 – The Real Problem: A System That Fragments Everything
When people ask me why I’ve spent the past four years working on this – writing, researching, building, refining – the answer isn’t simple. It certainly isn’t ideological. And it didn’t arrive in a single moment of inspiration.
It came from years of watching the same pattern repeat itself in every direction I looked.
Whether I was working in public policy, regulatory environments, the voluntary sector, or running businesses and operations, the same truth kept revealing itself:
We treat every problem as if it exists in isolation.
But nothing in real life works that way.
We talk about the cost-of-living crisis as if it’s separate from housing.
We talk about housing as if it’s separate from wages.
We talk about wages as if they’re separate from business models.
We talk about business models as if they’re separate from governance.
We talk about governance as if it’s separate from values.
We talk about values as if they’re separate from community.
We talk about community as if it’s separate from the economy.
And on it goes – endlessly dividing, categorising, isolating.
This fragmentation is not accidental. It’s built into the way the system thinks.
A money‑centric system can only see problems in terms of:
cost
efficiency
productivity
risk
compliance
metrics
optics
It cannot see people. It cannot see relationships. It cannot see interconnectedness. It cannot see the whole.
And because it cannot see the whole, it cannot fix the whole.
So instead, it breaks everything into pieces – and then blames the people trapped in those pieces for the consequences.
If you’re struggling with rent, the problem is you. If you’re struggling with food, the problem is you. If you’re struggling with debt, the problem is you. If you’re struggling with work, the problem is you. If you’re struggling with mental health, the problem is you. If you’re struggling with anything at all, the problem is always you.
This is the great sleight of hand of the money‑centric paradigm:
It creates the crisis, then convinces you that you are the crisis.
And because every crisis is treated as a separate issue, the system never has to confront the truth:
All of these problems come from the same place.
They are symptoms of the same design.
They are outputs of the same worldview.
This is why I’m doing this.
Because once you’ve seen the interconnectedness – once you’ve watched the same pattern play out in public policy, in regulation, in business, in community life, in governance, in economics – you can’t unsee it.
And once you’ve seen it, you realise something else:
No amount of tinkering will fix a system that is designed to fragment reality.
The only solution is to build a system that sees the whole.
That is where this journey began.
SECTION 2 – How the System Turns Symptoms Into “Individual Problems”
One of the most revealing things I’ve learned – not just from research, but from many years of working with charities, in politics, regulatory environments, and business, is that the system has a remarkable ability to turn its own failures into your failures.
It doesn’t matter whether the issue is:
poverty
housing
food insecurity
debt
mental health
loneliness
precarious employment
small business collapse
community breakdown
environmental decline
The pattern is always the same.
The system creates the conditions.
The system produces the harm.
And then the system convinces the individual that they are the cause.
If you can’t afford rent, it’s because you “didn’t plan well enough.”
If you can’t afford food, it’s because you “budget badly.”
If you’re struggling with debt, it’s because you “made poor choices.”
If you’re overwhelmed, it’s because you “aren’t resilient enough.”
If you’re exhausted, it’s because you “aren’t working the right way.”
If you’re anxious, it’s because you “aren’t coping.”
If you’re drowning, it’s because “you didn’t swim fast enough.”
This is the quiet violence of a money‑centric system.
It isolates every problem. It personalises every struggle. It individualises every consequence.
And in doing so, it hides the truth:
These are not personal failures. They are systemic outputs.
They are the predictable, inevitable consequences of a system that:
prioritises money over people
treats human needs as market variables
reduces life to transactions
fragments every issue into separate categories
refuses to see the whole
refuses to take responsibility
And because each problem is treated as a standalone issue, the system never has to confront the deeper reality:
All of these crises are connected.
They come from the same root.
They are symptoms of the same design.
This is why people feel overwhelmed. This is why people feel alone. This is why people feel like they’re failing.
Because the system has trained us to see only the part we’re trapped in – not the whole structure that created it.
And this is where the cruelty becomes almost elegant in its simplicity:
When you’re struggling, the struggle becomes your entire world.
And that is exactly how the system keeps itself hidden.
If you’re fighting to pay rent, you don’t have the bandwidth to question why housing is unaffordable in the first place.
If you’re juggling three jobs, you don’t have time to question why wages don’t cover basic living costs.
If you’re relying on foodbanks, you don’t have the energy to question why food insecurity exists in a wealthy country.
If you’re drowning in debt, you don’t have the clarity to question why debt is built into the economic model.
If you’re exhausted, you don’t have the strength to question why the system demands exhaustion as a condition of survival.
This is not accidental. This is not incidental. This is not unfortunate.
This is structural.
A system that fragments problems keeps people fragmented.
A system that isolates problems keeps people isolated.
A system that personalises problems keeps people powerless.
And this is the point where my own lived experience – and later, my research – began to collide with everything I had seen in politics, government, charities and business.
Because once you recognise the pattern, you start to see it everywhere.
You see it in the way government talks about “helping the vulnerable” while designing systems that create vulnerability.
You see it in the way businesses talk about “opportunity” while structuring work so people can never get ahead.
You see it in the way regulators talk about “fairness” while enforcing rules that entrench inequality.
You see it in the way society talks about “personal responsibility” while ignoring the structural conditions that shape every choice people can make.
And you realise something that changes everything:
People are not failing.
The system is failing.
And people are carrying the cost.
This is the moment the narrative shifts. This is the moment the illusion cracks. This is the moment you stop seeing isolated problems and start seeing the architecture behind them.
And once you see the architecture, you can no longer pretend that any single issue – poverty included – can be solved on its own.
Because the truth is simple:
You cannot fix symptoms in a system that is designed to produce them.
You can only fix the system itself.
And that is where the next part of this story begins.
SECTION 3 – Seeing the System from the Inside: My Lived Experience
Long before I ever worked in charities, public policy, regulatory environments, politics or business, I had already seen the system from the ground level – not through theory, but through lived experience.
I grew up in a one‑parent family, in circumstances that would now be described as poverty. At the time, I didn’t have the language for it. I didn’t have the context. I didn’t have the comparisons. I simply lived it.
And that’s the thing about childhood poverty: you don’t know you’re “poor” until the world tells you.
You don’t feel deprived if you’ve never had the things other people take for granted.
You don’t feel different until someone points out the difference.
You don’t feel the weight of the system until it presses down on you.
Looking back, what strikes me most is not the lack of money – it’s the normality of it all.
The rituals of stretching every pound. The quiet calculations. The constant trade‑offs. The small victories that felt enormous. The moments of shame that arrived without warning.
But the most important part – the part that shaped everything that came later – was this:
When you grow up inside a system that doesn’t work for you, you learn to see the system differently.
You learn to notice the gaps.
You learn to feel the pressure points.
You learn to sense the contradictions.
You learn to recognise when something is being presented as “your fault” when it clearly isn’t.
You learn, very early on, that the world is not designed with everyone in mind.
And once you have it, that awareness never really leaves you.
It sits quietly in the background as you move through life.
It colours the way you see decisions being made.
It shapes the way you interpret policy.
It influences the way you understand power.
It sharpens your sense of fairness.
It makes you pay attention to the things other people overlook.
Later in life, whether I was chairing licensing hearings, building services for charities, developing operational models for a county council, running businesses, or volunteering in roles that put me shoulder‑to‑shoulder with people on the ground, I kept encountering the same pattern from different angles.
And the more I saw, the more I recognised the same pattern I had lived through as a child:
The system creates the conditions.
The system produces the harm.
And then the system tells people the harm is their fault.
Every part of life touched by the system carried the same signature.
And that’s when the realisation began to take shape – slowly at first, then with increasing clarity:
The problem isn’t the people.
The problem is the system.
And the system cannot see itself.
My lived experience didn’t give me the answers. But it gave me the ability to see the questions that weren’t being asked.
It gave me the ability to recognise when a policy was designed to look good rather than do good.
It gave me the ability to sense when a decision was made for optics rather than outcomes.
It gave me the ability to understand why people were struggling even when the numbers said they shouldn’t be.
It gave me the ability to see the human cost behind the spreadsheets, the metrics, the targets, the narratives.
And it gave me something else – something that would become essential later:
The understanding that lived experience is not subjective noise.
It is data.
It is evidence.
It is truth.
This is why, when I began writing Levelling Level in 2022, I wasn’t writing from theory.
I was writing from a lifetime of seeing the system from both sides – the side that suffers its consequences, and the side that creates them.
And that dual perspective became the foundation for everything that followed.
SECTION 4 – Contemporary Evidence of Systemic Failure: My 2023 Research
By the time I began my postgraduate research project in 2023, I had already spent years seeing the system from multiple angles – as a child living within its consequences, and later as an adult working in professional and voluntary roles reaching across the different sectors.
But nothing prepared me for how starkly the system would reveal itself when I stepped into a Gloucestershire foodbank as part of my project.
I didn’t go there to confirm a theory, or qualify my own experience from decades before.
I went there to understand the lived reality of poverty today – to see how it feels, how it functions, and how it is being experienced by the people who have no choice but to navigate it.
What I found was not simply a story about food insecurity. It was a window into the architecture of the entire system.
Because the foodbank wasn’t just a place where people came for food. It was a place where the consequences of the system gathered in one room.
And the experience I had there crystallised something I had sensed for years:
The system is failing people in real time, every day – and it cannot see that it is failing.
A comment I heard from just one of the many professionals supporting people through Foodbanks across the UK today still echoes in my mind:
Sometimes there just isn’t enough money to cover everything.
Not because people are irresponsible.
Not because they are lazy.
Not because they are making poor choices.
But because the system is designed in such a way that survival itself has become a calculation that no longer adds up.
Another stream of words struck me even harder:
The minute you are removed from the ground, it becomes theoretical.
This wasn’t just about politicians and public sector employees.
It was about the entire structure of decision‑making itself.
It was about the distance between those who design policy and those who live with its consequences.
It was about the blindness that comes from never having to experience the realities your decisions create.
It was about the way the system fragments problems so completely that even those working within it struggle to see the whole.
And then there was this:
What used to be a crisis is harder to get out of… we see people more regularly than we used to.
Foodbanks were never meant to be structural.
They were meant to be emergency support.
But the system has normalised crisis.
It has institutionalised scarcity.
It has made emergency provision part of the everyday landscape.
And the people who walk through those doors carry not just hunger, but shame, fear, exhaustion, and a sense of personal failure – even though the failure is not theirs.
One of the most revealing insights came when the foodbank worker said:
If you work with people, you can get almost anyone out of that crisis point… but sometimes there just isn’t enough money to cover everything.
This is the system in a single sentence:
The problem is not the person.
The problem is not the behaviour.
The problem is not the choices.
The problem is the structure.
The problem is the design.
The problem is the system itself.
And yet, the system continues to treat each case as an individual failing – a budgeting issue, a lifestyle issue, a motivational issue – anything except a structural issue.
This is the same pattern I had seen in every sector I’d worked in.
But here, in the foodbank, it was laid bare.
Poverty is not the cause.
Poverty is the evidence.
Poverty is the symptom of a system that no longer works.
And the most important realisation of all was this:
The experience of poverty becomes the entire world for the person living it.
And that is exactly how the system hides the bigger picture.
Because when you are fighting to survive, you cannot step back far enough to see the architecture that created the fight.
This research didn’t change my understanding.
It confirmed it.
It showed me that the fragmentation I had seen in government, politics, business, regulation, and community life was not theoretical.
It was lived.
It was real.
It was happening now.
And it was happening everywhere.
It showed me that the system is not broken in one place – it is broken in every place.
And because it is broken everywhere, it cannot see its own failures anywhere.
This was the moment the work I had been doing since February 2022 shifted from important to unavoidable.
Because once you have seen the system clearly – once you have seen how it behaves, how it hides, how it blames, how it fragments, how it isolates – you realise something that changes everything:
You cannot fix a system that is designed to produce the very problems it claims to solve.
You can only build a new one.
And that is where the next part of this story begins.
SECTION 5 – The Realisation: The System Cannot Be Fixed From Within
By the time I completed and submitted my research project in late 2023, something had become unmistakably clear:
the system wasn’t just failing – it was incapable of recognising its own failures.
And once you see that, you can no longer pretend that reform, tinkering, or “better management” will make any meaningful difference.
Because the truth is this:
You cannot fix a system from within when the system is designed to protect itself from change.
This wasn’t an abstract conclusion.
It was something I had watched unfold repeatedly across every environment I had worked in:
In politics, where decisions were shaped by narratives rather than needs.
In regulatory structures, where rules were written to preserve the system, not improve outcomes.
In charity development, where services existed to fill gaps the system refused to acknowledge.
In local government, where bureaucracy replaced responsibility.
In business operations, where profit dictated priorities even when it harmed people.
In voluntary roles, where the human cost of systemic failure was impossible to ignore.
Everywhere I looked, the same pattern emerged:
The system treats symptoms as isolated problems because acknowledging the cause would require changing itself.
This is why poverty is treated as a budgeting issue.
Why housing is treated as a supply issue.
Why food insecurity is treated as a charity issue.
Why debt is treated as a personal responsibility issue.
Why mental health is treated as an individual resilience issue.
Why community breakdown is treated as a behavioural issue.
Why governance failure is treated as a political issue.
Every problem is reframed in a way that keeps the system intact.
And this is where the realisation becomes unavoidable:
The system is not malfunctioning. It is functioning exactly as designed.
A money‑centric system will always:
prioritise money over people
fragment problems into isolated categories
blame individuals for structural failures
reward behaviours that harm the collective
centralise power away from communities
treat human needs as market variables
hide its own contradictions
resist any change that threatens its logic
This is why the system cannot be repaired.
It can only be replaced.
And this is the point where my earlier work – the books I had written since February 2022 – suddenly made sense as a single, coherent journey.
Levelling Level was the first attempt to articulate the breadth of the problem – to show that no issue exists in isolation, and that political soundbites like “Levelling Up” were distractions from the deeper systemic failures.
The Basic Living Standard emerged because I realised that dignity cannot depend on charity, debt, or government intervention – it must be built into the structure of the economy itself.
From Here to There Through Now explored the transition – the bridge between paradigms – because you cannot leap from a failing system to a new one without understanding the steps in between.
The Way of Awakened Politics for Good Government confronted the reality that governance itself must change – that unconscious decision‑making is the root of systemic harm, and that awakened, values‑based leadership is essential.
A Community Route provided the frameworks – the practical structures that allow communities to lead, decide, and shape their own futures without hierarchy or centralised control.
The Revaluation articulated the paradigm shift – the moment where we stop measuring life through money and begin valuing people, community, and environment as the foundations of a functioning society.
Each book was a step.
Each step revealed another layer.
Each layer exposed another truth.
And together, they led to the same conclusion:
The system cannot be fixed.
But a new system can be built.
A system that sees the whole.
A system that understands interconnectedness.
A system that puts people first.
A system that restores locality, dignity, and responsibility.
A system that treats human needs as non‑negotiable.
A system that values contribution over accumulation.
A system that works with human nature, not against it.
This is the moment where the idea of LEGS – the Local Economy & Governance System – stopped being a concept and became a necessity.
Not because it was perfect.
Not because it was easy.
Not because it was fashionable.
But because once you see the system clearly, you realise:
There is no alternative.
Not if we want a future that works for everyone.
And that is where the next part of this story begins.
SECTION 6 – The Journey Since February 2022: How Each Step Built the Foundations of LEGS
When I look back at the work I’ve produced since February 2022, it’s tempting to see each book as a separate project – a standalone piece responding to a particular moment or question.
But that isn’t what happened.
What actually unfolded was a process of discovery.
A gradual revealing.
A step‑by‑step evolution of understanding.
Each book was written because the one before it raised a deeper question.
Each question led to a clearer insight.
Each insight exposed another layer of the system. And each layer made the next step unavoidable.
None of this was planned.
It emerged.
It unfolded.
It evolved.
And that evolution is the reason LEGS exists at all.
Levelling Level – Seeing the System Clearly for the First Time
Levelling Level was the moment I became certain that the problems we face cannot be solved one at a time.
It exposed:
the fragmentation of public policy
the blindness of political soundbites
the illusion of “Levelling Up”
the failure of both Left and Right
the structural nature of inequality
the way money distorts every decision
It was the first time I articulated the truth that would underpin everything that followed:
You cannot fix a system by treating its symptoms.
You must understand the system as a whole.
Levelling Level was the diagnosis.
The Basic Living Standard – Defining the First Universal Framework
Once I understood the system, the next question was obvious:
What does fairness actually look like in practice?
The Basic Living Standard answered that question.
It introduced the idea that:
dignity must be built into the economic structure
survival cannot depend on charity, debt, or government intervention
the lowest legal wage must be enough to live on
the economy must serve people, not the other way around
This was the first practical framework – the first building block of a new system.
From Here to There Through Now – Understanding the Transition
The next question was equally unavoidable:
How do we get from a failing system to a functioning one?
From Here to There Through Now explored the transition – the bridge between paradigms.
It recognised that:
change is a process, not an event
people need a way to move from the old to the new
the system cannot be replaced overnight
the steps matter as much as the destination
This book was the bridge.
The Way of Awakened Politics for Good Government – Redefining Governance Itself
Once the transition was clear, another question emerged:
What kind of governance can actually deliver fairness, balance, and justice?
The Way of Awakened Politics for Good Government answered that.
It showed that:
unconscious decision‑making is the root of systemic harm
politics today is reactive, self‑interested, and blind
awakened, values‑based leadership is essential
governance must be human, not hierarchical
good government is a method, not an ideology
This book provided the philosophical foundation for a new form of governance.
The Grassroots Manifesto – The Turning Point
And then came the moment where everything shifted.
The Grassroots Manifesto was both a continuation of the journey and a turning point.
It was the first time I articulated:
a fully Grassroots‑Up model of democracy
Local Assemblies and Community Assemblies
the rejection of Top‑Down governance
the principle that power flows from the individual outward
the idea that communities must shape their own futures
the early frameworks that later became A Community Route
the recognition that the future must be built from the bottom up
This was the moment where the governance philosophy became a governance structure.
It was the moment where the idea of a new system stopped being conceptual and started becoming real.
A Community Route – The Practical Frameworks
Once the Grassroots model was clear, the next step was to define the practical structures that would make it work.
A Community Route introduced:
the 11 Principal Frameworks
Economic Localism
People First
No hierarchies
Local decision‑making
Fixed‑value currency
Technology as a tool, not a master
Community‑centred governance
This was the operational blueprint – the practical architecture of a new system.
The Revaluation – The Paradigm Shift (Unpublished but Foundational)
Alongside the published works, another body of thinking was developing – not as a book, but as a deeper conceptual foundation.
I called it The Revaluation.
It wasn’t written for publication.
It wasn’t structured as a standalone work.
It was a set of ideas, reflections, and insights that shaped everything else.
It explored:
the shift from money‑centric to people‑centric
the collapse of the old paradigm
the need to revalue everything
the centrality of community, locality, and stewardship
the philosophical foundation of LEGS
It was the internal work – the thinking beneath the thinking – that made the rest possible.
And then came LEGS – The Local Economy & Governance System
By the time all these pieces were in place, LEGS – developing from its first evolution Our Local Future, was not just an idea.
It was the inevitable conclusion of everything that had come before.
LEGS is:
the synthesis of the diagnosis
the application of the frameworks
the embodiment of the values
the structure of the governance
the architecture of the economy
the practical expression of the paradigm shift
It is the system that sees the whole.
The system that understands interconnectedness.
The system that puts people first.
The system that restores locality, dignity, and responsibility.
The system that works with human nature, not against it.
And it exists because the journey demanded it.
SECTION 7 – Introducing LEGS & the Basic Living Standard as the Systemic Alternative
By the time the journey had unfolded – through lived experience, professional experience, research, reflection, and the evolution of ideas across multiple works – one truth had become impossible to ignore:
The system we live in today cannot deliver fairness, balance, or dignity.
Not because the people within it are bad.
But because the system itself is built on the wrong foundations.
A money‑centric system will always:
prioritise accumulation over contribution
reward extraction over value
centralise power away from communities
fragment problems into isolated categories
blame individuals for structural failures
treat human needs as market variables
measure life in terms of cost rather than meaning
You cannot reform a system that is designed this way.
You cannot tweak it. You cannot patch it. You cannot “fix” it from within.
You have to build something different.
Something that starts from a different premise.
Something that begins with a different question.
Something that places value where value actually lives.
And that is where LEGS – the Local Economy & Governance System – comes in.
The LEGS Paradigm Shift
LEGS begins with one simple, radical shift: People First.
Not as a slogan. Not as a political promise. Not as a moral aspiration.
But as the structural foundation of the entire system.
In LEGS, people are not variables in an economic model.
They are not units of productivity. They are not cost centres. They are not data points.
They are the purpose of the system.
Everything else – the economy, governance, community structures, technology, currency – exists to serve people, not the other way around.
This is the inversion that changes everything.
The Basic Living Standard – The First Framework of a People‑First System
If people come first, then dignity must be non‑negotiable.
And dignity begins with the ability to live – not survive, not scrape by, not rely on charity or debt – but live a stable, healthy, balanced life.
That is what the Basic Living Standard guarantees.
It is not welfare. It is not subsidy. It is not a handout. It is not a political gesture.
It is a structural rule:
Anyone working the lowest legal full‑time wage must be able to afford all essential costs of living – without debt, without charity, without government intervention.
This single framework:
eliminates structural poverty
removes the need for foodbanks
restores dignity to work
stabilises communities
reduces dependency
rebalances the economy
forces businesses to operate ethically
aligns value with contribution
anchors prices to reality
prevents exploitation
removes the hidden subsidies that currently prop up the system
It is the foundation stone of a humane society.
And it is only the beginning.
LEGS is not a policy.
LEGS is a system.
A whole system.
A joined‑up system.
It integrates:
Economic Localism – because real life happens locally
People‑First Governance – because decisions must be made by those who live with the consequences
Grassroots Democracy – because power must flow from the individual outward
Fixed‑Value Currency – because money must be a tool, not a weapon
Community‑Centred Services – because people know what their communities need
Frameworks Instead of Rules – because principles endure, bureaucracy does not
Technology as a Tool – because innovation must serve humanity, not replace it
Local Markets & Supply Chains – because resilience begins at home
Values‑Based Decision‑Making – because the system must reflect what matters
LEGS is not a utopia. It is not abstract. It is not theoretical.
It is practical. It is grounded. It is human. It is achievable.
And it is built on the understanding that:
When you design a system around people, everything else begins to work.
Work becomes meaningful.
Communities become resilient.
Governance becomes accountable.
Economies become stable.
Technology becomes ethical.
Value becomes real.
Life becomes balanced.
Dignity becomes universal.
This is not a dream. It is a design.
A design that emerged not from ideology, but from experience. Not from theory, but from reality. Not from abstraction, but from lived truth.
And it is the only system that answers the question that began this entire journey:
How do we build a world that works for everyone?
LEGS is the answer.
SECTION 8 – The Future We Choose
When people ask why I’ve spent years working on this – writing, researching, building, refining – the answer isn’t found in any single moment, book, or experience.
It’s found in the pattern that emerged when all of those moments were placed side by side.
A pattern that revealed a simple truth:
The world we live in today is not inevitable.
It is designed.
And anything designed can be redesigned.
We have been conditioned to believe that the system is too big to change, too complex to understand, too entrenched to challenge.
But systems are not living things. They do not have consciousness. They do not have agency. They do not have power of their own.
People give systems power. People maintain them. People enforce them. People accept them.
And people can choose differently.
That is the quiet truth that sits beneath everything I’ve written, everything I’ve researched, everything I’ve lived:
We are not powerless. We have simply forgotten our power.
The system we have today – the money‑centric, fragmented, hierarchical, centralised system – is not the natural order of things.
It is one way of organising life. One interpretation. One design.
And it is failing.
Not because people are failing within it, but because the design itself no longer works for the world we live in.
It cannot see people. It cannot see communities. It cannot see interconnectedness. It cannot see value beyond money. It cannot see dignity beyond productivity. It cannot see humanity beyond metrics.
And so it produces outcomes that reflect its own blindness.
But the future does not have to be an extension of the present. It does not have to be a continuation of the same logic. It does not have to be a slightly improved version of what we already have.
We can choose differently.
We can choose a system that begins with people, not money.
A system that sees the whole, not the fragments.
A system that values contribution, not accumulation.
A system that restores locality, dignity, and responsibility.
A system that works with human nature, not against it.
A system that treats communities as the foundation, not the afterthought.
A system that understands that fairness is not a luxury – it is the basis of a functioning society.
That system is LEGS.
Not because it is perfect. Not because it is easy. Not because it is fashionable.
But because it is built on the only foundation that has ever worked:
People first. Always.
The Basic Living Standard ensures dignity.
Economic Localism ensures resilience.
Grassroots governance ensures accountability.
Frameworks ensure fairness.
Community ensures belonging.
Values ensure direction.
And together, they create something the current system cannot:
A future that works for everyone.
Not a utopia. Not a fantasy. Not a dream.
A practical, grounded, human future – built from the bottom up, shaped by the people who live in it, and guided by principles that endure.
This is why I’m doing this.
Not because I believe I have all the answers.
Not because I think I’m the one who will lead the change.
Not because I imagine myself at the centre of anything.
But because I believe in people.
I believe in communities. I believe in fairness. I believe in dignity. I believe in responsibility. I believe in the possibility of a better world.
And I believe that when people are given the tools, the frameworks, and the opportunity, they will build something extraordinary.
The future is not predetermined.
It is not fixed.
It is not written.
It is chosen.
And the choice begins now – with us, with our communities, with the way we think, the way we act, and the way we imagine what comes next.
The future we need begins with the values we choose today.
And if we choose well – if we choose people, community, dignity, fairness, and truth – then the world that follows will be one worth living in.
The Work Ahead
As you reach the end of this work, it’s worth pausing to recognise something important: nothing in these pages is theoretical. Nothing here is abstract. Nothing here is written for the sake of argument, ideology, or intellectual exercise.
Everything in this book comes from lived experience, from real people, from real communities, from real consequences, and from the realisation that the world we live in today is not the world we have to accept.
The system we inherited was not designed with us in mind. It was built for a different time, a different set of values, and a different understanding of what life should be.
It has served some, harmed many, and shaped all of us in ways we rarely stop to question.
But systems are not permanent. They are not natural laws. They are not immovable truths.
Systems are choices.
And choices can be changed.
LEGS and the Basic Living Standard are not the final answer. They are the beginning of a new conversation – one that starts with people, not power; with communities, not hierarchies; with dignity, not dependency.
They offer a way to rebuild the foundations of society so that everyone has the chance to live a stable, meaningful, and self‑directed life.
But no system, no framework, no set of ideas – no matter how well‑designed – can change the world on its own.
Change happens when people choose to see differently, think differently, act differently, and believe that a better future is not only possible, but necessary.
If this work has done anything, I hope it has shown you that the problems we face are not isolated, accidental, or inevitable. They are connected. They are structural. And because they are structural, they can be rebuilt.
The future will not be shaped by the loudest voices at the top, but by the quiet decisions made in communities, homes, workplaces, and everyday lives.
It will be shaped by people who refuse to drift any longer, who refuse to be pushed around by winds they never chose, and who decide to take hold of the engine that has always been theirs.
A new world does not begin with governments, institutions, or declarations.
It begins with people.
It begins with us.
The work ahead is not easy. It will not be quick. It will not be perfect. But it will be real. And it will be ours.
If we choose it.
This is the end of the LEGS story.
But it is the beginning of the journey itself.
Further Reading:
Seeing the System Clearly
Levelling Level https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/03/03/levelling-level-full-text/ This was where I first put words to the patterns I’d witnessed for years – the fragmentation, the blind spots, and the way our system keeps us from seeing the whole. If you want to understand why I believe no single issue can be solved in isolation, start here.
The easy explanation is to fall back on the familiar left‑vs‑right framing – the tired them‑vs‑us narrative that has shaped the hunting debate for decades. But that framing has always obscured more than it has revealed.
Across the UK today, some will feel they have won and others will feel they have lost. Yet this moment isn’t new, nor is the opportunity to take a different path.
As I argued in my blog published on Christmas Day in 2017, the solutions that could have kept young people, rural voters, and the wider public onside have been hiding in plain sight for years.
Knowing people who hunt and people who don’t – and many who sit somewhere in between – I feel exactly as I did when I wrote that piece.
There was always a workable middle ground. The model we have today could have functioned well and kept most people broadly content, if only all sides had been willing to look beyond their own entrenched positions.
Instead of trying to rewrite the rules of the game or cling to the past as if personal belief were a universal right to impose on others, they could have chosen a bigger‑picture approach that protected both rural culture and public confidence.
But we live in a time when being “right” has become more important than being effective.
That mindset pushes people into emotional trenches, where the goal becomes defeating the other side rather than understanding what winning actually looks like in a changing world.
As the years have passed, since the ‘Hunting Ban’ came into force, the battle lines have hardened. Few have stopped to consider how easily self‑made traps can spring shut. And the hunting community, through its own shortcuts, diversions, and refusal to adapt, has handed the government the perfect excuse to act.
This is the same government that has already shown its willingness to undermine British rural life – the illogical Farm IHT rule being a prime example. Now, with trail hunting, they have been gifted a justification that many outside the community will accept without hesitation.
Many will still refuse to see what is happening. But when a government is openly delaying local elections, it is not unreasonable to expect they may attempt the same with the next general election if they can cling to power until 2029.
At the heart of this is a belief that everyone else is wrong and they alone are right.
If they succeed in pushing this change through before they lose power – assuming they haven’t already managed to entrench themselves further – the concern is that this will mark the true end of hunting as a living part of our culture and heritage.
Once an outright ban, or anything that functions as one, is in place, reversing it will be nowhere near the top of anyone’s agenda. Not with the scale of the political, economic, and social mess we have building up ahead.
The Farming Profitability Review, authored by Minette Batters, was finally released yesterday. Like many others, I downloaded the 150‑page document hoping it might herald positive change for our farmers.
Given Minette’s respected tenure as NFU president, many anticipated that this review would provide a clear, unvarnished account of the situation.
Authored and presented by one of their own, it was expected to carry the weight and credibility needed to push government support for UK farming back to where it belongs.
On that basis, the content does read as a genuine set of proposals rooted in what the industry itself recognises as urgent needs. Phrases such as “A New Deal for Profitable Farming”, the FARM proposal, and the assertion that “The UK is widely regarded as one of the most prized food markets in the world” will sound like music to many ears. Yet they also underscore the uncomfortable question: why, when everyone in the UK needs food every day, are farm businesses failing or closing?
Industry Context & Policy
The report covers the expected themes – profitability, overseas trade, nutrition, and more. But context is everything.
The elephant in the room is that farming policy continues to follow the establishment’s agenda: serving government and big business interests rather than what is genuinely best for farmers, and therefore for all of us.
This is where major food and farming advocacy organisations, and their champions old and new, fall short. They continue to operate within the framework defined by government, addressing symptoms rather than causes, and avoiding the deeper realities of the industry’s decline.
Documents of this kind often reveal the underlying truths driving government thinking. One of the clearest comes early in the Foreword, where Minette reminds readers that politicians dismiss farming because it represents only 0.6% of GDP. This stark figure highlights that, for politicians, the economy and money matter far more than farming, food security or the human issues as most normal people see them.
An industry valued at just 0.6% of GDP, reliant on grants and subsidies that do little to boost GDP, is not seen as an engine of growth. Ministers repeatedly emphasise their obsession with economic output, because under the current financial system – broken and rapidly failing as it is – growth is the only measure that sustains their positions while allowing them to avoid responsibility.
Profitability: Competing Definitions
The fact that the review is overtly about profitability says it all – not least because the term carries very different meanings depending on who is using it.
For farmers and small business owners, profitability means staying in the black: running a viable enterprise that pays wages and hopefully leaves a little extra. For politicians, however, profitability is measured in terms of supermarket margins and GDP contributions.
This warped definition highlights how broken the system has become: profitability is reduced to a metric of economic growth, rather than the lived reality of whether farms can survive.
In this way, farming is forced to fit into an economic narrative that serves government borrowing and spending priorities, rather than the needs of those who produce our food.
Economic Pressures and Regulatory Burdens
The figures in the report speak volumes: machinery costs have risen by 31%, and compliance with new regulations demands massive investment.
Though introduced under the guise of improving standards, these rules inevitably push more farmers and allied businesses out of the market because they cannot compete – and that reality bears much of the truth that lies behind the journey that UK farming has been on since the early 70’s.
Put bluntly, farming within this framework is not viable – and was never intended to be.
The establishment does not want traditional, independent farms to survive.
Even Minette’s more positive suggestions, however well‑intentioned, cannot succeed in this context. They risk becoming distractions – “dead cats” -designed to maintain the illusion that government is invested in the UK food chain and food security, when the evidence clearly shows otherwise.
What I would have liked to see is a stronger message about the importance of UK food production and the need to move towards self‑sufficiency.
Feeding the British public with fresh, healthy, nutritious food that is accessible and affordable should not be an aspiration – it should already be the baseline.
With food as vital as it is, and every one of us needing at least two meals a day, this is surely more important than abstract questions of GDP growth.
Harsh though it may sound, this report feels more like a whitewash than a clean shet. It’s exactly the kind of document political and establishment leaders hope for to cover their tracks and agendas.
Knowing how those from the farming advocacy organisations play along with government to stay close to power rather than risk friction, it stands to reason that the review may have been genuine and well‑intentioned but never risked being positioned to create problems for politicians by tabling the full truth. Regrettably, it fails to grapple with the central issue: the government’s relationship with farming is not about food, farming, or feeding the nation – it is simply about money and the transfer of power and wealth.
Government is not deaf to farmers – it simply does not care. That indifference is the real crisis.
The current approach to UK Agricultural and Food Policy, embedded long before this Labour government, is dismantling our food production capability by making it impossible for farmers to continue. This is a growing risk to everyone.
If borders closed tomorrow and external food supplies were cut off, around only 12% of the UK’s food supply would be immediately available to consumers.
The rest – despite the UK producing 52–58% the equivalent of what it consumes – would not be any good to the public for a considerable time, because the UK farming is subservient to and fits within the Euro‑Global food chain.
The majority of our People could go hungry in a real crisis and this is the reality we should be confronting – not how profits and therefore more helpful statistics are made.
A Call for Farmer-Led Change
Ultimately, only the farming industry can save itself – and that means taking immediate risks.
However, taking risks while there is still an industry left worth risking must surely be better than passively watching its demise until every independent and family farm in the UK has been shut down.
Summary & Key Takeaways: Adam offers a critical perspective on the Farming Profitability Review, highlighting both its intentions and its limitations from the viewpoint of UK farmers and food producers.
Key Points
High Expectations, Mixed Delivery: Farmers and industry stakeholders anticipated a transformative report, given Minette Batters’s reputation and leadership. The FPR presents genuine suggestions but remains constrained by establishment narratives.
Profitability Framed by Policy: The FPR’s focus on profitability is shaped by government priorities – specifically, farming’s small contribution to GDP. This economic lens overshadows broader issues like food security and the viability of independent farms.
Systemic Challenges: Rising costs (e.g., machinery up 31%) and regulatory burdens are pushing more farmers out of business. The FPR acknowledges these pressures but doesn’t fully address their root causes.
Establishment Influence: The FPR is too aligned with government and the aims of large corporate organisations that influence the food chain, lacking the independent advocacy needed to truly represent farmers’ interests.
Food Security Concerns: Adam’s response stresses the importance of UK food self-sufficiency, noting that current policies leave the nation vulnerable if external supply chains are disrupted.
Call for Farmer-Led Solutions: Ultimately, Adam argues that only the farming industry itself can safeguard its future, urging collective action and risk-taking to preserve independent and family farms.
Further Reading:
The resources below have been selected to help you explore the central themes discussed in this response. Key topics include:
The roles and priorities of farmers and consumers in UK food production
The impact of government policy, economic pressures, and systemic challenges on farming
The importance of food security and community resilience
Practical solutions and future directions for rebuilding and sustaining the UK food system
1. Understanding UK Food Production & Stakeholders
Food is as vital to our survival as the air we breathe and the water we drink. Yet, in a world shaken by global events – pandemics, wars, climate extremes, and economic shocks – we are being forced to confront just how fragile our access to food truly is.
The empty shelves, supply chain breakdowns, and soaring prices witnessed in recent years are not distant headlines; they are warnings that the systems we rely on can fail, and that complacency is no longer an option.
We cannot afford to treat food as a mere commodity or convenience. The urgency to reconsider our relationship with food has never been greater. Now is the time to arm ourselves with real knowledge about what food means, where it comes from, and how we can secure access to the foods that genuinely meet our needs.
This is not just about national policy or global trade – it is about reclaiming power at the most personal level, ensuring that we, our families, and our communities are resilient in the face of uncertainty.
At the government level, food security is too often interpreted as simply ensuring that people have something – anything – to eat, regardless of its source, quality, or nutritional value. This narrow view shapes policy and public messaging, and overlooks the deeper vulnerabilities in our food system.
The approach to farmers and the UK food chain has prioritised convenience and global supply over resilience and self-sufficiency, leaving us dangerously exposed. In a world where events can disrupt the flow of food into the country at any time, this complacency puts every household at risk.
Food is power. When we understand it, value it, and take responsibility for our choices, we begin to secure not only our own wellbeing but also the future of those around us.
Food security is not an abstract issue – it is immediate, urgent, and deeply personal. By learning, reflecting, and acting, each of us can play a part in shaping a future where food is truly recognised as the essential of life that it is.
Adam Tugwell
Cheltenham. UK.
December 2025
Introduction
Introduction
In a world increasingly shaped by uncertainty – pandemics, climate extremes, economic shocks, and geopolitical tensions – the question of how we secure our food has never been more urgent.
Foods We Can Trust: A Blueprint for Food Security and Community Resilience in the UK invites readers to rethink their relationship with food, challenging the complacency that has left households and communities vulnerable to supply chain disruptions and rising prices.
This book is not just a policy manual or a critique of government and industry. It is a call to action for individuals, families, and communities to reclaim power over what they eat and how it is produced.
Drawing on personal experience, research, and practical insight, Adam Tugwell explores the complex realities of food security in the UK – from the narrow definitions used by policymakers to the deeper vulnerabilities exposed by our reliance on global supply chains.
Through clear explanations, practical tables, and accessible guidance, the book equips readers with the knowledge to understand nutrition, assess the reliability of their food sources, and take meaningful steps toward resilience.
It highlights the abundance of foods that can be farmed, caught, harvested, and grown locally, and demonstrates how home growing and community initiatives can transform not just our plates, but our wellbeing and social fabric.
Foods We Can Trust is both a blueprint and an invitation: to question, to learn, to act, and to share. Whether you are a grower, a community organiser, or simply someone who cares about the future of food, this book offers the tools and inspiration to help build a more secure, nourishing, and connected future for all.
PART 1 – What is Food Security?
Introduction
Food security is a term that’s often used in headlines, policy debates, and community conversations – but its true meaning is far from simple.
For many, it conjures images of full supermarket shelves or national self-sufficiency. For others, it’s about the daily reality of wondering where the next meal will come from, or whether the food available is truly nourishing and trustworthy.
In the UK, the concept of food security is shaped by a range of perspectives: government officials, farmers, food producers, and everyday members of the public all bring their own experiences and priorities to the table.
These differences matter. They influence the policies we create, the support we offer, and the choices we make as individuals and communities.
My own understanding of food security has been shaped by personal experience and research. I’ve seen firsthand how easy it is for the meaning of food security to become muddled – sometimes even manipulated – by those in positions of power.
Too often, the conversation is reduced to a simple question: “If people can eat, are they food secure?” But as you’ll discover in this section, the reality is much more complex.
In Part 1, we’ll explore:
How food security is defined by different groups, and why these definitions matter
The risks and vulnerabilities in the UK’s current food supply
What true food security should mean for everyone, beyond just having enough to eat
By the end of this section, you’ll have a clearer understanding of the challenges we face – and why rethinking food security is essential for building a future where everyone can access foods they can trust.
Food Security Unpacked: Perspectives, Risks, and Realities
Food Security is one of the key reasons that I embarked on my Foods We Can Trust project.
Because of what Food Security means to me, what I understand it to really be and most importantly, how important I believe Food Security to be in respect of everyone – and that means us all.
However, like many things about Food today and indeed pretty much every experience that we share with others beyond ourselves and what’s very personal to us alone, Food Security can mean a lot of very different things.
And that difference is already doing a lot of harm.
What does Food Security mean to you?
Before we continue, could I ask you to please take a moment to stop and think about what Food Security means to you.
Is it about the Food that UK Farms produce?
Is it about being sure there is always Food available to eat?
Is it knowing that you will always have a choice of Food and whatever you want to eat?
For you, Food Security and what it means to be Food Secure could be any of these. It could be any of these in a manner of speaking. Or what Food Security means to you could be something very different, and ALL of the options could still be correct!
The things that Food Security can and does mean
It is important that we recognise and accept that different perceptions of Food Security not only exist.
To some, their own view, or what someone else like the Government refers to or considers to be ‘Food Security’ is the only thing that it can be.
Unfortunately, having any fixed or accepted meaning for Food Security can be problematic when there is a version of Food Security that everyone accepts as being what Food Security means, and those who are controlling that narrative then abuse the trust that people place in the understanding those people have of that version of Food Security and then manipulate information, statistics and even the truth, so that it can be said that either you or the UK is ‘Food Secure’, even when you are not.
In a moment, I will talk about the version of Food Security which is the establishment’s ‘accepted’ term.
I will then discuss the version of Food Security that UK Farmers and Food Producers generally think of when they talk about it.
We will then move on to discussing what Food Security should really mean, to everyone.
The Establishment view: If people can eat, they have Food Security
The way that the establishment, politicians and government operate today is built around this idea or philosophical standpoint:
If people can eat, they are Food Secure
Yes, I understand that suggesting this will annoy different people and organisations who are doing great things in the Food sphere. Because very few of us actually believe that as long as people have a meal of some kind, that’s all Food Security is about.
However, if you consider what having a meal of some kind can and regrettably does mean for so many different people in so many different ways today, you will then begin to see how those who really have control over Food policy, have come to think about their priorities and obligation to the Public in this perhaps honest, but nonetheless very unhelpful way.
If you aren’t hungry, you don’t have a problem
It sounds brutal I know, and it really is.
But with the issues that Government is really facing today – and that means the things that are really going on, rather than what the media and the narratives would suggest we believe, politicians do genuinely believe that if everyone can eat, they have done their job – no matter where our Food comes from or the Food we are eating really is.
This means that all the initiatives about healthy eating, encouraging us to eat properly and even the talk about how important our Farms and Fishing are, are really just wishful thinking and it doesn’t really matter to whoever is in power if they come to nothing. Because the only problem for them will be if people have nothing to eat and then everything as we know it stops as a result.
Foodbanks are a very uncomfortable truth
What I have just written isn’t easy to read.
I wouldn’t be surprised if it makes people feel prickly at the thought that so many parts of government, the public sector and all the organisations that are championing positive messages about Food and what we eat, are currently championing a lost cause.
But if you really want to try to get to grips with what the real priority around Food Security for politicians, the government and the establishment really is, then considering Foodbanks and the need for them – which is disputed by many – will soon begin to tell you what that priority is. And it has very little to do with Food and the role that Food does or should play in our lives.
When I was studying at the Royal Agricultural University, I wrote a paper after researching Foodbank use today and compared their role in poverty today in relation to my own experiences of poverty as a child. It’s called ‘Is Poverty Invisible to those who don’t Experience it’, and the full version can be read by following the link immediately below:
The Farmer view: Food Security is about the Food that we Produce in the UK
Whilst Food Security is a much broader set of issues than many realise, the one version of Food Security that is perhaps easiest to understand and relate to is that too much of our Food comes from overseas and outside of the UK.
Please read my last post on Foods We Can Trust ‘Rationing and Health: The Surprising Benefits’, if you would like to explore this view of Food Security and what the risks of being dependent upon Food from Overseas can mean.
However, as you read through the detail of this Government Report, you may note that this figure relates to ‘Food by Value’, which sounds very much like a way of using statistical jargon to make the figure sound higher than it actually is.
Regrettably, this is the kind of language or political double-speak that people in power and authority use, knowing that it is the figure that members of the public will usually note, rather than the words that the figure has been deliberately wrapped with!
During the 2023-24 Academic Year, the figure that I was using for my research, reports and writing was 54%. I found sources that suggested that it was already as low as 52%. I have seen no evidence to suggest that the UK has increased the amount of Food that it produces for our own consumption during that time.
The amount of Food the UK produces and what we would all have available for us to eat in a time of national emergency where the Food Chain was impacted are two VERY different things.
The impact of the Global Food Chain
Because of the way globalism has affected Food Chains and that Food ingredients are sourced and often moved around as they are processed and manufactured to become the Foods that we often eat, it means that very few of the Farms we pass by each day or know of, actually produce Food that we could eat or prepare to eat straight away, if we found ourselves needing to buy from the Farmer direct.
Even if we accept the figure of 58% that the Government has used in its latest Food Security Report, to quantify the amount of Food that the UK produces itself, the actual figure that relates to Food Produced in the UK, that people living in the UK can actually then eat is likely to be much less. Because so much of the Food Produced across the UK goes into Food Supply Chains where it is nowhere near ready for our consumption or is otherwise transported overseas.
The figures being used are therefore an equivalent. Because we have to import the equivalent of the Food that is grown in the UK and then exported or used for other purposes – because that’s how it goes into the Food Chain, and what we actually eat comes back into the UK from overseas.
The reasons that many farms don’t grow or produce Food that is ready for us to eat are many. It may be as simple as the way we eat and prepare Food in the UK means that we don’t like certain cuts of meat. It could be that even though the UK has vastly rich reserves of Fish and Seafood, we don’t actually eat that much of it ourselves and most of it goes to Europe. Or it may be that the wheat and the flour it produces that makes the kind of bread that Supermarkets have made us all believe we all want to see on sale, is most easy to produce when it comes from overseas.
If it sounds confusing, it is. And it helps those who are benefiting from the way that the Food Chain works for it all to be very confusing too!
The bottom line is this:
If we had a crisis tomorrow and the UKs borders were shut down, meaning that no more Food could come in from anywhere overseas, it wouldn’t take long before we all experienced Food Shortages. The Food Producers and Farmers that we have in the UK would have to undergo massive structural and system changes, before they would even be close to being able to meet that need. There is no way that would be possible, overnight.
This is scary stuff I know. But its very real and there are parts of government and other organisations that are researching, studying and thinking about what they call Food Resilience, the whole time.
If you would like to look more closely, here is an interesting link:
(Please note that this is not a recommendation or endorsement)
The UKs Food Security is at MASSIVE risk, right now
If you’ve read this far, you may be beginning to see the picture of just how vulnerable the UK Food Chain is, and that within the Food Supply that we are eating from and have available to us, the priorities of those with influence over the Food Chain are not anything like what most of us would think.
We are NOT Food Secure, anywhere in the UK today.
With global uncertainty unfolding in the way that it currently is, we could easily find ourselves experiencing Food Shortages or perhaps even worse, at any time.
Even supporting our Farmers with the Food Production related issues as they see them is not as simple and straightforward as campaigns like that driven by No Farmers No Food and some of the Farming Advocacy Organisations would suggest.
A successful outcome to any of their current aims wouldn’t be as effective for any of us, as they are suggesting the changes in government policy that they want for themselves would be. Simply because with the if the priorities remain the same, many of the Farms affected by the policies which are in the spotlight aren’t producing Food that would be of any immediate use to us to counteract Food Shortages in a crisis, anyway.
So, what does, or rather, what should Food Security really mean?
What Food Security and being ‘Food Secure’ should mean
To be fair, part of the problem, when it comes to the meaning of Food Security and being ‘Food Secure’, is that the whole subject and all of the other subjects and public policies that the issue of Food Security links to, are VERY complicated. And in many respects, deliberately so.
That’s why it’s very easy to be convinced by any soundbite we hear or read that makes some version of Food Security and what being Food Secure means to someone else, easy to get behind.
If we were to distil Food Security and what it means to be Food Secure into the simplest terms possible, it would probably be something as follows.
Namely that we will be Food Secure and have Food Security when:
Everyone can choose to eat enough of the Foods that are Good for them and that will meet their genuine needs at every mealtime, without any experiencing fear of going without or not knowing where the next meal will come from.
However, even this is open to interpretation.
Food Security will regrettably continue to be vulnerable and at risk for as long as what it means to be Food Secure can be interpreted differently by different parties, in ways that are not actually wrong. From a certain point of view.
To overcome this problem, it is likely that we all need to at least review and, in all likelihood, moderate or change the way that we think about Food Security and what it is to be Food Secure.
With this in mind, the key ingredients that together provide Food Security are that the Food Supply is:
Reliable and NOT under Threat
Available
Accessible
Meets Nutritional Needs and Health Requirements
Affordable
I will now add a little more detail to each, so that they and how they each interact with each other as part of the Food Security equation will hopefully begin to make more sense.
Reliable and not under Threat
Food Security can and will only be achieved when the supply of Food for everyone is not at risk.
If we are Food Secure as a Country or perhaps at the Macro level, the Food Supply cannot and will not be compromised by anything that we and our own systems of governance cannot independently address.
Today, government figures suggest that we are reliant upon at least 42% of the Food that we consume coming from Overseas. That’s before we consider that of the remaining 58%, only a fraction of that figure represents Food that any of us could eat at any time.
IF there were a national crisis and the borders shut down, this would mean that even if two thirds (66%) of the Food We Need were available to us every day, year round, that would still mean that more than 22 Million People in the UK would have to go hungry, if the rest of the population were to continue eating the same meals as they do, today.
However, we also know that even this isn’t the real figure. Because of the way that the UK Food Chain and Food Production works.
The reality is that if we were to experience a real national crisis where no Food from overseas could be brought in, the UK only has enough food AVAILABLE for everyone for perhaps a few days, before Food Shortages would cut in and people of all kinds would start to go without.
Available
We will only be Food Secure when the Food We Need is always available, to everyone.
Being available to everyone means that there is no reason that the Supply of Food can be obstructed or held up by anything that is outside of the control of the person who needs to eat that Food, or the People around them who they know and can trust.
The factors that can make Food unavailable to some are:
Cost
Food is too expensive for some people to be able to afford to eat properly at every mealtime. And the retail values of all the Food we buy today are continuing to shoot up!
To be Food Secure, the Food We Need MUST be affordable in the sense that the price to buy or exchange something for that Food is realistic and the price has not been overinflated by something like greed, profiteering or another agenda of some kind.
Supply
For most of us, the Food we are able to eat today relates directly to the Food that is supplied to the shops, websites or other sources where we buy it.
If we cannot source the Food We Need, the supply is not functioning as it should, and we are NOT Food Secure.
If the only Food Supply that we can Access will provide us with ‘Food’ that isn’t healthy for us or that we can afford to buy (with the money we have available) then that Supply is also NOT Food Secure.
To be Food Secure, we must ALL be able to Access the Foods We can Trust, without having to choose from Foods that are not good for us, as a substitute.
Religion and Ideology
Regrettably, agendas, ideas and even religion can get in the way of us being able to Access Food that is available. Because ideological restrictions can easily prevent some from accessing that Food, because others have made a ‘conscious’ choice.
This is not a matter of saying that anyone who will not eat certain Foods because of a religious or philosophical viewpoint is wrong.
It is merely a fact that many of those same people then influence the Supply of Food around them, because of the choices that they themselves make.
The agendas of other people are also important to consider. In instances such as the political pursuit of Net Zero, the choices that politicians are making and some of the worlds billionaires are using their financial resources to impose, will lead to the supply of Foods We Need being restricted and potentially stopped, only because of the ideas that they wish to pursue.
We will only be Food Secure when no other person can influence the supply of the Foods We Need, simply because they have the power, influence or financial means to do so.
Greed and Profiteering
In my recent book ‘Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future’, we unpicked the layers of the Food Chain onion to expose just how the Food Chain that brings most of the Food we all eat today, isn’t really about the Food We Eat at all.
The Food Chain today is ultimately all about money, profit and the power and influence that go along with an entire Food System that is being increasingly used as a tool of societal control.
People, Communities and entire Nations can and will only be Food Secure when they have complete control over their Food Chain and Food Destiny.
That means Food being all about the Food and what Food really means to People and Life, rather than the Food Chain being all about money, profit, influence and control, as it is now.
Accessible
We will only be Food Secure when the Food We Need is always Accessible.
Access literally means that we can access the Food We Need for every mealtime and that no matter where we are, what transport we have available, or what physical barriers might be in the way, these factors will never get in the way or stop us from eating as and when we might like or need to.
To put this in context, most of us can access one of the well-known supermarket brands across the UK, either by being able to travel to one of their stores, or by being able to make an online order that will then be delivered to our home or wherever we are, from there.
However, our Food Access is now limited to whatever the stores we are able to access actually sell.
Food Security will not exist until we are able to access the Foods We Need, whenever and wherever we need them to be.
Meets Nutritional Needs and Health Requirements
We will not be Food Secure until the Food that is Available, Accessible and Affordable, also meets all of our Nutritional Needs and Health Requirements – not matter what we may then personally choose to buy, prepare and eat from the Food that is available.
No matter how politically convenient it might be for politicians and the establishment to work on the basis that ‘Food is Food, no matter what the Food really is’ – whether deliberate or not, the truth is that Not all Food is equal in the Food Chain today, and the greater percentage of the Food that is Affordable to everyone, isn’t actually very good for us at all!
Affordable
Whilst we have already talked about Cost and the price of the Food that we buy, there is also a much bigger and perhaps even more alarming dimension to the issue or question of the Food that people can afford to buy. It relates to the issue of the Affordability of Food itself.
If people cannot afford to feed their dependents and themselves for reasons outside of their control that mean they don’t have enough money to buy the Foods they Need, they are NOT Food Secure.
Food Security for them, is unaffordable.
It is very easy for those who can get by each week to look unfavourably upon those who cannot and to assume that anyone who doesn’t have enough money for Food – either for themselves or themselves and their dependents – will have found themselves in difficulty through their own financial mismanagement. Or because they don’t work as much as they should.
Whilst this may of course be true for some, the number which it would be accurate to describe will be significantly smaller than many might imagine.
Indeed, the reason why many people today find themselves short and in need of emergency help like that provided by Foodbanks, is because a significant part of our society does not either earn or receive an income high enough – even for working a full working week – to cover the basic cost of living and to provide themselves with the basic essentials that are necessary today, just to stand still.
In October 2023 I wrote about what it genuinely cost to live as opposed to the rate of the National Minimum Wage and calculated that the difference between what those working a full-time 40hr week on the lowest legal wage and what it would actually cost to live without claiming benefits, help from charities (Foodbanks) or getting into debt, was at least £2.50 per hour or £100.00 per week.
Although the rate of the National Minimum Wage jumped to £12.21 in April of this year, there is no reason to believe that with inflation continuing to push up the cost of living as quickly as it has, that anything is really different for anyone on the lowest wages now.
Just as serious is the reality that life for many today revolves around credit.
Those with monthly payment commitments, including even those earning what many of us would consider to be very good wages, can easily find that a list of monthly outgoings that seemed very affordable at the time the commitments were made, can suddenly become an unaffordable burden. When even the smallest of changes – perhaps to utility bills, fuel or similar takes place, and payments are raised with those higher costs automatically taken from a credit card or bank account.
As food is one of the few things that most of us still pay for, as we go, it is easy to see how the disposable income left for Food and other essentials can very quickly disappear, pretty much as we are all still asleep!
Food Security and Income are inextricably linked
The reality is that Food Security at the personal or perhaps micro level, is inextricably linked with income levels and what it costs to live.
Because government doesn’t prioritise the Food Chain and Supply of Food in the way that we all really should, Food has become an afterthought in far too many ways.
No serious steps have been taken to acknowledge and certainly not to make provision for the need for everyone to be able to access and eat enough of the Food We Need, without being dependent upon the help or intervention of others to get by.
Any government that doesn’t recognise and legislate to ensure that everyone who is able to work can earn enough to cover the costs of the basics and essentials they need on a basic wage, without benefits, charity or debt, is not fulfilling its obligations or responsibilities to society at all.
Until the Food We Need is affordable for everyone – no matter how ridiculous in today’s terms that might seem, we will NOT be Food Secure!
Truth vs Truths that serve someone else’s purposes
The Food Security question and getting to grips with Food Security and what being Food Secure really is, demonstrates just how easy it has become for those with platforms and influence to speak about a subject and mean one thing, whilst knowing that to everyone else, what they have said will be heard as something very different.
Both the Establishment (Inc. Government, political, big business in the Food Chain) and the U.K. Farming industry hold positions on Food Security which are arguably right, from a certain point of view or from a manner of speaking.
Both positions on Food Security, either when:
People have ‘food’ or
Food should be produced on Farms in the UK
are both correct.
But they are also only partial truths.
Like any good sales tactic, a partial truth – or a sales pitch that contains an element of truth that they know will make the whole narrative, story or line sound like the whole thing is true – and is often enough to make an argument that is otherwise utterly flawed sound compelling, because we have fallen into the trap of assuming the rest!
So yes, it is certainly correct to say that we all need to eat food and if we are fed, we will not be hungry. But if the food itself isn’t good for us, is unaffordable, could potentially do us harm or comes with strings attached, it will not be Foods We Can Trust.
Equally, if only the equivalent of what we all eat is produced or grown on Farms across the UK, but is nonetheless produced with chemicals or processes that cause harm in any way, or the food grown is itself transported overseas and replaced by food that comes from overseas so that the net equation says we are producing what we eat ourselves, that also isn’t Foods We Can Trust.
Where Food Security is concerned, Farmers cannot be victim and saviour at the same time
It is important to add that I am massively pro-UK Farming. I’m just not pro-UK Farming in the sense that the industry typically functions today.
Farming today is actually part of the Food Problem. Because it has become part of the global model that is causing all the problems with Food.
Farmers understandably want help and support from everyone. But what they really want is for the establishment to change its policies so that the way farming works today stays the same, but just works better – more realistically, but also more profitably for them.
What many in the industry have not recognised yet is that UK Farming is no longer seen as being necessary to an establishment that believes it doesn’t have a problem with the Supply of Food, as long as people are being fed – no matter what they are being fed with.
Meanwhile, the people – that’s us – who desperately need UK Farmers to see the bigger picture and step up in a very different way – will lose out twice as badly if UK Farming collapses and the establishment gets its way!
If you’d like to read ‘Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future’, a copy is available online HERE.
If you’d like to understand more about the realities that underpin the differences between what we say deliberately or innocently, and what others hear, a read of the very interesting book ‘Words that Work – It’s not what you say, It’s what people hear’ by American Pollster Dr Frank Lunz may be worth your while.
Going round in circles
You may now feel the need to circle back to the ‘as long as people aren’t hungry’ backstop – which is where without good governance and leadership, the bigger Food picture and the importance of Food and the role it should be playing in our lives usually falls down.
We can accept what others tell us. Or we can be clear that we require Foods We Can Trust to be normal life for all.
Part 1 Summary
Part 1 explores the complex and often misunderstood concept of food security in the UK, examining how its definition and practical implications vary depending on perspective and policy.
Key Points
Multiple Definitions and Perspectives: Food security means different things to different groups—government, farmers, and the public. The actions of government define food security simply as “if people can eat, they are food secure,” focusing on the availability of any food, regardless of quality or origin. Farmers, on the other hand, emphasise the importance of producing food within the UK and reducing reliance on imports.
Risks in the UK Food Supply: The UK is highly dependent on imported food, with only about 58% of food consumed produced domestically (and possibly less, depending on how statistics are calculated). This reliance on global supply chains makes the UK vulnerable to disruptions, and the actual availability of UK-grown food for immediate consumption is much lower than official figures suggest.
Food Security Should Mean More Than Just Having Enough to Eat: True food security goes beyond mere availability. It should ensure that everyone can choose to eat enough foods that are good for them, meeting genuine nutritional needs at every mealtime, without fear of going without or uncertainty about the next meal.
Key Ingredients of Food Security: Food security requires that the food supply is:
Reliable and not under threat
Available to everyone
Accessible regardless of location or circumstance
Nutritious and meets health requirements
Affordable for all
Barriers to Food Security: Factors such as cost, supply chain issues, ideological or religious restrictions, greed and profiteering, and insufficient income all contribute to food insecurity. Many people in the UK do not earn enough to afford a healthy diet without assistance, and foodbanks have become a necessary but uncomfortable reality.
Partial Truths and Manipulation: Both government and farming industry narratives about food security contain elements of truth but are often incomplete or manipulated to serve particular interests. This can lead to public misunderstanding and ineffective policy.
Call for Rethinking Food Security: Part 1 concludes that food security in the UK is at significant risk and calls for a broader, more inclusive understanding – one that prioritises reliable, nutritious, and accessible food for all, and recognises the need for systemic change in policy and practice.
In summary: Part 1 challenges readers to reconsider what food security truly means, highlights the vulnerabilities in the UK’s current system, and sets the stage for exploring nutrition, local food production, and community action in the following sections.
PART 2 – What our bodies need every day
Introduction
When we talk about food security, it’s easy to focus on whether there’s enough food to go around. But having “enough” isn’t the whole story. True food security means having access to foods that nourish us—foods that provide the nutrients our bodies need to thrive, not just survive.
For many of us, the science of nutrition can feel abstract or overwhelming, filled with technical terms and conflicting advice. Yet, understanding the basics of what our bodies require is essential if we want to make informed choices for ourselves and our families. Nutrition isn’t just for experts—it’s for everyone who eats.
In this section, we’ll cut through the confusion and look at the fundamentals: the macronutrients and micronutrients that keep us healthy, why our needs can differ, and how to approach dietary information with a critical eye. You’ll find practical tables, trusted sources, and guidance on how to become more conscious about what you eat and why it matters.
By the end of Part 2, you’ll have a clearer understanding of what your body needs every day—and why access to nutritious, trustworthy food is a cornerstone of genuine food security.
The very sad thing about a standard education is that pretty much everything to do with science seems abstract or theoretical – and especially so when it comes to our relationship with Food and what our bodies actually do with it – which is pretty amazing!
Everything to do with Food, how we produce Food and how our bodies turn Food and what it contains from its basic natural forms into all the things that we need is an extraordinary process. The real magic of it all it is almost certainly happening in our bodies, right now.
We don’t need to be scientists or have a truck load of science qualifications to understand the basic mechanics and processes of the body. And if you are interested in finding out more, the internet and channels like YouTube have bags of information that come from a wide range of sources that don’t have agendas!
Will we look closely at specific Foods in other posts. But to begin with, I wanted to share an overview of the more detailed stuff that we should probably all know about the things that our bodies actually need our meals to contain EVERY DAY!
Like most of us, I’m not a food scientist, dietician or nutritionist. So, if you really want to get into the levels of detail which are available to uncover, these are the types of specialists who should have the most accurate understanding of these subject areas. You may also like to follow the links that I have added to this page that provide an idea of the kinds of organisations that are working on these subjects too.
When we start to look at what our bodies actually need to take from the Food We Eat, we are considering Nutrients and what is commonly referred to as Nutrition.
Nutrition is all about what Nutrients our bodies actually need; how much of those Nutrients our bodies need, and also, how much of those Nutrients may be too much.
Please do remember that too much or too little of anything we eat, or drink can become a problem, usually over a period of time!
The Nutritional Content of our Food is usually talked about at two different levels.
These levels are Macronutrients and Micronutrients.
Macronutrients are terms that we often hear talked about on the media and news. They include words like Sugar, Fat, Carbohydrate, Protein and Fibre.
Micronutrients are terms that we don’t hear talked about quite as often – unless we have an interest or maybe a job that puts us in regular contact with them, or we pay very close attention to food labelling all the time! They include words like Vitamins and Minerals – and then names like Calcium, Riboflavin, Phosphorus and a range of other Minerals and Vitamins too.
It’s important to be clear that I have written and posted this page to provide an overview of the basic nuts and bolts reasons why we all need to be able to eat Foods We Can Trust, normally.
Every Human Body is different.
Each of our Bodies has different Nutritional requirements.
Our Nutritional requirements may also vary depending on a wide range of factors that themselves may have very little to do with our food.
With this being an important part of the background and reason for Foods We Can Trust when it comes to making sense of what this Food Journey is about, I wanted to focus on information that is already available online, that we can all access.
Below is a brief table that I put together after doing an Internet search that we could all do using the search term ‘Daily Nutritional Requirements’.
My search provided a number of different links with the 4 that I have chosen to draw information from following immediately below:
(Web Search on Google 1 May 2025, from Cheltenham, UK)
Daily Macronutrient Requirements
Nutrient
BNF (UK) Male
BNF (UK) Female
FSC (NZ/Aus) Avg. Adult
WHO Healthy Person
Calorie Intake
2500 cal/pd
2000 cal/pd
—
2000 cal/pd
Fat
≤97g
≤78g
70g
—
Saturated Fat
≤31g
≤24g
24g
—
Carbohydrate
≤333g
≤267g
310g
—
Free Sugars
≤33g
≤27g
—
50g
Sugars
—
—
90g
—
Protein
55g
45g
50g
—
Fibre
30g
30g
30g
—
Salt
≤6g
≤6g
2.3g
≤5g
>= Up to <= More than
BNF = British Nutrition Foundation
FSC = Relates to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (There was an election underway at the time of the search which appears to mean the main website has been unpublished)
WHO = World Health Organisation
The most important information is on the left of the Table where the names of the Macronutrients and Calorie Intake requirement are listed.
I’ve added the different figures that these different websites have provided, as they give a general idea of the amount of the Macronutrients that we need in our Food every day.
However, they also demonstrate that confusion and contradiction can exist between just 3 different organisations, which we might all consider to be credible, as there are different approaches and figures being used.
I’m not going to recommend sources, but the links here are very interesting in respect of the information we are focusing on.
The subject of Micronutrients is where Nutrition starts to sound much more like a science and it’s very easy to become switched off or feel like you are glazing over.
Here’s a list of the Micronutrients – that’s Vitamins and Minerals, that our bodies require daily.
The search terms were specific – i.e. ‘calcium’ or ‘calcium function body’.
Please note that I have opted not to add specific amounts here.
As with Macronutrients, the amount of Micronutrients that we require will almost certainly vary from person to person.
My own view on Nutritional intake is that it makes sense to work out which Foods contain and will provide these Macronutrients and Micronutrients as part of a regular diet and go from there (Unless we have special or medically related Nutritional requirements and are taking advice or instruction from a specialist of some kind).
By now, you will probably be getting a good idea of how much detail, information, research and study is available on the subject of Nutrition at this level.
Foods We Can Trust isn’t about Food Science as such. But it certainly includes the importance of Food Science within it!
The only person we can really trust when it comes to what we put in our mouths, is ourselves.
So, the best way to look at any source of information is do do so with critical thinking.
Please don’t take any information about Food at face value, just because the source has a well-known name, is a big brand, has lots of followers, or is even a public organisation.
Ask yourself what the facts are. What is opinion. What is just something that helps someone else. What they are really trying to achieve. What is the message, story or narrative really about. Who or what are they really working for. What’s stopping them from being a bigger voice and making a real difference. How much of their credibility is because of how well known or who they are. And of course, does what they are saying set off any alarm bells in the wrong way – and not just because you are hearing something that is true, and you don’t like it because it means you should change!
Please note that it is clearly intended for use by Medical Professionals and that there is no clear guidance upon how the page works, what information and calculations it uses, so it shouldn’t be used as advice.
It may, however, provide some interesting food for thought!
We should all be aware of these lists, so that we can become more conscious about what we are eating and whether the food we consume is providing us with enough of everything we need to keep our bodies healthy.
Checking the contents listed on packets, asking what the pastries in our favourite coffee shop contain and talking to the farmer at the local farm shop about what they use to grow their crops and feed their animals are all actions that we can and should take, and not think twice about doing so.
When we know what we are eating and have full control over our diet, we will then have the best chance of being able to enjoy great physical, mental and all-round health, for as long as possible.
Part 2 Summary
Part 2 explores the essential role of nutrition in genuine food security, emphasising that having “enough” food is not enough. What matters is access to foods that truly nourish us.
Key Points
Nutrition Is for Everyone: Understanding nutrition isn’t just for experts. Everyone who eats benefits from knowing the basics of what our bodies require to thrive, not just survive.
Macronutrients and Micronutrients: Nutrition is built on two main categories:
Macronutrients: These include carbohydrates, proteins, fats, fibre, and sugars. They provide energy and are needed in larger amounts. Tables in this section outline recommended daily intakes from trusted sources such as the British Nutrition Foundation and the World Health Organisation.
Micronutrients: These are vitamins and minerals (like Vitamin A, B, C, D, calcium, iron, etc.) required in smaller amounts but vital for health. The section lists key micronutrients, their functions, and sources for further information.
Individual Needs Vary: Every person’s body and nutritional requirements are different, influenced by factors such as age, gender, activity level, and health status. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to nutrition.
Critical Thinking About Nutrition Advice: Readers are encouraged to approach dietary information with a critical eye – questioning sources, understanding the difference between fact and opinion, and being wary of advice that serves commercial or ideological interests.
Practical Tools and Resources: The section provides practical tables, links to reputable organisations (like the NHS Eatwell Guide), and guidance on how to check food labels and make informed choices about what to eat.
Empowerment Through Knowledge: By becoming more conscious of what we eat and understanding our nutritional needs, we can take greater control over our health and wellbeing, making food choices that support a secure and nourishing future.
In summary: Part 2 highlights that true food security is inseparable from nutrition. It equips readers with foundational knowledge about what our bodies need, encourages critical thinking, and provides practical tools to help everyone make healthier, more informed food choices.
PART 3 – Foods We Can Farm, Catch, Harvest and Grow Locally in and around the UK
Introduction
It’s no great wonder that “foods we can trust” are often thought of as boring, bland, or expensive—especially when compared to the convenience and variety of supermarket shelves. Yet, the reality is that the number and diversity of foods we can farm, catch, harvest, and grow locally in the UK is far greater than many of us realise.
In recent years, it’s become increasingly clear that relying on distant supply chains and imported ingredients leaves our food system vulnerable. Local food production isn’t just about nostalgia or tradition—it’s a practical response to the challenges of food security, resilience, and sustainability. By looking closer to home, we can rediscover a wealth of fruits, vegetables, crops, livestock, fish, and dairy that are available or could be made available to us with a different approach.
This section brings together practical lists and insights into what’s possible when we focus on local resources. You’ll find tables of UK-grown produce, farmed and wild foods, and ideas for what can be cultivated in gardens, allotments, and community spaces. The aim is to spark curiosity, challenge assumptions about what’s “possible” in the UK, and empower you to make more informed choices about the food you eat and support.
Whether you’re a home grower, a community organiser, or simply someone interested in where your food comes from, Part 3 offers a starting point for exploring the abundance and potential of local food in Britain.
Rediscovering Local Abundance: Foods We Can Farm, Catch, Harvest and Grow
It’s no great wonder that Foods We Can Trust are thought by many to be boring and bland, as well as being expensive and increasingly difficult to buy or access.
The alternatives often taste good. Always seem to be available whenever and wherever we want them, and in terms of the cost of everything we buy today, the most convenient Foods also appear to be the cheapest.
Ask anyone how many natural, locally or UK produced Foods they could find at a shop they regularly use to buy today, and the list will probably be short and at the same time confirm everything that I’ve just outlined above.
However, the number and variety of Foods We Can Trust that are available across the U.K. and that may be growing on a farm, in an orchard, in someone’s allotment, or perhaps are being docked at a fishing harbour near us today is much greater than many of us think.
We will talk about nutritional values, seasonality, production and other really useful things to know about how we make Foods We Can Trust available to everyone as a part of normal life in other posts.
But for now, becoming aware of and understanding the list basic Foods, or Foods that are either available or could become available to us that we can grow, farm, harvest or catch locally across the UK or around our coastline, is a very important place for us to begin.
A Work in Progress
The information that I am about to share is based on what I either know already, or what I have been able to research using sources such as those that I will link later on this page.
One of the reasons that I began Foods We Can Trust is that I hope to share information about Food Production that isn’t widely known or acknowledge about the Foods We Can Trust that are already widely available, or could be, if we decide to take a different approach.
As such, I hope that the following Tables will be updated here and will in time be accompanied by posts, videos and resources online that will come from other contributors.
If you notice any errors, glaring omissions or would like to add something yourself, please get in touch!
For now, the Foods We Can Farm, Catch, Harvest and Grow Locally in and around The UK will be broken down into the following groups, with a little detail to help with each:
Fruits
Vegetables
Crops
Livestock
Wild Livestock & Game
Natural Fish and Seafood Landed at UK Ports
Natural Fish that can be Line Caught from UK Rivers etc.
Dairy Products that can be made from UK produced Milk
Please note that the inclusion or exclusion of anything may not be deliberate and anything you are aware of may be added later.
Equally, inclusion is not making any statement upon the views and perspectives of any individual or group that believe certain foods should be included or excluded for ideological, religious or other reasons. This is about being practical and realistic about the food that we can grow, produce and that is otherwise available across the UK.
Table 1: Fruits that grow or can be grown in the UK
Fruit
Months Available
Apricots
July, August, September, October
Blackberries
July, August, September, October
Blackcurrants
June, July, August
Blueberries
July, August, September
Cherries
June, July
Gooseberries
July, August, September, October
Pears
January, February, March, October, November, December
Plums
July, August, September, October, November, December
Raspberries
June, July, August, September, October, November, December
Redcurrants
July, August, September
Rhubarb
March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October
Strawberries
June, July, August, September, October, November
Table 2: Vegetables that grow or can be grown in the UK
Vegetable
Months Available
Apples
January–December
Asparagus
April, May, June
Aubergines
January–December
Beetroot
January–December
Broad Beans
May, June, July, August, September
Broccoli
June, July, August, September, October
Brussels Sprouts
January–May, October–December
Butternut Squash
October–December
Cabbages
January–December
Carrots
January–December
Cauliflowers
January–December
Celeriac
January–May, December
Celery
July–December
Chestnuts
October–December
Chicory
January–December
Courgettes
July–November
Cucumbers
August–October
Fennel
July–November
Jerusalem Artichokes
January, November, December
Leeks
January–May, October–December
Lettuce
May–November
Mangetout
August, September
Marrows
August–November
Mushrooms
January–December
New Potatoes
April, May
Onions
January–December
Parsnips
January–May, September–December
Peas
July–September
Peppers
January–December
Potatoes
January–December
Pumpkins
January, October–December
Purple Sprouting Broccoli
February–June
Radishes
May–November
Rocket
May–November
Runner Beans
August–November
Sorrel
March–September
Spinach
June–November
Spring Onions
May–December
Swedes
January–November
Sweetcorn
August–November
Tomatoes
July–November
Turnips
January–March, July–December
Watercress
June–December
Table 3: Crop Types that grow or can be grown in the UK
Table 6: Natural Fish and Seafood that is or can be landed at UK Fishing Ports
Natural Fish and Seafood Landed at UK Fishing Ports
Fish/Seafood
Also Known As
Anglerfishes
Atlantic Cod
Atlantic Halibut
Atlantic Herring
Atlantic Horse Mackerel
Atlantic Mackerel
Ballan Wrasse
Black Seabream
Blonde Ray
Brill
Catsharks
Nursehounds
Clams
Common Cuttlefish
Common Dab
Common Edible Cockle
Common Octopus
Common Prawn
Common Shrimp
Common Sole
Cuckoo Ray
Cuttlefish
Bobtail Squid
Dogfishes and Hounds
Edible Crab
European Anchovy
European Conger
European Flat Oyster
European Flounder
European Hake
European Lobster
European Pilchard
Sardines
European Plaice
European Seabass
European Smelt
European Sprat
European Squid
Garfish
Gilthead Seabream
Great Atlantic Scallop
Green Crab
Grey Gurnard
Haddock
John Dory
Lemon Sole
Ling
Lumpfish
Lumpsucker
Manila Clam
Megrim
Megrims
Mullets
Norway Lobster
Pacific Cupped Oyster
Periwinkles
Pollack
Pouting
Bib
Queen Scallop
Rabbit Fish
Red Gurnard
Saithe
Coalfish
Sand Sole
Sandeels
Sandlances
Sea Trout
Shortfin Squids
Small-Eyed Ray
Small-Spotted Catshark
Smooth-Hound
Solen Razor Clams
Spinous Spider Crab
Spotted Ray
Starry Smooth-Hound
Thornback Ray
Tope Shark
Tub Gurnard
Turbot
Undulate Ray
Velvet Swimming Crab
Whelk
Whiting
Table 7: Natural Fish that is or can be line caught from UK Rivers and Watercourses
Natural Fish That Can Be Line Caught from UK Rivers and Watercourses
Fish Name
Barbel
Bream
Chub
Common Bream
Common Carp
Crucian Carp
Dace
Grayling
Gudgeon
Perch
Pike
Roach
Rudd
Salmon
Silver Bream
Smelt
Tench
Trout
Please note that whilst links to information sources used to create this page are listed later under ‘Worth a Look’, I have added a link here to Gov.UK – Freshwater rod fishing rules, as there are clearly stipulated fishing allowances for anyone wishing to catch fish with a line from UK Rivers and Watercourses.
Table 8: Fish that is or can be Farmed in the UK
Fish That Can Be Farmed in the UK
Fish Species
Atlantic Salmon
Lobsters
Mussels
Oysters
Rainbow Trout
Sea Bass
Table 9: Dairy Products that are or can be produced from UK Milk
Dairy Products That Can Be Produced from UK Milk
Dairy Product
Butter
Cheese
Cream
Milk
Yoghurt
Worth a Look
I researched the content for the 9 tables listed above on 9 May 2025 using mostly Google Searches made from Cheltenham.
There are a number of very useful websites that will follow from where I sourced most of the information that I have pooled together to construct these Tables. There are others and these have been used because the information they offer is easy to use.
Please note that whilst there is every reason to believe the information linked below is both credible and from organisations considered the same, the inclusion of these links is neither an endorsement nor recommendation of the information these organisations provide. Their referencing here makes no suggestion of there being shared views or objectives, even if there are areas relevant to this page which are aligned.
Overview on ‘Foods We Can Farm, Catch, Harvest and Grow Locally in and around the UK’
The information contained on this page is likely to be one of the most important parts of the Foods We Can Trust initiative.
When we remove all the noise and all the agenda-led information available about what Foods and Ingredients can be brought in from Overseas; what can be manufactured or produced in factories, and why these are the Food Sources that we can and must rely on, the reality is that it is only the Foods and the Ingredients for Meals that come from them that we can grow, catch, harvest and create from these, that have the potential to be classed as genuine Foods We Can Trust.
As this work progresses, I expect to reference this topic frequently, especially as we begin to look at different aspects of UK Food Production more closely, and at Grow Your Own and Home Growing in particular.
I am very keen to add as much information as I can in these important subject areas and will be very pleased to hear from anyone who can add to what is already here in ways that will promote awareness and understanding of the information and processes that will help everyone to have access to Food We Can Trust.
Part 3 Summary:
Part 3 explores the diversity and potential of foods that can be produced locally in the UK, emphasising the importance of local food systems for resilience, sustainability, and genuine food security.
Key Points
Local Food Production Is More Diverse Than Many Realise: The UK has a wide variety of fruits, vegetables, crops, livestock, fish, and dairy that can be farmed, caught, harvested, or grown locally. This diversity is often underestimated compared to the convenience and variety of supermarket offerings.
Vulnerability of Global Supply Chains: Reliance on distant supply chains and imported ingredients leaves the UK food system exposed to risks and disruptions. Local food production is a practical response to these vulnerabilities, offering greater resilience and sustainability.
Practical Lists and Insights: The section provides tables and lists of UK-grown produce, farmed and wild foods, and ideas for what can be cultivated in gardens, allotments, and community spaces. These resources help readers understand what is possible when focusing on local food sources.
Empowering Individuals and Communities: By highlighting what can be grown or sourced locally, Part 3 encourages readers to make more informed choices about the food they eat and support. Whether as home growers, community organizers, or consumers, everyone can play a role in strengthening local food systems.
Resources for Further Exploration: The section includes links to reputable organizations and guides for seasonal produce, crop and livestock statistics, fishing rules, and practical advice for growing food at home or in community settings.
In summary: Part 3 demonstrates that local food production in the UK is both abundant and achievable. It challenges assumptions about what is “possible,” provides practical tools and inspiration, and empowers readers to contribute to a more resilient and trustworthy food system.
PART 4 – Grow Your Own or ‘Home Growing’
Introduction
Writing and publishing these pages has given me the chance to reflect on how food security is not just a national or policy issue—it’s something that touches each of us, every day, in our homes and communities. While the challenges facing the UK’s food system can seem daunting, the most powerful solutions often begin close to home.
If we continue to take food for granted, trusting that supermarket shelves will always be full and that the food chain will keep working as it does today, we risk being unprepared for shortages or disruptions. The reality is that the UK’s food supply is more fragile than many realize, and waiting for a crisis before taking action could leave us all vulnerable.
But there is hope—and it starts with each of us. By growing our own food, joining community initiatives, or working together as “citizen farmers,” we can all play a part in building a more secure, resilient, and nourishing food future. Whether you have a windowsill, a garden, or access to a community allotment, there are ways for everyone to get involved and make a difference.
In this section, you’ll find practical guidance on home growing, collaborative projects, and community food solutions. We’ll explore the benefits of reconnecting with food production—not just for our plates, but for our wellbeing and our communities. The aim is to inspire action, share resources, and show that together, we can create access to foods we can trust.
Let’s dig in and discover how growing, sharing, and working together can help secure our food future—one seed, one meal, and one community at a time.
Growing Together: The Power of Home and Community Food Initiatives
Writing and publishing the pages of Foods We Can Trust as I go, does mean that I have had the opportunity to reflect upon and even mention relevant topics from the news as I go.
At the end of May, it was pleasing to see The Times report that former President of the National Farmers Union Minette Batters (Who has taken the step of working for the government, now that she is in the Lords) suggested that future housing developments should include Allotments.
Sadly, comments that followed on social media branded this as ‘Everythingism’; a term that like many others that is now being used to dismiss anything with deeper meaning or a point that runs contrary to common or ‘accepted’ thought.
Allotments, or rather the Allotments that are available for people to rent today are popular. This point was proven well when I did a search as I have been writing and found that the Local District Level Authority where I live, Cheltenham Borough Council has a waiting list for the Allotments under its control that can extend from a matter of weeks to a couple of years.
Contrary to what some might immediately think, I am not criticizing CBC or any Local Authority in any way for not having Allotments immediately available today – as it’s great that they are there and can be available. Popularity does of course vary and the last thing that many people think about today when it comes to Food, is Growing Your Own.
If you’ve read the page ‘What is Food Security’, you will now have a better idea of what it means to be ‘Food Secure’ and why we really aren’t Food Secure, anywhere in the UK today.
Unfortunately, finding a way to help enough people understand that we are all taking a massive risk by trusting that the Food we eat everyday will always be available and that as if by magic, the Food Chain will keep on doing what it does today, isn’t easy.
Especially as everything that the Government is currently doing is reinforcing the message that the UK doesn’t need Farms and that the Food of the Future will be manufactured in warehouses and factories – sadly without any regard for what that will really mean for us all in terms of not being able to eat Foods We Can Trust.
If we continue to wait until there is a real problem with the UK Food Supply, before we begin taking steps to ensure that we always have enough Food available and ready to Feed everyone across the UK, we are all likely to experience Food Shortages quickly. And as time goes by, following the arrival of a serious Food Supply Shortage, more and more of us may even be forced to go without.
Food Shortages are not a problem that any of us should be taking lightly. But neither should any of us – and particularly our politicians – be taking it for granted that enough Food of any kind will always be available for everyone – as is clearly the case, right now.
Perhaps the most challenging aspect of understanding the risk to UK Food Security and then considering the steps that need to be taken to ensure that we will always have enough Food, is this:
The UK Food Chain is currently unable to Feed the UK Population without considerable supplies being imported from Overseas.
If that’s difficult enough to accept, the next point we need to understand is this:
If Overseas Food Imports were stopped, UK Farms and Food Producers would be able to provide significantly less than the 54-58% of ‘self-produced’ or ‘UK-Produced’ Food that UK People would immediately need. Because the Food Supply and Logistics Chain isn’t set up to prioritise British Consumers today, and very few of the Farms the UK has would be able to supply Food that is ready to be prepared to eat, direct.
To add some further perspective, we must then accept that:
The Farms across the UK that are geared up and have the systems in place to provide Food to us direct are likely to already being doing so. They are what we already know and use as our Local Farm Shops and Food Businesses that are selling us the Food that we already know to be coming from Local Farms, Harbours and Fisheries before being turned into Dairy Products, Breads or any of the Foods that are available to us through recognizable Local Suppliers or direct delivery services.
The question of the Food We Eat, is now Food for Thought.
In real terms, that means that if the Border around the UK (That’s transport by Air, Sea or the Channel Tunnel) closed for any prolonged period, there would only be the equivalent of enough Food available for 1 in 9 People – in relative terms.
Whilst I will always champion UK Farmers as some of the most entrepreneurial and creative People I have the pleasure to know, the time it would take to transform and restructure the UK Food Chain so that it works as it arguably always should – in our best interests and for us all, following a crisis or breakdown in the Food Supply – would probably be a period of months, before everyone was being supplied with at least some Foods that we should all have available to us, rightnow.
Whilst it would be beneficial for the majority of Our Farmers to begin restructuring their businesses to work towards Local Food Chains and UK Food Security through self-sufficiency today – for themselves as well as the UK Population, many remain tied to the way that the Food Chain in the UK has been evolved by the Global Model (Most strikingly, through the UK relationship with the EU).
Many UK Farmers still believe that a change of government or the politicians themselves, will be all it will take for them to get paid more or to be subsidized further for what they do, so that they receive a higher, or more appropriate income than they do now.
However, Farmers and existing Food Growing Businesses are not going to survive, if they do not adapt their businesses to operate independently as part of Local Food Chains.
Because the economic system we have today doesn’t value independence in the Food Chain and is already actively working to remove it.
At some point, probably sooner rather than later, UK Farms will be called upon to make this necessary change.
Sadly, as things stand today, this is likely to be when the UK is already in crisis – as it will only be when we are in the middle of a Food Crisis, where everyone is experiencing the problem themselves, that the real meaning and need for genuine UK Food Security is going to make sense.
However, that doesn’t mean that we cannot do something to help, right now, if we can see that hope and waiting for tomorrow is very unlikely to save the day.
Whilst talking about the role we all have to play in the UKs future Food Security might feel like a deviation from the direction of Foods We Can Trust, it is important enough for us to be aware of and to understand the real benefits from having and developing access to home grown, community grown and Food that comes direct from Local Farms and Growers, today.
Just having Food to Eat is important. But prioritising Food Chains that supply the Foods We can Trust is essential.
There is no better way to be sure that we are eating Foods We Can Trust than if we Grow Our Own Food. Whether it be at home, within community allotments or gardens or other shared spaces, where we can be sure of everything used to Grow Our Food, as well as the continuation and availability of the supply.
As we have discussed above, there are two very good reasons to Grow Your Own:
Growing Our Own Food will at least increase the Food we have available, and
Growing Our Own Food is the surest way to know we are eating Foods We Can Trust
There are other advantages to Growing Your Own Food too, such as producing Food that we can all share with others, or exchange for different types of Food or other essentials that we might need in a crisis.
However, one of the biggest, and probably best reasons to Grow Your Own (beyond having a supply of our own Food to Eat) is that the process of growing, harvesting, cultivating and handling Home Grown Food can be very good for our mental health or sense of wellbeing, as well as the activity required to do so contributing positively to our physical health.
Understanding and being open to the idea of DIY Food Growing is where the whole idea of Grow Your Own can become even more interesting and exciting, as the list of the different Foods We Can Grow Ourselves is extensive!
In fact, what We Can Grow Ourselves may only be limited by the space and resources that we have available we have.
To illustrate just how broad the list of Foods We Can Grow Ourselves and the different ways that we can Grow Our Own Food really is, we will now share lists of the different Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs and Animals that we can grow ourselves, along with suggestions of the different ways that we can grow them.
The following list IS NOT exhaustive and there may be many more!
Please note that links to organisations, businesses and groups that are added anywhere on these Pages about Grow Your Own are for information sharing purposes only. They are not recommendations and certainly not endorsements of any other organisation, product or the advice and suggestions that they provide.
Growing Vegetables at home probably feels like the most obvious type of Food to grow when it comes to Growing Your Own.
However, did you know just how many types of different Vegetables there are that we can Grow Ourselves in the UK?
List of Grow Your Own Vegetables in the UK:
Aubergines
Asparagus
Beans
Beetroot
Broad Beans
Broccoli
Brussels Sprouts
Cabbages
Carrots
Cauliflower
Calabrese
Celeriac
Celery
Chard
Chicory
Chilli Peppers
Chinese Broccoli
Chinese Cabbage
Courgettes
Cucumbers
Endive
Florence Fennel
French Beans
Garlic
Globe Artichokes
Jerusalem Artichokes
Kale
Kohl Rabi
Leeks
Lettuce
Marrows
Mizuna & Mibuna
Okra
Onions
Pak Choi
Parsnips
Peas
Peppers
Potatoes
Pumpkins
Radishes
Rhubarb
Rocket
Runner Beans
Salad Leaves
Salad Onions
Salsify
Shallots
Soya Beans
Spinach
Squash
Swedes
Sweetcorn
Sweet Potatoes
Tomatoes
Turnips
Please note that I will cover the different methods that can be used to Grow Your Own, depending upon the resources and space that you have available once I have finished listing what you can grow.
There are lots of Vegetables that we can Grow Ourselves. But the list doesn’t stop there, as we can also Grow Herbs – which will of course help to add flavour to the other Foods that we Grow Ourselves when we have them available.
Vegetables and Herbs are likely to be the easiest and, in many cases, the quickest Foods that we can Grow at home.
However, if you have access to the space and resources necessary, there is a surprisingly long list of Fruits that we can Grow Ourselves in the UK too!
Some will be surprised to learn that it is possible to keep some kinds of animals for Food at home.
In fact, historically, it was quite normal to keep some animals as a source of Food for domestic consumption.
Perhaps the most obvious animals to keep at Home for Food would be Chickens. Not necessarily as a source of fresh meat. But as a source of fresh eggs. Which anyone who has had home grown eggs or eggs straight from a local Farm will know often taste much better than those we buy in supermarkets or online!
Other types of poultry, rabbits and fish are different animals that can more easily be kept as a source of Food at home.
However, it is important to be aware that these and other animals that are sometimes kept at home for Food such as pigs, goats and anything else that you might have space for, may need to be registered or cared for under licenses that it may be difficult for a normal home to hold.
As such, it may be better left to a local farm or community small holding to keep them.
Like pets, any animals kept for Food require time, commitment and unavoidable expense which may mean that keeping them is simply impractical.
Learning to Grow Your Own doesn’t have to be boring and certainly doesn’t have to follow any kind of rigid model or set plan.
In fact, like all of our homes, the resources we have and the time we have available will be different. So, Growing Our Own Food doesn’t need to be the same as what anyone else does, even if we are growing the same Foods!
Yes, having some ground available in a garden, allotment or open space is of course a fantastic place to begin. But we don’t need a garden to Grow Our Own Food and there are ways that we can grow all sorts of different things simply by making better use of the space that we have already got.
Here are the different ways that we can Grow Our Own Food, either alone or in collaboration with neighbours or members of our local communities:
Perhaps the simplest, quickest and most cost-friendly way to get started with Growing Your Own Food will be to use Grow Bags.
Garden Centres, Farm Shops, Country Stores and at certain times of the year, even supermarkets will have Grow Bags available to buy.
Grow Bags can be a fun, efficient and low-cost way to learn about growing Food, without making significant commitments with resources, money and time.
The range of Vegetables and Herbs that can be grown using Grow Bags may not be as extensive as it would be with other spaces and resources to use. But there is still plenty that you can try!
Space for growing any type of Food at home can be a challenge, and I’m certainly not taking it for granted that you have a garden or space available inside.
If you don’t have space outside or inside near a patio window or perhaps a conservatory area, growing Food using a Window Box may be another way to get started:
By this point it may be becoming clearer that Growing Your Own Food can be much easier to begin than we might have assumed!
Now that we’ve covered Grow Bags and Window Boxes, it might also be helpful to consider that Food can grow very well in containers of all sorts of descriptions.
This includes old buckets, watering cans and even dustbins (that have been cleaned out!).
If you have limited space where there is access to daylight in your Home and you enjoy a little DIY with technology, perhaps you could give Hydroponics a try.
Hydroponics – or what is known by some as Aquaculture, is the process of growing Food using water-based systems that provide nutrients and whatever the plant-based Foods you are growing through the water itself, which can be circulated around even a very small system that might even be small and compact enough to sit on a shelf.
Hydroponics supplies are now widely available, and it would be well worth doing an online search for them if you are interested in giving this form of Grow Your Own a try!
Some of us may already have Greenhouses or have space where one could easily be erected.
Greenhouses or glass boxes of any size or kind aren’t a small or low-value purchase – so please be prepared for this if you are going to research further after reading this section.
Greenhouses of any size are a great way to Grow Your Own, because they can be used to provide an environment that can be managed to be consistently the same for longer periods throughout the year.
List of Grow Your Own Foods for a Greenhouse:
Asparagus
Aubergines
Bean Sprouts
Beets
Broccoli
Carrots
Celery
Cherries
Chillies
Cucumbers
Garlic
Grapes
Herbs
Kale
Lemons
Lettuce
Onions
Peppers
Radishes
Raspberries
Spinach
Squash
Strawberries
Tomatoes
Turnips
Like each of the sections covering ways to Grow Your Own, researching Greenhouses further will be a great idea before ruling the idea in or out – not least of all because of the wider range of Grow Your Own options and what could be year-round ability they offer to Grow different Foods.
Here are a few links to help, but please do take time for a wider online search if you can!
If you have access to a Garden or an Allotment, there is a large variety of Vegetables, Fruits and Herbs that can be grown – subject to seasonality and the amount of space you have available.
Like all of the different ways to Grow Your Own, researching the best options for you will be a great place to start and it may also be useful to search online to see what other people are growing on their Vegetable Patches, Allotments and in their Gardens in the area you live in – bearing in mind that the climate across the UK can vary!
List of Grow Your Own Foods for Allotments and Gardens:
Whilst these pages on Grow Your Own are primarily intended to raise awareness for People who may be open to growing their own Food at home – whatever space and resources they might have available, there is a different, more community-orientated approach to Growing Your Own Food that is available to many of us too.
Where there are enough People ready to work together as a community or on behalf of the community they live in to grow and supply Food, there are different approaches that can be used to develop and manage the cultivation, growing and harvesting of all sorts of different Foods locally, working collaboratively, together with like-minded People, who live close by.
Whilst it may conjure up all sorts of different ideas and responses, putting the ideologies, agendas a bias that get in the way of us all having unfettered access to Food We Can Trust aside could easily lead to the age of the Citizen Farmer. Where everyone, young and old contributes to and plays a vital role in Local Food Production – recognising that even with U.K. Farming and Food Production infrastructure realigned, meeting our nutritional needs year-round and with Food being prioritised in the way that it should be, is likely to mean everyone playing their part.
People and Groups are already growing Food together, but an undercurrent in thinking still exists where whatever the stated aims and agendas might be, a big issue with ‘us vs them’ remains.
However, times are changing and changing quickly. The role of Citizen Farmer, whether it’s through Grow Your Own and then sharing, exchanging or bartering anything they don’t need, whole communities helping to grow fruit, vegetables and animals on shared farms or helping farmers to get their crops in, will be what True Citizen Farming is all about.
The options for Collaborative Food Growing that already exist include:
Earlier in this topic, I mentioned what Minette Batters said about the inclusion of Allotments in future Housing Developments.
As you will probably guess, I agree with Minette and believe that this is a valuable suggestion. Not least of all because there are good and growing reasons to believe that whilst Growing Your Own may only be considered a hobby by many today, it could easily become a need for many of us, in no time at all.
Green spaces, green lungs and park areas are of course required to be considered in appropriately sized Developments already. And a time of emergency or prolonged Food Shortages, it would not be unreasonable to consider using some of these spaces – where appropriate – to begin growing Food.
Green spaces and parks, like homes and business premises have their own Planning Restrictions too, so at any other time, thinking about creating a community space or area for growing Food may need to consider areas of land that may not be immediately obvious, or perhaps even renting a field or some land from a local farmer that can be used in this way.
If you should find yourself amongst a group of local people or a community that has agreed that there is a need for such a space and there are enough people committed to the idea to make it work either through self-funding or by seeking some funding support, it will be worth getting in touch with your local Parish/Town and/or Borough/District Council to ask for their help and guidance.
In my experience of working with Council Officers of all kinds, it has always been far more productive to ask for that help and guidance before beginning. And it’s advantageous as it’s the quickest way to find out what you can and cannot do!
The big upside of speaking to the local Council(s) is that you may also be guided in the direction of other people and organisations that can help – and perhaps even be signposted to sources of funding and help for groups of people working together that you may not have thought of along the way.
At the very least, knowing what steps to avoid locally is good for everyone. It will save time, good will and perhaps even money too – and that has to be something that’s good for everyone!
Whilst the key aim of these pages on Grow Your Own are really about encouraging us as individuals to think about the opportunity to Grow Foods We Can Trust in our own homes or using the resources that we already have available, it will also be useful to think about and be open to the idea of working with other People in our communities to provide Foods We Can Trust, for everyone in the community.
Surprisingly, this isn’t just an idea for a rainy day (or when there are real problems with the Food Supply) and People, Groups and Communities are already working together to produce, share and sell a wide range of Foods to benefit their Groups and the Communities in which they operate.
Most shared farming or community farming projects that exist today are relatively small. They service or supplement the Food Needs of what we would probably agree are a small number of People who are usually members of a charity, cooperative or social enterprise that has been set up as a way to manage a project that benefits all those involved, mutually.
However, projects like this one are already learning invaluable lessons. They are helping to create the models for re-learning the practical skills, knowledge and understanding that are needed for a much more hands-on approach to Food Production that itself has the ability to create, contribute to and provide Food Security, built around Local Food Chains.
For those of you thinking more carefully about shared farming and community farming, it might be helpful to consider that the model of Farming most likely to work best for everyone will sit somewhere between groups of what we recognise as typical small commercial or family farms today and the community farming models that we can already see in action like this one in Stroud today.
When you consider all the different Foods and the quantities that can be produced across a range of farms, and then add local processing and retail (like abattoirs, butchery, milling, bakery, dairies, fishmongers, greengrocers) – which will quickly make a lot more sense in a time of Food Shortages, it is much easier to visualise how Local Food Chains can not only work, but will begin to restore Food and Food Production to being a central part of our communities and life.
These pages on Grow Your Own have turned out to be much more extensive than I had expected when I began writing over the Whitsun Bank Holiday weekend.
I hope that by reaching this point and having had the opportunity to consider all of the options and aspects there are to Home Growing and Growing Food with the Community, you may have begun to see how Food and Food Production can bring People together, as well as Growing Our Own being a very important part of creating access for us all to Foods We Can Trust.
Whether we Grow Our Own at Home, or contribute to a Community effort in whatever form that might be, there is good reason to believe that even if not all of our Food is grown and brought to us this way, a significant amount of it will be, IF we really want to be sure that we are eating Foods We Can Trust, whilst also having an economic system that not only includes everyone, but is also balanced, fair and just for all.
If you would like to read more of my work on this important area of new thinking, please visit and take a look at my previous works which you will find on my Blog.
I am very mindful of the additional cost or ‘start-up’ costs for anyone who would like to Grow Food at Home with limited resources.
Like most things today, prices of any of the equipment required will always vary and it is always advisable to shop around.
However, the links of suppliers and organisations that are listed as we have covered the different methods to Grow Your Own and the Foods that you can grow too will certainly help with online searches for better prices – if the prices that some of them offer aren’t as competitive as they could be themselves.
I’m not kidding when I say that some of the people who could benefit most from Growing Their Own Food today are also those who simply don’t have the spare cash to invest in any of the things that they would need to continue alone.
For anyone experiencing that kind of difficulty, or for those who would prefer to work with others and perhaps get the social benefits of doing so, there is good reason to believe that looking for local gardening clubs or similar organisations could easily open up opportunities to collaborate, work together and pool existing resources, so that the initial outlay and costs associated with getting Your Home Growing started can be shared in different ways.
Online searches that use the name and location of the place that you live will always be a good place to begin. For example, search ‘gardening clubs in (place I live)’, or ‘gardening clubs near to where I live’.
With it being likely that many of us will need to embrace Growing Our Own Food, I am keen to link and collaborate with people, groups and organisations who are open to sharing their knowledge, experience, tips and stories that can help anyone who wants to consider Growing their Own Food using whatever resources they have or may be able to secure.
If you can share information, downloads or would perhaps like to record a tutorial or interview, please get in touch.
Writing this section of Foods We Can Trust has so far taken the longest time to complete.
Grow Your Own offers an opportunity for us all to reconnect with sustainable living and demonstrates that the opportunities to return to DIY living or to make an active contribution to ways of providing the things that are essential for us all to live are not something that can only happen out of sight, out of mind or behind the screen of some digital box.
Honestly, I was amazed by how much information, resources and advice is available for anyone thinking about Grow Your Own.
The list and variety of the Foods that we can grow at home, whether it’s in a container, grow bag, window box, greenhouse, garden, allotment or using hydroponics is simply staggering.
Yes, there are some very good reasons for as many of us as possible taking up Growing Our Own Food, but the benefits are much bigger than just adding a source of Food alone.
I hope that after reading through these pages, you will feel the same!
Part 4 Summary:
Part 4 explores how individual and community action can strengthen food security, resilience, and wellbeing in the UK by reconnecting people with food production and empowering everyone to play a role in shaping a trustworthy food future.
Key Points
Food Security Begins at Home and in the Community: While national policies matter, the most powerful solutions often start close to home. Growing your own food, joining community initiatives, or working together as “citizen farmers” can help build a more secure, resilient, and nourishing food system for all.
The Fragility of the Current Food System: The UK’s food supply is more vulnerable than many realise. Relying solely on supermarkets and long supply chains leaves communities at risk of shortages and disruptions. Taking action before a crisis is essential.
Practical Ways to Get Involved: There are many accessible methods for growing food, regardless of space or resources – window boxes, containers, grow bags, greenhouses, gardens, allotments, and hydroponics. The section provides lists of vegetables, fruits, herbs, and even animals that can be grown or kept at home, as well as guidance on collaborative approaches like community gardens and cooperative farming.
Benefits Beyond Food: Growing your own food and participating in community initiatives offer more than just sustenance. These activities can improve mental and physical wellbeing, foster social connection, and build local resilience.
Collaboration and Citizen Farming: Community gardens, share farming, and cooperative projects enable people to pool resources, share knowledge, and produce food collectively. The “citizen farmer” model encourages everyone – regardless of background or resources – to contribute to local food production and security.
Overcoming Barriers: The section addresses challenges such as start-up costs, limited space, and the need for local support. It offers suggestions for finding gardening clubs, sharing resources, and seeking guidance from local councils or organisations.
A Call to Action: Part 4 encourages readers to take practical steps – whether by growing a few herbs on a windowsill or joining a community project – to help secure their own food future and contribute to a more trustworthy, resilient food system for all.
In summary: Part 4 demonstrates that everyone can play a role in food security. By growing, sharing, and working together, individuals and communities can create access to foods they can trust and help build a healthier, more connected, and resilient future.
Conclusion
As we reach the end of this journey through food security, nutrition, local food production, and community action, it’s clear that the future of food in the UK – and beyond – depends on our willingness to rethink, reconnect, and take responsibility for what we eat and how it is produced.
Food is not just a commodity or a convenience; it is an essential part of life, community, and wellbeing.
The challenges we face – fragile supply chains, nutritional confusion, barriers to access, and the risk of taking food for granted – are complex, but they are not insurmountable.
By understanding the true meaning of food security, recognising the importance of nutrition, celebrating the abundance of local foods, and embracing the power of individual and collective action, we can build a more resilient, trustworthy, and nourishing food system for everyone.
The stories, research, and practical tools shared in these pages are meant to spark reflection and empower change. Whether you are growing a few herbs on a windowsill, joining a community garden, supporting local farmers, or simply making more conscious choices at the supermarket, you are part of a movement toward a healthier, more connected future.
Food security begins with each of us, but its impact reaches far beyond our own plates.
By working together – as individuals, families, communities, and citizens – we can ensure that everyone has access to foods they can trust, and that our food system serves the needs of all.
Let this book be both a blueprint and an invitation: to question, to learn, to act, and to share. The journey does not end here. It continues in every meal, every conversation, and every seed planted for tomorrow.
Together, we can build a future where food is truly at the heart of life – secure, nourishing, and accessible for all.
Glossary
Accessibility (Food Context) The ease with which individuals or communities can obtain the food they need, regardless of location, income, or circumstance.
Affordability (Food Context) The extent to which food is priced within reach for all people, allowing them to purchase enough nutritious food without financial hardship.
Allotment A plot of land rented by individuals or groups for growing food, often as part of a community initiative or local council scheme.
Barter and Exchange (Local Economy) Systems of trading goods or services directly, without using money, often used to supplement traditional economic models and improve access to essentials during times of crisis.
Citizen Farmer An individual who actively participates in food production—whether by growing food at home, joining community initiatives, or supporting local agriculture—to strengthen personal and community food security.
Community Garden A shared space where people come together to grow food collectively, fostering social connection, education, and local resilience.
Foodbank A charitable organisation or initiative that provides emergency food supplies to people in need, often as a response to food insecurity or poverty.
Food Chain The sequence of processes involved in the production and distribution of food, from farm to table, including growing, harvesting, processing, transporting, and retailing.
Food Security The condition in which all people, at all times, have physical, social, and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs for an active and healthy life.
Food Sovereignty The right of people to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems.
Local Food System A network of food production, processing, distribution, and consumption that is geographically localised, supporting local economies and reducing reliance on distant supply chains.
Macronutrients Nutrients required in large amounts by the body, including carbohydrates, proteins, fats, fibre, and water. They provide energy and are essential for growth and bodily functions.
Micronutrients Nutrients required in smaller amounts, such as vitamins and minerals (e.g., Vitamin A, B, C, D, calcium, iron). They are vital for health, development, and disease prevention.
Nutrition The process by which organisms take in and utilise food substances, including macronutrients and micronutrients, to support growth, health, and bodily functions.
Resilience (Food Context) The ability of individuals, communities, or systems to withstand and recover from disruptions to food supply, such as economic shocks, climate events, or global crises.
Self-sufficiency (Food Context) The ability of a person, household, or nation to meet its food needs independently, without relying on external sources or imports.
Seasonality (Food Context) The times of year when certain foods are naturally available or at their best, often influencing local food choices and sustainability.
Supply Chain The entire system of organisations, people, activities, information, and resources involved in moving food from producer to consumer.
Sustainable Agriculture Farming practices that maintain or improve environmental health, economic profitability, and social equity for current and future generations.
Vulnerabilities (Food Context) Weaknesses or risks in the food system that can lead to shortages, insecurity, or reduced access, often exposed by global events or policy failures.
Further Reading
Foundations of Food Security and Poverty
Is Poverty Invisible to Those Who Don’t Experience It? https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/02/24/is-poverty-invisible-to-those-who-dont-experience-it-full-text/ This article draws on personal experience and research to explore how poverty and food insecurity are often overlooked by policymakers and the public. It examines the role of foodbanks, the stigma attached to poverty, and the challenges faced by those who rely on emergency support, offering insights into the lived reality behind the statistics.
Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future https://adamtugwell.blog/2024/11/14/who-controls-our-food-controls-our-future-full-text/ This piece investigates the power structures and vested interests that shape the UK’s food system. It discusses how control over food production and supply can influence public health, policy, and social outcomes, and argues for greater transparency and democratic involvement in food governance.
Food from Farms Guaranteed https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/03/14/food-from-farms-guaranteed-full-text/ Focuses on the importance of supporting domestic food production and the risks associated with dependence on global supply chains. The article highlights the need for policies that prioritise UK-grown food and the resilience of local farming communities.
The Real Implications of the UK’s Food Strategy 2025 https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/07/23/the-real-implications-of-the-uks-food-strategy-2025/ Analyses the UK’s current food strategy, examining its strengths, weaknesses, and the potential impact on national food security. The article discusses policy gaps and the need for a more holistic approach to food system challenges.
The Basic Living Standard Explained https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/10/24/the-basic-living-standard-explained/ Breaks down what constitutes a basic living standard in the UK, including the role of food affordability and access in achieving a decent quality of life. The article discusses income, housing, and the minimum requirements for wellbeing.
Challenges and Crises
The Growing UK Food Problem https://adamtugwell.blog/2024/10/23/the-growing-uk-food-problem/ Provides an overview of the current challenges facing the UK food system, including supply chain vulnerabilities, policy gaps, and the impact of global events on food availability and affordability.
The Growing UK Food Crisis https://adamtugwell.blog/2023/10/04/the-growing-uk-food-crisis/ Details the escalating risks of food shortages and insecurity in the UK, examining the causes and consequences of a fragile food system and the urgent need for systemic change.
From Here to There Through Now https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/03/06/from-here-to-there-through-now-full-text/ Reflects on the process of change and progress in society, with insights relevant to food security, community resilience, and personal action. This piece encourages readers to consider their own role in shaping the future.