A question that more and more people have begun to ask is: who does government really work for?
For some, that question comes from living at the sharpest edge of society’s problems – for example, those who can no longer afford to feed themselves properly. But the truth is that across every part of society – our communities, small businesses, clubs, pubs, and the countless organisations that sit outside the government or public‑sector bubble – rules, regulations and requirements are appearing everywhere. And when you look at what these rules actually do, many no longer make any sense at all in terms of allowing people to continue doing what they have always done.
Look more closely and the picture darkens further. Through licences, taxation, penalty notices, workplace directives and endless compliance demands, the ability of anything small, people‑centred, cost‑effective or community‑driven to function is being slowly strangled.
The cumulative effect is suffocating. Many businesses have already gone to the wall because of red tape alone – and that’s before we even consider the wider impact of a money‑centric system and a government culture obsessed with growth, targets and perpetual money creation.
Very few have questioned any of this. Not because people haven’t sensed something was wrong, or felt that the direction of travel jarred with the common sense of real life. But because every change introduced over decades has been sold as “progress”.
Each new rule has been framed as something that improves life, modernises society, or makes everything better for us all – as if the past was universally terrible and the only possible path was the one we’re on.
Yet the freedom we believe we have today is already hollow. With every new move the machinery of government makes, that freedom becomes more restricted.
At some point, we must confront the uncomfortable truth: what is being presented as freedom is increasingly just conformity to a narrative – a form of oppression wearing a very misleading name.
And all of this is happening at a time when global tensions are escalating. With our traditional allies across the Atlantic now posturing over who “owns” Greenland, and European elites openly entertaining the idea of war with Russia and the East, the systems we rely on are heading toward collapse – potentially in a matter of months. That’s before we even consider the other crises and issues lining up behind them.
Without meaningful change – and without a wholesale rejection of the rule‑based system that is already choking every part of life – we face a future where people simply cannot help themselves when they most need to.
Whether it’s farms being unable to grow food, pubs being unable to operate as social spaces, or low‑paid workers being unable to earn enough to live, the dark clouds gathering ahead point to a moment where survival becomes impossible. Not because people lack the will or ability, but because someone in an office miles away decided to make normal life illegal.
Yes, governments talk about “emergency powers” – the idea that in a crisis, the state will temporarily turn a blind eye to rules that would otherwise be enforced. But that raises a very telling question: if these rules can be suspended when reality demands it, who were they ever really serving in the first place?
The time is fast approaching when people may have no choice but to ignore rules and regulations that were created solely because they suited someone else’s interests, rather than being developed to help people live. Frameworks that should never have existed in a genuinely free society, that are now the very things preventing society from functioning.
Of course, we will always need accepted and shared ways of doing things. But those ways should be created, maintained and managed by the people actually involved and the communities they will affect. Not by distant agendas and idealistic theories detached from basic human values.
Systems should reflect how life really works for everyone, not how it might look in the imagination of those who believe people must be forced to behave as they are told.
Dark as the future may appear, there is an opportunity emerging. People and Communities can take back our power and build a system centred on people, community and the environment – one that genuinely puts human beings first.
This alternative already exists in outline. It’s called the Local Economy & Governance System. Built on the foundation of The Basic Living Standard, and shaped by principles such as participatory democracy and the contribution culture.
It offers a complete shift away from the money‑centric disaster path we are currently on. It creates a world where accountability is shared, where frameworks support life rather than restrict it, and where everyone is involved in shaping the society they live in.
Further Reading: Building a People-First Society
To deepen your understanding of the ideas discussed in this work – especially the critique of centralised governance and the vision for a people-centred alternative – these readings from Adam’s Archive provide a logical pathway.
They move from foundational principles, through practical frameworks, to real-world applications and philosophical context. Each resource is accompanied by a brief description to help you navigate the journey.
1. The Basic Living Standard Explained
https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/10/24/the-basic-living-standard-explained/ Start here to understand the foundational principle underpinning the proposed alternative system. This article explains what the Basic Living Standard is, why it matters, and how it serves as the bedrock for a fairer, more resilient society.
2. The Local Economy & Governance System (Online Text)
https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/11/21/the-local-economy-governance-system-online-text/ This resource introduces the Local Economy & Governance System, outlining its structure and how it departs from traditional, money-centric models. It’s a practical overview of how communities can reclaim agency and build systems that genuinely serve people.
3. From Principle to Practice: Bringing the Local Economy & Governance System to Life (Full Text)
1. How does this philosophy redefine the concept of “human nature”?
Traditional economic and political systems assume humans are primarily self‑interested, competitive, and motivated by scarcity.
This philosophy rejects that framing as a structural artefact, not a biological truth.
It argues that what we call “human nature” is largely a reflection of the systems we live within.
Change the environment → change the behaviour → change the outcomes.
In this view, human nature is:
relational
adaptive
cooperative under conditions of security
meaning‑seeking
contribution‑driven
This is a foundational departure from neoliberal and classical economic assumptions.
2. Why is security considered the precondition for contribution?
Because fear distorts behaviour.
A person in survival mode cannot:
think long‑term
act ethically
participate meaningfully
contribute creatively
engage in community life
The Basic Living Standard is therefore not a welfare mechanism – it is a psychological and structural prerequisite for a functioning society.
Security → stability → contribution → community → resilience.
3. How does this philosophy reinterpret the purpose of work?
Work is not a commodity.
Work is not a transaction.
Work is not a mechanism for survival.
Work is participation in the life of the community.
This reframing dissolves the coercive relationship between employer and employee and replaces it with a contribution‑based model where:
people work because they are part of a community
work is meaningful
contribution is voluntary but natural
survival is not conditional on employment
This is a profound shift from the industrial and neoliberal worldview.
4. Why is locality the “natural scale” of human systems?
Because human beings evolved in small, relational groups where:
accountability was direct
decisions were transparent
consequences were visible
relationships were personal
Large, centralised systems create:
abstraction
detachment
bureaucratic distance
moral disengagement
power concentration
Locality restores the natural feedback loops that keep systems ethical and functional.
5. How does this philosophy challenge the concept of economic growth?
It argues that growth is not a measure of wellbeing – it is a measure of throughput.
GDP increases when:
people get sick
disasters occur
housing becomes unaffordable
debt expands
consumption accelerates
Growth is therefore not neutral – it rewards harm.
A People First Society replaces growth with:
resilience
sufficiency
regeneration
wellbeing
contribution
community health
This is a paradigm shift from extractive economics to human‑centred economics.
6. What is the philosophical justification for limiting property ownership?
Property accumulation creates power accumulation.
Power accumulation creates inequality.
Inequality creates dependency and coercion.
The philosophy argues that no person has the moral right to own more than they can use, because unused property becomes a mechanism of control over others.
Housing is therefore a right, not a commodity.
This is not ideological – it is structural ethics.
7. How does this philosophy understand value?
Value is not price.
Value is not profit.
Value is not scarcity.
Value is defined as:
anything that improves the wellbeing, freedom, dignity, or resilience of people, communities, or the environment.
This reframing collapses the entire logic of the money‑centric worldview.
8. Why does the philosophy reject interest, speculation, and financialisation?
Because they allow people to accumulate wealth without contributing anything of value.
Interest and speculation:
extract value without creating it
distort prices
create artificial scarcity
concentrate power
destabilise communities
reward non‑contribution
A People First Society requires that value only flows from contribution, not from ownership or manipulation.
9. How does this philosophy view governance?
Governance is not authority. Governance is not hierarchy. Governance is not control.
Governance is collective decision‑making about shared life.
The Circumpunct model reflects this:
no permanent power
no hierarchy
no distance between decision and consequence
leadership as service, not status
transparency as a moral requirement
This is governance as participation, not governance as rule.
10. What role does The Revaluation play in the transition?
The Revaluation is the psychological and cultural pivot that makes systemic change possible.
It is the moment when people collectively realise:
money is not value
growth is not progress
employment is not contribution
hierarchy is not leadership
centralisation is not stability
scarcity is not natural
competition is not inevitable
Without this shift, LEGS would be resisted.
With it, LEGS becomes the obvious next step.
11. How does this philosophy address the problem of power?
By dissolving the mechanisms that create it:
property accumulation
financial accumulation
hierarchical governance
centralised decision‑making
opaque systems
dependency structures
Power is not redistributed – it is deconstructed.
The system is designed so that no individual or organisation can accumulate disproportionate influence.
12. Is this philosophy compatible with modern technology and AI?
Yes – but only under strict conditions:
technology must serve human agency
AI must never replace essential human roles
systems must remain understandable at the human scale
digital tools must have non‑digital alternatives
local communities must retain control
Technology is a tool, not a trajectory.
13. How does this philosophy define freedom?
Freedom is not the absence of rules.
Freedom is not consumer choice.
Freedom is not individualism.
Freedom is:
the ability to live without fear, contribute without coercion, and participate without exclusion.
This requires:
security
dignity
community
transparency
meaningful work
environmental stability
Freedom is therefore a collective achievement, not an individual possession.
14. What is the ultimate purpose of a People First Society?
To create the conditions in which:
every person can live a good life
every community can be resilient
every environment can regenerate
every individual can contribute meaningfully
no one is left behind
no one is exploited
no one is coerced into survival
This is the philosophical north star.
15. What is the biggest misconception about this philosophy?
That it is idealistic.
In reality, the current system is the idealistic one – it assumes:
infinite growth
infinite resources
infinite stability
infinite human tolerance for inequality
This philosophy is grounded in lived reality, human psychology, ecological limits, and community logic.
It is not utopian.
It is necessary.
Further Reading:
This “Further Reading” section offers a set of resources that will deepen your understanding of the Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS), the Basic Living Standard, and the broader philosophy of a people-first society.
Each link explores a different facet of the philosophy, from practical implementation to foundational principles. Engaging with these readings will provide you with richer context, practical examples, and a more nuanced grasp of the ideas behind LEGS.
Whether you are new to these concepts or seeking to apply them, these resources will help you connect theory to practice and inspire new ways of thinking about community, governance, and human flourishing.
This foundational text introduces the LEGS framework in detail, explaining how local economies and governance can be structured to prioritise human dignity, participation, and sustainability. It’s ideal for readers seeking a comprehensive overview of the system’s mechanics and philosophical underpinnings.
Benefit:
Start here for a solid grounding in the core ideas and practical structure of LEGS.
This article breaks down the concept of the Basic Living Standard, clarifying what it means in practice and why it is central to a people-first society. It addresses common questions and misconceptions, making it accessible for those new to the idea.
Benefit:
Read this to understand the practical implications and necessity of guaranteeing basic security for all.
This piece explores the philosophical and ethical dimensions of the Basic Living Standard, linking it to personal sovereignty and collective peace. It’s a reflective essay that connects individual freedom with societal wellbeing.
Benefit:
Recommended for readers interested in the deeper values and ethical commitments behind the LEGS philosophy.
This resource provides practical guidance and real-world examples of how to implement the LEGS philosophy. It bridges the gap between theory and action, offering insights for communities and individuals ready to make change.
Benefit:
Essential for those looking to move from understanding to action, with concrete steps and inspiration for local transformation.
This link offers an overview of the broader LEGS ecosystem, showcasing projects, communities, and ongoing initiatives. It’s a gateway to seeing the philosophy in action and connecting with others on the same journey.
Benefit:
Explore this to find community, resources, and inspiration for your own involvement in the LEGS movement.
The Unifying Principles Behind The Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS), The Basic Living Standard, and The Revaluation
Introduction: The Thread That Runs Through Everything
Across all the work I’ve produced over the past four years – from Levelling Level to Safe Shores, from the Basic Living Standard to LEGS – there has always been a single thread running quietly underneath it all.
A worldview. A way of seeing people. A way of understanding systems. A way of interpreting what a society is actually for.
This document brings that worldview together.
Not as a policy. Not as a framework. Not as a manifesto. But as a philosophy – the foundation beneath everything else.
Because LEGS is not just a system. The Basic Living Standard is not just a guarantee. The Revaluation is not just a shift in perspective.
Together, they form a coherent way of understanding human life, community, work, and the purpose of a society.
This is that philosophy.
1. The Core Thesis
Every system is built on a single assumption about what people are.
The money‑centric system assumes people are:
self‑interested
competitive
unreliable
motivated only by scarcity
valuable only when productive
and in need of control
LEGS begins with a different assumption:
People thrive when they are secure, trusted, connected, and able to contribute to something that matters.
Everything else flows from this.
2. The First Principles
These are the foundational truths that sit beneath the entire philosophy.
1. Human dignity is non‑negotiable.
A society that allows people to fall below the basics of life is not a functioning society.
2. Security is the starting point of contribution.
People contribute most when they are not afraid.
3. Contribution is the natural form of work.
Work is not a transaction. It is participation in community life.
4. Locality is the natural scale of human systems.
People make better decisions when they are close to the consequences.
5. Community is the basic structure of society.
Not markets. Not governments. Communities.
6. The environment is not a resource; it is the context of life.
A system that harms its context cannot survive.
7. Value must be measured in human terms, not monetary ones.
Money is a tool, not a worldview.
8. Systems must reflect lived reality, not abstract theory.
If a system works on paper but not on the ground, the system is wrong.
These principles are the philosophical spine of LEGS.
3. The Paradigm Shift: The Revaluation
The Revaluation is the moment the old worldview collapses and the new one becomes visible.
It is the shift from:
Money → Life
Scarcity → Security
Employment → Contribution
Extraction → Reciprocity
Hierarchy → Participation
Centralisation → Locality
Fragmentation → Wholeness
Fear → Freedom
This shift is not ideological. It is structural. It is psychological. It is practical.
It is the moment we stop asking:
“How do we make the economy grow?”
and start asking:
“How do we make life better for everyone?”
This is the philosophical heart of LEGS.
4. The Human Assumptions
Every system is built on assumptions about human nature. Here are the assumptions LEGS is built on:
People want to contribute.
Given security and trust, contribution is natural.
People are capable when supported.
Most “failures” are structural, not personal.
People are relational, not isolated.
We are shaped by the communities we live in.
People need meaning, not just survival.
Purpose is as essential as food.
People thrive when trusted.
Control creates resistance. Trust creates responsibility.
People are shaped by their environment.
If you want different outcomes, change the environment.
These assumptions are the opposite of the money‑centric worldview – and that difference explains everything.
5. The Systemic Implications
When you take the principles and assumptions above seriously, the system that follows becomes obvious.
If security is essential → the Basic Living Standard becomes non‑negotiable.
People cannot contribute when they are afraid.
If contribution is the basis of work → employment becomes optional, not compulsory.
Work becomes meaningful, not coerced.
If food is the foundation of life → local food systems become central.
Communities must be able to feed themselves.
If community is the natural structure → governance must be participatory.
Decision‑making belongs with the people affected by the decisions.
If value is human → profit loses its dominance.
Businesses exist to meet needs, not extract value.
If locality matters → systems must be small, connected, and transparent.
People must be able to see and understand the systems they live within.
If the environment is the context → sustainability becomes the default.
Regeneration replaces exploitation.
This is why LEGS looks the way it does.
It is not arbitrary.
It is the natural outcome of the philosophy.
6. The Ethical Commitments
This philosophy carries a set of ethical commitments – not as rules, but as responsibilities.
1. No one should be left behind.
A society that abandons people is not a society.
2. No one should be coerced into survival.
Work must be contribution, not compulsion.
3. No one should be exploited for profit.
Extraction is incompatible with dignity.
4. No community should be dependent on distant systems.
Local resilience is essential.
5. No environment should be degraded for economic gain.
The land is not a commodity.
6. No system should be allowed to hide its own failures.
Transparency is a moral requirement.
7. No decision should be made without those affected by it.
Participation is a right.
These commitments are the moral foundation of the system.
7. The Purpose of a Society
At its core, this philosophy answers a single question:
What is a society for?
The money‑centric system answers:
“To grow the economy.”
This philosophy answers:
“To ensure that everyone has what they need to live a good life – and to create the conditions in which people can contribute to the wellbeing of the whole.”
Everything else is secondary.
8. The Philosophy in One Sentence
If this entire document had to be condensed into a single line, it would be this:
A society thrives when people are secure enough to contribute, connected enough to care, and trusted enough to participate.
That is the philosophy behind LEGS.
That is the worldview behind the Basic Living Standard.
That is the shift described in The Revaluation.
Further Reading:
This “Further Reading” section offers a set of resources that will deepen your understanding of the Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS), the Basic Living Standard, and the broader philosophy of a people-first society.
Each link explores a different facet of the philosophy, from practical implementation to foundational principles. Engaging with these readings will provide you with richer context, practical examples, and a more nuanced grasp of the ideas behind LEGS.
Whether you are new to these concepts or seeking to apply them, these resources will help you connect theory to practice and inspire new ways of thinking about community, governance, and human flourishing.
This foundational text introduces the LEGS framework in detail, explaining how local economies and governance can be structured to prioritise human dignity, participation, and sustainability. It’s ideal for readers seeking a comprehensive overview of the system’s mechanics and philosophical underpinnings.
Benefit:
Start here for a solid grounding in the core ideas and practical structure of LEGS.
This article breaks down the concept of the Basic Living Standard, clarifying what it means in practice and why it is central to a people-first society. It addresses common questions and misconceptions, making it accessible for those new to the idea.
Benefit:
Read this to understand the practical implications and necessity of guaranteeing basic security for all.
This piece explores the philosophical and ethical dimensions of the Basic Living Standard, linking it to personal sovereignty and collective peace. It’s a reflective essay that connects individual freedom with societal wellbeing.
Benefit:
Recommended for readers interested in the deeper values and ethical commitments behind the LEGS philosophy.
This resource provides practical guidance and real-world examples of how to implement the LEGS philosophy. It bridges the gap between theory and action, offering insights for communities and individuals ready to make change.
Benefit:
Essential for those looking to move from understanding to action, with concrete steps and inspiration for local transformation.
This link offers an overview of the broader LEGS ecosystem, showcasing projects, communities, and ongoing initiatives. It’s a gateway to seeing the philosophy in action and connecting with others on the same journey.
Benefit:
Explore this to find community, resources, and inspiration for your own involvement in the LEGS movement.
INTRODUCTION – WORK AS THE DOORWAY INTO A NEW WORLD
Every society has a centre of gravity – a place where its values, assumptions, and priorities become visible.
In the world we are leaving behind, that centre has been work. Not work as contribution, or work as purpose, or work as the expression of human ability, but work as a transaction. Work as the price of survival. Work as the mechanism through which people are controlled, measured, and divided.
If you want to understand why so many people feel exhausted, disconnected, or uncertain about the future, you only need to look at the way work has been structured.
It has become the lens through which we see ourselves, the measure by which society judges us, and the force that shapes our days, our relationships, and our sense of worth.
Yet the system that defines work today is not built around human needs. It is built around money — and money has become the organising principle of life in ways that have distorted everything else.
This paper begins with work because work is where the old world and the new world collide most clearly.
It is where the failures of the money‑centric system are most visible, and where the possibilities of a people‑centred system become most tangible.
Through the doorway of work, we can explore the entire Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS): the Basic Living Standard, the centrality of food, the redefinition of contribution, the reshaping of business, the pathways of learning, the shared responsibility of governance, and the ethical treatment of natural resources.
Each of these elements can be understood on its own, but together they form a coherent whole – a system designed not to extract value from people and the environment, but to support them. A system in which work becomes meaningful, communities become resilient, and the essentials of life are guaranteed for all.
This paper is written for those encountering these ideas for the first time. It is not a summary, nor a technical document, nor a chapter in a larger work. It is a stand‑alone introduction to a different way of seeing the world – one in which the future of work is not a threat, but an opportunity to rebuild society on foundations that are humane, sustainable, and grounded in the realities of life.
Work is the doorway.
What lies beyond it is a new way of living.
SECTION 1 – WHY WORK NO LONGER WORKS
If you want to understand why society feels as if it is coming apart at the seams, you only need to look at the way we work.
Work is the structure around which most people build their lives. It dictates where we live, how we spend our time, who we interact with, and what we believe we are worth.
Yet the system that defines work today is not built around people, community, or the environment. It is built around money – and money has become the measure of everything, even when it has nothing to do with what actually matters.
For most people, work is no longer a meaningful contribution to the world around them. It is a transaction. A trade of time, energy, and often wellbeing in exchange for the money required to survive.
The tragedy is that this transactional relationship has become so normalised that we rarely question it.
We accept it as the natural order of things, even though it is neither natural nor ordered. It is simply the result of a system that has placed money at the centre of life and pushed everything else to the margins.
Work has become disconnected from life
In the money‑centric system, the work most people do has little connection to the things that sustain life.
The majority of jobs today do not produce food, build shelter, care for people, or maintain the environment. They exist to support the machinery of the economy — administration, compliance, marketing, finance, logistics, and countless layers of abstraction that sit between people and the things they actually need.
This disconnection creates a profound sense of emptiness.
People spend their days performing tasks that feel meaningless, contributing to systems they do not believe in, and producing outcomes they cannot see.
The work may be busy, but it is not fulfilling. It may be demanding, but it is not purposeful. It may be paid, but it is not valued in any human sense.
Work has become disconnected from value
The most essential work in society – raising children, caring for elders, growing food, supporting neighbours, maintaining community life – is either unpaid or undervalued.
Meanwhile, work that extracts value, exploits people, or damages the environment is often rewarded the most.
This inversion of value is not accidental. It is the inevitable result of a system that measures worth in financial terms. If something does not generate profit, it is treated as worthless. If something generates profit, it is treated as valuable, even if it harms people or the planet.
The result is a society where the people doing the most important work are often the least secure, the least respected, and the least supported. And the people doing work that contributes little to human wellbeing are often the most rewarded.
Work has become disconnected from purpose
Human beings are wired for purpose. We need to feel that what we do matters. We need to feel that our efforts contribute to something larger than ourselves. We need to feel that our work has meaning.
But the money‑centric system does not care about purpose. It cares about productivity, efficiency, and profitability. It cares about outputs, not outcomes. It cares about metrics, not meaning.
This is why so many people feel lost.
They are working harder than ever, yet feeling less fulfilled.
They are achieving more, yet feeling less accomplished.
They are earning more, yet feeling less secure.
The system has taken the soul out of work, and people feel the loss deeply.
Work has become disconnected from community
Work used to be rooted in community. People worked where they lived, with people they knew, for the benefit of the community around them.
Work was a shared endeavour, a collective effort to meet shared needs.
Today, work is often the opposite. It pulls people away from their communities, isolates them from their neighbours, and pits them against one another in competition for jobs, promotions, and status.
The workplace has replaced the community as the centre of life, yet it offers none of the belonging, support, or meaning that true community provides.
This fragmentation is one of the greatest losses of the modern world.
When work becomes disconnected from community, people become disconnected from each other. And when people become disconnected from each other, society begins to unravel.
Work has become disconnected from the environment
Perhaps the most damaging disconnection is the one between work and the natural world.
Industrial systems of production – especially in food – have prioritised efficiency and profit over sustainability and stewardship.
The result is environmental degradation, loss of biodiversity, soil depletion, pollution, and a food system that is fragile, unhealthy, and controlled by a few.
Work that harms the environment is rewarded.
Work that protects the environment is marginalised.
This is the logic of a system that values money above life.
Work has become disconnected from truth
We have been taught to believe that:
work must be hard to be valuable
work must be paid to be real
work must be competitive to be efficient
work must be controlled to be productive
work must be scarce to be meaningful
None of these things are true.
They are stories created by a system that uses work as a tool of control. A system that needs people to believe that their worth is tied to their productivity, that their survival depends on their employment, and that their value is measured in money.
Once you see through these stories, the entire structure of the old system becomes visible – and so does the possibility of something better.
SECTION 2 – THE REVALUATION: SEEING WORK CLEARLY FOR THE FIRST TIME
If the first section exposes the cracks in the world we are leaving behind, The Revaluation is the moment we finally stop pretending those cracks are normal.
It is the point at which we step back far enough from the system we grew up in to see it for what it really is – not a natural order, not an inevitable structure, but a human‑made design that can be unmade and rebuilt.
The Revaluation is not a single event. It is a process.
It is the gradual but irreversible shift in how we understand value, purpose, contribution, and the meaning of life itself. It is the moment when we stop measuring everything in money and begin measuring it in human terms.
And nowhere is this shift more important – or more transformative -than in the way we understand work.
The Revaluation begins with a simple question: What is work actually for?
In the money‑centric world, the answer is survival.
In LEGS, the answer is contribution.
This is not a philosophical difference. It is a structural one.
When survival depends on employment, work becomes a form of coercion.
When survival is guaranteed, work becomes a form of expression.
The Revaluation reveals that the old system did not value work – it valued profit.
It valued the outputs of work only when they could be monetised.
It valued people only when they could be used.
Once you see this clearly, the entire logic of the old system collapses.
The Revaluation exposes the illusion of “value” in the old system
In the world we are leaving behind, value is defined by price.
If something can be sold, it is valuable.
If something cannot be sold, it is worthless.
This is why:
caring for children is unpaid,
caring for elders is underpaid,
growing food is undervalued,
repairing goods is marginalised,
supporting neighbours is invisible,
and maintaining community life is treated as a hobby.
Meanwhile:
speculation is rewarded,
exploitation is profitable,
environmental destruction is incentivised,
and the most harmful industries are often the most lucrative.
The Revaluation forces us to confront the absurdity of this arrangement.
It asks us to look at the world not through the lens of money, but through the lens of life.
The Revaluation reveals that money has replaced meaning
Money was never meant to be the centre of life.
It was meant to be a tool – a medium of exchange, a convenience, a facilitator.
But over time, money became the measure of everything:
success,
status,
security,
worth,
and even identity.
People began to believe that their value was tied to their income.
That their purpose was tied to their job title.
That their security was tied to their employer.
That their future was tied to the market.
The Revaluation breaks this illusion.
It reveals that money has no inherent value – only the value we assign to it.
And once we stop assigning it the power to define our lives, everything changes.
The Revaluation reconnects work with life
When you remove money from the centre of the system, work returns to its natural place – as a human activity rooted in contribution, relationship, and purpose.
Work becomes:
the way we support each other,
the way we strengthen our communities,
the way we care for the environment,
the way we grow as individuals,
and the way we participate in the shared life of the community.
This is not idealism.
It is the practical reality of a system that no longer uses work as a tool of control.
The Revaluation reveals the true purpose of an economy
The old system taught us that the purpose of an economy is growth.
Growth for its own sake. Growth measured in money. Growth that benefits a few at the expense of many.
The Revaluation restores the true purpose of an economy:
To ensure that everyone has what they need to live a good life.
This is the foundation of LEGS.
This is the logic behind the Basic Living Standard.
This is the reason food becomes central.
This is the reason work is redefined.
This is the reason businesses are refocused.
This is the reason governance becomes participatory.
The Revaluation is the moment we stop asking:
“How do we make the economy grow?”
And start asking:
“How do we make life better for everyone?”
The Revaluation makes LEGS possible
Without The Revaluation, LEGS would make no sense
It would look like an alternative system trying to fit into the logic of the old one.
But once you see the old system clearly – once you understand how deeply it has distorted our relationship with work, community, and the environment – the logic of LEGS becomes obvious.
The Revaluation is the bridge between the world we are leaving and the world we are building.
It is the moment when we stop believing that:
work must be paid to be real,
businesses must exist to make profit,
food must be industrialised,
communities must be fragmented,
and people must compete to survive.
It is the moment when we begin to see that:
work is contribution,
businesses exist to meet needs,
food is the foundation of life,
communities are the natural structure of society,
and people thrive when they are secure, connected, and valued.
The Revaluation is not an idea.
It is a shift in consciousness.
It is the beginning of a new way of seeing the world – and a new way of living in it.
SECTION 3 – THE BASIC LIVING STANDARD: THE FOUNDATION THAT MAKES REAL WORK POSSIBLE
The Basic Living Standard is the point at which the entire logic of the old world gives way to the logic of the new.
It is the mechanism that breaks the link between survival and employment, and the foundation that allows work to become contribution rather than coercion.
Without the BLS, the Local Economy & Governance System could not function.
With it, everything else becomes possible.
The BLS as a Guarantee, Not a Reward
In the money‑centric system, support is conditional. People must prove their need, justify their circumstances, and demonstrate their worthiness.
The underlying assumption is that people cannot be trusted, and that help must be rationed to prevent dependency.
The Basic Living Standard rejects this worldview entirely.
It begins with the recognition that every person, by virtue of being part of the community, is entitled to the essentials of life.
Not because they have earned them, not because they have demonstrated need, but because a functioning society cannot exist when people are forced to live in fear of losing the basics required to survive.
The BLS is not a benefit.
It is not a safety net.
It is the foundation of a healthy society.
Security as the Starting Point of a Good Life
The BLS provides the essentials that no person should ever be without: a secure home, nutritious food, heat, water, clothing, healthcare, and the means to participate in community life.
These are not luxuries. They are the minimum requirements for a life lived with dignity.
When these essentials are guaranteed, something profound happens. The constant background noise of fear – fear of eviction, fear of hunger, fear of illness, fear of falling behind – disappears.
People who are no longer afraid are people who can think clearly, act freely, and make choices based on values rather than desperation.
This is the psychological liberation that the BLS creates. It is not simply about meeting physical needs. It is about removing the coercive power that the old system held over people’s lives.
Breaking the Link Between Work and Survival
In the old system, work is the gateway to survival.
Lose your job, and you risk losing everything.
This creates a relationship of dependency that allows employers, institutions, and systems to control people’s lives in ways that are often invisible but deeply felt.
The BLS breaks this link completely.
When survival is guaranteed, work becomes something else entirely. It becomes a choice. It becomes a contribution. It becomes an expression of ability, interest, and purpose.
People no longer stay in harmful jobs because they have no alternative.
They no longer accept exploitation because the consequences of leaving are too severe.
They no longer measure their worth in wages because their worth is no longer tied to their income.
The BLS frees people to work in ways that strengthen the community, support the environment, and develop themselves – not simply in ways that generate money.
The BLS Reshapes the Purpose of Business
Businesses in the old system are driven by profit because profit is the only way they can survive.
This pressure forces them to cut costs, reduce wages, and prioritise growth over quality, sustainability, or community wellbeing.
The BLS changes this dynamic.
When people’s essentials are guaranteed, businesses no longer need to underpay workers or chase growth at all costs.
They no longer need to compete aggressively or extract value from the community.
Instead, they can focus on their true purpose: meeting the needs of the people they serve.
The BLS removes the pressure that forces businesses to behave badly.
LEGS removes the ability to accumulate wealth or property beyond personal need.
Together, they create a business environment in which contribution, quality, and sustainability become the natural priorities.
Restoring the True Meaning of Contribution
One of the most damaging distortions of the money‑centric system is the belief that only paid work is valuable.
This belief has devalued the most essential forms of contribution: raising children, caring for elders, growing food, supporting neighbours, maintaining community life.
The BLS restores the true meaning of contribution by removing the idea that value must be measured in money.
When survival is guaranteed, people are free to contribute in ways that reflect their abilities, interests, and the needs of the community.
Contribution becomes visible again. It becomes recognised. It becomes central to the life of the community.
The BLS as the Engine of LEGS
Without the Basic Living Standard, the Local Economy & Governance System would collapse back into the logic of the old world. Work would remain tied to survival. Businesses would remain tied to profit. Food systems would remain vulnerable. Communities would remain fragmented. Governance would remain hierarchical.
With the BLS, everything changes.
Work becomes contribution.
Businesses become purpose‑driven.
Food becomes central.
Communities become resilient.
Governance becomes participatory.
People become free.
The BLS is not an economic policy. It is the ground on which the future of work – and the future of society – is built.
SECTION 4 – FOOD AS THE CENTRE OF WORK, COMMUNITY, AND LIFE
If the Basic Living Standard is the foundation of a people‑first society, food is the structure that rises from it.
Food is not simply one part of the Local Economy & Governance System. It is the centre of it – the organising principle around which work, community, environment, and governance all revolve.
Without understanding the centrality of food, it is impossible to understand the future of work in LEGS. And without understanding why food must be local, trustworthy, and produced sustainably, it is impossible to understand why the old system has failed so completely.
My parallel work Foods We Can Trust lays out this truth with clarity: food is the most essential of all essentials. It is the one thing every person needs every day. It is the one area where dependency on external systems creates immediate vulnerability. And it is the one domain where the consequences of industrialisation, globalisation, and profit‑driven decision‑making have been most destructive – not only to health, but to community resilience, environmental stability, and the integrity of work itself.
Food as the Anchor of a Local Economy
In the money‑centric system, food has been treated as a commodity.
It is grown wherever labour is cheapest, processed wherever margins are highest, transported across continents, and sold through supply chains designed to maximise profit rather than nourish people.
This has created a food system that is fragile, exploitative, environmentally damaging, and deeply disconnected from the communities it is supposed to serve.
LEGS reverses this entirely.
Food becomes local wherever possible.
Communities grow what their land and climate naturally support.
They trade with other communities not to chase profit, but to ensure diversity, resilience, and balance.
Food production becomes a shared responsibility, not a specialised industry hidden behind factory walls.
This shift is not ideological. It is practical.
When food is local, communities become resilient.
When food is trustworthy, health improves.
When food is produced sustainably, the environment regenerates.
And when food production is woven into the fabric of community life, work becomes meaningful again.
Food as the Root System of Work
Every form of work in LEGS can be traced back to food. Not because everyone becomes a farmer, but because food production creates the conditions in which all other forms of contribution can flourish.
Growing food requires knowledge, skill, labour, and care.
It requires people who understand soil, seasons, seeds, animals, orchards, and ecosystems.
It requires people who can build, repair, transport, preserve, and prepare.
It requires people who can teach, mentor, organise, and support.
It requires people who can steward land, manage water, and maintain biodiversity.
Food production is not a single job. It is a network of interdependent contributions that touch every part of community life.
In Foods We Can Trust, we discussed how traditional methods, regenerative practices, and community‑based food systems create work that is meaningful, skilled, and rooted in place.
This is not nostalgia. It is the recognition that food production, when done properly, is one of the most complex, collaborative, and socially valuable forms of work that exists.
Food as the Centre of Community Life
When food is local, it becomes a natural gathering point. Markets become places of exchange not only of goods, but of relationships. People know who grows their food, who bakes their bread, who tends their orchards, who raises their animals.
Trust is built through familiarity, transparency, and shared responsibility.
This is why the Local Market Exchange (LME) sits at the heart of LEGS.
It is not simply a place to buy and sell. It is the physical and social centre of the community – the place where work, governance, and daily life intersect.
It is where the principles of fairness, sustainability, and contribution are made visible.
It is where the Basic Living Standard becomes tangible.
Food brings people together. It creates rhythm, ritual, and connection. It anchors community identity.
And because everyone depends on it, everyone has a stake in its integrity.
Food as the Foundation of Environmental Stewardship
Industrial agriculture has treated soil as a resource to be exploited rather than a living organism to be cared for.
The result has been soil degradation, biodiversity loss, water pollution, and a food system that is fundamentally unsustainable.
LEGS restores the natural relationship between people and the land.
Food is grown using regenerative methods that work with nature rather than against it.
Soil is protected and enriched.
Water is managed responsibly.
Animals are raised humanely.
Orchards are tended with long‑term care.
Waste becomes compost.
Inputs are natural.
Machinery is used to support people, not replace them.
The LEGS system, building upon Foods We Can Trust, embraces the reality that historic technologies, working horses, simple mechanical tools, and precision agriculture can coexist – not to maximise output, but to maximise sustainability, resilience, and human involvement.
This is the essence of LEGS: technology supports people, but never replaces them.
Food as the Catalyst for Redefining Work
When food is central, work becomes grounded. It becomes visible. It becomes connected to life. It becomes something people can understand, participate in, and take pride in.
Food production creates work that is:
meaningful, because it sustains life
skilled, because it requires knowledge and care
communal, because it depends on cooperation
sustainable, because it aligns with natural systems
dignified, because it is essential
And because food production touches everything, it creates a ripple effect across the entire economy.
Repair work becomes essential.
Craft work becomes valued.
Teaching becomes integrated.
Governance becomes participatory.
Health becomes preventative.
Community becomes the natural structure of daily life.
Food is not just the centre of LEGS.
Food is the centre of the future of work.
Food as the Proof That LEGS Works
If you want to understand whether a system is healthy, look at its food.
If you want to understand whether a community is resilient, look at its food.
If you want to understand whether work is meaningful, look at its food.
If you want to understand whether governance is functioning, look at its food.
Food is the mirror that reflects the health of the entire system.
This is why Foods We Can Trust is not just a piece of writing about agriculture and food production. It is a blueprint for understanding how a people‑first society functions.
It shows how food production, when done properly, becomes the anchor of a local economy, the centre of community life, the foundation of environmental stewardship, and the catalyst for redefining work.
Food is where LEGS becomes real.
Food is where the Basic Living Standard becomes tangible.
Food is where contribution becomes visible.
Food is where community becomes strong.
Food is where the future of work begins.
SECTION 5 – WORK AS CONTRIBUTION: THE NEW DEFINITION OF WORK IN LEGS
Once the Basic Living Standard is in place and food is restored to its rightful position at the centre of community life, the meaning of work begins to change in ways that are both profound and surprisingly intuitive.
People often assume that redefining work requires a radical leap of imagination, but in reality, it is the old system that is unnatural.
The idea that work must be tied to wages, that contribution must be measured in money, and that survival must depend on employment is not a universal truth. It is a cultural invention – and a relatively recent one.
When the distortions of the money‑centric system fall away, work returns to what it has always been at its core: the way people contribute to the wellbeing of their community, the way they express their abilities, and the way they participate in the shared life of the place they belong to.
Work becomes contribution, and contribution becomes the organising principle of the local economy.
Work That Reflects What People Actually Need
In LEGS, work is defined not by job titles or employment contracts, but by the needs of the community.
These needs are practical, human, and grounded in daily life.
People need food, shelter, care, learning, safety, connection, and the countless small acts of maintenance and support that make a community function.
These needs do not disappear because a market cannot monetise them.
They are constant, and they are universal.
The old system often ignored these needs because they did not generate profit.
LEGS places them at the centre.
This means that the work people do is directly connected to the wellbeing of the community.
It is visible. It is meaningful. It is valued not because it is paid, but because it matters.
Work That Reflects People’s Abilities and Interests
When survival is no longer tied to employment, people are free to choose work that aligns with their abilities, interests, and stage of life.
A person who is naturally patient and empathetic may choose to support elders or mentor young people. Someone with a practical mind may gravitate toward repair work, building, or maintaining community infrastructure. A person with a love of nature may work in food production, land stewardship, or environmental care.
This is not idealism. It is the practical outcome of removing coercion from the equation.
When people are free to choose, they choose work that suits them. And when people do work that suits them, the quality of that work improves.
The community benefits.
The individual thrives.
The system becomes stronger.
Work That Is Integrated Into Community Life
In LEGS, work is not something that happens in isolation from the rest of life. It is woven into the fabric of the community.
People work where they live, with people they know, for the benefit of the place they belong to.
This creates a sense of ownership, responsibility, and connection that the old system could never replicate.
The Local Market Exchange becomes the natural hub of this activity. It is where food is traded, goods are exchanged, services are offered, and contributions are recognised. It is where the rhythms of work and community life intersect. It is where people see the impact of their efforts and the efforts of others. It is where work becomes visible, relational, and meaningful.
Work That Is Shared, Not Hoarded
One of the most damaging features of the old system is the way it concentrates work into rigid roles and hoards responsibility within narrow hierarchies.
This creates bottlenecks, burnout, and a sense of disconnection between those who make decisions and those who carry them out.
In LEGS, work is shared.
Governance is participatory.
Responsibility is distributed.
People contribute to local administration as part of their weekly rhythm, not as a career.
Decisions are made collectively, not imposed from above.
This creates a culture in which work is not something people compete for, but something they share ownership of.
Work That Includes Learning, Care, and Creativity
The old system treats learning as preparation for work, care as a private burden, and creativity as a luxury. LEGS treats all three as forms of contribution.
A young person learning a trade or developing a skill is contributing to the future capacity of the community.
A parent raising children is contributing to the next generation.
A person caring for an elder is contributing to the dignity and wellbeing of someone who has contributed before them.
A musician, writer, or craftsperson is contributing to the cultural life of the community.
These forms of work are not secondary. They are central. They are recognised. They are valued.
They are part of the shared responsibility of living in a community.
Work That Is Sustainable and Human‑Centred
Because food is central and the environment is treated as a living system rather than a resource to be exploited, work in LEGS is naturally aligned with sustainability.
People work with nature, not against it.
They use technology to support human effort, not replace it.
They prioritise long‑term wellbeing over short‑term gain.
This creates work that is healthier, more varied, and more fulfilling.
It also creates a community that is resilient, adaptable, and capable of meeting its own needs without relying on distant systems that do not share its interests.
Work That Reflects the True Value of Contribution
When work is defined as contribution, the distortions of the old system fall away.
The person who grows food, repairs tools, teaches children, or cares for elders is not “less valuable” than the person who manages a business or provides technical expertise.
They are contributing in different ways, but their contributions are equally essential.
This is the heart of the future of work in LEGS.
It is not about replacing one set of job titles with another.
It is about restoring the natural relationship between people, work, and community.
It is about recognising that contribution is the true measure of value.
It is about building a society in which everyone has a role, everyone has a place, and everyone has the opportunity to contribute in ways that are meaningful, sustainable, and aligned with the needs of the community.
Work becomes what it should always have been:
a shared responsibility to build a good life together.
SECTION 6 – BUSINESSES IN LEGS: PURPOSE, STRUCTURE, AND THE END OF PROFIT‑DRIVEN WORK
If redefining work is the emotional and cultural heart of LEGS, redefining business is its structural backbone.
The way businesses operate determines the shape of daily life: what goods are available, how services are delivered, how people interact with one another, and how the community’s needs are met.
In the money‑centric system, businesses have been shaped by a single overriding priority – profit – and everything else has been arranged around that goal.
In LEGS, this priority is replaced by something far more human:
purpose.
The Basic Living Standard removes the pressure that forces people to accept exploitative work, but it also removes the pressure that forces businesses to behave in exploitative ways.
When people’s essentials are guaranteed, businesses no longer need to underpay workers or chase growth to survive.
And when wealth accumulation is structurally limited, businesses no longer have the incentive to expand endlessly or dominate markets.
This creates a business environment that is calmer, more focused, and more aligned with the needs of the community.
Businesses Exist to Meet Needs, Not to Create Them
In the old system, businesses often survive by manufacturing demand – convincing people to buy things they don’t need, replacing goods that could have been repaired, or creating problems that only their products can solve.
This is not a flaw in the system; it is the system.
Profit requires growth, and growth requires consumption, even when that consumption is wasteful or harmful.
LEGS removes this dynamic entirely.
Because people’s essentials are guaranteed and money cannot accumulate beyond personal need, there is no incentive to create artificial demand.
Businesses exist because the community needs what they provide – not because they have found a way to monetise a desire or exploit a vulnerability.
A bakery exists because people need bread.
A workshop exists because tools and goods need repairing.
A childcare provider exists because families need support.
A grocer exists because food must be distributed fairly and reliably.
This shift may seem simple, but it changes everything.
When businesses exist to meet needs rather than create them, the entire economy becomes more grounded, more sustainable, and more humane.
Businesses Are Local by Design
One of the most damaging features of the old system is the way businesses expand far beyond the communities they serve.
This creates monopolies, erodes local identity, and concentrates power in the hands of a few.
It also disconnects businesses from the consequences of their actions. A corporation headquartered hundreds of miles away has no relationship with the people whose lives are shaped by its decisions.
In LEGS, privately owned businesses operate within a single community.
They are licensed by the Circumpunct, not to restrict enterprise, but to ensure that businesses remain rooted in the place they serve.
This prevents monopolies, protects local diversity, and ensures that businesses remain accountable to the people who rely on them.
If a business needs to operate across multiple communities – for example, because it provides a specialised service or manages a regional supply chain – it does so as a social enterprise.
These enterprises are governed collaboratively by representatives from the communities they serve, not owned privately for profit.
This ensures that scale never becomes a tool for exploitation.
Businesses Do Not Compete for Essentials
Competition is often celebrated as the engine of innovation, but in essential goods and services, competition creates instability.
When multiple businesses compete to provide the same essential service, they must cut costs, reduce quality, or chase volume to survive.
This leads to shortages, price fluctuations, and the erosion of trust.
LEGS removes competition from essential goods and services.
Prices for basic essentials are set by the Circumpunct, ensuring fairness and stability.
Multiple businesses offering the same essential service only exist when the community’s needs cannot be met by a single provider – and even then, they serve distinct geographical areas rather than competing for customers.
This creates a system in which essential goods are reliable, affordable, and consistent.
It also frees businesses from the pressure to undercut one another, allowing them to focus on quality, sustainability, and service.
Businesses Are Embedded in Community Life
In LEGS, businesses are not isolated entities operating behind closed doors.
They are part of the community’s daily rhythm.
They work with the Local Market Exchange to ensure that supply meets demand.
They collaborate with local administration to support community contributions.
They participate in governance through the Circumpunct.
They are visible, accountable, and integrated into the life of the community.
This integration creates a sense of shared responsibility.
A business owner is not simply running a private enterprise; they are contributing to the wellbeing of the community.
Their success is measured not in profit, but in the quality of the service they provide and the strength of the relationships they build.
Businesses Support, Rather Than Replace, Human Work
Technology plays a role in LEGS, but it is a supportive role.
Businesses use technology to improve working conditions, reduce unnecessary strain, and enhance quality – not to replace people or eliminate jobs.
This is particularly important in food production, where the goal is not to maximise output but to maintain sustainability, quality, and human involvement.
This approach creates workplaces that are healthier, more humane, and more fulfilling.
It also ensures that work remains varied, skilled, and connected to the community.
Businesses Reflect the Values of LEGS
When businesses are local, purpose‑driven, and accountable, they naturally reflect the values of the community.
They prioritise sustainability because they depend on the land and resources around them.
They prioritise fairness because they know the people they serve.
They prioritise quality because their reputation is built on trust, not marketing.
They prioritise contribution because they are part of a system that values contribution above profit.
In this environment, work becomes meaningful because businesses themselves are meaningful.
They are not engines of extraction.
They are pillars of community life.
SECTION 7 – LEARNING, APPRENTICESHIP, AND THE PATH TO CONTRIBUTION
One of the most damaging assumptions of the old system is the idea that learning is something young people do in preparation for work, rather than something all people do as part of life.
This assumption has shaped education into a narrow, competitive, exam‑driven process that treats young people as future workers rather than present members of a community.
It has also created a false divide between “academic” and “practical” people, as if the value of a person’s contribution can be predicted by their performance in a classroom.
In LEGS, learning is not preparation for contribution.
Learning is contribution.
It is one of the most important forms of work a person can do, because it builds the capacity of the community to meet its own needs, adapt to change, and maintain the skills and knowledge required for a good life.
Learning Begins with Belonging
The first shift in LEGS is that young people are not treated as outsiders waiting to enter adult life.
They are recognised as contributors from the moment they are ready to participate.
This usually begins around the age of fourteen, when young people naturally start to look outward – toward the community, toward responsibility, and toward the question of who they are becoming.
At this point, they enter the contribution pathway.
This is not a programme, not a curriculum, and not a rigid structure.
It is a recognition that learning happens best when it is connected to real life, real people, and real purpose.
Young people begin to take part in the rhythms of the community, supported by mentors, guided by experience, and encouraged to explore the areas where their abilities and interests naturally lead them.
Two Pathways, One Purpose
In the old system, education is a funnel. Everyone is pushed through the same narrow channel, judged by the same metrics, and sorted into categories that often have little to do with their actual abilities or potential.
LEGS replaces the funnel with two parallel pathways – both equally valued, both equally respected, and both essential to the health of the community.
The Academic Pathway is for those who thrive in structured learning, theory, and conceptual understanding.
These young people may go on to become teachers, healthcare practitioners, engineers, researchers, or specialists in fields that require deep study and technical knowledge.
The Experiential Pathway is for those who learn best through doing – through apprenticeship, hands‑on practice, and immersion in real‑world tasks.
These young people may become growers, makers, builders, carers, craftspeople, or any number of roles that require skill, intuition, and practical intelligence.
Neither pathway is superior.
Neither is a fallback.
Neither is a consolation prize.
They are simply different ways of learning, reflecting the diversity of human ability.
Learning Through Contribution
The most important difference between LEGS and the old system is that learning is not separated from contribution.
A young person learning to grow food is contributing to the community’s resilience.
A young person learning carpentry is contributing to the maintenance of homes and tools.
A young person learning social skills, communication, or emotional intelligence is contributing to the strength of relationships within the community.
This integration of learning and contribution creates a sense of purpose that the old system often fails to provide.
Young people see the impact of their efforts.
They understand why their learning matters.
They feel valued, not because they have achieved a grade, but because they have made a difference.
Mentorship as a Community Responsibility
In LEGS, mentorship is not a profession. It is a shared responsibility.
Every adult who has experience, skill, or wisdom to offer becomes a potential mentor.
This creates a rich, intergenerational learning environment in which young people are supported not only by teachers, but by growers, makers, carers, elders, and community contributors of all kinds.
This approach restores something that has been lost in the modern world: the natural transmission of knowledge from one generation to the next.
It also strengthens community bonds, because mentorship is not a transaction – it is a relationship.
Learning as a Lifelong Process
The contribution pathway does not end at twenty‑one. It simply becomes less formal.
Adults continue to learn new skills, adapt to new roles, and deepen their understanding throughout their lives.
This is not a requirement. It is a natural outcome of living in a community where work is varied, meaningful, and connected to real needs.
Because work is not tied to survival, people are free to change direction, explore new interests, and develop new abilities without fear.
This creates a community that is flexible, resilient, and capable of evolving as circumstances change.
The Path to Contribution Is the Path to Identity
Perhaps the most profound impact of this approach is the way it shapes identity.
In the old system, young people are often defined by their performance in school, their exam results, or their perceived economic potential.
In LEGS, young people are defined by their contribution – by the ways they help others, the skills they develop, the relationships they build, and the role they play in the life of the community.
This creates a sense of belonging, purpose, and self‑worth that cannot be manufactured through grades or qualifications.
It also creates a generation of adults who understand that their value lies not in what they earn, but in what they contribute.
Learning becomes the beginning of contribution.
Contribution becomes the expression of learning.
And together, they form the path to a meaningful life.
SECTION 8 – GOVERNANCE, RESPONSIBILITY, AND THE SHARED WORK OF COMMUNITY LIFE
One of the most striking differences between LEGS and the system we are leaving behind is the way governance is understood.
In the old world, governance is something done to people. It is distant, bureaucratic, and often unaccountable.
Decisions are made by individuals who may never meet the people affected by them.
Power is concentrated, responsibility is centralised, and the everyday running of community life is handled by institutions that feel increasingly disconnected from the realities of the people they are supposed to serve.
LEGS turns this arrangement on its head.
Governance becomes a shared responsibility – not a career, not a hierarchy, and not a mechanism for control.
It becomes a form of contribution, woven into the fabric of community life in the same way as food production, care, learning, and craft.
It is not something separate from work. It is work – one of the most important forms of work a community can undertake.
Governance as a Collective Duty
In LEGS, every able adult contributes a small portion of their time – typically around ten percent of their working week – to the shared tasks of local administration.
This is not a burden. It is not an obligation imposed from above. It is a recognition that a functioning community requires participation from everyone, not just a small group of professionals.
This contribution might take many forms: helping to run the Local Market Exchange, supporting community events, maintaining public spaces, assisting with local planning, or participating in the processes that ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability.
These tasks are not glamorous, but they are essential. They are the quiet, steady work that keeps a community healthy, organised, and resilient.
Because everyone participates, governance becomes something people understand intimately.
They see how decisions are made, how resources are allocated, and how challenges are addressed.
They see the consequences of their choices and the choices of others.
This creates a culture of responsibility, not blame, participation, not apathy.
No Career Bureaucrats, No Political Class
One of the most corrosive features of the old system is the existence of a political class – individuals who build careers out of governance, accumulate power through position, and often become insulated from the realities of the people they represent.
This creates a disconnect between decision‑makers and the community, and it fosters a culture in which governance becomes a game of influence rather than a service to the public.
LEGS eliminates this dynamic entirely.
There are no career administrators.
There are no permanent positions of authority.
There is no political class.
The only full‑time roles within local administration are those required to maintain continuity and structure – roles that ensure the system functions smoothly, not roles that confer power or status.
Strategic decisions are made collectively through the Circumpunct, where every voice has weight and no individual has disproportionate influence.
Operational decisions are carried out by those contributing their time as part of their weekly rhythm.
This separation of strategy and operation prevents the concentration of power and ensures that governance remains grounded in the lived experience of the community.
Governance as a Form of Learning and Connection
Because governance is shared, it becomes a natural part of the learning pathway for young people and adults alike.
People learn how decisions are made, how resources are managed, and how conflicts are resolved.
They learn the skills of communication, negotiation, and collaboration.
They learn to see the community as a whole, not just their own role within it.
This creates a population that is not only more informed, but more connected.
People understand the pressures and responsibilities of governance because they have experienced them firsthand.
They develop empathy for those who take on difficult tasks.
They appreciate the complexity of balancing competing needs.
And they become more invested in the wellbeing of the community because they have helped shape it.
Governance That Reflects the Values of LEGS
Because governance is participatory, it naturally reflects the values of the community.
Decisions are made with an understanding of local needs, local resources, and local priorities.
There is no distant authority imposing policies that do not fit the context.
There is no bureaucracy creating rules for the sake of rules.
There is no hierarchy protecting itself at the expense of the people it serves.
Instead, governance becomes an extension of the principles that define LEGS: fairness, sustainability, contribution, and respect for people, community, and environment.
It becomes a living expression of the idea that everyone has a role to play in building and maintaining a good life for all.
Governance That Strengthens Community Resilience
When governance is shared, communities become more resilient.
They are better able to respond to challenges because they have the structures, relationships, and habits of cooperation already in place.
They do not wait for external authorities to intervene.
They do not rely on distant systems that may not understand their needs.
They act together, drawing on the skills, knowledge, and commitment of the people who live there.
This resilience is not theoretical.
It is practical.
It is built through the daily work of maintaining the Local Market Exchange, coordinating food production, supporting vulnerable members of the community, and ensuring that the Basic Living Standard is upheld.
It is built through the relationships formed in the process of shared governance.
It is built through the understanding that the wellbeing of the community is a shared responsibility.
Governance as Work, Work as Governance
In LEGS, the boundary between work and governance dissolves.
Governance is not something separate from the economy.
It is part of the economy – part of the shared work of sustaining life, supporting one another, and caring for the environment.
It is not a burden placed on a few.
It is a contribution shared by many.
This integration creates a community in which people feel ownership, agency, and belonging.
They do not see governance as something done by others.
They see it as something they are part of.
They see themselves reflected in the decisions that shape their lives.
And they see the community not as a collection of individuals, but as a living system that they help to maintain.
Governance becomes work. Work becomes contribution. Contribution becomes community. And community becomes the foundation of a good life.
SECTION 9 – TECHNOLOGY, TOOLS, AND THE HUMAN ROLE
One of the greatest misunderstandings of the modern age is the belief that technological progress must inevitably lead to the replacement of human beings.
This belief has shaped entire industries, influenced government policy, and created a culture in which people are constantly told that their jobs, skills, and contributions are temporary – that they will soon be made redundant by machines that can do the same work faster, cheaper, and more efficiently.
This narrative has been used to justify everything from the erosion of skilled trades to the consolidation of industries, the decline of local economies, and the devaluation of human labour.
It has created a world in which people are expected to adapt endlessly to systems that do not adapt to them.
And it has left many feeling anxious, replaceable, and disconnected from the work they do.
LEGS rejects this narrative entirely.
Technology has a place in the future of work, but it is not the place the old system has assigned to it.
In LEGS, technology is a tool – nothing more, nothing less.
It exists to support people, not replace them.
It exists to improve working conditions, not eliminate work.
It exists to enhance human contribution, not undermine it.
Technology as a Support, not a Substitute
In the money‑centric system, technology is often introduced with a single goal: reducing labour costs.
Machines replace workers.
Software replaces administrators.
Automation replaces entire industries.
The logic is simple: if a machine can do the work, the business can save money.
But this logic only makes sense in a system where profit is the primary measure of success.
In LEGS, the measure of success is contribution – not profit.
This changes the role of technology completely.
A tool that helps a person work more safely, more comfortably, or more effectively is valuable.
A tool that removes the need for human involvement in meaningful work is not.
This is particularly important in food production, where the goal is not to maximise output, but to maintain sustainability, quality, and human involvement.
Machines may be used to support heavy tasks, improve precision, or reduce strain, but they do not replace the grower, the maker, or the steward.
The relationship between people and land remains central.
Tools That Enhance Skill, Not Erase It
One of the tragedies of the old system is the way it has eroded skilled trades. Crafts that once required years of apprenticeship and mastery have been replaced by mass‑produced goods designed to be used briefly and discarded. This has not only reduced the quality of the goods we rely on; it has diminished the sense of pride and identity that comes from skilled work.
In LEGS, tools are used to enhance skill, not erase it.
A carpenter may use modern equipment to improve accuracy, but the craft remains in their hands.
A grower may use sensors to monitor soil moisture, but the understanding of the land remains in their experience.
A baker may use a modern oven, but the knowledge of fermentation, texture, and flavour remains in their judgement.
Technology becomes a partner in the work, not the master of it.
Technology That Strengthens Community, Not Replaces It
The old system has used technology to centralise power.
Online platforms replace local shops.
Automated systems replace local services.
Remote corporations replace local decision‑making.
This has created a world in which communities are increasingly dependent on distant systems that do not understand their needs and do not share their interests.
LEGS uses technology to strengthen community, not replace it.
Digital tools support the Local Market Exchange, making it easier to coordinate supply, manage contributions, and maintain fairness.
Communication tools help people stay connected, share knowledge, and organise community activities.
Educational tools support learning, mentorship, and skill development.
Technology becomes a way to enhance the relationships that already exist, not a way to bypass them.
Technology That Respects the Environment
Industrial technology has often been used to extract as much as possible from the environment with as little human involvement as possible.
This has led to soil degradation, pollution, biodiversity loss, and a food system that is fundamentally unsustainable.
In LEGS, technology is used to support regenerative practices.
Precision tools help growers understand the needs of the land.
Simple mechanical systems reduce waste and energy use.
Innovations in composting, water management, and soil care enhance natural processes rather than override them.
This approach reflects a deeper truth: the environment is not a resource to be exploited, but a living system to be cared for.
Technology must serve that system, not dominate it.
Technology That Keeps People at the Centre
The most important principle in LEGS is that people remain at the centre of work.
Technology does not replace human judgement, creativity, empathy, or connection.
It does not remove the need for skilled hands, thoughtful minds, or caring hearts.
It does not diminish the value of contribution.
Instead, it supports people in doing work that is meaningful, sustainable, and aligned with the needs of the community.
It reduces unnecessary strain, enhances safety, and expands the possibilities of what people can achieve together.
In this way, technology becomes what it was always meant to be: a tool that serves humanity, not a force that shapes it.
SECTION 10 – NATURAL RESOURCES, STEWARDSHIP, AND THE ETHICS OF A PEOPLE‑FIRST ECONOMY
If food is the centre of LEGS, natural resources are the ground it stands on – literally and figuratively.
The way a society treats its land, water, soil, and natural systems reveals everything about its values.
In the money‑centric world, natural resources have been treated as commodities: things to be owned, extracted, traded, and exploited for profit.
This approach has shaped not only the environment, but the structure of work, the behaviour of businesses, and the relationship between people and the places they live.
LEGS rejects this extractive logic entirely.
In a people‑first economy, natural resources are not assets to be monetised.
They are life‑support systems to be cared for.
They are shared responsibilities, not private property.
They are the foundation of community resilience, not the raw materials of corporate profit.
And because they are treated differently, the work associated with them changes too.
Land as a Living System, not a Commodity
In the old system, land ownership confers power. It determines who can grow food, who can build homes, who can extract resources, and who can profit from the labour of others.
This has created a world in which vast areas of land are controlled by a small number of individuals or corporations, while the people who depend on that land for food, shelter, and community life have little say in how it is used.
LEGS dismantles this dynamic.
Land is not something that can be owned in the traditional sense.
It is something that can be stewarded – cared for, worked with, and protected for the benefit of the community and future generations.
People may live on land, work on land, and take responsibility for land, but they do not own it as a commodity that can be bought, sold, or accumulated.
This shift changes the nature of work.
People who work the land are not labourers serving the interests of distant owners.
They are stewards serving the interests of the community.
Their work is not extractive. It is regenerative.
It is not about maximising yield. It is about maintaining balance.
It is not about profit. It is about life.
Soil as a Living Organism
One of the most important insights from Foods We Can Trust is the recognition that soil is not dirt. It is a living organism – a complex ecosystem that supports plant life, stores carbon, regulates water, and sustains the entire food system.
Industrial agriculture has treated soil as a medium for chemicals, stripping it of life and reducing it to a substrate for production.
LEGS restores the natural relationship between people and soil.
Work on the land is guided by the understanding that soil must be fed, protected, and nurtured.
Regenerative practices – crop rotation, composting, mulching, cover cropping, and minimal tilling – become the norm.
Animals are integrated into the system in ways that support soil health rather than degrade it.
Waste becomes a resource. Inputs are natural. Outputs are sustainable.
This approach creates work that is skilled, meaningful, and deeply connected to the rhythms of nature.
It also creates a food system that is resilient, nutritious, and trustworthy.
Water as a Shared Responsibility
Water is another resource that the old system has treated as a commodity.
It has been privatised, polluted, over‑extracted, and mismanaged in ways that have harmed communities and ecosystems alike.
In LEGS, water is recognised as a shared responsibility.
It is managed collectively, protected from contamination, and used in ways that reflect the needs of the community rather than the demands of industry.
This creates work in water stewardship – maintaining waterways, monitoring quality, managing irrigation, and ensuring that water use is sustainable.
It also reinforces the principle that essential resources cannot be controlled by private interests.
Forests, Wildlife, and Biodiversity
In the old system, forests are often valued for the timber they can produce or the land they can be cleared to create.
Wildlife is valued only when it can be monetised.
Biodiversity is treated as an afterthought.
LEGS takes a different view.
Forests are recognised as vital ecosystems that support air quality, water cycles, soil health, and biodiversity.
Wildlife is part of the natural balance.
Biodiversity is essential to the resilience of the entire system.
Work in these areas becomes work of care – maintaining habitats, restoring ecosystems, monitoring species, and ensuring that human activity supports rather than undermines the natural world.
Minerals and Materials: Use, Not Exploitation
Even in a localised economy, communities need materials – stone, clay, timber, metals.
But the extraction of these materials is guided by principles of necessity, sustainability, and stewardship.
Materials are used sparingly, recycled wherever possible, and extracted only when the community genuinely needs them.
This creates work that is careful, skilled, and grounded in responsibility.
The Ethics of a People‑First Economy
At the heart of LEGS is a simple ethical principle: natural resources exist to support life, not profit.
This principle shapes every aspect of work.
It means that people do not work to extract as much as possible from the environment.
They work to maintain the balance that allows life to flourish.
It means that businesses do not treat natural resources as assets to be exploited.
They treat them as responsibilities to be honoured.
It means that governance does not regulate resources from a distance.
It stewards them from within the community.
This ethical foundation creates a different kind of economy – one in which work is aligned with the long‑term wellbeing of people, community, and environment.
It creates a different kind of community – one that understands its dependence on the natural world and acts accordingly.
And it creates a different kind of future – one in which the health of the land is inseparable from the health of the people who live on it.
Natural resources are not commodities.
They are the living foundation of a good life.
And in LEGS, caring for them is one of the most important forms of work we do.
SECTION 11 – BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER: THE FUTURE OF WORK AS A WHOLE SYSTEM
By the time a reader reaches this point, they have encountered the individual components of LEGS – the Basic Living Standard, the centrality of food, the redefinition of work, the reshaping of business, the contribution pathways, the shared governance model, and the ethical treatment of natural resources.
Each of these elements can be understood on its own, but their true power emerges only when they are seen as parts of a single, coherent system.
The future of work in LEGS is not a reform of the old world.
It is the expression of a new one.
It is the natural outcome of a society that has re‑evaluated what it values, re‑centred what matters, and re‑designed its structures around people, community, and the environment rather than money, competition, and extraction.
A System Built on Security, Not Scarcity
The Basic Living Standard removes the fear that has shaped work for generations.
When people are no longer forced to work to survive, they are free to work in ways that reflect their abilities, interests, and values.
This single shift transforms the entire landscape of work.
It removes coercion. It restores dignity.
It allows contribution to become the organising principle of the economy.
Security is not a luxury. It is the foundation of a functioning society.
A System Rooted in Food, Not Finance
Food is the centre of LEGS because it is the centre of life.
When food is local, trustworthy, and sustainably produced, it anchors the entire economy in something real.
It creates meaningful work.
It strengthens community.
It protects the environment.
It ensures resilience.
It reconnects people with the land and with each other.
This is why Foods We Can Trust is not just a piece of project about agriculture and food production.
It is a blueprint for a society in which the most essential work is treated with the respect it deserves.
A System That Redefines Work as Contribution
When work is no longer tied to wages, it becomes something deeper.
It becomes the way people participate in the life of the community.
It becomes the way they express their abilities.
It becomes the way they support one another.
It becomes the way they grow.
Contribution is not a category of work.
It is the definition of work.
A System Where Businesses Serve People, Not Profit
Businesses in LEGS are not engines of wealth accumulation. They are tools for meeting community needs.
They are local, purpose‑driven, and accountable.
They do not compete for essentials.
They do not expand endlessly.
They do not extract value from the community.
They contribute to it.
This creates a business environment that is calmer, more sustainable, and more humane.
A System That Treats Learning as Part of Life
Young people do not prepare for work.
They begin contributing to the community through learning.
They follow pathways that reflect their abilities – academic or experiential – and both are valued equally.
They learn through doing, through mentorship, and through participation in real life.
Learning becomes contribution.
Contribution becomes identity.
Identity becomes belonging.
A System Where Governance Is Shared, Not Imposed
Governance in LEGS is not a hierarchy. It is a shared responsibility.
Every adult contributes a small portion of their time to the work of local administration.
Decisions are made collectively.
Power is distributed.
Strategy is separated from operation.
There is no political class.
There are no career bureaucrats.
Governance becomes part of community life, not something separate from it.
A System That Respects Natural Resources
Land is not a commodity.
Soil is not dirt.
Water is not a product.
Forests are not timber.
Minerals are not assets.
They are living systems, shared responsibilities, and the foundation of community resilience.
Work becomes stewardship.
Stewardship becomes contribution.
Contribution becomes the ethic of the entire economy.
A System That Puts People Back at the Centre
When you step back and look at LEGS as a whole, a simple truth emerges: the future of work is not about jobs. It is about people.
It is about creating a society in which people are secure, connected, valued, and able to contribute in ways that are meaningful and sustainable.
The old system treated people as units of labour.
LEGS treats people as members of a community.
The old system treated work as a transaction.
LEGS treats work as contribution.
The old system treated natural resources as commodities.
LEGS treats them as responsibilities.
The old system treated businesses as engines of profit.
LEGS treats them as tools for meeting needs.
The old system treated learning as preparation.
LEGS treats it as participation.
The old system treated governance as authority.
LEGS treats it as shared responsibility.
The Future of Work Is the Future of Community
The future of work in LEGS is not a vision of automation, efficiency, or endless growth.
It is a vision of community – of people working together to build a good life, grounded in the essentials that sustain them and the relationships that connect them.
It is a future in which:
work is meaningful.
food is trustworthy.
businesses are ethical.
learning is lifelong.
governance is participatory.
natural resources are protected.
and people are free.
This is not a utopia. It is a system built on practical realities, human needs, and the lessons of a world that has pushed its old logic to breaking point.
The future of work is not something we wait for.
It is something we build – together, through contribution, community, and care.
CLOSING STATEMENT – THE FUTURE OF WORK IS THE FUTURE OF US
When you step back from the details of LEGS – the Basic Living Standard, the food‑centred economy, the redefinition of work, the reshaping of business, the contribution pathways, the shared governance model, and the stewardship of natural resources – a simple truth emerges: this is not a system designed to fix the old world. It is a system designed to replace it.
The old world was built on scarcity, competition, and the belief that people must earn the right to survive.
It treated work as a transaction, communities as markets, and the environment as a resource to be exploited.
It created wealth for a few, insecurity for many, and instability for all.
LEGS offers a different foundation.
It begins with security, not fear.
It centres food, not finance.
It defines work as contribution, not employment.
It treats businesses as tools for meeting needs, not engines of profit.
It sees learning as participation, not preparation.
It understands governance as a shared responsibility, not a hierarchy.
And it treats natural resources as living systems to be cared for, not commodities to be extracted.
The future of work in LEGS is not a vision of automation, efficiency, or endless growth.
It is a vision of community – of people working together to build a good life, grounded in the essentials that sustain them and the relationships that connect them.
It is a future in which everyone has a role, everyone has a place, and everyone has the opportunity to contribute in ways that are meaningful, sustainable, and aligned with the needs of the community.
This paper has introduced the foundations of that future.
It has shown how the pieces fit together, how the logic holds, and how the world we are building differs from the world we are leaving behind.
But it is only a beginning.
The deeper exploration – of food systems, governance structures, contribution pathways, and the ethics of a people‑first economy – lies beyond this introduction.
The future of work is not something that happens to us.
It is something we create – through contribution, community, and care.
And the work of creating it begins now.
Further Reading: Deepening Your Understanding of the Contribution Culture and the LEGS ecosystem
Core Concepts of LEGS and the Basic Living Standard
The Basic Living Standard Explained https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/10/24/the-basic-living-standard-explained/ Discover the heart of LEGS: the Basic Living Standard (BLS). This article breaks down how BLS redefines security, dignity, and the essentials of life, making survival a right – not a reward. It’s an accessible entry point for understanding why LEGS begins with guaranteeing everyone’s basic needs, and how this shift unlocks new possibilities for work, contribution, and community.
The Basic Living Standard: Full Text https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/03/06/the-basic-living-standard-full-text/ For those seeking a comprehensive grasp of BLS, this full-length text offers a deep dive into its principles, mechanisms, and transformative impact. It’s ideal for readers who want to see the full scope of how BLS underpins the LEGS system and why it’s foundational to a humane, resilient society.
Foods We Can Trust: A Blueprint for Food Security and Community Resilience in the UK https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/12/15/foods-we-can-trust-a-blueprint-for-food-security-and-community-resilience-in-the-uk-online-text/ This comprehensive blueprint explores why food is central to LEGS and the future of work. It examines how local, trustworthy, and sustainable food systems underpin community resilience, health, and environmental stewardship. The article offers practical insights into building food systems that are not only secure but also foster meaningful work and strong community bonds. Essential reading for understanding why food is more than just sustenance – it is the foundation of a people-first society.
LEGS in Practice: Governance, Community, and Local Economy
The Local Economy Governance System: Online Text https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/11/21/the-local-economy-governance-system-online-text/ Dive into the nuts and bolts of LEGS governance. This resource explains how local decision-making, participatory structures, and shared responsibility create a system that is fair, transparent, and deeply rooted in community needs.
A Community Route: Full Text https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/01/17/a-community-route-full-text/ Learn how resilient, participatory communities are built. This resource focuses on the social structures, relationships, and practices that make LEGS work at the local level.
Manifestos and Systemic Change
Levelling Level: Full Text https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/03/03/levelling-level-full-text/ A foundational manifesto for economic and social transformation. This text sets out the vision, principles, and arguments for a more equitable society, making it a compelling read for anyone interested in the “why” behind LEGS.
The Grassroots Manifesto: Full Text https://adamtugwell.blog/2025/03/20/the-grassroots-manifesto-full-text/ Discover the bottom-up approach to change that underpins LEGS. This manifesto champions local action, community empowerment, and the collective will to reshape society from the ground up.
Begin with the Core Concepts to understand the philosophical and practical foundations of LEGS and the Basic Living Standard.
Explore Food, Security, and Community Resilience to see why food is central to the system’s success.
Move to Practice and Governance for insights on implementation, community building, and participatory governance.
Finally, explore Manifestos and Systemic Change for broader context, vision, and strategies for transformation.
Each summary is designed to invite you into deeper exploration, connecting the dots between theory, practice, and the lived experience of a people-first society.
These resources will enrich your understanding and help you see how the ideas in LEGS – The Contribution Culture, can be brought to life.