Category: UK Politics

AI won’t make life cheaper for those who cannot work and the mega rich would be using their money to help others right now if they were going to do it for everyone in the future

You may have noticed that there is a growing trend for people to generate clicks on social media by creating long threads that tell interesting stories – many of which have already been told before.

One of them has popped up on my feed several times recently and outlines the predictions of some great contemporary sage of future tech who has apparently been proven right several times before.

The next prediction tells us that in no more than a few years, AI will have made everything so cheap that nobody will work and everything we pay for will cost just a few pennies and no more.

This prediction is popular. Because in today’s world everything relates to money.

Therefore, when people are handed the suggestion that everything they want will cost next to nothing, and there will also be no need to work, the immediate response and logic for just about anyone is to frame that in the way that we see, feel and experience our lives today or right now. Rather than considering what the pathway to that place will have changed in our lives and what our life experience will have then become.

The Moneyocracy or money-centric way of living that we are all experiencing today isn’t one where anything we need and certainly nothing that we want comes to us for free or without there being some financial-related cost of some kind.

Whilst the narrative that the establishment, big tech and big business would have us believe is that AI is here to make life much cheaper and easier for us all, the financial growth that the establishment’s pet politicians are so obsessed with and the picture of unfettered abundance for everyone that they want us to buy into, don’t go hand in hand.

Yes, there is of course the chance that the money hoarding elites are doing what they do today and that they have done everything that they’ve done in the past so that once they have optimal control of everything that we know, they will then benevolently give every one of us the perfect life experience that was always the aim. Which of course only ridiculous amounts of cash would allow them to do.

However, before we run away with that idea and think more about living our best material lives for free, there are perhaps just a few alternative truths that we all need to consider.

Money has made money by riding off the backs of the masses. First by making many hands do the work that enriched the few, through industrialisation and everything that came with it. Then by turning the mass population into debtors, exploiting the unwitting who have bought into the money myth themselves, so that the elites can continue to make ridiculous profits, just the same.

The system is very clever. And it is clever because it preys on the darker attributes of the human condition that make too many of us overlook common sense and basic logic when we are in receipt of money, wealth, position and shiny things. Everything that makes us live for a constant flow of temporary yet momentary hits that we have foolishly mistaken for what makes life and living feel good.

Addiction hides truths that are big, small and cover the multitude that sit between.

No matter our level or position within this carefully constructed top-down pyramid, the truth swirls all around us. But we remain blind to it for as long as we continue to be bought in.

So, in the sense of this coming ‘nirvana’ that AI is supposedly now promising us all, perhaps we should consider some of the more serious and consequential truths that we are almost certainly missing whilst we remain within:

The wealthy are only wealthy because of where their wealth sits within the hierarchy of the way that money and the wealth divide works against the rest of us today.

If the masses stop working, there will be billions of mouths around the world to feed and as many people to support with all the basics and essentials for life, just for people to continue to exist.

Even if machines are creating food, creating entertainment, providing transport, building houses and doing just about everything else we can imagine that has historically been done by hand up until now, there will always be a cost of some kind to pay.

The running, energy production, maintenance and replacement of the systems that would be required to enable such a massive workless population not only to survive, but to be sustained at what we would surely expect to be a good standard or experience of life, would remain very high.

Indeed, the cost of supporting billions of people around the world would still be much greater than many would imagine and would not be a cost that could be covered by playing with money and the way that people who are earning money today believe in the power of money right now.

In this sense playing with money means the way that the entire monetary, financial and economic system as we know works.

The ‘money’ and currencies we have today are part of the biggest confidence trick that has ever been played on humanity.

The whole economic system and the way money is created and managed within it is well and truly rigged.

The creation of the wealth, and the levels and scope of the asset ownership that the elites enjoy today would not have been remotely possible without them having and retaining the ability to constantly game the system.

Those running, managing and ‘in’ on the system use money that doesn’t exist to buy up everything that has real, non-monetary value to people.

This ‘ownership’ means that they will control our future and everything within it.

This has all been achieved under a system that they have created and manipulated using the establishment and the political and legislative processes within it to allow them to carry out what amounts to nothing less than legalised theft.

The wealth that has been created to enable this world take over by the wealthy can and will only achieve the aims of creating a utopian world if that world is inhabited by few enough to make the absence of money creation sustainable.

It will not be sustainable in any way, if the few have to manage and provide for a world population tomorrow, where the masses do nothing productive, become professional users and behave or act like farm animals or caged pets that exist in every direction and live all over the place.

Many baulk at even the merest hint or suggestion of there being some kind of plan for depopulation.

But anyone who understands how the money, financial and economic system we have today really works and where it is going, will see that depopulation of some kind is the unavoidable answer that bridges what is otherwise an unbridgeable void on the pathway to the outcome which has always been this Moneyocracy’s aim.

The only challenge they face is how to achieve this on a big enough scale without the masses ever awakening to the idea that national and worldwide crises can be planned and implemented by design. Just as easily as an entire monetary, financial and economic system that has led the majority of us to believe that those who don’t have enough of what they need to live today are the only ones who are at fault.

Actions Speak Louder than Digital Words | Full Text
Just like AI, the tools, actions, rules and infrastructure of tomorrow will be good or bad for us depending upon who and what is in control
Technology and Artificial Intelligence Should Only Fill Jobs When No Humans Are Available
People need jobs more than AI and the Tech Revolution
AI won’t make life cheaper for those who cannot work and the mega rich would be using their money to help others right now if they were going to do it for everyone in the future
The Local Economy & Governance System | Online Text
The Local Economy & Governance System (LEGS): Escaping the AI Takeover and Building a Human Future
The Future of Work: Redefining Value, Meaning, and Human-Centric Employment in the Age of AI and Economic Change
AI wont make life cheaper 15Jan25 PDF_Vers1_12Dec25Download

The unfolding tragedy of the UKs political right

You may have read the title of this blog and immediately wondered what I’m on about. After all, Reform UK are running level with the Labour Government in the polls; the gap is opening up to the Conservatives behind them, and it’s all looking rather like Nigel Farage’s prophecy that Reform will form the next government in 2029 is unfolding in front of them like a political itinerant’s dream come true.

Anything is of course possible. And with the result and consequences of the General Election only six months ago plain for all to see, there is just as much reason to believe that Reform could sweep to victory on a 2029 landslide, that a majority vote for, simply because they appear to then be the better option out of a very bad bunch.

However, could it really be as straightforward as that?

My guess today, as someone whose political background is the ‘right’; who was elected into local government twice as a Conservative and who has dealt with evolutions of reform that include UKIP and the Anti Federalist League before Farage himself was even around, is a considered no.

Not because a new political party from outside of the traditional mainstream cannot smash the current triopoly. But because both Reform and those who are riding off the idea that they can profit from being like Reform are still playing the establishment game and offering too much of the destructive sameness that the establishment demands.

Whilst the reader would need to be watching all forms of media closely to see a very different reason for Reform’s future unfolding differently, the other problem that Reform – and therefore the whole of the right or conservative family has, is that there are already two further parties emerging that to one degree or another could easily split the Conservative Party and Reform axis even further. Leaving it ever more realistic that a left-wing or rainbow coalition will form the next government, with an even weaker Labour Party leading and ‘in charge’ than the one being accused of crashing the economy right now.

What Andrew Tate, and whatever Dominic Cummings has cooking, the current mentality of the Conservative Party and Nigel Farage’s Reform all have in common is their belief that they are different. Whilst the only difference they offer or look like they will offer, is a distilled version of policies which are no better than calling out the issues facing the UK as they see them. Which in terms of being the difference that the majority of people now need and want is the same thing as no difference at all.

Whilst the polls create a constant source of excitement for political anoraks, they do not indicate that a sweeping aside of petty rivalries and egos is now or is currently likely to take place.

That means all the right is offering today is all it has done for living memory:

Whichever version you choose, it’s all about the politicians themselves rather than people – which is what we all so desperately need.

Being able to talk about the uncomfortable issues that the government today and the last conservative government would not, is no longer enough.

That much has been quickly proven by the reality that the Labour Cabinet is massively out of its depth with the problems and realities of the establishment machine that they face. When they also rode a wave of good faith-based voting that led them to believe that they were equipped and ready to take on what faced them on the 5th of July.

It will not be different for any of the politicians currently coveting the keys to No. 10. As will be the same case for all of their understudies who sadly show all too easily what we can expect from them through their ambition and failure to genuinely connect.

If the political right is going to gain a meaningful result at the next election, rather than contributing to the creation of greater damage to the UK and what may then be an unnavigable mess, they have to be ready to fight the next general election together.

More importantly they will have to work together in a very different, people orientated way.

2029 is not a long time, assuming that the next general election will be then, rather than much before.

The time to deal with the differences and find common ground is now. Not in 3 years and certainly not during the fall out of the next general election where on current trajectories, things are going to be hideously worse than they are even now.

I’m not convinced that a coalition of the right is possible as things stand. Because nobody in politics can face up to the truth that it’s the outcome that is the most important factor to consider. Not how they take us there or who becomes the name that everyone then thinks about as being in charge.

The one thing we can be sure of is that change of the kind that the UK currently needs and what getting there really means, isn’t going to be offered or achieved by any political vehicle constructed with the same motives and way of looking at the electorate as the Political Parties who have been swapping power between them up until now.

Your Beliefs Today create Everyone’s Experiences Tomorrow | New Book

How do you look at the world?

How is your view of the world different to other people?

What will tomorrow look like based on the view of the world you have today?

Would you change the way you view the world if you understood the difference between your view, other people’s views and what they could really mean?

These are all very important questions that most of us are typically too busy or distracted to even consider, let alone ask.

However, the consequences of us not doing so could be very profound, as the future will just happen to us unless we do so

Your Beliefs Today create Everyone’s Experiences Tomorrow invites you to consider a range of the different prevailing ways that people look at today’s world. How they came into being, and what – without change – they are likely to bring into our lives for our tomorrows.

Will you recognise yourself and what your beliefs today could bring to your future experiences?

Will you be happy with everything you believe?

Will you see your own perspective as very different?

Or will you choose to step forward into the future armed with the tools and power for change?

Your Beliefs Today create Everyones Experiences Tomorrow PDF_Vers1s_Jan25Download

Rethinking The Minimum Wage: The need for a Basic Living Standard

Today, the establishment offers us ‘The Minimum Wage’ and ‘The Living Wage’.

However, neither the Minimum Wage nor the Living Wage are genuinely representative of what it costs a single person to live independently, without having to rely upon Benefits or Welfare, Charity such as Food Banks, or going into Debt of some kind, in order to meet the real Cost of Living or threshold for independent living.

The reality that government subsidises low wages through income support, housing benefits, tax relief is overlooked by many, because the ‘official’ or ‘establishment’ narrative is that if you received the Minimum Wage or its equivalent, you have enough money to live.

Sadly, the many truths that surround life experience where there is lack, reliance upon others and a culture that looks down upon anyone who needs financial help in ways that too often suggest guilt is overlooked by the very people who should know better.

Every Person should have the ability to live and support themselves independently in the lowest paid work, irrespective of background, qualifications, experience or any factor that could be used to excuse some form of prejudice on the part of others.

Creating and implementing A Basic Living Standard would provide an equal financial or material footing for Every Person is both a necessary and required foundation for the Just, Balanced and Fair society, that we all deserve.

The Basic Living Standard

“Adults, working a full working week in any job at any level, must be able to feed, house, clothe and provide adequately for their own transport needs, whilst providing basic necessities such as communication themselves, without the need for credit, loans, benefits or third-party support of any kind.”

To work effectively and as it should, The Basic Living Standard would become the key requirement of all business and economic activities.

Every economic activity and transaction would be made and progressed with The Basic Living Standard in mind and no economic activity would exist that does not place People and the impact and consequence to People at its core.

The Basic Living Standard will help flip the value set across society and address every wider social problem that society faces, leaving the Public Sector to take care of those who have genuine problems that have not been caused by societal conditioning or environmental factors, as it always should.

The Basic Living Standard could either be adopted as a voluntary change, or as the way to move forward, should the unthinkable happen and we experience some kind of system collapse, where a new form of governance is finally accepted as being essential for change.

The Basic Living Standard Explained_Poster_PDF_Vers2b_24Oct25Download

Is the Collapse of UK Farming and Food Security now inevitable?

From the position where I am looking at everything UK Farmers and the supporting businesses and sectors around them now face, I regrettably believe that a collapse of UK Farming and our Food Chain is now inevitable.

The accelerating downward trajectory of UK Farming will not be stopped until events take over, or the majority of UK Farmers step back and see everything they face differently.

Quite a statement I know. Not least of all because it flies in the face of a great many names that the industry respects, whom I have no personal quarrel with.

Somewhat disconcertingly, despite the bubbles of different interests that exist across the industry; when it comes to the answers, solutions and whatever we can expect to happen next, everyone – other than perhaps just a few like me – is looking the very same way.

Expectation vs Reality

Farmers, Farmers membership and advocacy organisations and even No Farmers No Food expect the problems the industry has to be solved by the same people and organisations that not only caused them, but are accelerating the problems being experienced right now.

Few Farmers agree with what I have to say. Because those who are Farming today typically see Farming, the role of Farming and how Farming is being treated by industry and government in a very different way.

To be fair, I wouldn’t expect anything else. Farmers are far from being alone when it comes to the questions over what we know, what we believe and what is normal to expect from the businesses and organisations that we have relationships with and most importantly, the people that we elect.

However, it really shouldn’t be hard for anyone to stop, step back and remember that what we see and what is happening can be very different things.

Power of the political and financial kind has always been open to abuse. Many will have heard the expression ‘Give them bread and circuses’ that dates to Roman times and demonstrates how the public have always been ‘played’. So that those in power can reduce the risk to their position, no matter what might be going on.

Unfortunately, we are navigating a period of human history where manipulation in the forms of marketing, narratives and fear rolled out in many peculiar forms, is used very effectively to create a situation where any one of us can find ourselves questioning our own common sense and what we actually believe.

The internet, smart phones and the arrival of the most recent forms of Artificial Intelligence have made the problem all the more severe.

The reality that we do question what we can trust at least peripherally has the rather perverse outcome for many of making it even more likely that we will trust people and organisations, because of who they are and how their roles are presented to us, when we really shouldn’t be doing anything other than steering a wide berth from anything they say or compel us to do.

In real terms, this means that anyone, including Farmers, no matter how well educated or experienced, is likely to believe and accept as truth whatever those benefitting from whatever is happening to each and every Farm want us or that Farmer to believe.

And they sure don’t like it when anyone questions the validity of what they say and what is likely to just be a partial truth might be.

What is really ‘in play’ today?

The attack on UK Farming didn’t begin on 30th October, when The Chancellor unveiled the assault on Inheritance Tax Relief on the generational transfer of working Family Farms.

What it did herald however, was the step of taking the war to destroy UK Food Production as we have known it, into the open. Instead of the whole thing being hidden in plain sight, as it has been for decades before.

They have done this:

Either because the politicians we have and those who advise or influence them are now confident enough that the industry no longer has the clout or leverage to stop them.

Or more likely, because they are now desperate to contain the threat of power being returned to the Farmers themselves.

(Because the whole system that has been working and undermining everything for greed, profit and control since the early 70’s has now reached a point where the economic system that underpins it could collapse, and they could lose their control at any time.)

The outcry from the general public over Farmers IHT has taken the political classes more than a little by surprise.

They believed that the accompanying narrative that ‘Farmers must pay their way like everyone else’ would very quickly resonate with the general public. Given that the left has always happily propagated myths like ‘You never see a poor Farmer’.

What the establishment didn’t expect was a predominantly visceral response from so many different people. Where instincts have told even those not consciously thinking about it that any attack on Farming isn’t about Farming. It’s actually an attack on our Food.

Is Farming really about self-interest or public interest?

Regrettably, this is where maintaining the momentum for supporting Farmers becomes tricky. Because many Farmers see their businesses as being all about income and profit. In a similar way, if not in the very same sense as the politicians do.

With what seems impeccable timing and within a month of the Budget announcement, an initiative landed on social media that informed anyone watching that a new methane-reducing feed supplement initiative is about to be launched and underway using Farms that are contracted into the corporate system.

The relationship between Farms and a processor suggests that this isn’t a matter of choice.

So, it didn’t come as any great surprise that the issues raised by the implications of ‘playing god with natural processes’ would immediately create a new division between those who ‘cannot’ say no to such ‘trials’, because of the financial implications of doing so, and those who see and are at least beginning to question the vein of commonality flowing through every attack on UK Farming.

The last minutes of a VERY long game

Whether its supermarket prices, chemical additive use required by processors, the freeing up of capital that invested in Land and Farms through new punitive taxes, the disintegrating financial support from government and the public sector, or the bureaucracy that has steadily transformed everything since our membership of the deliberately flawed Common Market and latterly The EU began, they all have a war on the ability of the UK  and more importantly our communities to run and thrive independently with Food in common at their very core.

In the world we are now being shoehorned into, Money talks and bullshit quite literally walks.

Food Production as we traditionally know it, is the antithesis of everything that those controlling our lives and businesses want and represent.

Who am I and why am I presenting a different understanding of the status quo?

I realise and understand why few can see or even agree with what I am saying here and what I write, speak and publish about Food, Farming and Food Security – amongst many other public policy related things.

Before 12 years in frontline politics, roles in professional charity leadership and years of being an entrepreneur and living the highs and traumatising lows of being in and around businesses, I began my career in farming – where I always had a strong affiliation with the Dairy Sector and made many friendships as a Young Farmer that I maintain to this day.

Farming and specifically Agri-contracting is a big thing within my wider family and beyond the proud heritage of my grandfather being a highly skilled wheelwright and pioneer in hydraulic farm trailer manufacturing, my great grandfather was a steam ploughman too.

My active interest in politics, or rather my driving belief in something better for everyone, in public service and for community working has been at the centre of so much of what I have done and what I still do.

That interest has taken me on a path that led me to appreciate how important the independence of local Food Chains to Our Future will now be. But also, to spend time completing a Postgraduate Certificate in Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security at the Royal Ag, where my fears about the position and outlook of the industry and where it is being led were starkly confirmed and amplified.

The watershed UK Farming is now within

It is difficult for anyone thinking rationally or logically to believe the realities and mechanics of the position that Farming and the wider economy now find themselves in.

Not because of the expertise and knowledge that is there to be tapped into by those who need it suggests otherwise.

But because nothing that is happening to Farming, to people or in politics at any level across the UK as we know it today, is in any way that which it seems.

I’m sure that you will agree it is more than likely that anyone questioned would at least admit that they believe something is going very wrong. Even if they cannot or would not try to identify what that something is.

In the few days after the Budget bombshell was dropped, I began writing ‘Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future’, in an attempt to open up the reality of what is happening and why within the UK Food Chain.

I did so in what does today feel like the forlorn hope that at least some of the people and businesses that I care so deeply about would at the very least conduct a review of what they currently believe to be true.

Within ‘Who Controls Our Food Controls Our Future’, I discussed the strange but nonetheless compelling ‘situational bias’ that is holding us back from looking at anything and everything differently to what we already know and do.

Because we have trapped ourselves with the belief that we can only trust the sources, systems, procedures, businesses, organisations and news channels that we already know.

It is this situational bias that today presents the greatest risk to the future of UK Farming and with it the UKs Food Security and our Food Supply.

All of which should quite rightly be placed at the heart and function of our Local Communities and everything that we know.

Sadly, most of us still believe that the mind of Politicians can be changed politically. When the game that they are playing and which the politicians and those who control them have framed, isn’t politics at all.

By continuing to engage in any way that shows deference to them and their system and their way of working, rather than just sticking to the basic level of adherence to the rules which the current way of working requires that we all respect, the power of change and control over our future remains firmly in their hands.

The option to save UK Farming and with it our Food Security and a future that will give us all much more besides exists.

But it is also a journey and process where there isn’t politics of the kind that Westminster controls involved.

Play it their way or play it our way.

The Food that UK Farmers can produce is a key part of Our Future. But the choice of whether Farms end up at the centre of that future, or die without anyone other than the politicians themselves knowing why is for Farmers to decide.

Like everything. Its all about the way that we think.