A Deep‑Dive Guide to The Philosophy of a People First Society

1. How does this philosophy redefine the concept of “human nature”?

Traditional economic and political systems assume humans are primarily self‑interested, competitive, and motivated by scarcity.

This philosophy rejects that framing as a structural artefact, not a biological truth.

It argues that what we call “human nature” is largely a reflection of the systems we live within.

Change the environment → change the behaviour → change the outcomes.

In this view, human nature is:

relational
adaptive
cooperative under conditions of security
meaning‑seeking
contribution‑driven

This is a foundational departure from neoliberal and classical economic assumptions.

2. Why is security considered the precondition for contribution?

Because fear distorts behaviour.

A person in survival mode cannot:

think long‑term
act ethically
participate meaningfully
contribute creatively
engage in community life

The Basic Living Standard is therefore not a welfare mechanism – it is a psychological and structural prerequisite for a functioning society.

Security → stability → contribution → community → resilience.

3. How does this philosophy reinterpret the purpose of work?

Work is not a commodity.

Work is not a transaction.

Work is not a mechanism for survival.

Work is participation in the life of the community.

This reframing dissolves the coercive relationship between employer and employee and replaces it with a contribution‑based model where:

people work because they are part of a community
work is meaningful
contribution is voluntary but natural
survival is not conditional on employment

This is a profound shift from the industrial and neoliberal worldview.

4. Why is locality the “natural scale” of human systems?

Because human beings evolved in small, relational groups where:

accountability was direct
decisions were transparent
consequences were visible
relationships were personal

Large, centralised systems create:

abstraction
detachment
bureaucratic distance
moral disengagement
power concentration

Locality restores the natural feedback loops that keep systems ethical and functional.

5. How does this philosophy challenge the concept of economic growth?

It argues that growth is not a measure of wellbeing – it is a measure of throughput.

GDP increases when:

people get sick
disasters occur
housing becomes unaffordable
debt expands
consumption accelerates

Growth is therefore not neutral – it rewards harm.

A People First Society replaces growth with:

resilience
sufficiency
regeneration
wellbeing
contribution
community health

This is a paradigm shift from extractive economics to human‑centred economics.

6. What is the philosophical justification for limiting property ownership?

Property accumulation creates power accumulation.

Power accumulation creates inequality.

Inequality creates dependency and coercion.

The philosophy argues that no person has the moral right to own more than they can use, because unused property becomes a mechanism of control over others.

Housing is therefore a right, not a commodity.

This is not ideological – it is structural ethics.

7. How does this philosophy understand value?

Value is not price.

Value is not profit.

Value is not scarcity.

Value is defined as:

anything that improves the wellbeing, freedom, dignity, or resilience of people, communities, or the environment.

This reframing collapses the entire logic of the money‑centric worldview.

8. Why does the philosophy reject interest, speculation, and financialisation?

Because they allow people to accumulate wealth without contributing anything of value.

Interest and speculation:

extract value without creating it
distort prices
create artificial scarcity
concentrate power
destabilise communities
reward non‑contribution

A People First Society requires that value only flows from contribution, not from ownership or manipulation.

9. How does this philosophy view governance?

Governance is not authority.
Governance is not hierarchy.
Governance is not control.

Governance is collective decision‑making about shared life.

The Circumpunct model reflects this:

no permanent power
no hierarchy
no distance between decision and consequence
leadership as service, not status
transparency as a moral requirement

This is governance as participation, not governance as rule.

10. What role does The Revaluation play in the transition?

The Revaluation is the psychological and cultural pivot that makes systemic change possible.

It is the moment when people collectively realise:

money is not value
growth is not progress
employment is not contribution
hierarchy is not leadership
centralisation is not stability
scarcity is not natural
competition is not inevitable

Without this shift, LEGS would be resisted.

With it, LEGS becomes the obvious next step.

11. How does this philosophy address the problem of power?

By dissolving the mechanisms that create it:

property accumulation
financial accumulation
hierarchical governance
centralised decision‑making
opaque systems
dependency structures

Power is not redistributed – it is deconstructed.

The system is designed so that no individual or organisation can accumulate disproportionate influence.

12. Is this philosophy compatible with modern technology and AI?

Yes – but only under strict conditions:

technology must serve human agency
AI must never replace essential human roles
systems must remain understandable at the human scale
digital tools must have non‑digital alternatives
local communities must retain control

Technology is a tool, not a trajectory.

13. How does this philosophy define freedom?

Freedom is not the absence of rules.

Freedom is not consumer choice.

Freedom is not individualism.

Freedom is:

the ability to live without fear, contribute without coercion, and participate without exclusion.

This requires:

security
dignity
community
transparency
meaningful work
environmental stability

Freedom is therefore a collective achievement, not an individual possession.

14. What is the ultimate purpose of a People First Society?

To create the conditions in which:

every person can live a good life
every community can be resilient
every environment can regenerate
every individual can contribute meaningfully
no one is left behind
no one is exploited
no one is coerced into survival

This is the philosophical north star.

15. What is the biggest misconception about this philosophy?

That it is idealistic.

In reality, the current system is the idealistic one – it assumes:

infinite growth
infinite resources
infinite stability
infinite human tolerance for inequality

This philosophy is grounded in lived reality, human psychology, ecological limits, and community logic.

It is not utopian.

It is necessary.

How the Trail Hunting Ban Exposes a Bigger Battle for Britain

Trying to unpick what looks like the sudden announcement that the government intends to ban trail hunting in the upcoming animal welfare strategy is far more complicated than it first appears.

The easy explanation is to fall back on the familiar left‑vs‑right framing – the tired them‑vs‑us narrative that has shaped the hunting debate for decades. But that framing has always obscured more than it has revealed.

Across the UK today, some will feel they have won and others will feel they have lost. Yet this moment isn’t new, nor is the opportunity to take a different path.

As I argued in my blog published on Christmas Day in 2017, the solutions that could have kept young people, rural voters, and the wider public onside have been hiding in plain sight for years.

Knowing people who hunt and people who don’t – and many who sit somewhere in between – I feel exactly as I did when I wrote that piece.

There was always a workable middle ground. The model we have today could have functioned well and kept most people broadly content, if only all sides had been willing to look beyond their own entrenched positions.

Instead of trying to rewrite the rules of the game or cling to the past as if personal belief were a universal right to impose on others, they could have chosen a bigger‑picture approach that protected both rural culture and public confidence.

But we live in a time when being “right” has become more important than being effective.

That mindset pushes people into emotional trenches, where the goal becomes defeating the other side rather than understanding what winning actually looks like in a changing world.

As the years have passed, since the ‘Hunting Ban’ came into force, the battle lines have hardened. Few have stopped to consider how easily self‑made traps can spring shut. And the hunting community, through its own shortcuts, diversions, and refusal to adapt, has handed the government the perfect excuse to act.

This is the same government that has already shown its willingness to undermine British rural life – the illogical Farm IHT rule being a prime example. Now, with trail hunting, they have been gifted a justification that many outside the community will accept without hesitation.

Many will still refuse to see what is happening. But when a government is openly delaying local elections, it is not unreasonable to expect they may attempt the same with the next general election if they can cling to power until 2029.

At the heart of this is a belief that everyone else is wrong and they alone are right.

If they succeed in pushing this change through before they lose power – assuming they haven’t already managed to entrench themselves further – the concern is that this will mark the true end of hunting as a living part of our culture and heritage.

Once an outright ban, or anything that functions as one, is in place, reversing it will be nowhere near the top of anyone’s agenda. Not with the scale of the political, economic, and social mess we have building up ahead.

Minimum Wage, Maximum Exploitation: A Collapsing System Propped Up by Rising Taxes

Introduction

As the cost of living continues to climb across the United Kingdom, many households find themselves struggling to maintain even the most basic standards of financial independence.

With impending tax rises on the horizon, the pressure on those already living near the edge is set to intensify, pushing even greater numbers below the threshold of self-sufficiency.

This is not a temporary crisis, but a symptom of a deeper, systemic failure—a collapsing economic model that now survives only by extracting more from those who can afford it least.

The money-centric economic system that we have – The “Moneyocracy” – perpetuates itself by shifting the burden onto workers and taxpayers, while the promise of prosperity grows ever more distant for the majority.

Against this backdrop, it is essential to confront a fundamental question – one that exposes the uncomfortable realities at the heart of our economy.

A Question:

Do you believe the minimum wage is enough for a full-time worker to live on – and if so, why?

The answer to this question, which varies depending on one’s relationship with the minimum wage, reveals uncomfortable truths about the foundations of our economy and the way work is valued in this country.

What is not surprising is that those who already have financial security often agree in principle that low-paid workers should earn more. Yet when confronted with the implications of paying every worker enough to live independently, many recoil. Why? Because such a change would disrupt their own relationship with the economy.

The Minimum Wage Reality

Let us be clear: the national minimum wage in the UK is not enough for anyone working a full-time 40-hour week to live independently—free from reliance on benefits, charity, or debt.

The widespread acceptance of this wage stems from government and establishment narratives.

What is legally mandated is presented as morally and practically sufficient.

Yet, in truth, the minimum wage is a carefully placed rock covering a pit of myths and lies.

Those who benefit from the system prefer not to lift that rock, because doing so would expose their complicity in maintaining the illusion.

The Employee

A worker earning the minimum wage – currently £12.21 per hour, equating to £488.40 per week or £25,396.80 annually – cannot afford the basic essentials required for independent living.

The gap between what they earn and what they need is effectively the amount by which they are underpaid.

Employers exploit workers by failing to cover the true cost of living.

Regardless of how the deficit is filled—through benefits, charity, or debt—someone else is subsidising both the employee and the employer.

The Employer (Small Business)

Small business owners often insist they pay fairly because they comply with the law. Yet compliance does not equate to fairness.

Paying the legal minimum is not the same as paying enough for employees to live independently.

Common justifications include:

• “They can top up with benefits.”

• “I can’t pay more or I’ll go out of business.”

But these arguments miss the point. The government—and by extension, taxpayers—should not subsidise businesses that cannot afford to pay workers a living wage.

In reality, small businesses are also exploited: they cannot operate independently within the current economic system, because they too are constrained by models that undervalue their work.

The Employer (Big Business)

Large corporations differ because they can afford to pay more.

Supermarkets and other major employers of minimum-wage staff generate enormous profits – even during a cost-of-living crisis, like the one we are experiencing now.

They could easily pay wages that allow workers financial independence, if boards and shareholders accepted smaller returns.

Instead, big businesses exploit both employees and taxpayers. Workers are underpaid, while the government subsidises wages through benefits.

This allows corporations to maximise profits while keeping the mechanics of exploitation hidden from public debate.

The Government

Why does the government subsidise wages so small businesses can survive and big businesses can thrive? Why not simply set a minimum wage that reflects the true cost of living?

The answer is stark: doing so would collapse the system.

The economy functions by undervaluing the majority of jobs deemed “low-skilled” or of “little value.”

If wages reflected reality, the house of cards would fall.

The Taxpayer

The system is a con. The complex machinery of what can be called a Moneyocracy manipulates trust and deference so effectively that taxpayers rarely ask basic questions.

Why, in an economy where corporations make billions annually, must taxpayers top up their employees’ wages through taxes?

Why are we threatened with price hikes whenever government policy shifts, while corporate profits remain largely unscrutinised?

Following the money reveals the truth: wealth is funnelled in one direction, made possible only by exploiting workers, taxpayers, and weak governments.

Corporations profit by underpaying staff, then spin narratives that justify charging consumers more.

Reality Bites

Exploitation of normal people has gone too far. The system enriches the few by exploiting the many – sometimes multiple times over – so profits can grow while wages stagnate or reduce in real terms.

The Moneyocracy survives by perpetuating the myth that it is acceptable for many to grow poorer while a few grow disproportionately rich.

The promise dangled before workers – that if they play the game long enough, they too might “live the dream” – is false.

Humanity is destroying itself chasing a dream that continually recedes, because playing the game requires forgetting our true worth.

The basic equation of the Moneyocracy is simple: for some to be rich, most must be poor.

This is neither humane nor true.

The Alternative

There is another way. A system built on real values – where people, communities, and the environment come first – can replace the current money-centric model.

This alternative requires transparency, local systems, and a commitment to prioritising human worth over profit. Instead of hiding self-interest behind complex structures, society must embrace a model where business and life are conducted openly, sustainably, and with fairness at the core.

The choice is absolute: continue with a Moneyocracy that exploits us all or build a future centred on people.

Path Forward

The Local Economy & Governance System provides the foundational framework for a truly people‑centric future – one where People, Community, and Environment sit at the heart of every decision.

At its core lies a new benchmark: The Basic Living Standard, a guarantee that every individual receives a weekly wage sufficient to cover all essential needs.

This principle of equity and equality is not an optional add‑on, but the priority that guides every part of the system.

By shifting away from exploitation and toward fairness, transparency, and sustainability, this model offers a pathway to rebuild trust and resilience in our economic and social structures.

To explore how this vision can be realised and what it means for the future, please follow these links:

The Local Economy & Governance System | Online Text

The Basic Living Standard Explained

Minimum Wage Maximum Exploitation PDF_Vers1_25Nov25 Download

The Basic Living Standard: Not a Fix for a Collapsing Money-Centric System, but the People-Centric Foundation of a New One

Although initially overlooked after I first introduced it in my book Levelling Level, published on Amazon on 31 March 2022, the Basic Living Standard (BLS) has increasingly attracted interest from readers and visitors to my blog.

However, I have noticed that when people search for BLS using AI, a whole chain of stories and information—often including quotes attributed to me—has emerged, much of which is either out of context or entirely fabricated.

This is concerning, especially when those outside the mainstream are trying to share solutions and perspectives that challenge the compliance and blindness of today’s system.

We must recognise that the so-called AI takeover is being built on delivery levels that, in many cases, are no better than the efforts of a lazy teenager responding to an encouraging parent. And the outright creation of false information and narratives—even regarding work from independent voices—is troubling.

Given that AI now tells those seeking a quick overview that the Basic Living Standard is a way to fix our broken economic system, I feel it is time to clarify: while I believe BLS is a pivotal solution, it cannot and will not work within the current economic paradigm.

The integral priority of BLS is to put people, not money, first.

The Basic Living Standard: Not Intended for the Current Economic System

I have never created or published financial models or projections to ‘cost’ or predict the impact of BLS on the current economy or financial system, because the two are mutually exclusive.

BLS was not designed to be part of, or to work within, the existing paradigm, which makes it impossible to do so.

Decision-makers, legislators, and their influencers will not openly admit that our system is structured against equity and equality.

It is only because the system works progressively against these values that the disproportionate levels of wealth and benefits enjoyed by those in power can exist as they do.

Paying Lip Service to Parity

While the National Minimum Wage should be the benchmark or minimum earnings floor necessary for financial independence, the reality is that no person can be financially independent or live free of benefits, charity, or debt on this wage when working a typical 40-hour full-time week.

The current economic and financial system survives because the National Minimum Wage does not reflect the genuine cost of living for the lowest paid, who must then be subsidised by government benefits, seek help from charities such as food banks, or go into debt to meet the growing cost of living.

The FIAT, Neoliberal, Global-Driven Money System: The Perfect Crime?

A hard truth about our broken and collapsing system is that its design centres on wealth transfer and impoverishment, relying on the ongoing creation and addition of new money to the economy.

Currency debasement devalues the worth and ownership of the masses, while creating additional wealth for the elites and enabling them to secure property, public infrastructure, and ownership of everything devalued by their actions.

System Collapse and the Choice We Must Make

The finite lifetime of what may one day be considered one of the greatest ongoing crimes against humanity is fast approaching its end.

How the masses respond to financial and systemic collapse will dictate whether the Basic Living Standard, or a similar benchmark, forms the basis of a new people-centric economic and governance system.

This new system would put people back at the heart of everything, rather than the money-centric focus we have now.

The current system is collapsing because it is fundamentally corrupt and wrong.

Introducing a system like BLS within the current system—even under the name National Minimum Wage—could not achieve its true purpose, because implementing it honestly would speed up, if not immediately collapse the current money-centric system – and that’s why nobody in power today who benefits from this system will ever agree or willingly help for it to be done.

Embracing the Shift: Making Life About People, Not Money

If we accept and adopt an economy and governance system cantered on People, Community, and Environment, we will naturally move away from financial modelling, projections, profit margins, and all the tools that reinforce money as the only important value in life.

The Basic Living Standard provides a clear focus for the paradigm shift from money-centric beliefs to what everyone needs—not wants—and establishes the basic standard for independent living without dependency.

However, BLS is not a policy that can work in isolation or as an add-on to the current system. It is a fundamental building block of the universal change we must choose and embrace, because we cannot fix what cannot be fixed.

The Basic Living Standard: The Basis of a New Way of Living

By restarting, reestablishing, regenerating, reforming, and replacing our economic and governance systems, the Basic Living Standard becomes the benchmark for guaranteeing that the lowest paid can sustain themselves and be financially independent in return for a standard working week.

It requires all businesses, organisations, and systems within a new framework of economy and governance to realign with ensuring that every person experiences this minimum standard as the foundation of society, business, and culture.

Improving lives today really should be as simple as creating a Minimum Wage and changing everything for those who need help in one day. But changing perceptions is not the same as changing the way everyone thinks.

That is why the introduction of a system that genuinely works for everyone cannot be openly embraced before the pain of collapse and the reality it brings.

Everything we know today exists because of a system built around money as a value set—a flawed belief system we have all been conditioned to accept.

Only when this system fails and excludes people, step by step, do those affected awaken to the reality that something is fundamentally wrong.

Yet those excluded are often viewed by those still inside the system as the ones who are guilty and wrong.

Out of Our Problems, an Opportunity Awaits

The collapse offers a moment when the balance can flip, and those who have been excluded may reach a critical mass that signals to everyone participating in the money game that a better, equitable way exists.

However, ordinary people must see, understand, and accept this en masse.

Whatever happens next will lead to wholesale change—whether we choose it or simply go along with it.

Only by being aware and honest about what we need, rather than what we want, can we take the leap of faith necessary to change everything and contribute to the creation of a new system where people, community, and environment come first.

The Basic Living Standard offers a benchmark for the frameworks and opportunities of a new way of living. Yet, it will remain unknown and inaccessible to those unwilling to step away from the comfort of an unsustainable relationship with the past.

Money, democracy, ownership, business priorities, and practices are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the breadth and depth of necessary change.

Everyone must own and be part of the transformation ahead, because the change is about the needs of everyone, not just the wants of a privileged few.

There’s More…

In the coming days, and hopefully as soon as this week, my next book will be published, building on all I have been writing and sharing for over three and a half years.

Evolving directly from Our Local Future, first published in summer 2024, this latest work brings more detail and focus to the mechanics of implementing a new system for economy and governance, while simplifying previous concepts to make them more accessible and relatable.

The Basic Living Standard lies at its heart, and I am confident that we can flip everything to work for People, Community, and Economy, once we see the benefits and share the determination to implement a system and new code for life that truly works with equity and equality for all.

The Basic Living Standard Explained

Our Local Future | FULL TEXT

BLS is not a fix for the collapsing economic system PDF_Vers1_16Nov25 Download

Breaking The Money Myth: Rethinking Value, Exchange, and Equality

An Economy That Cannot Function Without Money Will Not Work for Anything Else

Coming to terms with the role money plays in our lives is challenging for most people. But the difficulty doesn’t end there.

We have come to value money not just as a tool, but as the benchmark by which we measure everything in life.

This leads us to a deeper truth—one that must be faced, rejected, and overcome: an economy that functions for money, with money, or through money cannot, will not, and does not work for anything else.

An economy should always serve People, Community, and the Environment. These are the only foundations that truly support a good life and foster genuine equality for all.

Most people instinctively reject the idea that any form of economy or trade could operate without money. This reaction stems not from truth, but from habit. We’ve grown so accustomed to money being present in every transaction that we take it for granted—not because it’s inherently necessary for exchange.

The reality is this: an economy designed for the people must be capable of operating without money, currency, or any medium whose value can be universally—or nationally—controlled or manipulated by external parties.

Instead, value must be determined solely by those directly involved: the buyer, the seller, and the facilitator (or a community body that sets local trade rules for the exchange of essential goods and services).

This doesn’t mean money or currency must be eliminated entirely. Rather, it means that their value must remain free from inflationary or deflationary forces.

Any variation in exchange value must reflect only the true worth of the goods, services, or contributions involved.

The Moneyless Economic System

The essential shift—both in action and mindset—is from a system where money is required in every transaction, to one where the exchange of life’s necessities does not inherently depend on money at all.

One of the fundamental truths of our world is that not all things are equal. However, the way we treat people and the planet should be equal and fair for all.

It follows, then, that money—or any form of currency used as a medium of exchange—should not be governed by a universal benchmark, especially when that benchmark can be manipulated by a powerful few to serve their own interests.

It is normal that we all contribute work to meet our needs. Therefore, the things we need should be accessible to everyone, based on the value of what they can offer through their work.

The imbalance in this equation today arises not from scarcity, but from the greed of those who control access to what others need.

This imbalance is reinforced by systems of privilege, power, and the illusion of ownership that steps beyond the requirements of genuine personal need.

Our Local Future | FULL TEXT

Money IS The Greatest Crime of Our Time

The Coming Collapse and The Revaluation of Everything Needed to Regain Personal Freedom and Control

Breaking The Money Myth PDF_Vers1_12Nov25 Download

Tag: Politics

How the Trail Hunting Ban Exposes a Bigger Battle for Britain

Further Reading:

Breaking The Money Myth: Rethinking Value, Exchange, and Equality

An Economy That Cannot Function Without Money Will Not Work for Anything Else

The Moneyless Economic System

1. How does this philosophy redefine the concept of “human nature”?

2. Why is security considered the precondition for contribution?

3. How does this philosophy reinterpret the purpose of work?

4. Why is locality the “natural scale” of human systems?

5. How does this philosophy challenge the concept of economic growth?

6. What is the philosophical justification for limiting property ownership?

7. How does this philosophy understand value?

8. Why does the philosophy reject interest, speculation, and financialisation?

9. How does this philosophy view governance?

10. What role does The Revaluation play in the transition?

11. How does this philosophy address the problem of power?

12. Is this philosophy compatible with modern technology and AI?

13. How does this philosophy define freedom?

14. What is the ultimate purpose of a People First Society?

15. What is the biggest misconception about this philosophy?

Further Reading:

Share this:

Further Reading:

Share this:

Introduction

A Question:

The Minimum Wage Reality

The Employee

The Employer (Small Business)

The Employer (Big Business)

The Government

The Taxpayer

Reality Bites

The Alternative

Path Forward

Share this:

Share this:

An Economy That Cannot Function Without Money Will Not Work for Anything Else

The Moneyless Economic System

Share this: